Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


sungho_kr

Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

218 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1629
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      817


Recommended Posts

I think there are too many variables to consider that people overlook. Forgive me if they have already been mentioned a million times, but I'm new here :D

-Equipment Yes Tiger uses forged blades, but there is still a lot of innovation in those irons over what Jack played in his prime. I'd also like to see Tiger use a persimmon driver like Jacks with a balata ball!

-Course Layout More and more courses, including Augusta National are turning into "grip it and rip it" style venues instead of good old "shot makers" tracts. Not saying Tiger can't make shots, but he doesn't have to work the ball as much as the older guys used to.

-Competition A lot of people say Jack didn't have much competition. But I don't think you can put Phil, Padraig, Ernie and others in the same category of Watson, Palmer, and Trevino. Hell, those guys haven't really pushed Tiger that much... his biggest battles were from virtually unknowns like Bob May and YE Yang. But Jack had Watson, Trevino and sometimes Palmer on his ass every week!


Last but not least.... why is Ben Hogan never mentioned in these debates? Im not wishing any bad things here, but I'd like to see what Tiger would do or what Jack would have done if they almost died in a car accident. I'll bet a lot of money that they wouldn't come back and win 6 more majors and be called the best ball striker to ever live!

Driver: taylormade.gif Tour Burner 9.5*
4 Wood: taylormade.gif200 Steel 16*
Irons: taylormade.gif Burner '09
Wedges: taylormade.gif RAC TP Satin 54*, 58*
Putter: odyssey.gif White Hot Tour #9  Ball: bridgestone.gif B330

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Old enough to have enjoyed Jack - his win at Augusta in 86' is will be talked about for generations to come. However, Tiger creates a sense of wonderment with blow-out wins and nail-biters. And some of his shots?!? Even non-sports fans followed Tiger.

909D3 Driver 10.5*
909F3 Fairway Metal 15*
909H Hybrid 19*
AP1 3-4 Irons
AP2 5-8 Irons ZB 9 Iron & PW Oilcan Spin Mill 54* & 58* Studio Select Newport 2 SG5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think there are too many variables to consider that people overlook. Forgive me if they have already been mentioned a million times, but I'm new here :D

This equipment thing is ridiculous. Why didn't you say you want to see Jack play with equipment that Tom Morris Sr was using?

When a player's peers use same equipment as that player, it really is a moot point, it doesn't matter because Tiger isn't playing against Jack and his equipment, and Jack isn't playing against Tom Morris and his equipment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


This equipment thing is ridiculous. Why didn't you say you want to see Jack play with equipment that Tom Morris Sr was using?

I may have missed your point. What was it exactly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I may have missed your point. What was it exactly?

That people say Tiger has an advantage because of better equipment, but everyone he's playing with has the same equipment, so their is no advantage.

A quote from Kris
...is that college bball really isn't "lower tier". The better teams have their rosters filled with guys who could play in the NBA. hell, guys used to come straight from high school to the NBA. I really don't think there's much of a difference skill-wise between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I can't agree that Nicklaus had tougher competition. That argument just doesn't add up. The feilds today are deeper and just plain better. Jack had big names to deal with because back then there were only about 12 great players today i think that number has tripled. However I will give some back in saying that for too long much of todays's talented field would just fall down and die when Tiger was in the hunt. I see that changing a bit but for the first 6 years of Tiger's career that what happened too often.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


i think that tiger is a bigger asset to the game never has there been more people who watched golf just beacuse of him and ratings would go down if he stopped playing. even though jack is still the man with 18 majors.

Omega V cart bag

Driver- i15 9.5 degree UST AXIVCORE 69 S

Woods- big berthaIrons- MP-32 s300 shaftsWedges54* Vokey56* Spin Milled Vokey60* Mp SeriesPutter-Pro PlatinumBalls- ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thats really a tough call to make, thats like saying who's better Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant.... Tiger Woods is still playing and will have to see how his career finishes out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I haven't played golf, consistently, in the last 15 years. But I've always followed golf and remember watching and following it since the mid-80's.

I'm kind of a stats geek (background is baseball) and, at least right now, Tiger is the clear winner. He might falter, he might get injured, his play might drop off...but by any quantifiable measurement, he's way above Nicklaus at the same age.

I haven't read through this whole thread, but I'm sure at least a minority contingent claims Tiger doesn't have the same competition as Jack. To me, that's a fallacy based on results. In other words, because Jack frequently had Arnie or Watson or whomever in the hunt, you're assuming there were more golfers of elite skill level back then. Whereas I think it's more that the competition level is the same or better, but Tiger is an order of magnitude better than that.

Bottom line: Jack might steal a major or two from Tiger, all things being equal. But head to head in the last round of a major? Tiger wins two out of three.

Although, if you ask me who is the most purely talented golfer of all time--sans equipment, training, etc.--Nicklaus might be the one. It's like Deep Blue vs. Kasparov.

In my Grom:

Launcher 9.0 and 3W. Fujikura Hit-on-M Red X-Stiff
'09 Burners 3-AW. KBS +1" Stiff. 1x hard-stepped
A7 2H. UST ProForce Axiv Stiff 56.08 SW Stainless. G5i Putter. TP Burner LDP or Bridgestone e6+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Tiger- although everyone says that Jack had more competition because of more multiple major-winners, the opposite is true- players win fewer majors each these days because the field is more talented, meaning that Tiger's 14 (and hopefully eventually 18) are more meaningful.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I wasn't around when Jack is at his prime.. but I haven't seen anyone generated as much buzz as Tiger.. for golf game for sure.. and possiblly for all sports as well..

so... tw for sure
Link to comment
Share on other sites


How can you compare them?

Jack was in the era of the wooden drivers and 1-rons
Really tough stuff to hit.

Tiger has all this new technology helping him.

I know tiger trains hard.
But for actual talent and ball striking I'd vouch for jack.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How can you compare them?

I'm astounded at the number of people who make this statement without thinking it through. Everyone in Jack's era used the "really tough stuff to hit," and everyone in Tiger's era uses all the "new technology." Tiger is only playing against a field of players with modern equipment, not Jack with persimmon and balata. If anything, this hurts Tiger, as the better ballstrikers were able to distance themselves from the pack in the era of persimmon. Modern technology closes the gap between the top pros and journeyman golfers, making Tiger's dominance even more impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 119: 4/24/24 Chipping and pitching followed by putting through 50 mm gates.
    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...