Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Zeph

Confessions of a hacker

Note: This thread is 3504 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

51 posts / 15036 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

I knew that because HI of 99.9 doesn't exist if I am correct

Technically, yes. The USGA says that the

HI is supposed to stop at 36.4 for men. If you took an average of 10 hits per hole you'd be roughly a 100 HI. Maybe a first-time player with no practice who kept honest score would post something like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

Last night was a culmination of 3 straight weeks of frustration. I came home from the range and said I was done with golf, not just in a dejected way, but in a "I'm going to put my clubs on Craigslist for $28, first one takes it" kinda way. Watch for my new updated handicap in the coming weeks, it's not gonna be pretty.

P.S. I was mini-gunning balls last night... 120 in 30 minutes. I hate this game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha Zeph you just got major brownie points from me for this thread. Well done.

It's going to be a rude awakening when I play golf for the first time in a year. Albeit, playing golf again is going to be an extremely happy day for me, no matter what the results.

My hacker confession: When you weren't looking, I improved my lie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I can't play golf Every third hole I can; popular scramble partner
I hit 90% of my shots fat 40% fat or thin
I hit the ground with my driver when swinging If I really miss one
I hit my PW 110 yards about right
I can hit my driver 240 yards, but usually 190 and sky-high Misses vary
I hit my 7i 150 yards Try 140
I finish on my toes and fall forward No, I chase ball slightly to left
I chunk when chipping Blade 1 of 10; rest pretty good
I shoot in the 90s Lately yes; pre-2005 broke 90 half the time
I have fun when playing, but want to quit after most rounds or practices Let's not go there!
I swing too long, too hard, too fast I hit overswing streaks about twice a round
I've once broken 90 Actually broke 80 twice - when I was younger
I think I know more about the swing than I really do Really quite knowledgeable; I just can't repeat it consistently
I've gotten rid of my slice, only to exchange it for a hook Can miss either way
I lack most swing fundamentals Pretty good on static parts; gets exciting during swing - timing is biggest problem
I try to hit the ball I get several excellent shots a round; the misses are... just that
I lose balls all the time Varies week by week
I'm not a good short game player, or putter, it just seems so because my long game stinks Most days pretty good; I need those one-putt bogies!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Im so bad that I pick up the ball and quit on at least 12 holes a round. My score card usually looks like this:
X, 7, 7, X, X, 8, X, 5 . . .where X means "too many strokes so I quit or just tossed the ball onto the green and putted"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im so bad that I pick up the ball and quit on at least 12 holes a round. My score card usually looks like this:

Those rounds just suck, they really do, I feel for you man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't play golf But I always look like I can
I hit 90% of my shots fat Thin here
I hit the ground with my driver when swinging Rarely
I hit my PW 110 yards Exactly
I can hit my driver 240 yards, but usually 190 and sky-high I knock satellites out of orbit
I hit my 7i 150 yards Exactly
I finish on my toes and fall forward heels for me
I chunk when chipping I'm 50/50 chunk or thin over the green
I shoot in the 90s most of the time
I have fun when playing, but want to quit after most rounds or practices never thought about quitting, I'm stubborn and swear next time will be better
I swing too long, too hard, too fast working on that problem seriously right now
I've once broken 90 a few times, but not enough
I think I know more about the swing than I really do I have no clue
I've gotten rid of my slice, only to exchange it for a hook but not enough to work on fixing it
I lack most swing fundamentals I'm sure I do also
I try to hit the ball I succeed most of the time
I lose balls all the time even when I see exactly where they went
I'm not a good short game player, or putter, it just seems so because my long game stinks exactly opposite here, short game is the worst

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great list, I totally relate!

