Jump to content
IGNORED

How far do you hit your clubs?


Note: This thread is 2872 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Driver: 240-275

Figured i'd quote you since you and i have virtually the same yardages:

Driver: 240-270 3 wood: 220-230 2 hybrid: 185-220 4 iron: 170-180 5 iron: 160-170 6 iron: 150-160 7 iron: 140-150 8 iron: 125-140 9 iron: 115-125 P wedge: 100-115 S wedge: 85-100 54 wedge: 50-85 60 wedge: 30-50
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 559
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Driver - So far that you wouldn't want your wife to see me hit it. 3+ Wood - You'd get tired and have to sit down while walking to my ball. 1 Iron - Wooden tees catch fire like match heads eve

^^^ My brother from another mother!

We should totally play sometime! I can only hit driver on holes that run north-south, anything east-west is a no go. Just too risky, don't wanna **** up the earth's rotation.

Personally, I equate distance with handicap index to some extent. It doesn't hold true with every player, but almost all the good players I play with hit the ball further on a more consistent basis. I've never met a 25+ that hits the ball over 300 yards, or hits a 7i 170, or anything even remotely close to that. To achieve those distances you need to do a lot of things right.

Agreed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the numbers posted here are outrageous, but I can believe a lot of them.

I hit my clubs significantly longer a couple years ago, but I was definitely a worse golfer.

If you're a good athlete, you can figure out how to find the sweet spot and hit a powerful trajectory a decent amount of the time while also swinging nearly as hard as you can. It doesn't mean you're a good golfer or anything...
Link to post
Share on other sites

the ball goes as far as it goes. it is what it is and golfers should match their shot to the required distance, and not match a distance and require club.

Dave hits his 8 iron 155 so that means I have to as well. Not so.

I hit my wedge about 128, my 8 iron 153, my 6 iron 182, and my hybrid club 232. My driver flies 264 in the air with a draw and 270 with a fade. Those are MY numbers based on what I CAN DO and I can change the distances based on different shots and set up adjustments. There are too many golfers trying to match other peoples distances and I think it forces bad swing mechanics and tempo.

why dont you try matching shoes sizes and then think about how silly it sounds?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I equate distance with handicap index to some extent. It doesn't hold true with every player, but almost all the good players I play with hit the ball further on a more consistent basis. I've never met a 25+ that hits the ball over 300 yards, or hits a 7i 170, or anything even remotely close to that. To achieve those distances you need to do a lot of things right.

Maybe I came off brash, didn't mean to..Sarcasm has always been a habit I can't kick ;^). I'm about your handicap after about 4 seasons, sometimes I go low tho. My point was shaving strokes takes time, regardless of distance. It all has to come together, for everyone- short and long. Your right about killing it into the woods. That's less than pointless. When your game is erratic, power doesn't matter. But when your game isn't erratic, it is a HUGE advantage. Some people are just naturally longer than others. And while some inflate their distance for whatever reason, some are just being honest. Wait until they clean up their game, fuggetabotit...The short game is the great equalizer, because everyone can practice it. It is a fact that some, no matter how much they practice, will never hit as long as others.....
Link to post
Share on other sites

Driver: 250-280
3W: 220-240
5W: 205-225
3H: 200-215
4H: 190-205
5i: 175-180
6i: 165-175
7i: 155
8i: 145
9i: 135
PW: 110-120/90-100/60
56* SW: 80-85/70-75/50
60* LW: 60-65/50-55/20-40
Link to post
Share on other sites

the ball goes as far as it goes. it is what it is and golfers should match their shot to the required distance, and not match a distance and require club.

I couldn't agree more. One thing beginners to the game seem to have trouble understanding when they first start out is that there really isn't all that much of an advantage to hitting the ball a tad bit further by swinging for the fences on every swing. I can understand to a certain extant trying to hit your driver further, but beginners need to understand it's not how far you hit your irons/wedges but instead how well you can hit them to a specific yardage. It doesn't mean a damn thing if you are capable of hitting your 7 iron 200 yards if you can't to it consistently and with any directional control. With your approach shots, you are trying to hit a target a specific distance from you, not trying to hit it as far as you can.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah i think alot of players try to focus on the driver distance a little too much. Ive hit the ball over 300 yards many times but I know on an average Im much closer to 240 to 260. But I hit fairways. And thats whats important. New players and all players really should remember that you only hit the driver, on average, 14 times per round. You hit the putter around 30 to 35 times. So you tell me which is more important?
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Direction Versus Distance Debate. It would not surprise me if BubbaWatson could hit his 9iron 185 yards with a towering draw, but he doesn't look to play that shot. Clearly if you are playing the game of golf to keep score, and you have an general understanding of how not to make Big numbers, then you are concerned with your accuracy over your distance, however, I understand that it is a fine line.

