Jump to content
IGNORED

Short Course Handicapping


Boyder
Note: This thread is 3728 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I do most of my playing on a par 62 "executive course". I was wondering if there is a formula for figuring handicap that works with short courses?

Mark Boyd of the Clan Boyd
"Retired in my Dreams"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The course rating is 70.0 and it has a slope rating of 113.

Mark Boyd of the Clan Boyd
"Retired in my Dreams"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


well then there ya go. your course handicap would be 23 since the courses slope and the "average slope" are both 113. Unfortunately there is no way of differentiating between an "executive" course and a regulation course that I'm aware of.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Par 62 with a course rating of 70.0 ? Must be a tough course.

Really hard! Pebble Beach is a par 72 with a rating of 75.5 and the pros have a heck of a time with that course.

OHIO

In my Revolver Bag
R9 460, RIP
R9 TP 3 Wood, Diamana 'ilima 70*Idea Pro Black 20*Titleist AP1 712 4-AW Spin Milled Black Nickel 56.08 & 60.10

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I do believe 70 and 113 are the "standards" that most sites use for courses without a rating, for people who are adding courses into their database. Those numbers caught my eye, as I was adding a local par 3 short course to one of those sites and when they asked for the rating/slope, they said if none, use the standard 70/113. So most likely, it's never been rated and should never be used to figure out a handicap on your own.

What's in my Tartan Precise TS-869 Bag:
Woods: Northwestern 1W, 3W, stock grip
Hybrids: 855 Graphite shaft 3H, 4H, Golf Pride Tour Wrap midsize grips
Irons: 855 R flex steel shaft 5-PW, Golf Pride Tour Wrap midsize grips
Wedges: PureSpin Tour Series Diamond Face 52* AW, 56* SW, 60* LW, Golf Pride...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I do believe 70 and 113 are the "standards" that most sites use for courses without a rating, for people who are adding courses into their database. Those numbers caught my eye, as I was adding a local par 3 short course to one of those sites and when they asked for the rating/slope, they said if none, use the standard 70/113. So most likely, it's never been rated and should never be used to figure out a handicap on your own.

This makes sense ... Thanks!

Mark Boyd of the Clan Boyd
"Retired in my Dreams"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Also, note that for courses under 3000 yards (18 holes) or 1500 yards (9 holes) you can't post for handicap anyway, unless you maintain a separate "short course" handicap.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Also, note that for courses under 3000 yards (18 holes) or 1500 yards (9 holes) you can't post for handicap anyway, unless you maintain a separate "short course" handicap.

All the more reason why I currently have a 99.9 handicap.. aka NONE. Haha... Maybe someday.

What's in my Tartan Precise TS-869 Bag:
Woods: Northwestern 1W, 3W, stock grip
Hybrids: 855 Graphite shaft 3H, 4H, Golf Pride Tour Wrap midsize grips
Irons: 855 R flex steel shaft 5-PW, Golf Pride Tour Wrap midsize grips
Wedges: PureSpin Tour Series Diamond Face 52* AW, 56* SW, 60* LW, Golf Pride...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 3 years later...

I was looking at the short course that I play all the time and the total is 4180 for 18 (2090 for 9) holes and it's a par 68.

There is no slop or rating on the card (I will ask them next time I am there), but what is interesting is that on the back there is a big square that says "Standard Scratch - 60"

So, am I to assume that what they are saying is that if a pro played this course he would score at or below a 60?  Anyone have any way of interpreting the above?  The other day I scored a 74, so that basically means I am a long way away!

8 under as scratch just seems like a lot doesn't it?

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was looking at the short course that I play all the time and the total is 4180 for 18 (2090 for 9) holes and it's a par 68. There is no slop or rating on the card (I will ask them next time I am there), but what is interesting is that on the back there is a big square that says "Standard Scratch - 60" So, am I to assume that what they are saying is that if a pro played this course he would score at or below a 60?  Anyone have any way of interpreting the above?  The other day I scored a 74, so that basically means I am a long way away! 8 under as scratch just seems like a lot doesn't it?

If the course has been rated by the USGA, you will find it here..... http://ncrdb.usga.org/NCRDB/ A course rating of 60 for a course playing less than 4200 yards doesn't strike me as that unusual.

  • Upvote 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If the course has been rated by the USGA, you will find it here..... http://ncrdb.usga.org/NCRDB/ A course rating of 60 for a course playing less than 4200 yards doesn't strike me as that unusual.

Lol,,,, so the course rating is the number of expected strokes a scratch golfer is expected to have? Never knew that.. Thanks!

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If the course has been rated by the USGA, you will find it here.....

http://ncrdb.usga.org/NCRDB/

A course rating of 60 for a course playing less than 4200 yards doesn't strike me as that unusual.

The old rule of thumb used to be divide the yardage by 200 and add 38.25.  So a 4200 yard course would be estimated at 21 + 38.25 so you are right, 60 doesn't sound like a bad estimate.  This was back in the days where there was no slope and the 96% factor was only 85%.

Yeah, I AM that old. ;-)

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

Bumping this up rather than starting a new thread.

There's this executive course in my area named Hiawatha Trails in Guilderland, NY which has a Par 57 and 2331 yards.  The course is all par 3's except for 3 holes that are par 4's.

I've been trying to get the CR/Slope for this course but most sites have it listed as CR: 90 / Slope: 100.

I've played this course a few times and am nowhere near scratch and shot under 90 so my thoughts are that the CR/Slope can't be correct.

I found one site that had it listed as CR: 57 / Slope: 75.

Thoughts?

FWIW: http://ncrdb.usga.org/NCRDB/ doesn't have the course listed.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
@RFKFREAK , sounds to me like the course has never been rated.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Bumping this up rather than starting a new thread.

There's this executive course in my area named Hiawatha Trails in Guilderland, NY which has a Par 57 and 2331 yards.  The course is all par 3's except for 3 holes that are par 4's.

I've been trying to get the CR/Slope for this course but most sites have it listed as CR: 90 / Slope: 100.

I've played this course a few times and am nowhere near scratch and shot under 90 so my thoughts are that the CR/Slope can't be correct.

I found one site that had it listed as CR: 57 / Slope: 75.

Thoughts?

FWIW: http://ncrdb.usga.org/NCRDB/ doesn't have the course listed.

18 hole courses must be a minimum of 3000 yards to be rated


13. What is the minimum yardage of a golf course to have a USGA
Course Rating and Slope Rating?


In order to qualify for a USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating, a
course must have a minimum of 3,000 yards for 18 holes (1,500
yards for nine holes), and must have one long hole as follows:

A. For any combination of nine holes, there must be at least one hole
that requires a woman scratch golfer to hit a shot greater than 210
yards.

B. For any combination greater than nine holes, there must be at least
two holes that require a woman scratch golfer to hit a shot greater
than 210 yards.

When a golf course is shorter than this length, the basic assumptions
in the USGA Course Rating System no longer hold true, and the
formula for converting the effective playing length into strokes fails.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3728 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...