Jump to content
IGNORED

The Haney Project: Rush Limbaugh


JetFan1983
Note: This thread is 4318 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by Harmonious

1) My comment about talent was referring to Diane Warren vs. Beyonce.  Had nothing to do with golf instruction.



My point was that talent and success are not related.  Dianne Warren is far, far more talented than Beyoncè, but has far less to show for it.  Jay Graydon is a far better guitar player than Eric Clapton, but who here has heard of him?  Talent does not equal success.  Never has, maybe never will.  Success is in much part based on luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Shanks A Million

My point was that talent and success are not related.  Dianne Warren is far, far more talented than Beyoncè, but has far less to show for it.  Jay Graydon is a far better guitar player than Eric Clapton, but who here has heard of him?  Talent does not equal success.  Never has, maybe never will.  Success is in much part based on luck.


And I am agreeing with you.  Success can sometimes be due in part to being in the right place at the right time, etc.  And, just as likely, success can be due in part to talent.  It depends.  To use your musical background idea, is Stevie Wonder a success because he was talented?  Of course.  Is Lady Gaga?  Not so much. Sorry if I insulted any Lady Gaga fans out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Talent and success probably have a loose correlation, but not a strong one. You generally have to have some talent to be very successful, it's just that the very most, top .01% of the successful is dictated by many factors other than talent. The next top .02-10% of the successful (below the radar to the average public) are often more dictated by talent since the field is larger and popularity much lower (hence fewer politics, etc). Take politics even, members of congress are rarely the most qualified politicians to be there, but if you look at the next step down of politicians, you'll find plenty of more qualified ones. The criteria for filling the top .01% of the successful is just too varied to be dictated by talent alone, but that's different from a lack of correlation between success and talent on the whole. [quote name="Harmonious" url="/forum/thread/36789/the-haney-project-rush-limbaugh/252#post_576193"]


And I am agreeing with you.  Success can sometimes be due in part to being in the right place at the right time, etc.  And, just as likely, success can be due in part to talent.  It depends.  To use your musical background idea, is Stevie Wonder a success because he was talented?  Of course.  Is Lady Gaga?  Not so much. Sorry if I insulted any Lady Gaga fans out there.

[/quote] Hm, actually, I believe you somehow picked a poor example from a sea of good ones. My understanding is that Gaga is actually quite a talented piano player and singer, she just happens to have found niche to fill in the pop music world. But I think you can pick Ke$ha, Black Eyed Peas, or almost anyone else currently at the top of the US Billboard, though, to make your point. :-P

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

It is tough to watch the show. On one hand, it will be the most entertaining. Limbaugh is one of the those guys where, if you're smart, you roll your eyes and not take in anything he says. And he says a lot of words in an entertaining manner.

On the other hand, his fans seem to take him seriously, he thinks he is a great American, a great listener, etc., and knows he is influential. And to put it as nicely as possible,he makes his money by dividing people in a questionable manner and using the type of rhetoric that dehumanizes people he opposes.



Sound like anyone you know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My wife and I enjoy watching golf shows but we've really had to force ourselves with this season's Project. We keep waiting for either instructional value or entertaining personalities, and prior to watching this week's show we'd seen neither. So as we were queueing it up on the DVR to watch it last night I said to my wife, "If he does one more chest thump I swear I am turning it off - you ok with that?" She agreed. Then sure enough, in one of the first scenes of Rush (not flashback/recap because you know you're going to see it there, I'm talking new footage) we get that ridiculous thump. True to my word, I turned it off, deleted the episode, and deleted the rest of the scheduled recordings.

I'm about as much of a conservative as they come, but life's too short to spend time watching this big blowhard.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by sacm3bill

My wife and I enjoy watching golf shows but we've really had to force ourselves with this season's Project. We keep waiting for either instructional value or entertaining personalities, and prior to watching this week's show we'd seen neither. So as we were queueing it up on the DVR to watch it last night I said to my wife, "If he does one more chest thump I swear I am turning it off - you ok with that?" She agreed. Then sure enough, in one of the first scenes of Rush (not flashback/recap because you know you're going to see it there, I'm talking new footage) we get that ridiculous thump. True to my word, I turned it off, deleted the episode, and deleted the rest of the scheduled recordings.

I'm about as much of a conservative as they come, but life's too short to spend time watching this big blowhard.

I found a lot of instructional value in the last episode. Talking about sand shots, fairway bunkers, hitting off tiled lies.

I love the "blowhard" comments lol. Can you think of your own word?


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm am not the biggest Rush fan by any means but I must admit, the dude is funny.  I certainly wasn't expecting that from him which is entertaining.

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Another 30 minutes tonight with Haney and Rush

- no instruction tonight (not a surprise)

- Rush hit some nice shots (not a surprise)

- Rush hit 10 shots in a row with a hybrid on one hole before he got a good one - told Haney that he hit 4 out of bounds (that was a surprise)

- Rush promoted the next show (no surprise)

-- More boring than I expected (SURPRISE)

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by mattshaver

I think the most off-putting thing about the last episode was when Rush was talking about having "multiple orgasms."

He is the last person I want to associate with the word orgasm...


Indeed.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by iacas

I'm tempted to stop watching simply due to the stupid, repeated chest thumping. Does Rush know how dumb that makes him look? Seriously, come up with another move.