And, to the OP who wants to make a comparison, I think that's healthy. We all benchmark our game against something. Right now, 125 on the pgatour hits 63% of his greens, 60% of his fairways and averages 282 off the tee. 1.64 putts per green (29.6 putts per round), as well as getting up and down 53% of the time when the green is missed.

Does anyone have someone like Phil's yardages? Or how about Justin Rose, who's 123 on the money list, 124 on the fedex points list, and a scoring average of 72.00, which is 162 in scoring.

I guess the only issue with benchmarking yardages is that it can get to you, mostly likely not in a positive way, and may affect a shot or two on the course... again, not in a positive way.



TIGER'S CLUBS:
Driver: 285 yards (of carry)
3 Wd: 265 yards (of carry)
2 Iron: 245 yards
3 Iron: 230 yards
4 Iron: 220 yards
5 Iron: 208 yards
6 Iron: 190 yards
7 Iron: 172 yards
8 Iron: 158 yards
9 Iron: 142 yards
Pitching Wedge: 128 yards
Sand Wedge: 106 yards
Lob Wedge (60°): 92 yards

Source(s):
golfchannel.com, 2008

pshhh... I got him beat

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Direction Versus Distance Debate. It would not surprise me if BubbaWatson could hit his 9iron 185 yards with a towering draw, but he doesn't look to play that shot.

hell,

The Sand Trap has some forum members who (claim to) hit a 9 iron farther than that! lol
Link to post
Share on other sites

^phsh I already posted that, I like how nobody actually reads all of the post. Tiger distance that is. Also I mentioned somewhere in the post that tiger says that he sometimes hits a 200 yard nine iron.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't hit my CLUBS very far, but I can hit a golf ball WITH a club, like this:

My drives, about 225, 230 on average;
3-wood about 80 feet, dead push right (thus the 1-Hybrid in my bag)
I hit a 3-hybrid about 193-195 and every club below that is ABOUT 10-11 yards less - plus or minus a few yards.

I think it's more of taking into consideration the slope, the wind, the lie, etc. then exactly how far I can hit a specific club. At 14 hndcp, close is about all I'll get without tons and tons of practice in all conditions.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, when I started my distances were less than good. I was driving a 3 wood almost as far as my driver (3 wood is still my favourite club), I couldnt seem to get a drive past 240, except once every couple of rounds or so i'd crush one hard, but I was far from happy, as im 6'4", 245lbs, and in excellent shape (fitness and nutrition are both my job and a huge part of my life).

Then I started taing lessons, and found out I was doing many things wrong, we worked at them one at a time. First the grip and stance, my coach had me switch to an interlocking grip, and widened up my driver stance, and shortened up my iron and wedge stance. Then it was posture and ball position. Then footwork. Finally, after 5 lessons (with more to go), we started on swing plane and swing speed (I was swinging way too hard to keep an effective plane)

After this, my distances were greatly improved, with 275 yard drives becoming very, very common, and my 3 wood is even longer than it was (average of 245). With a stiffer, heavier shaft (he's suggesting 80+ gram, my swing speed on the launch monitor is about 109mph), he expects that I will carry over 300 very consistently. As it is now, my stiff shaft looks and feels flimsy when I swing)

So while im not the best golfer (short game kills me, and also putting, though to a much lesser extent), my game is improving greatly. So if these 25+ handicappers really drive as long as they say to do with a typical all over the place high handicap swing and horrible posture and positioning, it would be scary to think of what they could do if they cleaned up their stance and swing and positioning.

While im sure most of these guys think their telling the truth (they hit a good drive and a friend says, 'wow, mine is about 270, so that must be 300'!, and of course they believe them), im guessing they dont know for sure what their distances are and go by guess and word of mouth.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of these replies are outrageous! I have only ever played with someone who hit a ball around 300 yards last summer. His pitching wedge went around 145-155. He was a big dude, around 6'2" and 220 pounds. Needless to say, he was going off to play for a school in north carolina.
My distances:
Driver:230-260
19*:210
21*:200
4i:185
5i:175
6i:165
7i:155
8i:145
9i:130
pw:115
53*:100
60*:70
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah i think alot of players try to focus on the driver distance a little too much. Ive hit the ball over 300 yards many times but I know on an average Im much closer to 240 to 260. But I hit fairways. And thats whats important. New players and all players really should remember that you only hit the driver, on average, 14 times per round. You hit the putter around 30 to 35 times. So you tell me which is more important?

