Jump to content
IGNORED

Long Putters and Belly Putters Taking Over


Note: This thread is 3381 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Originally Posted by JetFan1983

I noticed Michelle Wie is rocking a belly putter today (although she uses it more like a conventional putter with a cross-handed grip). How long has she been using one?


She had it at the Canadian Open. Pretty sure she had it before then.

She runs it up her left arm IIRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Agreed. That train left the station long ago. Really, there are two practical choices at this point: If you're convinced it's a clear advantage, suck up your aesthetic objections and play one yourself

Comon man - the long putter anchored to your chin is clearly a different tool than a conventional putter.    The stroke is different, the anchoring of it is different ... they simply should not be all

I don't think that's the only sensible reason. How about this: it's not the way golf is to be played. If you developed the yips and you could putt as poorly/as well as the 150th ranked p



Originally Posted by GolfSteady

I'm all for whatever will grow the game.  I do think the belly putter takes pushing and pulling out of play.  Which is HUGE.  You still have to have the right line and speed.



How exactly are belly putters growing the game? I never seen anybody using one locally. Allowing walkers/caddies or riders might grow the game, but belly putters? Okly dokly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, scores must be dipping into the mid-50's with the amazing advantage given by the long putters?

Nope.

Everyone must keep a really long one in their bag for relief purposes because they are so long!

Nope.

Egads!

The principle complaint seems to be 'they look ridiculous', and the complainers are too self-conscious to try it out themselves so they demonize it.

I use a 48" two grip putter right now, and I like it.  Some days I putt better with it, some days I putt better with my old newport 2.  I like being able to stand up at address (back issues) and personally it lets me see my lines a bit better because I have a better vantage point rather than being hunched over and having to turn my head to see the hole.

It has been brought up many times: if belly/broom putters are wrecking the PGA tour, then the putting stats should all be topped by them. But they aren't, and they don't.  It's just a preference.  The only legitimate complaint I see is the hazard relief complaint.  And to that I say, just slap a 48" limit on all clubs.  That keeps it fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Originally Posted by bustaone

The principle complaint seems to be 'they look ridiculous', and the complainers are too self-conscious to try it out themselves so they demonize it.


I don't think that's been the "principle" complaint at all. That may be why some people choose not to use them, but speaking for myself and more than a few others, the principle complaint is more to with the fact that the game of golf was not intended to be played by anchoring something to our bellies or chests. It's a strong or weak argument, depending on the side you're on, but "it looks ridiculous" isn't the top complaint, not from where I'm sitting.

Originally Posted by bustaone

It has been brought up many times: if belly/broom putters are wrecking the PGA tour, then the putting stats should all be topped by them. But they aren't, and they don't.  It's just a preference.  The only legitimate complaint I see is the hazard relief complaint.  And to that I say, just slap a 48" limit on all clubs.  That keeps it fair.

It's "fair" right now because everyone can use them. Your rule is more "unfair" than the rule now because you're preventing a taller person from putting the exact same way you putt now. How would a 6'5" guy putt the same way as Ian Woosnam if Woosie used a 48" putter? He couldn't. That'd be more "unfair" than the current rules.

And the point to me has nothing to do with PGA Tour stats. Belly putters aren't racing to the tops of the putting stats.

To try an analogy, belly putters are to putting what bumpers are to bowling. Just imagine if a bunch of bowlers said "I've got the yips, and once out of every ten first balls I throw, I just throw it right in the gutter!" So they put bumpers in, because it makes it just a little easier for some bowlers not to throw a gutter ball with their first throw in a frame. The regular bowlers, the ones who don't have the yips, never throw the ball in the gutter anyway, so it does nothing to affect them.

That's similar to what we see in golf. It has helped turn poor putters into average putters. It's let guys who can't perform a required part of the game get "decent enough" that they can now compete. Yet they're competing by, in my opinion, doing something that's not very "golf-like" by anchoring something to their body.

