• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
normdamarine

IS IT ME??? OR...

18 posts in this topic

I my catch flak but it seems to me that Jack was a little disappointed that TIGER tied his record...

Now, I make that statement knowing that the "greatest" golfer to have ever played "the game" would not want to see his record tied/broken, I got it! Most will say that "records are made to be broken" but I know no one ever wants to see their record broken...

Was I the only one who looked at Jack and thought that? Maybe he was just exhausted after the tournament...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

When they mentioned it to Jack on air yesterday that Tiger could tie his record he seemed completely unaware.  I'm sure he was a bit bummed that he will soon drop a slot in the record books.  He seemed very gracious towards Tiger at 18, even called Tigers shot at 16 the best he ever saw on that course and hole.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think Jack was disappointed. Jack even said during the post round press conference - sitting beside Tiger... That he knew Tiger would do it, and was happy that he did it at the Memorial versus somewhere else. Jack has a lot of respect for Tiger. It's evident in his post round interview IMO.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Jack has too much class to be disappointed.

I would chalk it up more to just being 72 years old & it being a long day.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a record. It's second place.

Sam Sneed has the record.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno but I kind of thought Jack kept criticizing Tiger. I think he could've played at the hole there, I think that shot was the most risky shot ever, etc...

No I think any human would be a bit sad to see their own record broken, but Jack probably takes at as well as anyone possibly could.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, it didn't seem that way to me. They shook hands right after Woods came off 18 and they showed them chatting later as well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tiger got #71 in 2009, so Jack had plenty of time to reconcile himself to Tiger passing him. Jack actually got a couple of bonus years at solo 2nd in career PGA wins, so I don't see why he would be bummed about it happening now. It now seems pretty likely that Tiger is going to go back to averaging five wins a year, so Snead's record is also doomed. I thought Tiger was sticking it to Jack a bit, when he kept hinting how much faster he got to 73 than Jack. But he's right, he got there faster, and he did it the hard way. He could have had 100 wins by now if he had played a lot of weak-field events, like Snead, or Vijay. Instead, he's averaged only about 16 events a year, and except for the old Buick Open, which was a sponsor thing, they were generally the toughest fields of the year.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched the exchange on 18 and the post-round presser, and Jack seemed very complimentary.  He was classy as always and seemed genuinely appreciative that it happened at his tournament.  I didn't really get a hint of any sour grapes, although I could understand if a competitor such as Jack showed some slight disappointment publicly.

Jack sarcastically said "[Tiger] had to rub my face in it" at the beginning of the presser; a reference to Tiger doing it at his (Jack's) tournament, but it was just a joke and met with laughter.  It seemed like a pretty comfortable and good moment for both.

Brandon

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw the same thing, Jack was pure class and Tiger was respectful and appreciative of what Jack had to say.  As I said earlier and others have said, it had to be a bit semi-sweet for him to know he wasn't alone at #2 and would likely soon be #3.  No competitor wants to see their life achievements surpassed so I can imagine that Jack was a bit saddened by Tigers accomplishment, especially given how many #2's Jack had in his career.

Originally Posted by bplewis24

I watched the exchange on 18 and the post-round presser, and Jack seemed very complimentary.  He was classy as always and seemed genuinely appreciative that it happened at his tournament.  I didn't really get a hint of any sour grapes, although I could understand if a competitor such as Jack showed some slight disappointment publicly.

Jack sarcastically said "[Tiger] had to rub my face in it" at the beginning of the presser; a reference to Tiger doing it at his (Jack's) tournament, but it was just a joke and met with laughter.  It seemed like a pretty comfortable and good moment for both.

Brandon

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Mr. Nicklaus looked worn out and older than his age today. Jack, the ultimate competitor, wants to host the best tournament he possibly can. I'm sure he was up early all four days in a jacket and tie shaking hands, appeasing the media, spending time with players, politicking in warm, sunny, humid conditions on a hilly golf course. My advice would be for him to take a few days off, then start joining Mr. Player in the fitness trailer.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Jack was not disappointed. In fact I would imagine he was glad it was done at his tournament. The ratings must have been very good with Tiger in the mix. It was just a matter of time before he tied it, what better place to do it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First, I agree that Jack is way too classy to root against Tiger tying or breaking his records.  Also regarding the 73 tour wins, Jack knew that was going to happen sooner or later and was probably happy they could share the moment at his course/tournament.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don' think Jack cared one way or the other about Tiger tying his number of wins. I don't think Tiger cared either. This was something overblown by CBS. Jack's goal was to win majors, the same for Tiger. While winning tournaments is of course why they play, winning majors is what the Pro game is all about. What's amazing is that Tiger is only 36 and has 73 wins on the PGA Tour. He may end up with over 100. And he wins 25% of the tournaments he enters. Holy crap that's amazing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tiger still referred to Jack as the best ever at the press conference. I think he always will even if he ties the major record.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by boogielicious

Tiger still referred to Jack as the best ever at the press conference. I think he always will even if he ties the major record.

