Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

213 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1630
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      817


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Zeph said:

Someone find footage of every major Jack won to analyze the putts his competitors made…

Come on…this is silly. Chris didn’t play well enough to win, but one more putt was all he needed, or one missed by Tiger. And he played four under, while Tiger played one under. It was very close and even went to a playoff. Tiger wasn’t handed anything. Maybe Chris mishit a few putts, but every golfer do, Tiger included. It’s not like Chris wanted to lose.

On the one hand this point is the first actual new point in this thread for years.

OTOH, this point is fairly absurd.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

For some reason, you have missed hundreds of posts that do accept that.  I've often said I can't even prove that Tiger would beat Vardon head to head, although I'd bet on him. What I CAN prove is

That's very unfair to Jack, since he played events well into his 60's.  It also distorts Tiger's record, since he played injured for several years. It would be more fair to look at the the period

Your quote highlights something that Tiger is seldom given credit for, which is that he has never (to my knowledge) tried to lobby for himself the way Jack did. Tiger is pursuing the two biggest

Posted Images

1 hour ago, jxdama said:

I vote for  Jack

Well statistically that’s silly. But nostalgically …to each his own.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Well statistically that’s silly. But nostalgically …to each his own.

Hey, he's entitled to his opinion.  I've never objected to anyone saying they vote for Jack.  I only object when they start trying to justify their opinion with the kind of non-factual nonsense that is contained in the thousands of messages in this thread.  Or this latest nonsense of DiMarco somehow "gifting" the Masters to Tiger.  It's like saying Rocco 'gifted' the 2008 US Open to Tiger by driving it into a bunker on the 91st hole.

But I respect his right to his opinion, even though I think it is unsupported by the facts.  Not everyone has dived into the topic as deeply as we have in this thread, and it is indisputable that the 18>15 criterion is still being peddled whole-heartedly by much of the golf media.  So there are a lot of people whoo still reflect that.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
39 minutes ago, turtleback said:

Hey, he's entitled to his opinion.  I've never objected to anyone saying they vote for Jack.  I only object when they start trying to justify their opinion with the kind of non-factual nonsense that is contained in the thousands of messages in this thread.  Or this latest nonsense of DiMarco somehow "gifting" the Masters to Tiger.  It's like saying Rocco 'gifted' the 2008 US Open to Tiger by driving it into a bunker on the 91st hole.

But I respect his right to his opinion, even though I think it is unsupported by the facts.  Not everyone has dived into the topic as deeply as we have in this thread, and it is indisputable that the 18>15 criterion is still being peddled whole-heartedly by much of the golf media.  So there are a lot of people whoo still reflect that.

Of course. And I gave him mine.😃

Edited by Vinsk
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 5/8/2021 at 7:57 PM, Vinsk said:

Faldo is the supreme recipient of profound luck when it comes to The Masters. To be handed 2 Masters wins is quite amazing. 

You’re talking about ‘89 and ‘96 I hope.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

People don’t wanna remember that Tiger really only gave away one major... (He could’ve won at least 5 more majors... perhaps even more)... that debacle at Hazeltine as we like to call it... really was not just Sunday it started Saturday, he really played like shit on Saturday and Sunday. He handed the 2009 PGA to Y.E. Yang.

Jack, on the other hand did finish Second 19 Times in majors. Some of the second places were a little more, someone dominated, Jack kinda just played well, didn’t make the putts to win (1968 U.S. Open comes to mind, 1982 U.S. Open, ‘83 PGA). But there were a few that Jack let slip away and he’ll be the first one to tell you. ‘75 Open at Carnoustie finishes one shot out of the playoff because off an untimely 5 at 17. ‘72 Open at Muirfield, he’ll tell you he wanted to finish. 3, 4, 4 as he did in ‘66. He bogeyed 16 (his only bogey of the day) failed to birdie the 17th, and parred 18. He finished one stroke behind Trevino. 
 

