Jump to content
IGNORED

Free Lift From Swale


Mkgrady

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iacas said:

Do you see any rocks? 🙂 I don't.

Play it as it lies.

The rocks need not be visible.

On order to made a correct judgement one needs to be there and neither of us is.

Edited by Ruler
Link to comment
Share on other sites


In the example from my course (not OP), it’s not a french drain - but does divert water to a catch basin at a low point. Played in an atmospheric river storm this morning and this is what they look like when it’s raining (today was insane rain, not normally this bad).

7C9987F0-5AC4-4874-BFAB-CB2CA3B6228A.thumb.jpeg.33679d7fe51ec838c1e79d79a9118a86.jpegC2F790A3-986E-412D-AA28-E4FA8BB97BA8.thumb.jpeg.f1ad9d21dd28621e4e80499a0e201c0d.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, Darkfrog said:

In the example from my course (not OP), it’s not a french drain - but does divert water to a catch basin at a low point. Played in an atmospheric river storm this morning and this is what they look like when it’s raining (today was insane rain, not normally this bad).

Yeah, so… temporary water relief.

Not a PA. (Almost certainly) Not an IO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/18/2021 at 6:20 AM, Darkfrog said:

This is what the channels look like on my course (not a great angle but it shows the concept):

C4F4A89C-D1B2-4D67-852B-F779F3037EE7.thumb.jpeg.53b0a3570b500f54b8e54517750c40fb.jpeg

That looks like normal fairway with some irregularity of surface. Play it as it lies. Potentially this could be seen as a surface drainage ditch, even without water this would be considered a penalty area. If I was on the Committee I wouldn't declare it as a penalty area, nor GUR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


10 hours ago, GRQs said:

That looks like normal fairway with some irregularity of surface. Play it as it lies. Potentially this could be seen as a surface drainage ditch, even without water this would be considered a penalty area. If I was on the Committee I wouldn't declare it as a penalty area, nor GUR.

I must say this is an intriguing issue. On the other hand the Definition of a Penalty Area is very clear and on the other hand any undulation on a fairway built to direct water could be regarded as a PA based on the Definition. So, the question arises: where to draw the line?

Any ideas / guidelines / experiences on the matter? Or is the Definition too strict..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
3 minutes ago, Ruler said:

I must say this is an intriguing issue. On the other hand the Definition of a Penalty Area is very clear and on the other hand any undulation on a fairway built to direct water could be regarded as a PA based on the Definition. So, the question arises: where to draw the line?

Any ideas / guidelines / experiences on the matter? Or is the Definition too strict..?

The definition of Penalty Area includes the areas:

"Any body of water on the course (whether or not marked by the Committee), including a sea, lake, pond, river, ditch, surface drainage ditch or other open watercourse (even if not containing water)"

To me, those shallow grass-covered depressions just don't fit any of those terms.  The closest might be "surface drainage ditch", but to me that is a more sharply delineated area.  The catch-all term "other open watercourse" doesn't apply either, at least the way I read the words.  I think the definition is OK the way it is.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

The definition of Penalty Area includes the areas:

"Any body of water on the course (whether or not marked by the Committee), including a sea, lake, pond, river, ditch, surface drainage ditch or other open watercourse (even if not containing water)"

To me, those shallow grass-covered depressions just don't fit any of those terms.  The closest might be "surface drainage ditch", but to me that is a more sharply delineated area.  The catch-all term "other open watercourse" doesn't apply either, at least the way I read the words.  I think the definition is OK the way it is.

Dave, how would you define a ditch? How deep / wide / long must it be to be a ditch and not a depression? Must it not be grass-covered? Something else?

The term 'other open watercourse' gives lots of latitude IMO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
7 minutes ago, Ruler said:

Dave, how would you define a ditch? How deep / wide / long must it be to be a ditch and not a depression? Must it not be grass-covered? Something else?

The term 'other open watercourse' gives lots of latitude IMO...

