Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JEWMAH9701

Master Scotty Cameron Putters: Worth It or Not? Thread

Note: This thread is 2116 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

586 posts / 125408 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

This offseason the major golf purchase I want to make is to buy a new putter. And of course when thinking of putters everyone always starts with the Scotties. However, I was wondering if these putters are really worth the $100-$200 extra that they go for? Is the quality really that much better then the other name brand putters out there? Any information that you can contribute would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

The two putters that I've looked at so far are the Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport or the TaylorMade ACGB Daytona 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

This offseason the major golf purchase I want to make is to buy a new putter. And of course when thinking of putters everyone always starts with the Scotties. However, I was wondering if these putters are really worth the $100-$200 extra that they go for? Is the quality really that much better then the other name brand putters out there? Any information that you can contribute would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

What kind of car do you drive? Do you own any artwork? Have you ever bought something with a brand name when a generic model was available?

Scotty Camerons are worth the cost if they're worth it to you. It's that simple. For me, I appreciate the craftsmanship and the style. His putters are beautiful to look at. I tried, for example, a Yes! putter that was $100 less than the Red X I use. It sounded bad and just looked "cheap" in a way that you'd never see with a Scotty Cameron. Or a Bettinardi, etc. Something like 30-40% of your strokes in golf come with the putter. It's the one area of my game where I vowed never to skimp, because if I have the slightest bit of doubt in the putter in my hands, aesthetically, aurally, etc., I am going to miss the putt, or I'm more likely to at least. He wouldn't charge more if the market didn't see the value and pay what he requests. So his prices are worth it to those who buy them, and not to those who go less expensive. So the real question is: are you one of those people or not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What kind of car do you drive? Do you own any artwork? Have you ever bought something with a brand name when a generic model was available?

I agree with you Erik. I have never seen a putter (or a golf club in general) look as good as a Scotty Cameron. If people are willing to pay $300+ for a driver that they use only maybe 12-14 times a round then how much more so should you be willing to pay that for the single most important part of the game?

Thanks for your insight. Now excuse me while I find my black jumpsuit and ski mask..... I have to pay a visit to the local bank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you Erik. I have never seen a putter (or a golf club in general) look as good as a Scotty Cameron. If people are willing to pay $300+ for a driver that they use only maybe 12-14 times a round then how much more so should you be willing to pay that for the single most important part of the game?

Just go to Ebay and there are tons of reputable sellers..and if you don't mind slightly used you're going to save more. I own 2 SC's..do I putt better with them..yes..why?..because it makes me FEEL like a better player. True, I baby them but maybe that's why I putt better with them. Anyway, there's no buyer's remorse with a Scotty. People realize you take the game seriously too with one in the bag IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this is the putter that I have in fact chosen to treat myself with this offseason, the Titleist by Scotty Cameron Studio Style Newport 2.

Unfortunately there are not many choices for a left handed golfer if you want to buy a Scotty Cameron. It has gotten better, but I can't believe that companies are still making products primarily for right handed golfers and then throwing some scraps to us lefties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the market for a new putter, and lots of people say to get a scotty cameron are these putters really better and worth the money or are you just paying for the name.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the market for a new putter, and lots of people say to get a scotty cameron are these putters really better and worth the money or are you just paying for the name.

Both. Most of the time, if you have a Scotty Cameron, you'll feel more confident.

90% of putting is half confidence. (hehe). The more confident you feel, the more putts you'll make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both. But to say whether or not a putter is worth it, is a personal thing. Some love them, others dont. I prefer Odyssey, but it was just a personal preference thing for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly don't regret my SC putter. The feel seems more 'buttery' than other putters which almost immediately allows for better feedback on distance control.

I have the Circa 62 #2 with the Black Oxide finish...and i simply think it looks better than other putters that i have seen.


If you have big flaws in your stroke you wont become a better putter. However, if you have a reasonably sound stroke, i think you can expect an improvement in feel and distance control

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both. But to say whether or not a putter is worth it, is a personal thing. Some love them, others dont.

I guess that's true. It all depends with how you feel when you use the putter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just purchased a new SC Studio Select a couple of weeks ago. Was using an Odyssey 2-ball prior, a great putter in its own right. I want to move away from the insert and something with more feel. I went to the local golf store and tried all the new milled offerings such as Ping Redwood, Bettinardi, Rife, Odyssey, etc.... IMO, the SC felt the best. The weighting and feel is excellent compared to the others. They also hold their value quite well. The others simply do not.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think people who expect an expensive putter will make them better at putting are being unrealistic. But in golf one can never ignore the mental aspect of the game. The placebo effect if you will. The danger in following trends though is that once something loses it's allure you're in danger of finding yourself right back in the same boat again. I would encourage someone to experiment with different styles of putters before zeroing in on a particular brand. That way you'll find out what you like and then you can make a purchasing decision that you'll know you'll be happy with for many years to come. Putters are like women. When you find a good one you keep it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will agree with the majority here.

I bought my SC not too long ago and have not been happier with it. I really do enjoy it.