If he ties it yes, if he passes...not so much.  Tiger has very consistent in his position that the number of major wins is the SOLE factor in determining who is the best of all time....he has repeated, repeated and repeated this statement and has done so very deliberatily.....the reason is that he expects to pass Jack on the major list and wants everyone (and I mean EVERYONE) to acknowledge that there is no doubt he is the greatest of all time.....

Tiger knows exactly what he is doing..........personally, I would love to see Tiger win the US Open and get a step closer....would make the rest of the summer that much more compelling......one of the best golf seasons in  a long while so far

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by BallStriker

If he ties it yes, if he passes...not so much.  Tiger has very consistent in his position that the number of major wins is the SOLE factor in determining who is the best of all time....he has repeated, repeated and repeated this statement and has done so very deliberatily.....the reason is that he expects to pass Jack on the major list and wants everyone (and I mean EVERYONE) to acknowledge that there is no doubt he is the greatest of all time.....

This is it exactly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So we can mark Tiger down as a Jack vote in the 'Who is Greater' poll.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • From this, it actually looks like he gets the club back on plane through impact. This is wild.
    • That's an exaggeration. He's obviously shown that he has the potential to compete but he struggles with consistency month to month. I think everyone who watches golf underestimates just how rare it is to have back to back seasons as the likes of Tiger, Jack, or Arnold- especially in a field as talented as it is in 2016. I'm a huge believer that these past few seasons have been some of the best tour golf ever played in the history of the game, especially when it's looked at in terms of depth. Week to week, it's really anyone's tournament to take, and it hasn't always been like that.
    • Trump paying out the $1M to a wealthy individual is a non-story.  The entire story is a non-story, I haven't seen it mentioned on any of the news channels and beyond a cut and paste no one else is covering it.  If this was something the democrats or liberal media really thought could hurt Trump we'd be hearing about it constantly.  No one cares when rich guys get into a dispute, there's no damage control to be done here. The real reason it's even in the news is because Trump's charity (not his golf course) paid out money to Greenberg's charity and it was a potential inappropriate use of the charity funds.  
      I'm guessing those that voted Trump should pay are basing this off their general dislike for Trump or his platform as a POTUS candidate.  Anyone who read the facts and didn't have a bias against Trump would conclude paying off Greenberg was not Trump's responsibility.  
    • Genetics definitely play a role, but not as much as people think. If you have a 6 foot frame to work with from the get-go, you will obviously be able to make a bigger swing with less effort than someone who stands 5 feet tall with shorter arms. A bigger swing path = more time to gain momentum through impact. This is where technique and flexibility come into play, though. Having a large frame/swing only correlates to distance if you can do two things, 1) swing at a high rate of speed through the slot, 2) maintain a square club face on impact. I am not a tall or big person by any means, but I gain a lot of my strokes by being able to hit a wedge or low iron into the majority of holes I play. The biggest adjustment to my game that I made in order to hit the long ball has been working on my shoulder flexibility as well as timing my hip turn. If you are a smaller person and want to improve distance, you should first make sure you are able to hit the ball squarely, but after, elongate the path of your lead arm without compromising your spine alignment and swing plane. It definitely isn't something that happens in one range session as it oftentimes takes multiple seasons in order to find 15-25 yards from the tee. But genetics definitely are not the only thing that factor into hitting big drives, I would say it is much more contingent on technique and timing than anything else.  
    • Actually it is not. It's taking something that people will perceive is bad associated with you, your brands and your business as Trump and making sure it doesn't affect you negatively. People saying it's not his fault and would be bad business are failing to see the big picture. He generates so much money off of his name and reputation and brand that if something is associated with him negatively, wrong or right, it could have already cost him far more than a million dollars of revenue or EBITDA.  And this was another executive  not sure I want the word on street to be that I didn't make good for another CEO. It's the same reason why when Chik Fil A made a statement about gay marriage they also were outside handing out free bottles of water to protesters. And their sales went even higher!  They controlled the message and paid for it and what happened?  They came out winners. There are multiple examples of this in business. That's why I disagree with @iacasand with @newtogolf  And apparently over 70 percent of the voters on this poll agree.  Ultimately we can have our own opinions on it and that's mine. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dresilved
      Dresilved
      (51 years old)
    2. kpetrina
      kpetrina
      (24 years old)
    3. Luana
      Luana
      (38 years old)
  • Blog Entries