• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
mchepp

Validity of The Golfing Machine

Recommended Posts

Taggsy,

Question for you. Do you think the yellow book is 100% correct? Honest question.

My opinion of TGM is very very high. Why? It has helped in the growth of the greatest instructors in the game. Not all of course, and it would be unfair of me to try to name them because I would certainly forget one, but for example most of the instructors on this site have developed from someone very close to TGM. There is 3 degrees (the whole Kevin Bacon joke) at most. Point being tons of it is right on and it has forced people to think and the brightest minds have learned a great deal from the yellow book. Also some have moved away from it, but if we sat them down they would no doubt tell you it had a profound influence on them at some point in their life.

That being said, I do not think it is 100% right. With Trackman and 300fps video we have learned more. Tons more. I think Homer would have loved these innovations as most engineers would. He could verify or find flaws in his theories and re-write some of what he wrote. We would be on the 22nd edition.

I will also add, considering what he had to work with he sure did get a bunch right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I created a new thread. I hope that's okay Mike.

Also, I planned to respond even though you wrote to Taggsy, but all I ended up typing was "I agree with everything you just said." So there, I will just say it like that. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

More than okay. I doubt there is much interest in discussing it as its own thread, but I am interested in what others think about how much the book is accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think Erik should write the updated version, and I'm not joking.

Yes I also agree with everything said.  Not necessarily the "best" instruction book but will probably become the most important.  All the language should be standard in golf instruction so we can all talk to eachother and know what we all mean.  Instead of saying I "overswing" you would say i overload power accumulator #4 or #2.  May sound a little complicated but it actually simplifies things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There definitely needs to be a standard language for golf instruction.  It would make it easier for instructors to communicate, but also make it easier for students to learn.  That way they don't need to learn new terminology every time they get a lesson from a different instructor.  One word to on teacher may mean something different to another and that could really confuse the student, especially some of the vocab used in (Golf Digest, Golf Magazine, on Golf Channel, etc.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by mvmac

I think Erik should write the updated version, and I'm not joking.

You Mikes seem to think alike. : )

Could I call it "Project 1.69"?

Originally Posted by mvmac

Yes I also agree with everything said.  Not necessarily the "best" instruction book but will probably become the most important.  All the language should be standard in golf instruction so we can all talk to each other and know what we all mean.  Instead of saying I "overswing" you would say i overload power accumulator #4 or #2.  May sound a little complicated but it actually simplifies things.

I'm not sure I'd go that far, though. We've had to invent new things like the positions (Ps), TGM talks very little about the feet or knees or legs, the way other parts of the body actually work, etc. I agree that the book is good for vocabulary but it doesn't provide enough vocabulary, and some of it is useless. We'd never say the word "flail" to a student, for example.

Originally Posted by sk golf

There definitely needs to be a standard language for golf instruction.  It would make it easier for instructors to communicate, but also make it easier for students to learn.  That way they don't need to learn new terminology every time they get a lesson from a different instructor.  One word to on teacher may mean something different to another and that could really confuse the student, especially some of the vocab used in (Golf Digest, Golf Magazine, on Golf Channel, etc.)


Yeah.

Heck, we can't even get people to define what a clubface being "closed" is closed to. (That's why myself and the others at Golf Evolution, and here on this site, are trying to say "right" of the target, closed to the path" - closed/open refers to path, right/left refers to target - it's clear that way).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by mchepp

Taggsy,

Question for you. Do you think the yellow book is 100% correct? Honest question.


Honest answer; I don't know, because I don't 100% understand 100% of TGM. If I did, I'd more likely be teaching tour professionals than answering your question on this forum

I'll give you a more thorough answer though;

There are a couple of different sections to the book. For the most part, TGM is a catalogue simply giving names to different motions you can make during the swing. Kelley divided the swing into 12 sections, the body into 3 zones, different motions into 24 components, each component had it's own variations, then he'd listed 4 motions you could make with your hands and arms to power the swing, then the different hand / wrist positions... etc.

Is any of this wrong? Well no, how could it be? Kelley's simply identified a motion or position in the golf swing and given it a name.

Well, what are the other parts of TGM?

Some simple geometry, simple physics, a few characteristics every decent swing should have, advice on how to practice, how to change your swing... Not too much to argue with there.

Seeing as there's a thread on this, could I ask another question?

