Jump to content
IGNORED

Matrix XCON-5 Stiff After-Market Shafts


Note: This thread is 2799 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Anyone tried this shaft? I don't know much about it, or how it compares to other after-market shafts, or to stock shafts for that matter.

Looking to buy a club with this shaft on it, and I would like to know more before shelling out the cash. Can someone educate me on this shaft?
What's in My Bag?

Driver: 10.5° KZG SP-700 with Fujikura SIX Regular Flex Shaft | 2h: Adams A7OS Stiff | 3h: Adams A3OS Stiff | 4h: Nike Slingshot Steel | 5i-PW: Adams A2OS | Sand Wedge: Cleveland CG14 56° 3-dot | Lob Wedge: Cleveland CG15 60° 3-dot | Putter: Fisher CTS-9 Polyurethane Face
Link to comment
Share on other sites


x con is one hell of a shaft...

the 5 is pretty light.. you may want to look into the 6 or 7, depending on your preference.

performance wise its a bit of a higher launching shaft... the made for ones, (aka the "Matrix Ozik" is outlined in silver, not in gold) have a bit more torque, so you can close the clubface easier..

the high launch is nice.. not too high launch like the altus, but i found this one to kinda start out high, where as my altus starts low and then kicks up. both get great carry and some pretty good kick when they land as well.

dont buy it new tho.. golfwrx has them regularily for fairly cheap, (well, not the 500 you would shell out new) you may want to buy a made for first, see if you like it, and then shell out the big ones for a "real" one. I know i have sold a couple made for Xcon's for 50, so you wont be out too much on your initial matrix venture. You may notice all my woods have a matrix in them, maybe i just drank the KoolAid, but god i would swear by these things!!

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The 5 is light (will be crazy long, but harder to control) I have the 6. I LOVE it.

Link to the Martix site

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Great information. thanks!

So, since the Matrix Ozik XCON-5 stiff flex shaft is lighter (59 grams), does that mean it "acts" more like a regular flex XCON-6 (67 grams) for example? I guess the more appropriate question is, how does weight of the shaft make the club more or less controllable?

I'd love to be able to try out all of the after-market shafts and find the right one for me. But this one comes with the club I'm thinking about buying. Sure, I could switch out shafts later, but I'd rather spend the money on other things.
What's in My Bag?

Driver: 10.5° KZG SP-700 with Fujikura SIX Regular Flex Shaft | 2h: Adams A7OS Stiff | 3h: Adams A3OS Stiff | 4h: Nike Slingshot Steel | 5i-PW: Adams A2OS | Sand Wedge: Cleveland CG14 56° 3-dot | Lob Wedge: Cleveland CG15 60° 3-dot | Putter: Fisher CTS-9 Polyurethane Face
Link to comment
Share on other sites


because it is lighter, it will promote a faster transition and, in turn, a faster clubhead speed. Should not affect flex, but if you have a bit quick of a transition, a heavier shaft may help to slow that down without affecting your yardage too much..

And honestly, i would go out on a limb and say that Jay Bird has what is considered a "Not real" matrix in his FTi..the stock shafts do differ from the aftermarket shafts..dont get me wrong, but they are still the same technology, just different weights and torques to accomodate different clubheads.

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


And honestly, i would go out on a limb and say that Jay Bird has what is considered a "Not real" matrix in his FTi..the stock shafts do differ from the aftermarket shafts..dont get me wrong, but they are still the same technology, just different weights and torques to accomodate different clubheads.

Agreed whole heartedly. But I bet my fake Matrix hits many, many fairways and I'd go out on a limb and say I usually out drive everyone I ever play with.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


And honestly, i would go out on a limb and say that Jay Bird has what is considered a "Not real" matrix in his FTi

If you would, please cite your sources on the "fake" Matrix Icon shaft. The one in my FT-i looks real. Is this hear say, or did Matrix make a "fake" Matrix Icon X6 especially for Callaway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you would, please cite your sources on the "fake" Matrix Icon shaft. The one in my FT-i looks real. Is this hear say, or did Matrix make a "fake" Matrix Icon X6 especially for Callaway.

They are not fake per se... All of the made for shafts aka the ones that come stock in clubs go for much much less than a quote real matrix will. They come from the same place that "real" matrix come from. They just are a little different in weight ans torques. But as jaybird said, the "fake" ones work very well... On a first venture into matrix, a made for shaft that costs 50 is a great deal.. Especially when you see the results :] then you will imagine what a "real" matrix would perform like :]

Note- most of the matrix that come as stock shafts, the "matrix ozik" will be out lined in silver, where as a "real" or after market matrix is outlined in gold. This is true for all matrix shafts except the code series (or any of the odd colored matrix, as the colors beyond red were not offered to retail beyond the to and the hd series which come in white) the code is more of a matte red and is just plain silver writing. And there is your all inclusive guide to matrix golf shafts! Feel free to pm or post amy other questions!

