Jump to content
IGNORED

Master "Forged vs. Cast" or "Blade vs. Game-Improvement" Iron Thread


muskegman
Note: This thread is 1396 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by saevel25

They feel better than AP2's. That is my perspective.

That suck the AP'S are way sexier.

Maybe. But they aren't sexier than just about anything else Mizuno makes. I'll take anything in the MP line over the AP2's.

Tyler Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I always found AP's ugly

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Probably MP 54, they have progressive cavity backs

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Probably MP 54, they have progressive cavity backs

Yep. The MP H4's and MP 59's are also appropriate for low to mid handicappers, according to the Mizuno website.

Tyler Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think they're very blocky looking, like Lego golf clubs.

I beg your pardon??  Are you suggesting that Lego golf clubs wouldn't be awesome?!?!?!  Maybe Duplo clubs would suck, but regular Lego clubs would kick ass!!!

The 59's are gorgeous.

I don't know.  I mean, I wouldn't kick them out of bed for eating potato chips, but I think (based on their website because I'm no Mizuno expert) that they are the least sexy of all of the current MP line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I beg your pardon??  Are you suggesting that Lego golf clubs wouldn't be awesome?!?!?!  Maybe Duplo clubs would suck, but regular Lego clubs would kick ass!!!

I don't know.  I mean, I wouldn't kick them out of bed for eating potato chips, but I think (based on their website because I'm no Mizuno expert) that they are the least sexy of all of the current MP line.

Honestly the images don't look as good as they do in person.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yonex had an interesting blade design at the PGA Show that included a pocket of titanium inside the the muscle of the forged head. Since titanium is lighter than steel, this to some extent emulates the effect of a cavity back by biasing the weight distribution more to the perimeter of the club head. They were dead sexy, too.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yonex had an interesting blade design at the PGA Show that included a pocket of titanium inside the the muscle of the forged head. Since titanium is lighter than steel, this to some extent emulates the effect of a cavity back by biasing the weight distribution more to the perimeter of the club head. They were dead sexy, too. [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/91140/] [/URL] [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/91141/] [/URL]

Hella shex-shay...

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, it's the same principle as the MP-59s. But getting the Ti plug inside the blade is pretty darn cool.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So how good as far as handicap should someone be before they switch from SGI's to players irons or GI's? Then from there how much better do they have to be to switch to blades?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So how good as far as handicap should someone be before they switch from SGI's to players irons or GI's? Then from there how much better do they have to be to switch to blades?

There is no direct correlation between handicap and what irons you should play. It's all about ball striking, and more specifically, consistency in ball striking. But there's a reason that a lot of pros are playing cavity back/perimeter weighted irons. For me, I don't necessarily find muscle backs harder to hit than smaller cavity backs (think MP-69 vs MP-64). The main difference I see is in trajectory.

Tyler Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So what are you playing? How much different would you say it would be to go from a G series irons to mp series?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yonex had an interesting blade design at the PGA Show that included a pocket of titanium inside the the muscle of the forged head. Since titanium is lighter than steel, this to some extent emulates the effect of a cavity back by biasing the weight distribution more to the perimeter of the club head. They were dead sexy, too.

I'm not understanding this.  (Because, for one, I'm not a metallurgist ;))  I thought that "forged" meant that it was basically "molded" from a solid chunk of metal.  How, exactly, do they get the titanium inside of a solid chunk of metal?

It must involve those guys who build old ships inside of tiny bottles, right?  Or the guy at Disneyland that sells you balloons that are inside of other balloons. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, I'm going to have to go with "no ****ing idea." :-)

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not understanding this.  (Because, for one, I'm not a metallurgist ;))  I thought that "forged" meant that it was basically "molded" from a solid chunk of metal.  How, exactly, do they get the titanium inside of a solid chunk of metal?

It must involve those guys who build old ships inside of tiny bottles, right?  Or the guy at Disneyland that sells you balloons that are inside of other balloons. :)

Yes, it can be from 1 chunk of metal. But I think forged basically means pounded and shaped. Casted means the metal was liquefied and then poured into a mold. What they probably do is heat the steel to high temps to make it workable. Then they put the titanium inside and bend half of the metal over, then pound it so it becomes a club. This way the Titanium is inside the metal. So basically the steel is folded over the titanium.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1396 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Of course. I've used different words to start, but like 90-95% of the time it's been this one. And I'm unlikely to switch now.
    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...