I can't play golf Yep. At least not when I'm <100 from the green
I hit 90% of my shots fat Totally. Not really fat, but the kind that takes 10 yards off your irons
I hit the ground with my driver when swinging Actually don't do that. But I miss the sweet spot all the time
I hit my PW 110 yards More like 125, but it's lofted 45*
I can hit my driver 240 yards Embarrassingly, I hit it 275 and still suck at this game
I hit my 7i 150 yards 165 but my seven is lofted low too. Hitting it far is the only thing I can do.
I finish on my toes and fall forward It does happen.
I chunk when chipping Yep.
I shoot in the 90s Average about 95 a round.
I have fun when playing, but want to quit after most rounds or practices I guess I enjoy pain because I keep coming back for more.
I swing too long, too hard, too fast If I had to describe my swing in one sentence it would be this
I've once broken 90 A few times, shot 81 once when I was really hot
I think I know more about the swing than I really do Haha I try not to be that guy but deep down am
I've gotten rid of my slice, only to exchange it for a hook I relate to this more than anything, totally
I lack most swing fundamentals I go past parallel, move my head, sway my hips some. Hogan would disapprove.
I try to hit the ball One of my swing thoughts
I lose balls all the time Every now and then I hit a 50 yard slice into the driving range
I'm not a good short game player, or putter, it just seems so because my long game stinks Other way around for me. Descent long game, at least compared to my short game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have to add:
  • The only club in my bag that I actually don't fear pulling out is my 9i. Anything longer and I might lose control, anything shorter and I fear skulling the ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When people ask my handicap i say: "The clubs". (ooold joke)

However, The range will normally have mats. The mats are very forgiving compared to whatever lie you deal with on the course. Try to practice on the course if you can. This involves mid-week golf! Replace all divots etc. You all know this. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh!

I can't play golf (More frustratingly, I CAN play golf... about once or twice a round.)
I hit 90% of my shots fat (More prone to thin.)
I hit the ground with my driver when swinging (I do this with practice swings more than real swings, oddly.)
I hit my PW 110 yards (120-ish, 48*)
I can hit my driver 240 yards, but usually 190 and sky-high (In the same round, I've hit a 310 and a 40yd pop-up. Sickeningly inconsistent.)
I hit my 7i 150 yards (Round the 160 range)
I finish on my toes and fall forward (Lose my balance back more often than forward.)
I chunk when chipping (Gawd, yes. And blade it right over the green.)
I shoot in the 90s (Not yet.)
I have fun when playing, but want to quit after most rounds or practices (I usually get mad mid-round and finish just strong enough to keep me coming back, hah.)
I swing too long, too hard, too fast (Been getting this under control, lately.)
I've once broken 90 (Not yet.)
I think I know more about the swing than I really do (I think I know exactly jack about my swing, hah.)
I've gotten rid of my slice, only to exchange it for a hook (Vice-versa. Started with a hook, developed a slice, got my hook back.)
I lack most swing fundamentals (Actually, every lesson I've taken has garnered me swing compliments. Yet I still suck.)
I try to hit the ball (Like it owes me money.)
I lose balls all the time (I think I give up too soon. Yay cheap balls. "Nah, that one's gone.")
I'm not a good short game player, or putter, it just seems so because my long game stinks (I've three-putted for par.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to add:

Ive hooked 3 consecutive irons OB from the fairway and the green isn't a difficult green to get to straight in front no danger yet I duck hooked the ball three times coming down the last

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive hooked 3 consecutive irons OB from the fairway and the green isn't a difficult green to get to straight in front no danger yet I duck hooked the ball three times coming down the last

Augh. I did a similar with my 3 wood. Playing 9 at my soon-to-be-former home course, on the second shot at the Par 5 9th I hit a lovely arcing 3w shot directly push-left into the duck pond. Was a lateral hazard, but I wanted to see if I could work the shot out since I wasn't keeping score anyway (One of those early newb rounds where you say 'Screw it' by about hole four.). Popped an identical shot directly into the same duck pond. Giving up on my 3w, I went back to my bag and pulled my usually reliable 22* 5-iron... right into the same duck pond. Wasn't even a BIG duck pond, I think the green was actually a bigger target.

Maddening thing about it, is on the SAME DAY I'd skulled three consecutive shots about ten feet into a creek right in front of me. By the time of the Duck Pond Incident I was pretty sure I was doing it on purpose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you took an average of 10 hits per hole you'd be roughly a 100 HI. Maybe a first-time player with no practice who kept honest score would post something like that.

