Jump to content
IGNORED

Master "Forged vs. Cast" or "Blade vs. Game-Improvement" Iron Thread


muskegman
Note: This thread is 1375 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

True enough.

Many people dispute that statement. There in no question cast steel is harder than forged. How much harder, a lot. High quality cast clubs show little or no bag chatter after years of use, yet forged steel of 1020 carbon, soft, shows dings all over from one round. 1020 can lose its lie angle after a few shots on a mat, cast will never lose its lie angle. Forged can be bent as much as 6 degrees, cast cannot, in fact Pings are pre-bent they are of such high quality and hardness. The grooves on a cast club last almost forever, on a forged club as a wedge you could wear them down in a few months of regular play. To say no one can feel that difference in hardness in a perfectly struck ball on either club is a little unrealistic with a blade design. The key is a perfectly struck ball with almost 100 percent energy transfer, which believe or not many good players do a lot of the time. There are countless old forged sets around where there is a quarter/dime size worn spot right in the sweet spot, but otherwise the face looks new. Mishits tell us nothing other than they are mishit, no comparison there. Bottom line, cast clubs are less expensive to make, allow more elaborate cavity back designs, are much more durable and are the far better choice for most golfers, period. Wishon is a component head maker and his margins are most likely better on casted heads, so he has all the reason to say there is no difference in feel.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Depends on the weather for me. In the late fall and early spring i didn't care for my ald forge blades. WOW did you get some stingers. With my cast clubs i rarly get the feeling.
whats in my bag
Driver: Superquad 8.5 LOVE THIS CLUB
woods: R7 TP 3 wood
Hybrids: Burner 3
Irons: XD BurnersWedges:Vokey Spin Milled 56Putter: G5 ZINGBall:TP Black
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I am a materials scientist/metallurgist and I just wanted to throw in my $.02. When a metal is cast it is poured in liquid form into a metal or sand mold and allowed to cool (cooling times can vary to obtain different phases of the material for different applications) If the liquid metal is allowed to cool at a slower rate it will give the atoms in time to form into large equiaxed (similar size and shape) grains. Forging involves beating a piece of metal that has been heated to a softening temperature so it is easier to form into a desired shape. When a metal is rolled, bent, or smashed it becomes cold worked and harder with grains that are much smaller in size and usually elongated in the rolling/forging direction. Since the yield strength and thus hardness of a material is inversely proportional to the grain size, two identical metals would be softer if cast and cooled slowly than a forged/cold worked sample. Also when discussing changing the lofts of a club and the worry about fracture: a general rule of thumb is the smaller the grains in the material the higher the fatigue life. That should never be an issue unless you were to change the loft of your clubs by many degrees hundreds of times. The type of steel also plays a big part in how the club feels/performs but this post has gone on long enough. Man, am I a nerd or what?

In My Bag
Driver: 907 D2 10.5 degrees Aldila VS Proto
3 Wood: 906 F4 15.5 degrees Aldila VS Proto
Hybrid: Idea Pro 20 degrees Aldila VS Proto
Irons (3-P): i5Wedges: Vokey 52.8 and Vokey Spin Milled 56.10Putter: Studio Style NewportBall: Pro V1x or NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I feel it used to be much easier. The newer cast clubs with elastomer backs and vibration bars etc, I can't really tell the difference. I remember someone posted that the type of shaft connection used is a factor also. Parallel Vs. Taper tip? I wonder if the top and bottom edge width affects feel also, wide is much more common in cast clubs. When I tested Callaway Xs in both forged and cast versions I could barely tell any difference, mostly on poorly struck shots.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Many people dispute that statement. There in no question cast steel is harder than forged. How much harder, a lot. High quality cast clubs show little or no bag chatter after years of use, yet forged steel of 1020 carbon, soft, shows dings all over from one round. 1020 can lose its lie angle after a few shots on a mat, cast will never lose its lie angle. Forged can be bent as much as 6 degrees, cast cannot, in fact Pings are pre-bent they are of such high quality and hardness. The grooves on a cast club last almost forever, on a forged club as a wedge you could wear them down in a few months of regular play. To say no one can feel that difference in hardness in a perfectly struck ball on either club is a little unrealistic with a blade design. The key is a perfectly struck ball with almost 100 percent energy transfer, which believe or not many good players do a lot of the time. There are countless old forged sets around where there is a quarter/dime size worn spot right in the sweet spot, but otherwise the face looks new. Mishits tell us nothing other than they are mishit, no comparison there.