But Hank Haney was using a MacBook Pro, so now we're going to try to get a copy of Analyzr Pro to him. ;-)


Yes that is so annoying he is way too old and fat to be acting like frat boy

Driver R7 Superquad NV 55 shaft or Bridgestone J33 460 NV 75 shaft
3 and 5 Wood X
Hybrid original Fli Hi 21* or FT 22*
Irons AP2
Wedges Vokey 52* - 8 , 56* 14, 60*-7Putter California CoranodoBall TP RedGPS NeoRange Finder- Bushnell Tour V2 When Chuck Norris puts spin on the ball, the ball does not...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

Rush shoots 83 with a dozen people watching and filming him in the final episode - wins a membership to The El Dorado in Mexico for shooting under 85.

I think he also got a case of vodka, and a box of his favorite cigars for meeting some personal challenges.

Though Rush is worth hundreds of millions of dollars, it was obvious that he was excited to "win" these paltry trinkets.

I'm glad it is over...waiting to see who they have on next season.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I found the last espisode a lot of fun to watch, it was a lot more entertaining than the ray romano ending with some gift challenges and a lot of light fun going on like the glass pane breakage. also did not have to see hanks wife hovering around a lot for the last couple of espisodes so that was a big plus. there was of course very little golf instructions visible in any of the espisodes. I originally thought I might as a new golfer gleen some instructional data from the espisodes but it was far and few between.  however, recovering from a torn menicus and unable to do any real movement keep me away from the range so I looked to the boob tube way more than I would normally have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 year later...

Just watched all series of the haney project. I Didn't know who some of these people were. Only Knew Barkely and Sugar and Romano and Adam Levine. Enjoyed the show. However i would not want to be coached by a guy who i botched Tiger Woods swing.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4318 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Two things I bring up when it comes to this discussion. One is if you have let's say two towns next to each other, one has a population of 10,000 people and the other has a population of 1,000 people. Let's also say that they never play golf against each other. Only among themselves. In the first town, you have one guy who has won 15 events, then a couple of guys who won 6, a couple who won four and a bunch of people who won three, two and one events. In the second town, you have one guy who won 18 events, then a guy who won 11, a guy who won 9, a guy who won 8, a couple who won 7, a couple who won 3-5 and then a few 2s and a few 1s. Who's the best golfer? It's possible it's the guy who won 18, but it's pretty unlikely. Far more likely to be the guy who won 15 in the much bigger town.  In the same way, I view the fact that there is more parity in the 1990 and onwards world than there was in the pre 1990 world as a plus for Tiger. It's much harder to stand out if the fields are deeper, stronger, better. If there are a handful of players who win all of them, that tends to suggest weakness to me, not strength. The other thing is Ed White. Harvey Penick talked about him in one of his books. Ridiculously good at the game, but no one ever heard of him, because he got a job and didn't play professionally. There was no money in it and he needed security, so he took a job that paid him steadily. No clue how many people there are out there like him, but if he was around today, he'd be playing pro golf for sure. If he had played professionally, Penick sure seemed to think he'd have been one of the best of all time. Fred Haas played him in a college match and got stuffed. 40 years later he walked into Penick's shop and saw Ed White's picture on the wall and, after a full career playing pro golf, he said that Ed White was the best player he ever saw. Those 40 years would presumably have included at least some of Jack. I can see why people might say Jack is the GOAT. I don't agree, but I can at least understand why they say it. IMO there is no argument you can make for anyone other than Tiger to be the BOAT though. At least not yet.
    • A good option is to play the Par 3 courses. after playing an 18 -hole round. The Par 3 courses have 18 holes, we usually played only 9 holes after playing 36 holes on each of the trips we had. You may want to check out Grand National while you're in the middle of Alabama. I enjoyed Oxmoor Valley and Ross Bridge courses which are a short drive north.
    • In August, I am playing the World Am in Myrtle Beach. I do not know which courses yet, but should be a blast. Aside from that, those are the only golf trip plans, unless I play while on vacation in Destin in June.
    • Even on a perfect center hit I was receiving at most 1.48 smash factor. 10 days ago on the warming up for a round my Driver made a weird sound, I checked the bottom and it was cracked. Don't know for how long it was cracked but at least this time the crack was easy visible. Maybe it was already cracked before but with a more subtle crack?.. don't know. I'm waiting for TaylorMade to approve the warranty and send me a new head. I was using the Stealth Plus, I will take the opportunity and upgrade it to the Qi10 LS paying the difference.  On Sunday with my old Titleist 915 and softer balls I was reaching 1.5, even 1.51 on center hits. Test didn't went well. Only gained 2..3 miles, not worth pursuing. Figured out that with a ball and with a target, my path was way to in to out with this new idea, so in order to move the club in the correct path I needed to slow down to redirect the club on the downswing or aim more to the right, close the face a play a big hook.. not possible. I already play a big draw with Driver, more curvature is unplayable. Yesterday at home, with no ball messed around with a more neutral path, even swinging a little out to in. It felt a lot more in sync with the body. With a big in to out path it feels like my hands are working right, away from the body, when the body is working to rotate to the left. With the path to the left is was easier to apply force thru the hitting zone.  As always tested 10 swings with my current swing (A), and 10 with this little out to in path(B).  The difference was huge, like 12 miles faster with swing (B). I knew something wasn't right. The fact was that the PRGR was aligned more in line with the (B) path so it of course was giving higher speeds. I proceeded to align it with the (A) path and tested again 5 more swings each. Again (B) was faster but only by 5 miles. (Made a tiny experiment moving the PRGR to a more extreme in to out path and the swings register 25/30% slower for both swings, so it wasn't reading properly at that angle) Finally I moved the PRGR in the middle of both paths, and this time (B) won by 9 miles. Off course, this was without a ball and a target so.. I will be hitting the range tomorrow to see the real difference.            
    • Wordle 1,032 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 😲
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...