I play regularly with a couple of caddies from the Augusta National. The story out there is that one time an Englishman came in and had never played golf before and shot the course record of 245. I can't imagine having the patience to see something like that through. At least the caddie got paid for it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically, yes. The USGA says that the

28.0 for men in the UK!

Personally I think the max should be 36 for men and women to allow under the UK CONGU system as well (for up to 2 extra shots on all holes)... but then again I also think the USGA system is much better than the CONGU handicapping system in general.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you took an average of 10 hits per hole you'd be roughly a 100 HI. Maybe a first-time player with no practice who kept honest score would post something like that.

Haha, luckily I'm not quite that bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't imagine having the patience to see something like that through. At least the caddie got paid for it...

Wow. I can't believe either of them had the patience to finish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 3504 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • I thought about this a while, and then had an epiphany last night.  Without a perfect test, the answer is almost definitely no. It's a fairly simple statistical calculation called Bayes' Theorem. The end result is that you'll end up preventing more people from driving when they aren't drunk than preventing drunk drivers. I'm going to plug in numbers, but since I'm (likely correctly!) assuming drunk driving is a rare event, the numbers don't really matter that much. I'm also going to assume the test is extremely accurate. Let's say that in 1/10,000 car trips, the driver is too drunk to legally drive. This is probably an underestimation by a factor of 100, if not more, if you think about how many car trips there are in a day. Let's assume that the when the test is positive, the driver is drunk 99.9% of the time. And then assume that when the test is negative, the driver is sober 99.9% of the time (in other words, if the test is negative, the driver is drunk 0.1% of the time). We can use this to plug in probabilities for each event. Probability that a driver is drunk: .0001 Probability that a driver is sober: .9999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a positive test: .999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a negative test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a positive test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a negative test: .999 Bayes' Theorem applies here. It says: The probability that someone is drunk driver given a positive test is equal to the probability of a drunk driver gets a positive test times the probability of a drunk driver; that divided by the following: the probability of a drunk getting a positive test times probability of a drunk driver plus the probability of sober driver getting a positive test times the probability of a sober driver. In mathematic terms (DD=drunk driver; SD = sober driver; + = positive test): P(DD | +) = (P(+ | DD)*P(DD))/((P+ | DD)*P(DD)+P(+ | SD)*P(SD)) Plug in the numbers: P(DD | +) = ((.999)*(.0001))/((.999)*(.0001)+(.001)*(.9999)) P(DD | +) = .0908 In other words, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 9%. Meaning that out of a 100 people that test positive under this test, 91 of them would actually be sober. Because the test is imperfect and drunk driving is rare, it's going to impact more sober drivers than drunk drivers. Even if the test is 99.99% accurate and as a false positive rate of 0.01%, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 50%. Note that I'm assuming that 1/10,000 car trips is one by a drunk driver. If you assume 1/100,000 car trips are by a drunk driver, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is 0.9%. (You can also use this calculate to find out the odds that a drunk driver will have a negative test, but I have other stuff to do now...) So, without a nearly perfect test, it's a bad idea for the entire population. If drunk drivers were more frequent, then it would make more sense. Hence, it makes sense for someone who is more likely to drive drunk, and why the current policy probably makes sense. 
    • Hey Ben, good to see you’re still around!   I remember those irons. They’re beautiful! Sorry, I can’t help with the driver though…
    • Sometimes this is called a Telehandler, and sometimes its called a Rough Terrain Fork Lift. It all depends on where you live. 
    • Dragging the handle without the correct wrist movements to go with it can lead to an open clubface at impact. But without a video it's hard to determine the underlying cause of your problem.