And now we're seeing people who may be average putters with a short putter using the belly putter because that's what they've known for a while now. They might be better putters with shorter putters, who knows... Maybe if they start to struggle with the long putter they'll switch to short ones, like Stewart Cink.

How much do I really care? Eh, not a lot.

But I'm not on the PGA Tour and I'm not competing against guys who are doing something that I consider "not the way golf is played." If I was, and these are guys I was beating, but since they're no longer crappy putters and are instead simply average, I might be a little upset.

Other sports have rules that protect the way the game is played. I think golf's ruling bodies slightly missed the boat on this one. I think they could still ban them, but they'd suffer horribly , and I'm not sure it's worth it. Then again, I don't really care that much. Others are more fervent than I.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by iacas

I don't think that's been the "principle" complaint at all. That may be why some people choose not to use them, but speaking for myself and more than a few others, the principle complaint is more to with the fact that the game of golf was not intended to be played by anchoring something to our bellies or chests. It's a strong or weak argument, depending on the side you're on, but "it looks ridiculous" isn't the top complaint, not from where I'm sitting.

It's "fair" right now because everyone can use them. Your rule is more "unfair" than the rule now because you're preventing a taller person from putting the exact same way you putt now. How would a 6'5" guy putt the same way as Ian Woosnam if Woosie used a 48" putter? He couldn't. That'd be more "unfair" than the current rules.

And the point to me has nothing to do with PGA Tour stats. Belly putters aren't racing to the tops of the putting stats.

To try an analogy, belly putters are to putting what bumpers are to bowling. Just imagine if a bunch of bowlers said "I've got the yips, and once out of every ten first balls I throw, I just throw it right in the gutter!" So they put bumpers in, because it makes it just a little easier for some bowlers not to throw a gutter ball with their first throw in a frame. The regular bowlers, the ones who don't have the yips, never throw the ball in the gutter anyway, so it does nothing to affect them.

Reading through this thread, I remember the 'looks' complaint coming up more often than anything else.  I should probably go back and tally, but that seems a little over the top.

You're right though, imposing a length limit would not be fair to the tall people.  Simply excluding the putter from being used for hazard relief is probably the most safe (and only needed) fix.

I don't think that your "bumper" analogy has any basis here though, really.  I find that, personally, I putt similarly with both my long and short putters.  I find it a little easier to line up with the long one due to standing well over the ball rather than really close (some people I have heard make the opposite observation; that being closer to the ball makes it easier to line up).  That and  my back are the two 'benefits' I get, but neither are a competitive advantage.  Then again, I'm not a particularly good putter in the first place.  But despite my poor putting, I never just wail the ball in a random direction.  My misses are usually due to misreading the slope or speed of a green.

I think that cross grip putting is just as 'against the way golf is intended' as a long putter.  No other club is cross gripped so it should not be allowed, right?  But what about center-shafted putters?  There are no other clubs in the bag that are center-shafted so it should also not be allowed?

It mostly comes down to style, and we all know how 'styles' change over time.  I think it's pretty cool how much variety there are in putters though.  And with all that variety, there still seems to be no clear-cut best way of doing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Originally Posted by bustaone

I think that cross grip putting is just as 'against the way golf is intended' as a long putter.  No other club is cross gripped so it should not be allowed, right?  But what about center-shafted putters?  There are no other clubs in the bag that are center-shafted so it should also not be allowed?