To @Vinsk’s point on Faldo being handed 2 Masters and 1 Open Championship... I’ll do it  in Chronological order.

’87 Open: Faldo makes 18 pars on Sunday. To post 279. Azinger bogeyed 17 and 18 to lose by 1.

’89 Masters: Faldo played like absolute shit on Saturday... garbage 77.... He did in his defense in regulation play he did play very well shooting a 65. Hoch had a 2 1/2 foot putt for par on the 1st Hole of Sudden death. He missed it and made the comebacker. Faldo walked through the door Scott Hoch left open and made a 30 footer at the 2nd playoff hole to win the Masters.

’96 Masters: Faldo shot 67, Norman played like shit that simple to blow a 6 shot 54 hole lead...

Half of Faldo’s majors were handed to him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

All evidence wold indicate that Tiger has put it in many, many more holes than Jack.

 

But seriously, Tiger was much better at scrambling and making stunning recovery shots than Jack.

But Jack didn't seem to find trouble as often as Tiger.

Edited by Esox
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Esox said:

All evidence wold indicate that Tiger has put it in many, many more holes than Jack.

 

But seriously, Tiger was much better at scrambling and making stunning recovery shots than Jack.

But Jack didn't seem to find trouble as often as Tiger.

Tiger’s driving could be more erratic than Jack’s. 
 

Driving: Jack (I think they were equal in distance relative to the equipment they were  playing, but Jack stayed out of the shit)

Approach (75-250 yards): Wash. Jack takes the longer end (mainly because of some amazing 1 and 2 iron shots). Tiger takes the shorter end.

Short Game: Tiger not close.

Putting: Wash. Both of them in pressure situations. 
 

Recovery: Tiger

Mental: That’s a wash.

Performance under pressure: Both

How much better than everyone else was Tiger in his prime vs Jack on his prime? Tiger set the bar so high when he was in his prime that most guys behind him weren’t even in the same time zone let alone, the same tour. Jack was pretty damn good but he wasn’t as dominant as Tiger and that’s where Tiger is so much greater than Jack and that’s what makes him the GOAT.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

First off, is this the oldest topic in the forum? 15 Years, wow.

This discussion about the greatest of all time is mute.  All sports have the same point and counterpoints. Most Home-runs, best hitter in baseball, most Super Bowl Rings, on and on.

Comparing athletes from different eras are practically impossible. From changes ranging from physicality to equipment, travel, nutrition, playing conditions, shorter courses vs longer courses, stadiums indoor vs outdoor, astroturf, lowering the mounds, 3 point lines, instant replay and more.

Best of an “ERA” I could believe in that. Sustainability in a sport is a good measure, but not those that linger.  Having the most Majors?  Most Super Bowl Trophies? Individual sports, Team Sports?

Jack vs Tiger?  Take your pick.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is there a definition of what makes one the greatest golfer? Is it how many majors one has won? How many total tournaments one has won? Or is it who would win most matches if the two played each other. Maybe it's the length of their career mixed with the quality of their successes? If Tiger and Jack went head to head in the primes of their careers, say 10 matches, I would probably pick Tiger to win more then Jack. jmo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

Is there a definition of what makes one the greatest golfer? Is it how many majors one has won? How many total tournaments one has won? Or is it who would win most matches if the two played each other. Maybe it's the length of their career mixed with the quality of their successes? If Tiger and Jack went head to head in the primes of their careers, say 10 matches, I would probably pick Tiger to win more then Jack. jmo.

If only there was a nearly 7000 post thread exploring these and other related issues.😯😉

But to answer your question, no there is no definition.  Everyone decides for themselves.  Mine is dominance.  Tiger dominated golf for ten years to an extent and degree never before seen.  While being a significant factor for long enough to be significantly ahead of Jack in PGA victories. I was a huge Jack fan in my earlier years and still am, although his jockeying to get and try to hold the goat designation have disappointed me.