Here's the first definition I found online:

"a long narrow excavation dug in the earth (as for drainage)"

This shallow and moderately wide (in comparison to the depth) depression doesn't fit, in my mind.  I agree that "open watercourse" gives lots of latitude, but I don't believe its intended to include every depression of any kind that holds or carries water in a heavy storm.  To me, unmarked areas are Penalty Areas only when they clearly fit one of the definitions.  Borderline areas, depressions like in the photo we've been looking at, should be considered Penalty Areas only when a Committee chooses to define them as such.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Here's the first definition I found online:

"a long narrow excavation dug in the earth (as for drainage)"

This shallow and moderately wide (in comparison to the depth) depression doesn't fit, in my mind.  I agree that "open watercourse" gives lots of latitude, but 1) I don't believe its intended to include every depression of any kind that holds or carries water in a heavy storm.  To me, unmarked areas are Penalty Areas only when they clearly fit one of the definitions.  Borderline areas, depressions like in the photo we've been looking at, 2) should be considered Penalty Areas only when a Committee chooses to define them as such.

1) I agree but I also think it should be up to the course designer to very carefully think through which depressions are for so called everyday use and which are not. Heavy storm is an extreme example and I would not use a lot of effort to deal with cases such as that but would rather put the focus on depressions where water is frequently present and that fulfil the Definition with regard to collecting and directing water.

2) Now that is rather self-evident, don't you think? It is the criteria what I am after here. This is one of those issues in golf that have no B&W solution and that is why I took it up as it is good to gather many different opinions and I believe that is why people like You and me bother to spend our time on forums like this. Or what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
1 hour ago, Ruler said:

It is the criteria what I am after here.

For more guidance I'd look to the Committee Procedures, specifically at 2C which concerns marking Penalty Areas for General Play.  There's still some judgement involved, and there always will be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A French drain is not a surface ditch: the drainage is via a pipe, buried underground, with weeping material to capture the water and direct it into the pipe, not simply using a depression (the surface ditch) and its slope and gravity to capture and eject water.

Conversely, a ditch is excavated and forms a hole, much more than a depression, which can indeed become full of water and meets the intent of a penalty area (water hazard), whether it is dry or full of water.

A French drain is neither a ditch (permanently exposed hole, whether containing water or not), nor a surface ditch (a mere depression). It is a constructed device which normally does not interfere with play (it shows just as a small depression), but can become obstructive when its top soil is disturbed and reveals the rocks making up its construction: then it qualifies as an immovable obstruction (like a cart path).

Edited by sjduffers
  • Upvote 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo after clicking this link. For Mevo+, click this link or the image above.
  • Posts

    • FFS. You think scientists are all huddled in some town in North Dakota hiding evidence from the world. We have plenty of clues about the efficacy of the vaccines. And let’s face it, you wouldn’t believe this top secret study if it didn’t fit your narrative anyway.
    • Went with Tiger. In grand scheme of things would be the memorable. Now who are these 'Raiders' tho?? 😜
    • My 3 personal favorite arguments against being vaccinated are:   1 - (I saw this one just the other day) "I don't put anything in my body until I understand all of the long term effects." .... Takes a huge sip of Diet Coke.  2 - "I'm not getting vaccinated because I don't want to be told what to do." ... Okay, so you don't stop at red lights?  3 - "I think the government is using this whole thing as an excuse to plant a transmitter inside me. ... Oh shit, I gotta go charge my phone." 
    • Nice to hear some words from himself rather than someone else. He seems to have come out of a pretty bad accident relatively lucky, all things considered. When was the last time he played full time? 😛 The occasional major, his own tournaments and maybe some other special tournaments then, at best. With slim chances of the good old «double U».
    • Absolutely.   I agree that it doesn't follow modern styles as far as pacing, but I would argue that that is a good thing. People have become far to used to constant over-sensatory movies, where action is the only thing that matters. A good story is far more interesting to me. I am 70% through the first 6 Dune books according to my kindle (start of book 5), and I thought the movie should have been less fast. There are plenty of things that were added in (not in the book) that could have been replaced with even better story telling (things from the book). I am super excited that they green lit part 2, and hopefully we will get even more. Even more will probably just be Messiah, because after that things get unexplainable in movie form. My only complaint about the movie was the casting of Duncan (Mamoa), as he we just the "bro dude relatable comic relief". I thought taking away Gurney's good laughable moments and giving them to Idaho was a disservice to all Dune fans. I wasn't impressed with Mamoa, though he was just doing what was asked of him, but the switch of character roles was like nails on the chalkboard to me. I'd also give it an eagle, but it could have been an albatross by staying truer to the source material.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. ALong17
      ALong17
      (34 years old)
    2. jjdam
      jjdam
      (58 years old)
    3. leftygibby
      leftygibby
      (57 years old)
    4. RadioCop
      RadioCop
      (57 years old)
    5. rarce_torres
      rarce_torres
      (56 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...