Gripping the clubs cross-handed is the same as anchoring a club to your body? Not even close, dude.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

Been months since I've been on.  Need to stir thing up again. This time I am wondering were the opinions fall concerning the long putter.  I haven't looked up the rule about anchoring a club to your body but if that is the rule than how can they be legal?  Golfers seem to have the "our sport is a sport of gentlemen, with strict compliance to the rules" attitude. If so, how have long putters circumvented that rule?? Can anyone clarify the rule?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link to the older tread.  I want to talk mainly about golfers and their following of the rules.  If the long putters are better or worse for someone is strictly a matter of opinion and good arguments can be made either way.  I want to know more about the "anchor" the club to your body rule.  Golfers call 'fouls"   ( I use the word foul) because you can't "call a penalty" a penalty is the punishment for the foul,   on themselves all the time in competition.  So are they breaking a rule or not? It shouldn't be that complex. Any answers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now as I understand it, there is no rule to prevent one from anchoring the putter to their body.  There is a rather lengthy thread on here somewhere (started by iacas if I recall correctly) about whether or not they should be banned, and if so how to go about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hi everyone:

I'm brand new to this board...a refugee left at the curb when the Golf Channel reneged on its promise of creating a "new and improved" discussion board...then eliminated the entire thing instead!

Anyway, this looks like a very nice place to call my golf discussion home -and I've been thirsting for good on-line golf discourse for quite some time...

that said the issue at hand is the belly putter...I just purchased a new putter adaptor to try on my existing putter because when I fooled around with a putter too long for me and made believe it was a belly putter I essentially couldn't miss!!

Is it legal?  Well a fundamentalist interpretation of "anchoring" the club would say "no"

But economic reality may win out as the mania for this putter grows with every Sunday's PGA winner wielding one!

That's an awful lot of $$$ for OEMs to turn their back upon-especially during these difficult economic times ...and all of them are now introducing belly and long putter lines for the holiday gift season!

Methinks that the objections will eventually subside as more players young and old find success with the innovation...it may be something akin to those who objected to hybrids and dimpled golfballs in the past...LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator


Originally Posted by stogiesnbogies

Hi everyone:

I'm brand new to this board...a refugee left at the curb when the Golf Channel reneged on its promise of creating a "new and improved" discussion board...then eliminated the entire thing instead!

Anyway, this looks like a very nice place to call my golf discussion home -and I've been thirsting for good on-line golf discourse for quite some time...

that said the issue at hand is the belly putter...I just purchased a new putter adaptor to try on my existing putter because when I fooled around with a putter too long for me and made believe it was a belly putter I essentially couldn't miss!!

Is it legal?  Well a fundamentalist interpretation of "anchoring" the club would say "no"

But economic reality may win out as the mania for this putter grows with every Sunday's PGA winner wielding one!

That's an awful lot of $$$ for OEMs to turn their back upon-especially during these difficult economic times ...and all of them are now introducing belly and long putter lines for the holiday gift season!

Methinks that the objections will eventually subside as more players young and old find success with the innovation...it may be something akin to those who objected to hybrids and dimpled golfballs in the past...LOL


I think for the right person it can definitely help.  But I don't think it's illegal, there is no "guarantee" you're going to make a perfect stroke.  You can still "yip" a belly or long putter.  And there is so much more to putting, reading the slope, getting the right speed, aiming, etc.  The game is hard enough already lol.

Guys are alway trying something new and are just like us, if someone in your group is hitting it longer with so and so driver the other guys are going to check it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by nleary9201

Been months since I've been on.  Need to stir thing up again. This time I am wondering were the opinions fall concerning the long putter.  I haven't looked up the rule about anchoring a club to your body but if that is the rule than how can they be legal?  Golfers seem to have the "our sport is a sport of gentlemen, with strict compliance to the rules" attitude. If so, how have long putters circumvented that rule?? Can anyone clarify the rule?

What rule? I am assuming that you looked up the Rules of Golf. There is nothing to clarify.

Once again, in golf, we have a situation where a consensus begins to exist because of perceptions about a "rule". In this case, it stems from the word "anchoring" or "anchored" or "anchor".

People read this word often enough in golf forums and assume that there is some rule that prevents a club being "anchored" to the body. It sounds even more official when the word "deemed" is thrown in there.

Problem is, there is no such rule. No rule is being broken.