For most Jack supporters their definition is simply 18>15.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

35 minutes ago, turtleback said:

I was a huge Jack fan in my earlier years and still am, although his jockeying to get and try to hold the goat designation have disappointed me.

For most Jack supporters their definition is simply 18>15.

Agree 100% with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 hours ago, Sandy Lie said:

This discussion about the greatest of all time is mute.

You say this in post #6922 in the topic…

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, iacas said:

You say this in post #6922 in the topic…

Plus, the word is moot, not mute.

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

Driving: Jack (I think they were equal in distance relative to the equipment they were  playing, but Jack stayed out of the shit)

I have to wonder if this is particularly true though, simply because when Tiger burst onto the scene the new trend in course design and renovation was to "Tiger-proof" your golf course by making it longer, but more importantly by making it very narrow and penal specifically in the areas where longer hitters put their tee shots. Bunkers were added, the rough was grown out, fairways were pinched down to a narrower waist ~300 yards out from the teebox. Was Tiger truly less accurate than Jack, or is it partially because the courses were modified specifically to make things more narrow and difficult for golfers who hit the ball as far as Tiger?

I personally believe Jack was still a bit more consistent off the tee, with Tiger Woods off the tee being best compared to Arnold Palmer ("Hit it hard, go find it, and hit it hard again").  I think it's an interesting and important discussion though, because only one of these two golfers was so influential that virtually every important golf course around the world was modified specifically to be made harder for that one golfer. Nobody talked about "Jack-proofing" a golf course, he won but wasn't so much better than everyone else as to be specifically thought about when designing a new or revised golf course.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just watched the 2000 PGA Championship playoff where Bob May gifted the win to Tiger.

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Pretzel said:

Was Tiger truly less accurate than Jack, or is it partially because the courses were modified specifically to make things more narrow and difficult for golfers who hit the ball as far as Tiger?

I have no clue. Jack was known for his advantage off the tee. Tiger was hitting it 300 yards, with only John Daly in the area, but he was way more accurate than Daly. I feel like Tiger's driver issues came later on his career. 

2 hours ago, Pretzel said:

I personally believe Jack was still a bit more consistent off the tee, with Tiger Woods off the tee being best compared to Arnold Palmer ("Hit it hard, go find it, and hit it hard again"). 

I disagree. Tiger wasn't just a bomber off the tee. He would hit it hard, shape it, hit it easier. He had a full range of shots. He wasn't just hit it hard. 

2 hours ago, Pretzel said:

I think it's an interesting and important discussion though, because only one of these two golfers was so influential that virtually every important golf course around the world was modified specifically to be made harder for that one golfer.