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I got an email back from Matrix today. I was pleased to hear that I don't have a "fake" shaft


"Thank you for contacting Matrix Shafts. Good news! You have the REAL thing. All Callaway parts have real,aftermarket Matrix shafts.Your OZIK XCON 6 is as real as if you bought it directly from us."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I got an email back from Matrix today. I was pleased to hear that I don't have a "fake" shaft

again, there not fake.. they are just not aftermarket.. meaning if i bought a matrix x con 5 and you bought a FT i and we tried to sell the shafts, you Xcon would fetch about 50 bucks where as mine would fetch something in the realm of 150 bucks. Its from matrix, but just like every other made for shaft, there are differences between them and their aftermarket brothers.

perhaps the cally ones are considered "aftermarket" but ive certainly never seen them go for what aftermarket ones do when being sold..

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Its from matrix, but just like every other made for shaft, there are differences between them and their aftermarket brothers.

Based on the reply I got from Matrix, the only difference is the price. But I see what you are saying about the prices of aftermarket shafts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


If the only difference where price, people would be crazy to not get on eBay and purchase a "Made for Titleist" Matrix shaft. As was stated earlier, the weight of the shaft is lighter in the "Made for..." stock shafts and the torque is higher. I just got a Titleist 909D3 with an XCON 6 made for Titleist shaft and had it tipped 1/2 inch to bring the torque down to be more consistent with the after market shaft. So, aside from the weight (I think my shaft is 2grams lighter) everything else should be close to the same.

Honestly, unless you are an extremely gifted golfer (I'm talking tour caliber player) you're not going to notice the difference in the "made for..." stock shaft vs. the more expensive after market shaft.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


If the only difference where price, people would be crazy to not get on eBay and purchase a "Made for Titleist" Matrix shaft. As was stated earlier, the weight of the shaft is lighter in the "Made for..." stock shafts and the torque is higher. I just got a Titleist 909D3 with an XCON 6 made for Titleist shaft and had it tipped 1/2 inch to bring the torque down to be more consistent with the after market shaft. So, aside from the weight (I think my shaft is 2grams lighter) everything else should be close to the same.

Thank you lol.

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"Thank you for contacting Matrix Shafts. Good news! You have the REAL thing. All Callaway parts have real,aftermarket Matrix shafts.Your OZIK XCON 6 is as real as if you bought it directly from us."

Again guys, not being argumentative here, but all I have to go on is what Matrix told me in the above pasted email. Thanks for the insights.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Again guys, not being argumentative here, but all I have to go on is what Matrix told me in the above pasted email. Thanks for the insights.

The email you received from Matrix is 100% correct. They are in fact REAL Matrix shafts. The difference is that the specs on your Callaway Matrix (same as the Titleist Matrix in my 909D3) are different from those of the "exotic" shafts that you can actually purchase from Matrix. As I said before, the differences are the shaft weight and torque.

I don't think anyone is arguing the fact that they are fake because that couldn't be further from the truth, they just don't have the same same specs. The exotic Matrix XCON 6 in which you purchase straight from Matrix would cost you $300 just for the shaft alone. The best analogy that I can come up with is purchasing a new computer. You could get online and purchase a brand new Dell directly from Dell and it will likely cost you anywhere from $800 - $2000 dollars; or you could go to Wal-Mart and purchase a Dell for $400. Both are in fact real Dell computers, but the one you purchased straight from Dell will likely have better hardware, faster processor, etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The email you received from Matrix is 100% correct. They are in fact REAL Matrix shafts. The difference is that the specs on your Callaway Matrix (same as the Titleist Matrix in my 909D3) are different from those of the "exotic" shafts that you can actually purchase from Matrix. As I said before, the differences are the shaft weight and torque.

Pretty well put, while the "made for" shafs are made by Matrix and others, they try to take the real specs and make an affordable "one-size-fits all" that will work for club manufacturers. It's really a win-win for both sides, shaft manufacturers get their name out and the club manufacturers get to tought super expensive name brand shafts that come stock in their cubs. A lot of times the specs are pretty close which is fine for 95% of golfers out there, I think once you get into stiffer shafts and higher swing speeds is where issues start to arise.

Driver: 910D3 - Oban Kiyoshi 75 X / 909D3 - Oban Devotion 7 X
3 Wood: R9 TP - Oban Devotion 8 05
Hybrid: 909H - Project X Graphite
Irons: 4-6 AP2 - Project X 6.5 / 7-W MB - Project X 6.5
Wedges: Scratch 1018 52/56/60 KBS Tour XPutter: SC Button Back Newport 34" / SC Del Mar 34" / SC SS Newport...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


They are not fake per se... All of the made for shafts aka the ones that come stock in clubs go for much much less than a quote real matrix will. They come from the same place that "real" matrix come from. They just are a little different in weight ans torques. But as jaybird said, the "fake" ones work very well... On a first venture into matrix, a made for shaft that costs 50 is a great deal.. Especially when you see the results :] then you will imagine what a "real" matrix would perform like :]

This is not true at all. The XCON 5,6,7 and 8h are all outlined in silver. The Altus and M2 lines are outlined in gold.

Just thought I would clear that up. Riot
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Don't be so quick to drop the gun there.. When I get to my comp ( on I pod now) I will provide a link to gold outlined x cons. Regardless op, pick up a made for shaft... Should serve you well

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2799 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 119: 4/24/24 Chipping and pitching followed by putting through 50 mm gates.
    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...