There is debate about what constitutes a swing, but as far as rules about clubs being "anchored" no such rule exists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to agree with your assessment...I think that the governing bodies of golf will probably leave the belly putter alone...afterall aren't they fresh off of changing the groove rules?

That's enough meddling for a decade or so.   :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just think its a little funny that golf seems to pride itself on being a game where the purists pride themselves on adhering to the rules no matter what, and all of a sudden when something seems to help their game there isn't much of an outcry if a rule is being broken or not. Someone please clairfy  this. What does the rule in question say?  If there isn't a rule, then why is everyone talking about it?  Come on golf and golfers, figure it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Originally Posted by nleary9201

Just think its a little funny that golf seems to pride itself on being a game where the purists pride themselves on adhering to the rules no matter what, and all of a sudden when something seems to help their game there isn't much of an outcry if a rule is being broken or not. Someone please clairfy  this. What does the rule in question say?  If there isn't a rule, then why is everyone talking about it?  Come on golf and golfers, figure it out.

People have already answered your questions. Specifically, there's no rule about "anchoring," but some feel it's in violation of the spirit of the game or the way it was intended to be played.

This thread's being merged now.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3381 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjan21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • I'm inviting Annika and Gary to my house for cocktails and the Medal of Bad Timing.
    • Oh brother. RL has a measure of control over some of those things, and very little to no control over some of the others. It’d be hypocritical if their CEO said something like what JT did and faced no repercussions, but they fired JT for saying it. See above. RL has won awards for their support of the LGBTQ in the world.
    • I can see how, if you think they should have refused the medals, you think it would have been okay to cancel the ceremony. But surely you can see how, if it’s okay to accept the medals, canceling the ceremony would have been stupid. First of all, presumably they traveled up to DC the day before, so now they flew in for nothing. And again, neither Gary nor Annika did anything “wrong.” So why should they cancel the ceremony. That’d be like Lucy pulling the football away from Charlie Brown. Also, why no media? Because I’m pretty sure most of them were busy covering things down the street. Let’s avoid the political commentary, too, please. Obama gave out over a hundred of these things. I’m sure you could find some stinkers in there, too. Bill Cosby has one, after all (from Clinton I believe). P.S. Again, I just don’t buy the idea that two people, neither of which (to our knowledge) have done anything “bad” really, should willingly give up an award that is not exactly handed out lightly. Had they beers given the award a week prior, should they have had to give them back? If so, how about everyone else who got this award from Trump at any point in his presidency. Should Tiger have to give his back? And isn’t it possibly true that they could have used the time they had with Trump to speak their mind to him, and that perhaps they did so? I’m fine with what Coach Hoodie did, just as I’m fine with what Annika/Gary did. But, I can separate the “I earned this award,” and “That guy is terrible.” They’re different things to me.
    • I don't know the truth to it, because I haven't looked into it myself, but there is lots of talk that RL manufactures their products in places that have openly anti-gay governments, even to the point of outlawing being gay. For them to drop a player for a comment he made to himself including an anti-gay slur, and then go and exploit labor in countries that are truly awful would be hypocrisy on the highest order, and not the right move at all.
    • Look, I am not dead set against these 2 getting a medal, although I think their accomplishments on (less so for Annika) and off the course are significantly less than those of Jack and Tiger, and thus devalue the medal in question (but after Rush Limbaugh and David Nunes, that value has probably hit rock bottom now, after once being given to Mother Teresa...) Anyway, Gary and Annika get to keep their medals: no-one is asking that they give them back, but they should have refused to participate in a charade after what had transpired just the day before. If it was all good and fine, why was the press not invited then? IMHO, this ceremony should have been postponed or even just canceled, if all involved, included Trump of course, had any decency, but then of course we wouldn't be discussing this now, would we? Perhaps Biden would have given them a medal later, or not. It does not really matter.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Cy McCaffrey
      Cy McCaffrey
      (39 years old)
    2. MPD
      MPD
      (64 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...