I wonder how much courses actually went to Tiger-proof the course? Maybe this was overblown? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • On what? Even a 6I is generally around low 60°s. Titleist 620 MB Irons | Muscle Back Irons | Titleist New 620 MB irons from Titleist. The dependability golfers desire with progressive enhancements to ensure you're carrying the best iron on the links. 63.5° there.   P.S. @KevinBlake: https://thesandtrap.com/how-to/add-an-avatar/
    • Naga-Waukee War Memorial 6.0 The course if just a great local favorite county course. It is a great old design which has views of Pewaukee Lake in multiple spots. It has one goofy par 5(#11) where you tee off straight up hill and then it drops off down and to the right after about 240 yards or so. Other than that, I like every hole on this course.  I wish they would put some good sand in the bunkers and maybe modernize those a bit. Greens roll a bit slow compared to the other courses we played, but for the amount of heavy play it gets they stay in decent shape year after year. The Club Lac La Belle – 6.5 I played this a few times now since it re-opened last year. My main issue with it is that they put so much money into the course it seems like they have to overcharge for it. It is a nice re-design though and they did a great job fixing the water drainage issues on the course. They also addressed how tight and short many of the holes were. Having been founded in 1896 it was due for some updates. I do enjoy the course, but it feels target oriented to me on a number of the holes. You can play hyper aggressive and take a lot of drivers but often from what I have witnessed and experienced, that leads to a lot of penalty stokes taken. I hit a lot of irons and hybrids off the tee to certain spots on the fairway and had one of my better rounds of the week.    Lawsonia Links – 7.5 It isn’t really like anything I have played or experienced. It is just such a neat property overall.  I am not really a student of golf architecture at all but it seems like some of the design brilliance is in the subtle things and ways that they moved earth to visually change looks. Big reveals and raised greens are all over the course. I was not a big fan of the blind shots early on in the round. I just have never been a big fan of teeing off over a hill covered in rough. I think it is a must play if you come to sand valley. It gives you something different to see and the price to play it is a great value. Mammoth Dunes – 8.0 This was the first time out on Mammoth for me. Visually, it is very cool. I love that this course is a journey. You don’t return to the clubhouse until 18 so after your first tee shot, you have committed to that end. It is a fantastic portion of the property and I love the layout. In some ways it is visually more appealing than Sand Valley. It was my best round of the week and I feel that this is nice course for a struggling golfer like myself to have a bit of a easy day and put up a decent score. The absence of much overall difficulty is also what keeps the course from being a top tier course for me. Sand Valley – 9.0 I’ve now played it 3 times. I have not played many top tier courses, so this is probably in my top two courses, the other being Whistling Straits. I need to get out more for sure. SV is just a challenge, and a very fun one at that. You pretty much have to focus the entire way through the course. Number one is short and seems pretty easy, but leave yourself a partial wedge and I hope you are practiced up on those. The green has a false front as well. Holes 2 – 7 are the welcome to Sand Valley slap in the face. You get a bit of a break at 8 in my opinion which is a short uphill par 3 but you still have to hit a fairly tight landing area. Number 9 is drivable but it is almost the worst decision you can take for most of us the bunkers around the green are horrifying and the only water on the course is in play to the right. The first two par 5s on the back(10 and 12) are tons of fun, they are not overly long or at least they don’t play as long, and are very getable in 2. Number 13 is fairly forgettable as a hole but that second shot seems to be a tough one even though the hole seems fairly simple and is easy to lose focus on. It plays longer than it looks and is uphill to another difficult green. 17 and 18 are the ultimate test of exhaustion and your state of mind to this point in the round. A good player just needs to hit the proper side of the bowl for the pin position and will end up with a birdie putt(or in Erik’s case a 4” tap in). For a lesser player this hole can be a real challenge, at 210-235 uphill, depending on your tees. 18 is the final test, you are exhausted by this time, and you are asked to play a 3 shot hole in which you are walking up a fairly aggressive slope the entire way. It is maybe the best finishing hole I have played. Depending on the pin position you can bank your third shot off a slope for a run at the hole as well. I will probably find time to play this course every year that I possibly can, since I live so close.  What a week this was!  
    • This thread covered set up posture. Set up can help other issues as well like early extension.  
    • Hi all, I've attempted to see if this was already covered... I am pretty new to golf having spent the last couple of years going to the driving range casually and have taken to the course circa 10 times. I would like to take some advice on which clubs i should be holding in my bag. My current set up in as follows Ping G30 (white dot which are 1.5 inch longer) 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, PW, SW Ping G30 Hybrid (4) 22 degree Ping G30 Driver (1) 10.5 degree Spider Putter Couple of things which i am thinking about. Secure a LW (58deg) as the most aggressive wedge i have at present is the SW (54 deg) The Hybrid i have feels like it could be useful but feels short, i.e. i have white dot irons but this is standard length, would you recommend getting this extended? Is there any other clubs which you feel could be useful to me? Thanks in advance, Alex    
    • Things that make you go, "Hmmmm...". Large study finds COVID-19 is linked to a substantial drop in intelligence  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...