Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5382 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

How would you guys say they compare?   Forgiveness, distance, Looks, etc.  I've have hit the JPX-800 pro bus not the MP-53s.  I seem to be striking my irons better & might be looking to upgrade irons, but I also do not want to purchase clubs that are above my skill level.   Sometimes you don't get a true feel just from hitting a club a few times in store.

Thanks for any info!


In my clicgear.gif 2.0 Push Cart and callaway.gifgolf bag are - 

 

 Z-Star driver 10.5  Mashie 3 and 7 metals  Mashie 4 hyrbird  Z-Star 4-PW Irons  cleveland.gifCG Black 48, 52, 56 degree wedges  GoLo putter  upro mx+ gps


Posted

If you hit the JPX irons in the store into a net, I would brace yourself and then hit them where you can see the ball flight.

Not to sound like a moron, but I would forget the 53's unless you plan on getting your handicap down to 10 or so. They have a great reputation and are remarkable clubs, but not forgiving as they are a player's iron.

I have hit the JPX 800's irons and the JPX pros, 53's, 58's, and the blades. I bought 58's last fall.

As a general rule, the less forgiving the club, the shorter you will hit it since your ball flight will be lower and you won't get the same carry.

Initially, I didn't see that you had the JPX 800's and was going to recommend that you try them. Since you have them, I would play another season with them and cut a few strokes off your handicap. Otherwise, you are in danger of getting a club that will be frustrating as he{{ to play.

  • Upvote 1

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts


Posted

Thank you for all the feedback. I'm just to stick with the JPX-800s that I have


In my clicgear.gif 2.0 Push Cart and callaway.gifgolf bag are - 

 

 Z-Star driver 10.5  Mashie 3 and 7 metals  Mashie 4 hyrbird  Z-Star 4-PW Irons  cleveland.gifCG Black 48, 52, 56 degree wedges  GoLo putter  upro mx+ gps


Posted

Hope all of this wasn't too intense for feedback. But, the clubs you have are truly great clubs - way better than the clubs I replaced last fall.

The good news: spring is fast approaching and with it all the joys and sorrows of golf!

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts


  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hello,

I've bought the JPX Pro (3-PW) with S300.

I think they a really nice for low to mid handicapers (7-18).

They are forgiving, but give also a good and remarkable feedback if you don't hit the ball in the sweetspot.

I really emphazie these clubs in the above mentioned handicap range.

If you are <6 I would definitly go to MP-53 or better MP-63, but you have to be a ball striker.

Andreas

  • Upvote 1

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Ive demo'd them both and to be completely honest didnt notice a lot of difference between the two clubs.   They both have very little offset which is nice but the JPX have a little bit thicker top line which isnt as pretty to my eye.   I find the forgiveness to be negligable though obviously the JPX pro is more fogiving as its a slightly larger head.  The JPX pros also fly a little farther due to the slightly stronger loft and the lighter stock shaft.   I think if you have a enough game to play the JPX pros then the MP 53's should not be too much club.  To me it all comes down to looks and the 53's are a very pretty club


Posted

When I demoed (and subsequently bought) the JPX800 pros I didn't even have a hit of the MP53's. My reasoning was that if PGA pro's (and there are 3 guys on tour using them iirc) can use the 800 pros then why do I need less forgiving and harder to hit clubs than them. Get the JPX800's, I have gone from 17 to 13 in 2 months since I bought them. They are seriously awesome clubs. Getting fit for the right shaft and lie is crucial so make sure that is 100% correct before you pull the trigger.

Driver: :tmade: R1 S 10 degree Wood: :ping: G20 3W Hybrid: :nike:Covert Pro 3H
Irons: :tmade: Rocketbladez Tour 4i-AW KBS S SW: :cleveland: CG15 54 degree
LW: :cleveland: CG15 58 degree Putter: :tmade: Corza Ghost Ball: :tmade: Penta


Posted


Originally Posted by k14

When I demoed (and subsequently bought) the JPX800 pros I didn't even have a hit of the MP53's. My reasoning was that if PGA pro's (and there are 3 guys on tour using them iirc) can use the 800 pros then why do I need less forgiving and harder to hit clubs than them. Get the JPX800's, I have gone from 17 to 13 in 2 months since I bought them. They are seriously awesome clubs. Getting fit for the right shaft and lie is crucial so make sure that is 100% correct before you pull the trigger.



Just throwing this out there, but all things being equal, I'd go with the irons that make me want to go golfing every tiime I see them. The ones I can't pass by without taking one and making a few swings. If your JPX whatevers do that, fill your boots. Personally, I'd have gone for the MP-53s.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Im sorry if this comes across as a bit harsh but as an 17 handicap, Id say you have no business even thinking about MPs.  Stick with the 800 Pros and when you get down to single digits, then and only then consider a set of MPs.  MPs are great irons but you have to hit them flush and you need to know what youre doing.  They dont offer you much help and wont mask your swing faults.

At your level you might even be pushing the limits of your swing with the 800 Pros.  You might want to consider just the standard JPX-800s. They arent forged but they will be a little bit easier to hit than the 800 Pros.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted



Yeah, the 63 is the one I was thinking of. 63 or 62.

Originally Posted by andfri

Hello,

I've bought the JPX Pro (3-PW) with S300.

I think they a really nice for low to mid handicapers (7-18).

They are forgiving, but give also a good and remarkable feedback if you don't hit the ball in the sweetspot.

I really emphazie these clubs in the above mentioned handicap range.

If you are <6 I would definitly go to MP-53 or better MP-63, but you have to be a ball striker.

Andreas



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 5382 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.