I've read numerous posts between cast and forged, each justifying their reasons against another. Frankly I don't really care what they say, but I do know for myself that forged clubs feel softer. That's why there's different market for cast clubs and forged clubs. I am personally fond of forging method and I will continue to use irons/clubs made that way.

There's another theory that I've come up with as to why some people say both of them feel the same and some who say otherwise. Since "feel" is subjective and has to do with senses, one has to know that everyone may not have the same sensitivity. For instance, I can stand spicier food and feel totally comfortable (insensitive) up to a certain level, but others probably can't even stand from just a drop of hot sauce (sensitive). The same goes for the "feel" in hitting golf clubs. Highly sensitive golfer may acknowledge the slight differences in feel and some probably don't. I've heard the story about someone screwing up Tiger Wood's range balls (Tiger has totally different balls than retail ones) by placing one different (retail) ball into the bucket. After hitting that specific ball, he then asks, "Okay, who messed up with the balls?"
I am a materials scientist/metallurgist and I just wanted to throw in my $.02. When a metal is cast it is poured in liquid form into a metal or sand mold and allowed to cool (cooling times can vary to obtain different phases of the material for different applications) If the liquid metal is allowed to cool at a slower rate it will give the atoms in time to form into large equiaxed (similar size and shape) grains. Forging involves beating a piece of metal that has been heated to a softening temperature so it is easier to form into a desired shape. When a metal is rolled, bent, or smashed it becomes cold worked and harder with grains that are much smaller in size and usually elongated in the rolling/forging direction. Since the yield strength and thus hardness of a material is inversely proportional to the grain size, two identical metals would be softer if cast and cooled slowly than a forged/cold worked sample. Also when discussing changing the lofts of a club and the worry about fracture: a general rule of thumb is the smaller the grains in the material the higher the fatigue life. That should never be an issue unless you were to change the loft of your clubs by many degrees hundreds of times. The type of steel also plays a big part in how the club feels/performs but this post has gone on long enough. Man, am I a nerd or what?

Since you're metallurgist scientist, I have a question for you that I got from another forum. Is it true that you can't cast carbon steel for golf clubs? I know you literally can, but the reject rates for golf clubs being inconsistent is way too high.

The guy on another forum knows this from forging factory in China and he also mention that is why you don't see cast clubs made from 1020 or 1025 carbon steel. What say you?
What's in the bag:
Driver: r7 SuperQuad 10.5° ~ UST Proforce V2 65g Regular
Wood: 906F4 18.5° ~ Aldila VS Proto 80g Stiff
Irons: MP-60 3-PW ~ True Temper Tour Concept S3
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 252.08, SM56.10 & SM60.08Putter: Marxman Mallet 33"
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I wouldn't go that far but I would say anyone over about a 2 or 3 handicap is doing a disservice to themselves by playing blades. First, higher handicappers don't hit the center of the clubface consistantly enough the be using blades. They need the forgiveness of a cavity back. Second, higher handicaps can't work the ball well enough to take advantage of a blade. Some will disagree with me on this, but every pro I work with will tell you the same thing. You have a good enough handicap, go pick out a good players cavity back iron. You will benefit from the forgiveness, and will give up very little in feel.

This was very well put...I play

MP 60 for this reason. Being a 12-14 handicapper I suffer from not hitting the center of the club face all the time and my MP's give me a little forgiveness for that...however, they are close enough to blades that they give me great feedback when I miss, so I can work on improving...best of both worlds in my opinion...

TEE - XCG6, 13º, Matrix Ozik HD6.1, stiff
Wilson Staff - Ci11, 3-SW, TX Fligthed, stiff

Odyssey - Metal X #7, 35in

Wilson Staff - FG Tour ball 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I play the MP-32s for 3 1/2 month now.
Fact is that during this time my scoring did not suffer. I had a round where I played 12 strokes better than my adjusted handicap(was CR 74.3 and 145 Slope)!
Also I can say that they really give me hard time from time to time!