    • I'd go with this system over either of those. I have seen automatic braking systems malfunction before and it turns catastrophic in an instant. The incredibly unfortunate part is that automatic braking systems also have a disturbingly high number of ways they can be fooled. The two I have seen personally were leaves covering up the sensor (slammed the brakes on someone in town and caused a collision) and bugs from I-70 covering the sensor (the car locked up and the brakes remained engaged until the sensor covering could be cleaned). As far as GPS-enforced speed limits, this also introduces danger on the roads. It prevents drivers from making effective evasive maneuvers when driving at the speed limit. Malfunctions for this system would also be incredibly dangerous, considering the number one cause of traffic accidents is a differential in speed between the two cars that collided. If one car is limited to 10mph under the speed limit because their GPS glitched out then they just became a sitting duck on the road, though not as bad as the automatic braking malfunction. I'm fine with mandatory safety measures that don't risk lives compared to the alternative of not having them, such as seat belts and air bags. If those fail you may die, but if they fail you are no worse off than you would have been if the safety measures were never installed. I draw the line at mandatory safety measures that will actively risk your safety or life when they fail. Automatic braking systems that will slam the brakes in highway traffic. GPS-enforced speed limits that can hamper evasive maneuvers and cause the same symptoms as automatic braking system failures (if an error displays a limit lower than the true limit). And yes, mandatory BAC interlock devices for law-abiding citizens that can leave them stranded and stuck with a very costly repair bill in the best case scenario and death in the worst case scenario. If we want to talk about personal anecdotes about why it's incredibly important to be able to start you vehicle at any time, I've got the perfect example of how this can risk lives in real scenarios that actually happen. When I was 17 I took the bus with my friends down to the annual Denver Avalanche game and we hung out at the 16th Street Mall afterwards until we caught the last bus back to where our cars were parked. Having parked in opposite corners we parted ways getting off the bus and went to our cars, my friends having no issues driving home. I, on the other hand, had some trouble with starting my vehicle. You see that year the temperature was 15 degrees below zero and my car was an old (1979) Mercedes 240D diesel. Diesel engines don't particularly like the cold, so I cycled the glow plugs several times before trying to start. No dice, so I repeated that. This went on until my car battery died at around 2 AM, and the worst part of it was that stupidly I was only wearing jeans, a t-shirt, and a sweatshirt with no jacket or coat. The buses had finished their schedules and the park and ride was empty (I was the last car) in the middle of nowhere without areas I could take shelter nearby. I was lucky to have a mylar blanket and a comforter in the trunk of my car that I kept there only because my Grandpa insisted I'd need them if I was ever stranded in the cold. I wasn't able to get assistance at my location until 5:30 that morning because it was located in the mountain, a lovely cell phone dead zone. 3.5 hours spent in -15 degree weather with only jeans and a sweatshirt. Even sitting in my car without exposure to wind I would have risked frostbite in 30 minutes or less, and that temperature presents a high risk of hypothermia even with proper winter clothing. While wearing winter clothing at that temperature you'll lose one degree of core body temperature about every 30 minutes, sooner if you have no hat. Below 95 degrees (2 hours) is the beginning of hypothermia, below 93 degrees (3 hours) is when amnesia sets in. Profound hypothermia is 90 degrees (4.5 hours) and you'll find yourself no longer even shivering to keep warm. At 86 degrees (6.5 hours) your heart starts to pump arrhythmically. At 85 degrees (7 hours) you'll rip off your clothes for your final minutes of life. Those times are for proper winter clothing. When an ignition interlock device fails, it WILL kill people in the mountains every single year. People who went camping, skiing, hiking, or hunting and get back to their car in the evening only to have it refuse to start. Cell service is sparse at best in these areas, meaning only those prepared with extra blankets/gear and the ability to start fires will survive through the night without heat from their vehicle. I say when, not if, because the failure rate will be above 0%. 15 million new cars are sold each year, and if the failure rate is 0.01% annually then you'd see 1,500 failures in the first year, growing by another 1,500 every year and providing 1,500 more opportunities to kill in either what was described or other scenarios. This is exactly why using emotional arguments is dumb, because realistically the number of deaths would be small but a personal anecdote carries additional weight. The point is that any deaths that directly result from a safety device are unacceptable even if that safety device may save lives in other circumstances. Trading lives of innocent and law-abiding citizens because of a small number of criminals is morally reprehensible on every level.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Edsland
      Edsland
      (65 years old)
    2. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (37 years old)
    3. snowbeast
      snowbeast
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...