well according to a scientific research they found that if tiger putted for you it would save an average 2.8 strokes but if he hit all shots froom 100+yards he would shave 9.4 strokes so which one is more important for us again??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 2872 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Good for you, what course are you qualifying at?  Good luck.
    • Considering how many people he comes into contact with and how often he is flying, it is unfortunate but not a total surprise. You can catch Covid-19 again even with being vaccinated and previously infected. It just means that your infection is mild.
    • Or, he understands how it transfers, and he was only around his wife for two months. He didn't need to get tested… because in getting tested, maybe he would have gone out more than he did in isolating at home, perhaps? You are making a LOT of assumptions, as you often do, @Shorty. Cool it.
    • The Club at Lac La Belle - 6.5 I wasn't a big fan of this course. It was beautiful and well-maintained, but I found parts of it to be a little contrived. It's definitely a target golf course and for someone like me who is wild off the tee, it took all the fun of strategizing out of it because the risks were just too high. I did like that there was variety in the course layout with a good mix of short/long, right/left, uphill/downhill holes. I'm not sure I'd make a trip out to this one again if I'm ever back in the area for golf, but it's less than 10 minutes away from a delicious French bakery with the best croissants I have ever had, so that bumps up the score a little  I'd go back just for the croissants. The Sandbox - 7.0 This little 17 hole par 3 course was just fun. It gave you different looks and a variety of options for play. I really liked it and tried a bunch of different things I normally wouldn't have on a regular course. A 7.0 is probably the most I'd give to a par 3 course, though. Lawsonia Links - 7.5 I really enjoyed this course. Overall I found the layout to be good. There were plenty of places to miss, but you still needed to hit good golf shots to play well. I liked the way the mounds and bunkers were designed to play with the shape of the holes visually. There were really only a couple of holes I didn't like - 13 in particular, even though I made par both times using completely different strategies. It's just bordering on too many blind shots for me, though. I'd definitely play this course again if I have the chance. Mammoth Dunes - 8.5 This course was spectacular to look at - absolutely visually stunning. The pictures don't do it justice because they fail to capture the scale of everything. The place is massive. I'll echo what the others have wrote above: it's a journey. You feel like you're not going out to play a round of golf, but rather that you're going on an adventure while hitting a golf ball on the way. I understand now how some other reviews I've read or seen describe a feeling of getting lost, or losing your bearings for a bit. I wasn't thinking about routing. I had no idea where the clubhouse was. I didn't really care about any of it because I was out in this beautiful landscape. The golf itself for me was just there. I would be perfectly happy spending an afternoon just walking the course without playing it. And that's a bit of a detriment, because at the end of the day, it is a golf course. As a golf course, I found it didn't really matter much how you played it as long as you hit decent shots. There was certainly an ideal way to play the course well, and I hit some awful shots and paid the price for them, but plenty of just okay shots I got away with because of the layout. In the end that's fine. I don't need every course I play to be a grueling test of my skills.  I'd make a return trip and play this course again. Sand Valley - 9.0 This one is a golf course first and a spectacular view second. Where Mammoth Dunes focuses on the adventure, Sand Valley focuses on the golf. It's still visually stunning, but just not quite on the grand scale that Mammoth Dunes is. And Sand Valley does not let you forget for even one second that you're out there to do one thing: to play golf. I don't remember having a single shot out there that didn't require my undivided attention. The course absolutely punished you for missing your spots. But the flip side of that coin is that it was extremely rewarding to hit good shots there. An example is #8 mentioned above - I don't think I have ever felt so pleased to hit a GW to 35' before in my life, and I might never again. The course is a challenge in the best way. It makes you want to rise up to face it. I want to go back and battle it again. I shot my best score of the week with an 87 at Lawsonia, but it's the 94 the second time playing Sand Valley that I'm most proud of. Like Mammoth Dunes above, I'd make a return trip specifically to play this course again. Bonus Stuff The facilities at Sand Valley Golf Resort were top notch. The prices at the pro shop were fair. The food and drinks were also reasonably priced and delicious. The food truck at The Sandbox had the best food in the whole complex, IMO. Lac La Belle I felt was fancy but overpriced. I bought a polo at the pro shop at Sand Valley, but a similar shirt at Lac La Belle was like 50% more expensive. The golf carts had beautiful leather seats, but I absolutely hate geo-mapping on the GPS systems. I don't know how many times it slowed me down to tell me not to drive in the fescue even though I was driving parallel to it 20 yards away. Lawsonia had an older clubhouse and it certainly had a quaint feeling to it. That's not a bad thing. I did not look to see the prices they were charging for their merchandise.
    • Every YouTube video should start with a 10- to 45-minute diagnosis to make sure the video you're about to watch applies to you. There are a LOT of reasons why someone hits a slice. YouTube videos do not start with a 45-minute "disclaimer" because nobody would get through it. They just want to stop slicing, but if the video shows a fix for something that the student doesn't do, the video is less than worthless — it may actually cause more damage. Don't watch YouTube videos unless they're just working on some fundamental things, or you're very confident that what they're going to show you actually applies to you.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...