Right now I have some lessons to improve my game and hopefully therefore it is good to play blades, to learn it right.

In my Bag:

Driver: Taylormade R7 425 10,5°, Graphite Design Purple Ice 85 Regular
#3 Wood: Taylormade R7 Steel 15°, RE*AX 70 Stiff

#4 Rescue: Taylormade Rescue Hybrid 09 22°, RE*AX 65 Stiff
3-PW Irons: MP-32 ProjectX 6.0
Wedges: MP-T Black Nickel 51.6 and 56.14 Spinner Rifle Shafts
Putter: Studio Style Newport 2.5 35''

Golfclub Schloss Myllendonk (Par 72, CR 72,9, Slope 134)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I may be wrong, but arn't Vokey wedges cast?

Yes, Vokey wedges are cast.

What's in the bag:
Driver: r7 SuperQuad 10.5° ~ UST Proforce V2 65g Regular
Wood: 906F4 18.5° ~ Aldila VS Proto 80g Stiff
Irons: MP-60 3-PW ~ True Temper Tour Concept S3
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 252.08, SM56.10 & SM60.08Putter: Marxman Mallet 33"
Link to comment
Share on other sites


First, higher handicappers don't hit the center of the clubface consistantly enough the be using blades. They need the forgiveness of a cavity back.

Are you talking real high handicappers. Blades always get a bad rap, it seems to me. Get some with a properly weighted and flexed shafts and they are no harder to hit than cavity backs. Problem seems to me, the blades you see on the rack are heavy and very stiff. These shafts only work for strong, highly skilled players who can swing the heavy shafts at great angles. I play blades with Nippon Steel 950, (95 grams) in a stiff, which is very soft to flex in this model, and they are a piece of cake to hit. I admit I practice, but I see no improvement at all with cavity backs sets, I have in the garage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Since you're metallurgist scientist, I have a question for you that I got from another forum. Is it true that you can't cast carbon steel for golf clubs? I know you literally can, but the reject rates for golf clubs being inconsistent is way too high.

Casting anything is not a very good technique for forming metals that will impact things or are under some load. Cast materials can be very very porous which can lead to failure of the sample unless other processes are used. As for why low carbon steels are not cast for golf clubs: most forged clubs are very thin in many parts, at least when compared to cast cavity backed sticks. when you cast a metal and there is not much liquid in the mold it cools and solidifys rapidly. this causes impurities in the melt (sulpher, phosphorous, small amounts of chromium, nickle, and other things found in steel) to segregate out and make 2nd phase particles that put tremendous stresses on the regular crystal lattice. This in turn causes the sample to crack much of the time in order for the structure to relieve the stresses.

Casting does work to make golf clubs (my ping i5's are cast) but for thinner blade like irons forging gives more control over the orientation of the grains and less to worry about when it comes to porosity and second phase particles. I hope that helps.

In My Bag
Driver: 907 D2 10.5 degrees Aldila VS Proto
3 Wood: 906 F4 15.5 degrees Aldila VS Proto
Hybrid: Idea Pro 20 degrees Aldila VS Proto
Irons (3-P): i5Wedges: Vokey 52.8 and Vokey Spin Milled 56.10Putter: Studio Style NewportBall: Pro V1x or NXT Tour

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Casting anything is not a very good technique for forming metals that will impact things or are under some load. Cast materials can be very very porous which can lead to failure of the sample unless other processes are used. As for why low carbon steels are not cast for golf clubs: most forged clubs are very thin in many parts, at least when compared to cast cavity backed sticks. when you cast a metal and there is not much liquid in the mold it cools and solidifys rapidly. this causes impurities in the melt (sulpher, phosphorous, small amounts of chromium, nickle, and other things found in steel) to segregate out and make 2nd phase particles that put tremendous stresses on the regular crystal lattice. This in turn causes the sample to crack much of the time in order for the structure to relieve the stresses.