Could anyone provide links to specific studies on TGM concepts? Or even where someone has taken a passage / idea verbatim from TGM, and then proven it to be wrong using trackman / high speed cameras for example? I'd be genuinely interested in studying them!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Taggsy

Honest answer; I don't know, because I don't 100% understand 100% of TGM. If I did, I'd more likely be teaching tour professionals than answering your question on this forum

Look, Taggsy, I mean no offense at all by this: no way you would be teaching Tour professionals, and it's a slight to those who can and do to say something like that. There's a HUUUUUUUGE gap between "understanding" TGM and "applying" TGM, and that's assuming TGM is 100% accurate and all you need to teach (it's not).


Originally Posted by Taggsy

Some simple geometry, simple physics, a few characteristics every decent swing should have, advice on how to practice, how to change your swing... Not too much to argue with there.

Actually, I think you'll find that there's plenty to argue with there. Does hinging action, given the exact same impact alignments, affect ball flight? Nope. Does the ball leave perpendicular to the face angle? Nope. There are things you can disagree with elsewhere, too, for example, in terms of how the body works, what the wrists do, etc.

I won't get into them all (it'd take waaaaay too long), but they're out there. Open your eyes, man. TGM was a great book given the tools Homer had at his disposal. It's outdated. Homer, if he were alive today, would have undoubtedly made changes to entire sections of the book given the new tools, new science, and new studies at his disposal.

Originally Posted by Taggsy

Could anyone provide links to specific studies on TGM concepts? Or even where someone has taken a passage / idea verbatim from TGM, and then proven it to be wrong using trackman / high speed cameras for example? I'd be genuinely interested in studying them!


I gave you some freebies above. Others may be more generous with their time and I welcome them to post some more things you can study, because you seem like a good guy and I just want to encourage you to open your eyes and see the bigger picture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by mvmac

I think Erik should write the updated version, and I'm not joking.



I told Erik the EXACT same thing 2 or 3 months ago, and I was not joking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by Taggsy

Honest answer; I don't know, because I don't 100% understand 100% of TGM. If I did, I'd more likely be teaching tour professionals than answering your question on this forum

I'll give you a more thorough answer though;

There are a couple of different sections to the book. For the most part, TGM is a catalogue simply giving names to different motions you can make during the swing. Kelley divided the swing into 12 sections, the body into 3 zones, different motions into 24 components, each component had it's own variations, then he'd listed 4 motions you could make with your hands and arms to power the swing, then the different hand / wrist positions... etc.

Is any of this wrong? Well no, how could it be? Kelley's simply identified a motion or position in the golf swing and given it a name.

Well, what are the other parts of TGM?

Some simple geometry, simple physics, a few characteristics every decent swing should have, advice on how to practice, how to change your swing... Not too much to argue with there.

Seeing as there's a thread on this, could I ask another question?

Could anyone provide links to specific studies on TGM concepts? Or even where someone has taken a passage / idea verbatim from TGM, and then proven it to be wrong using trackman / high speed cameras for example? I'd be genuinely interested in studying them!

Taggsy,

Have you read anything from John Erickson? That would be a great place to start if I were you. He has his own site and a MONSTER thread called Lag's Golf Machine where he outlines his disagreement with the yellow book. He like many agrees with most of it, but for example he disagrees with the hitting procedure. He also thinks Homer left out footwork.

Just a good place to start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Embarking.


Nah. My wife already nixed the idea of taking over the garage, building a wooden plane board, and bringing some cute girl over in a skirt to pose for photos in all sorts of "positions."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by mchepp

Taggsy,

Have you read anything from John Erickson? That would be a great place to start if I were you. He has his own site and a MONSTER thread called Lag's Golf Machine where he outlines his disagreement with the yellow book. He like many agrees with most of it, but for example he disagrees with the hitting procedure. He also thinks Homer left out footwork.

Just a good place to start.


Thanks for the suggestion mchepp, I'll give it a read!

I've managed to get hold a copy of "Science & Golf 1", I've heard there's plenty of interesting jazz in there.

