• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
LongballGer

Quick question about head movement in the S&T swing...

14 posts in this topic

Hi all,

Quick question concerning the downswing.

Is it okay for the head to move left (towards the target) or should it be completely stationary the whole way through? When I keep it stationary it seems like my weight is stuck in the middle instead of 90% on my left foot at impact. When I transfer my weight the head and the sternum automatically move forward which enables me to really trap the ball. However I also watched a vid of charlie wi and his head barely moves towards the target on the downswing. It seems to not move in any direction during his swing. Isn´t it impossible to transfer your weight towards your front foot without moving your head and sternum as well?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

The head can move a little forward, but not too much. Ideally it should stay pretty stationary. The hips is what cause the weight to move forward. By moving the hips you also move parts of the leg and stomach to of course, but the head should not follow forward with the hips. You can't transfer all the weight over to the left foot without moving the head, but we are not looking for 100% weight shift, it's more 90% at impact. Emulating Charlie Wi on head movement is a good start. The weight is a part of the big picture, but without proper hand action, you can still hit it fat. Weight forward makes it easier, but you still need to retain the lag and get the forward leaning shaft at impact, which comes from a different part of the swing (hands and arms). Moving the head forward may feel good when you hit the ball first, but I would recommend you work on keeping the head still, moving the hips forward and do some work on the hands and holding the flying wedges.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Zeph answered it.

Head going forward also inhibits proper secondary axis tilt. Club can get stuck in the ground (not necessarily literally, but sometimes).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades


Originally Posted by Zeph

The head can move a little forward, but not too much. Ideally it should stay pretty stationary.

The hips is what cause the weight to move forward. By moving the hips you also move parts of the leg and stomach to of course, but the head should not follow forward with the hips.

You can't transfer all the weight over to the left foot without moving the head, but we are not looking for 100% weight shift, it's more 90% at impact. Emulating Charlie Wi on head movement is a good start.

The weight is a part of the big picture, but without proper hand action, you can still hit it fat. Weight forward makes it easier, but you still need to retain the lag and get the forward leaning shaft at impact, which comes from a different part of the swing (hands and arms). Moving the head forward may feel good when you hit the ball first, but I would recommend you work on keeping the head still, moving the hips forward and do some work on the hands and holding the flying wedges.



Agree with the above. One of my (many) problems trying to adopt the S&T; method was my misinterpretation of "weight forward" to mean a large upper body move toward the target. What helped me was keeping the head and upper body centered and striving for the "butt tucked" finish. I found in the off season that by striving for the proper finish had my hips moving forward properly on the downswing. I added distance and mucho height to my ball flight with proper extension. Contact has become much more consistent as well and far less fat/thin shots by attempting to hold onto the flying wedge.

Dave's video helped me a ton!!

edit: added video

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very helpful thread.  This is what I need to be doing too.  On the downswing slide those hips forward but keep the head back.  Would it be correct to say it's a "reverse c"?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be correct. Though it must not be mistaken with the more commonly known reverse C with the weight too far back, which is not something you want. That position is usually a result of the head being too far back. Good: [img]http://www.golfdigest.com/images/instruction/2007/09/insl05_stacktilt.jpg[/img] The S&T; reverse C is created by the feet and head staying still while the hips move forward, at no point should the head move backwards or forwards in the downswing. On the follow through at to the finish, the head can move a bit forward, which it probably will from the momentum, but try not to get the head over the left foot at the finish. If you can ingrain keeping the head where it is from start to finish, it's easier to work with and control.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by Zeph

That would be correct. Though it must not be mistaken with the more commonly known reverse C with the weight too far back, which is not something you want. That position is usually a result of the head being too far back.

Good:

The S&T; reverse C is created by the feet and head staying still while the hips move forward, at no point should the head move backwards or forwards in the downswing. On the follow through at to the finish, the head can move a bit forward, which it probably will from the momentum, but try not to get the head over the left foot at the finish. If you can ingrain keeping the head where it is from start to finish, it's easier to work with and control.



This is a move where Foley is different from S&T.; Foley wants you to be standing almost straight up on the finish. He teaches this on the videos I have as well, its a move that really makes his swing not look like a carbon copy of S&T; with his players.

foley.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by motteler621

This is a move where Foley is different from S&T.; Foley wants you to be standing almost straight up on the finish. He teaches this on the videos I have as well, its a move that really makes his swing not look like a carbon copy of S&T; with his players.


Without getting into too much detail, that's part of the thing his players struggle with as well, because Sean doesn't really seem to understand the downswing as well as some S&T; guys (including me) wish he would. Tiger's improved here but not as much as he really should with that piece. I don't know that they've worked on his downswing at all, really, except not letting his head go to the RIGHT, which was likely cleaned up more from the backswing pieces than anything.

Additionally, we don't much care if your head drifts forward from P8 onward, and technically we don't care if it goes forward starting at P7.1... the problem is that if you want to feel your head going forward, it's going to start much sooner than you think.

The shoulders should continue to swing in a circle, and Foley's more upright finish disrupts that circle, and likely a LOT earlier than most people realize.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks to everyone that replied so far.

I worked on keeping the head stationary today, but the result was that I was hitting everything fat. I had a good lateral shift with my hips and my upper body wasn´t tilted too far back at impact so I don´t understand why I´m still hitting it fat. My arm and hand action is also fine since I maintain a lot of lag coming down. My backswing is also good. Any thoughts why I´m still hitting it fat?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by iacas

Quote:

Originally Posted by motteler621

This is a move where Foley is different from S&T.; Foley wants you to be standing almost straight up on the finish. He teaches this on the videos I have as well, its a move that really makes his swing not look like a carbon copy of S&T; with his players.

Without getting into too much detail, that's part of the thing his players struggle with as well, because Sean doesn't really seem to understand the downswing as well as some S&T; guys (including me) wish he would. Tiger's improved here but not as much as he really should with that piece. I don't know that they've worked on his downswing at all, really, except not letting his head go to the RIGHT, which was likely cleaned up more from the backswing pieces than anything.

Additionally, we don't much care if your head drifts forward from P8 onward, and technically we don't care if it goes forward starting at P7.1... the problem is that if you want to feel your head going forward, it's going to start much sooner than you think.

The shoulders should continue to swing in a circle, and Foley's more upright finish disrupts that circle, and likely a LOT earlier than most people realize.



yea I understand the geometry behind what S&T; teaches to keep the circle even well after impact because people can come out the the circle alot earlier than is desired. I dont disagree with teaching people this but I think Foley teaches a more natural finish to the swing, check out hunter mayhan below. Hunter still has kept the circle well after impact so it doesnt look like its effecting him much.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone that replied so far.

I worked on keeping the head stationary today, but the result was that I was hitting everything fat. I had a good lateral shift with my hips and my upper body wasn´t tilted too far back at impact so I don´t understand why I´m still hitting it fat. My arm and hand action is also fine since I maintain a lot of lag coming down. My backswing is also good. Any thoughts why I´m still hitting it fat?

Can't say for sure without video, but I will make a guess that you are either not getting the weight far enough forward, able to hold the lag through the downswing (casting) or a combination of the two. There are of course lots of components that can affect the impact position, a video is usually the best place to start.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I figured it out. I just reread parts of the S&T; book and my problem is that I´m not actively pulling my arms down from the top of the backswing position. I mistakenly thought you didn´t have to since you don´t actively lift them during the backswing.

Taken straight from the book: "If your hands don´t start moving downward from the start, you´ll tend to drop your right shoulder to get the club down to the ball...The problem with that is that it shifts the shoulder center back."

Quote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongballGer

Thanks to everyone that replied so far.

I worked on keeping the head stationary today, but the result was that I was hitting everything fat. I had a good lateral shift with my hips and my upper body wasn´t tilted too far back at impact so I don´t understand why I´m still hitting it fat. My arm and hand action is also fine since I maintain a lot of lag coming down. My backswing is also good. Any thoughts why I´m still hitting it fat?

Can't say for sure without video, but I will make a guess that you are either not getting the weight far enough forward, able to hold the lag through the downswing (casting) or a combination of the two. There are of course lots of components that can affect the impact position, a video is usually the best place to start.



0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by motteler621

yea I understand the geometry behind what S&T; teaches to keep the circle even well after impact because people can come out the the circle alot earlier than is desired. I dont disagree with teaching people this but I think Foley teaches a more natural finish to the swing

If by "more natural" you mean "more likely to disrupt the geometry" then sure, yeah, Foley teaches that on the downswing. Yippee. :-P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by motteler621

yea I understand the geometry behind what S&T; teaches to keep the circle even well after impact because people can come out the the circle alot earlier than is desired. I dont disagree with teaching people this but I think Foley teaches a more natural finish to the swing, check out hunter mayhan below. Hunter still has kept the circle well after impact so it doesnt look like its effecting him much.

Well, not really.  The SnT finish is meant to look that way or "planned".  As an example, Hunter Mahan doesn't keep pushing his hips forward (along the circle) long enough and isn't extending as well as he could be (better extension would keep his head more stable viewed FO).  Because of this the inclination is somewhat "faked" in the early part of the follow through (he adds side tilt manually more than it being "put in" by the forward).  I would say it is proven by the fact that he can't stick the finish in his inclination and ends more vertical, ala Foley.  And btw I'm not at all saying Mahan and many of Foley's players don't playing great golf...they do.  I'm just saying that it is NOT "more natural". It may be more comfortable but there is a difference.  We play with bent clubs with the ball on the ground...the most natural way to do things would be to adhere to what is "forced" on us by the setup itself.  The more vertical, Foley taught finish would be natural and perfect if the ball were on a 5 ft. tee.

Dave

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Some background information before you vote... I run a weekly game on Saturdays and Sundays with anywhere from 8-12 guys. Handicaps in my group range anywhere from 1 to 16. Expected pace of play at my course is right at 4 hours. Anything more and its frowned upon. We do not get the earliest tee times of 8am, because the course does me a favor by allowing me to have standing tee times without having to call every week. We have 9:00-9:10-9:20 every weekend.  This morning we had 7 guys, so I sent off a 3some (me included) and the last 4 guys to follow. On the 3rd hole I noticed that there was a 2some in front of us on 4 tee, and one of the guys took 5 practice swings just to top his driver maybe 4 feet. It was still on the tee box. He reteed and pulled one about 60 yards left. No biggie, golf is hard no matter how good or bad you are.  The 2some was not very good, so they were having a hard time keeping  up with the 4some in front of them. I texted the assistant pro (close buddy) in the pro shop and he came out and asked the 2some to try and keep pace or let our 3some through. We waited on every shot on 4-5-6 and finally on 7 green we hurried to the 8th tee only for them to look back at us then drive off. The issue was they were waiting for the 4some to get on the green before they would tee off, and then come nowhere close to hitting it 200 yards. On the 9th tee I finally said, "hey guys, do you mind if we play through? We will get through that 4some no problem and you wont see us again" They said sorry, but the 4some is not allowing them to play faster and that they couldnt let us through. At that point I said, you're a 2some, and 2 hours for 9 holes is not on pace. You need to push the guys in front of you so they know to let people through.  At the turn the assistant pro let us through, and we played through the 4some on 11 without them missing a beat. Ended up playing in 2 hours and 55 mins, even with the hold up (all three of us shot sub 80 rounds). After the round I thank the assistant pro for allowing us to play through, and mentioned that 2 hours for a 2some was not on pace. He told me that they complained that I was pressuring them to push the group in front of them, and that he was a tennis member who they would like to join as a golf member. The assistant pro said he has been giving one of them lessons, and that 2 hours probably should be their pace. I replied with " I have no problem with anyone shooting 120 on a Sunday morning, golf is golf, but when there is a faster group behind its golf courtesy to let them through"  I dont really care what they think, and honestly if they can get around in less than 4 hours Id be glad to have them play in my weekly game. Was I wrong for pushing a group of not very good golfers?  
    • Fired up the smoker and plan to watch in about 35 minutes.  Can't wait to see this match go down.  My money is on Rory, but we shall see.........   @natureboy - How about that 133 YARD ;) wedge shot yesterday into the elevated green with the pin placement in the front.  Mortals wouldn't have a chance at that pin....
    • Not a smart bet IMO.  Just for the fact that Spieth plays so well at the Masters.  I would take that bet on all the major excluding the Masters.  No one in their right mind would bet against Spieth at the masters, 2nd, 1st and 2nd place finishes in his last 3 attempts.  Just saying.....  I believe he will win another Major, @ the Masters.  
    • Yes, some ranges with limited space use "restricted flight" balls that don't fly nearly as far as regular golf balls (60% sounds about right).
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dresilved
      Dresilved
      (51 years old)
    2. kpetrina
      kpetrina
      (24 years old)
    3. Luana
      Luana
      (38 years old)
  • Blog Entries