This is exactly what Miura states in its tests. Their forged heads have much finer and compact sand like particles where as other less quality forgings and cast heads have bigger irregular particles and air pockets as seen under an electron microscope. The feel comes from the partcle size and compactness.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not a metallurgist, but I managed a large metal working corporation that produced cast and forged items, including CNC milled items, and I know the machinery and problems in making complex shapes simply by forging. I remain extremely skeptical that what some brands call "forged" is really what forged is supposed to mean.

However, the bottom line for me is I always choose what feels best and works best for me; I really don't care what works or feels best for anyone else, except as a starting point for my personal testing. If plastic clubs made in China worked best, I would use them.

I played forged blades and stiff steel shafts for almost 20 years and was a scratch golfer for most of that period. After recently concluding several months of testing numerous cast and forged clubs, I now have maximum-forgiveness cast, component irons with graphite shafts and hit them better than I ever hit blades with steel shafts.

However, there's probably some old codger out there that still swears by persimmon headed woods with hickory shafts and leather balls stuffed with chicken feathers. By the way, I hit some old wound balls recently and they were sweet!

2007 Yamaha Cart
TaylorMade R7 460 Superquad Driver, 10.5, Reg flex (RF)
Taylormade R7 Titanium 3,5 & 7 Fairway woods RF
PING Rapture irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, graphite RF
Odyssey White Hot Two Ball putter Ping Cart Bag, Pioneer in Atomic OrangeNow playing Titleist Pro V1x balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
titleist 735

Yep...Check out my sig. I played these the first time on Saturday and really enjoyed the blades in the 8-9-pw. The 5-6-7 is a moderate cavity back while the 3-4 are full cavities. The forged response was good, I could tell exactly on the club face where I hit the ball. They were suprisingly more forgiving than I thought they would be on the mishits. I had been looking at this set for a while and wanted to have blades, but not throughout the whole set. I will get back to you guys after a few more rounds.

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5*| Rad Tour 18.5*  | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Are you talking real high handicappers. Blades always get a bad rap, it seems to me. Get some with a properly weighted and flexed shafts and they are no harder to hit than cavity backs. Problem seems to me, the blades you see on the rack are heavy and very stiff. These shafts only work for strong, highly skilled players who can swing the heavy shafts at great angles. I play blades with Nippon Steel 950, (95 grams) in a stiff, which is very soft to flex in this model, and they are a piece of cake to hit. I admit I practice, but I see no improvement at all with cavity backs sets, I have in the garage.

I agree I decided to give the blades a try(Titlelist 690 mb's) and was very surprised how easy they were to hit. I liked them so much I have bought two more sets. One for my vacation getaway and one which I keep hidden in my pickup truck for practise when ever I drive by a driving range. I have a theory on this subject. Basically your average golfer who gets out 2 or 3 times a month needs a mental crutch and is more than willing to accept the "cavity back koolaid" solution. If that works for them great but if you start to take the game seriously then don't be afraid of trying the blades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I play the MP-67's as well and truly love the look and feel, but also have GIR issues sometimes. I have been looking into reshafting (from DG S300 to Project X). Whatever you do, get fitted and try as many demos as you can get your hands on. Good luck and hit 'em well.
What's in Your Bag?
Driver: Burner TP (9.5*)
3Wood: 906F (15*)
4Wood: 980F (17*)
Hybrid: Burner (19*)Irons: MP-67 (4-PW)Gap: MP-R 52*-07Sand/Lob: MP-R 58*-10Putter: Whitlam Jules ETBW/CentershaftBall: Pro V1Muroc Lake GC - Par 72White:71.5/124Blue:73.5/130
Link to comment
Share on other sites


i just made the switch to musclebacks, and i love em.
What's In My Bag?

Driver: R9 460 TP 9.5* w/ Motore F1 75g S
Wood:Exotics XCG-V 16.5*
Hybrids: 3DX Ironwood 3 and 4Irons:695.MBWedges:Stripped Spin Milled Custom C Grind (52*,56*,60*)Putter: Black Series i #9 32" w/ white Iomic gripBall:ProV1Shoes: Foot Joy DryJoysGrips: Lamkin Crossline...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1375 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of like this interpretation especially if you think about it the unplayable rule would probably put you in a better spot.  using back on the line releief.  
    • I did not realize that, I was thinking a more traditional golf club.  
    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...