I think that since I have had it, my confidence has gone up in my putting and I have been putting much better than I used to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To each his own.

I've tried a couple scottys vs a couple odysseys and i just LOVE the feel of odyssey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't just jump on to the scotty cameron train. Get one if you try a bunch of putters and really like the scotty better. If you're looking for more traditional looking milled putters, try (in addition to the scottys) bettinardis, oydssey black series, and ping redwoods. Also give rife, yes, and other odysseys a try. I was given my scotty by my dad but if I had 300 to drop on a putter right now, I think I would rather spend it on a yes! callie f forged or a bettinardi putter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems hard to justify 300 dollars for a putter, especially one that has no insert or anything special. Its just a piece of metal and if it helps you putt better then great, but its probably just a placebo effect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have $200 or more to spend on a Scotty Cameron, I'd say do it. They're remarkable clubs. But other good names are Guerrin Rife, and Yes! putters that are a little less than SCs but are still great clubs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems hard to justify 300 dollars for a putter, especially one that has no insert or anything special. Its just a piece of metal and if it helps you putt better then great, but its probably just a placebo effect

Well, if you divide the price of a club by the number of strokes you take with it, your putter will be amortized far more quickly than any other club in your bag.

Just playing devil's advocate here, but a putter that you feel confident will aid in scoring more than a driver you feel confident in. So maybe we should be spending more on putters than drivers? I do have a SC, but I got mine used because I was too cheap to pay for a new one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 2116 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Another idea is to make your own shaft flex board. Maltby sell one for $180. I once made one for free using a scrap of plywood, and some 2", 1/4" dowell material. Hung it on my garage wall.  I marked known  clubs flexes on the board as reference points, using a consistent weight. The board also gave me other info besides flex.  It was crude looking, but did the job.  It mattered little what the manufacturer's rating on the shaft was, which was usually different from each company. What ever my flex board showed me, was what the actual flex was when compared to the known flexes I used.   Maltby probably has a picture of his flex board on his website. Probably other sites have picts available too. With a little self ingenuity, a person can study the picture, and build their own. It's pretty easy. 
    • I thought about this a while, and then had an epiphany last night.  Without a perfect test, the answer is almost definitely no. It's a fairly simple statistical calculation called Bayes' Theorem. The end result is that you'll end up preventing more people from driving when they aren't drunk than preventing drunk drivers. I'm going to plug in numbers, but since I'm (likely correctly!) assuming drunk driving is a rare event, the numbers don't really matter that much. I'm also going to assume the test is extremely accurate. Let's say that in 1/10,000 car trips, the driver is too drunk to legally drive. This is probably an underestimation by a factor of 100, if not more, if you think about how many car trips there are in a day. Let's assume that the when the test is positive, the driver is drunk 99.9% of the time. And then assume that when the test is negative, the driver is sober 99.9% of the time (in other words, if the test is negative, the driver is drunk 0.1% of the time). We can use this to plug in probabilities for each event. Probability that a driver is drunk: .0001 Probability that a driver is sober: .9999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a positive test: .999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a negative test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a positive test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a negative test: .999 Bayes' Theorem applies here. It says: The probability that someone is drunk driver given a positive test is equal to the probability of a drunk driver gets a positive test times the probability of a drunk driver; that divided by the following: the probability of a drunk getting a positive test times probability of a drunk driver plus the probability of sober driver getting a positive test times the probability of a sober driver. In mathematic terms (DD=drunk driver; SD = sober driver; + = positive test): P(DD | +) = (P(+ | DD)*P(DD))/((P+ | DD)*P(DD)+P(+ | SD)*P(SD)) Plug in the numbers: P(DD | +) = ((.999)*(.0001))/((.999)*(.0001)+(.001)*(.9999)) P(DD | +) = .0908 In other words, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 9%. Meaning that out of a 100 people that test positive under this test, 91 of them would actually be sober. Because the test is imperfect and drunk driving is rare, it's going to impact more sober drivers than drunk drivers. Even if the test is 99.99% accurate and as a false positive rate of 0.01%, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 50%. Note that I'm assuming that 1/10,000 car trips is one by a drunk driver. If you assume 1/100,000 car trips are by a drunk driver, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is 0.9%. (You can also use this calculate to find out the odds that a drunk driver will have a negative test, but I have other stuff to do now...) So, without a nearly perfect test, it's a bad idea for the entire population. If drunk drivers were more frequent, then it would make more sense. Hence, it makes sense for someone who is more likely to drive drunk, and why the current policy probably makes sense. 
    • Hey Ben, good to see you’re still around!   I remember those irons. They’re beautiful! Sorry, I can’t help with the driver though…
    • Sometimes this is called a Telehandler, and sometimes its called a Rough Terrain Fork Lift. It all depends on where you live. 
    • Dragging the handle without the correct wrist movements to go with it can lead to an open clubface at impact. But without a video it's hard to determine the underlying cause of your problem.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Edsland
      Edsland
      (65 years old)
    2. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (37 years old)
    3. snowbeast
      snowbeast
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...