Erik, I was only joking about the tour instructor thing - besides, you know Sean Foley's teaching tour pros now too? ;)

Have a great Christmas gents, I'm off back to work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Richie3Jack wrote an informal "translation" of TGM here

Would love to see Erik's version though. Or definitely a soup to nuts dive in make it readable for the masses yet retain all the nuances version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hi,

I was wondering if any of the 5SK instructors could share some of their comments on TGM. Specifically, what are the things that are considered outdated? Based on previous posts, it looks like that might be a long discussion. I'd be interested in just reading about some of the larger issues that are considered outdated that are still being taught by TGM instructors.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was wondering if any of the 5SK instructors could share some of their comments on TGM. Specifically, what are the things that are considered outdated? Based on previous posts, it looks like that might be a long discussion. I'd be interested in just reading about some of the larger issues that are considered outdated that are still being taught by TGM instructors.

Virtually all of it. I use a few of the terms - the accumulators and pressure points, mostly - and only then with other instructors.

TGM was the bee's knees… in the 1960s. Homer would have kept adapting it. It hasn't changed in decades, so it's fallen behind as we've gotten better equipment that can make better measurements.

That's the general "issue" with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Virtually all of it. I use a few of the terms - the accumulators and pressure points, mostly - and only then with other instructors.

TGM was the bee's knees… in the 1960s. Homer would have kept adapting it. It hasn't changed in decades, so it's fallen behind as we've gotten better equipment that can make better measurements.

That's the general "issue" with it.

Thanks, Erik. Would you advice against trying a TGM authorized instructor?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • really hope his back holds out this time as, despite all the bad stuff he's been through (even if self inflicted), i think golf has missed him to a certain extent. Maybe he should make his return on one of the Web.com events or even an smaller one (Tiger Woods on the Hooters tour ). After the layoff he's had the less pressure he the better.
    • You put on quite a show the final two days.  Fun to watch man.  You found your long game and were putting to one of those oversized holes I think!    I just wish my long game would have been settled enough to give you a closer match.  I had a blast, learned a lot and enjoyed competitive golf for once.   It was great to play with you and learn from you @NCGolfer.  I truly enjoyed our pairings.  Hopefully I was not too much of a distraction out there with my long game struggles.    Thanks for being a good sport about it if anyway.   I really enjoyed playing with @bkuehn1952 as well.  I had a very tough first nine out there but Brian kept things positive and we battled through it.  We played much more competitively the second time out as shown in Drew's scorecard post.  We found a way to make our abilities work together, and it was a lot of fun!  I enjoyed meeting everyone else and a lot of the guys I have not had a chance to yet.  I want to mention @jsgolfer who was my roommate and our MVP.  I wish I was able to see Jerry play more.  What I did see was a treat to watch.  He is also one of the most kind and considerate people I have met in a long time.  A true class act.   Yellow ball or white ball I take responsibility for my shots out there no matter how much weight was on each individual one.  I had a 10' putt or so for a half point on the front Saturday that I lipped out after I thought I put a great stroke on it.  I should have put that one in.  I sure hit some bad ones off the tee and I am just thankful that I did not cost my team the cup.   Finally I just wanted to say one more time, thank you to @iacas and @mvmac.  I know that this was a lot of work for you organizing and making this a truly special experience for us all.  I hope everyone who was there could see how much work this must have been for them and how it was done to give an incredible experience to the participants.  Thank you guys so much!  
    • Finally again a (really) good tournament from Joost. Battling for victory until the final hole, coming up one shot short against Garcia to get a second place. Which raises him right back into the top 100 of the OWGR. Hopefully a good finish of the season in The Final Series, good points and money to earn there.
    • My answer depends on what you mean by "manage on the course."   I have a bag full of swing thoughts, because I have made the same mistakes so many times and corrected things so many times.  It's like a bag full of clubs.  I carry them around with me but I only use one at most when I'm addressing my shot.  But which one it is depends on what happened on the last shot or sometime in the recent past.  Then there are the times I have no swing thought at all, but hit a great shot.  But definitely I cannot have more than one swing thought in my head when I'm about to hit a shot. 
    • I voted 4 and 0, not based on the definitions you provided,  but based on your vote (9 and 1), and how I would compare my game to yours.   I think if you hit a solid shot 9 out of 10 times, then I should say I hit that kind of shot 4 out of 10 times.   I believe you would define "sweet spot" as much much smaller and more elusive than I would, but we have to agree on a definition, so taking your definition, which is really, "a spot you hit 1 out of 10 times," then I should say less than that.  So I said 0. 
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Covert
      Covert
      (74 years old)
    2. opie
      opie
      (40 years old)
    3. Robert Diddings
      Robert Diddings
      (33 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon