Jump to content
IGNORED

Prescription sunglasses: Polarized vs. Transition


Note: This thread is 3681 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I might get prescription sunglasses for when I play golf.

I currently wear clear lenses with clip-on sunglasses. I have blended lenses - distance high and reading low - and sometimes move my head trying to see upper/distance when addressing the ball. The clip-on sunglasses give a double layer of rims is distracting on chips and putts.

So, what are you all using for prescriptions sunglasses...

  • Do you use the polarized , which is dark all the time, or the transition , which lighten up if you're in the treeline?
  • Lens tint: Do amber and brown give more contrast than the smoke gray? (Amber is popular with competitive rifle shooters).

Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I personally like the amber tint.

Though, I admit, when I got my first pair of glasses, I opted for transition lenses, but couldn't adjust to use them for playing golf.  So, I'm just in amber, polarized lens.  The polariziation gives me the ability to see through the glare of water when fishing and fishing for balls!

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Polarized and photochromic lenses (Transitions is a brand name) are two different things and aren't mutually exclusive.   Polarized lenses can be any tint, color, or even clear - they affect how reflected light gets filtered.      You can get polarized Transitions lenses as well.

As to tint, most feel that an amber or yellowish tint brings out the details in grass much better than grey tints, which tend to wash out the details.    In his book Putting Prescription, Dr. Craig Farnsworth discusses how he came to the conclusion to blend an amber tint for the lower half of the lens with grey tint on the upper half to help combat eye fatigue from the brighter sky but still let the player see details on the ground; his result was Peak Vision sunglasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

My polarized sunglasses make it a little harder to read the grain.

Brown tint for me.

Grain is largely irrelevant unless you're using it only to determine downhill/uphill.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think amber tint is the way to go.  I had issues with the progressive bifocals when standing over putts so I just went with the distance prescription in my golf glasses. I also went with non-polarized  because I had read that polarized makes it difficult to see the grain.

  • Upvote 1

“You don't have the game you played last year or last week. You only have today's game. It may be far from your best, but that's all you've got. Harden your heart and make the best of it.”

~ Walter Hagen

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

I've got both Transitions and Oakley prescription M-Frames with amber tint.  I definitely prefer the Oakleys.  You get better contrast with that tint.  I wear the transitions on cloudy days, but would actually prefer just straight lenses.  The issue with transitions is even on cloudy days they will darken even if you don't need it.  The M-frames are wrap around and really protect your eyes from wind, dust, sand flying because of a crappy bunker shot, etc.

The tint in transitions is also grey and doesn't quite give the contrast to find the ball when it is descending from sky through a tree background.  I tend to lose it their.  With the Oakley, the contrast is enhanced a bit and helps.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I like the transitions lenses though they do not change sometimes when you're wearing a hat.  Mine are not polarized, I find it difficult to play golf with polarized lenses, they make the ball and grass at address look very different from shot to shot as your angle to the sun changes.

Personally I like a neutral non color shifting lens when I play golf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Transition lenses change based on UV, not brightness. So, they do not change while in your car (windows block UV) and the do change on cloudy days when you may or may not want the darker lenses for golf. Newer versions change faster than older versions but still do not change fast. So, walking from sunlight into the tree line, the lenses will not change unless you stay there a good while. They do change when you go inside after the round which means you need not carry two pairs of glasses. All said, I like wearing mine and choose them when I'm spending the day at the course.

I also have dark tint glasses for sunny days and I prefer them when I know it will be bright the entire round. The style is a bit larger and that is why I prefer them for very bright days.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

You ever have half the lens darker because of the shadow of your hat? .  I laid them down once in the grass and the grass lines were lighter for about 4 minutes.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I too wear dark polarized for very bright days or links style courses with few trees. Cloudier days I use my transitions. Both those sets are distance only, can' t play with my progressives. Browns, grays and rose are easier to read greens with.

Callaway Razr X Black driver 9.5* Callaway x hot pro 3 deep stiff Callaway x hot pro 16, 18, 20 hybrids Callaway diablo forged 5-GW Callaway jaws vintage 54, 58 wedges me grooves Odyssey metal x milled # 7. 35" Callaway org 14 bag Taylormade TP3 ball Callaway tour golve :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by VMAN

I like the transitions lenses though they do not change sometimes when you're wearing a hat. ...

Never been my experience. Hat has never effected the UV change of lenses. I've only been wearing them about ten years. I know this latest set from last year had some improvements over my originals (mostly speed of the change). Perhaps the hat stable ones are much older.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by rustyredcab

Never been my experience. Hat has never effected the UV change of lenses. I've only been wearing them about ten years. I know this latest set from last year had some improvements over my originals (mostly speed of the change). Perhaps the hat stable ones are much older.

I've been wearing them a long time as well, I get a new pair every two years or so.  Depending on the angle of the sun they don't change.  The hat tends to block the rays.  Sometimes only half of the lens will change, once again depends on the angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
Originally Posted by VMAN

I've been wearing them a long time as well, I get a new pair every two years or so.  Depending on the angle of the sun they don't change.  The hat tends to block the rays.  Sometimes only half of the lens will change, once again depends on the angle.

Do you mean the top half of the lens is clearer than the bottom half? I gotta learn to keep my head down better.

I've paid attention to the last few sunny rounds and never seen anything close to only partial lens changes. Perhaps there are differing styles of lens material. When mine change, the entire lens changes.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by rustyredcab

Do you mean the top half of the lens is clearer than the bottom half? I gotta learn to keep my head down better.

I've paid attention to the last few sunny rounds and never seen anything close to only partial lens changes. Perhaps there are differing styles of lens material. When mine change, the entire lens changes.

Exactly.  If the uv hits only half the lens than only that half changes.  I'm not sure if there are different styles, mine are transitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by rustyredcab

Transition lenses change based on UV, not brightness. So, they do not change while in your car (windows block UV) and the do change on cloudy days when you may or may not want the darker lenses for golf. Newer versions change faster than older versions but still do not change fast. So, walking from sunlight into the tree line, the lenses will not change unless you stay there a good while. They do change when you go inside after the round which means you need not carry two pairs of glasses. All said, I like wearing mine and choose them when I'm spending the day at the course.

I also have dark tint glasses for sunny days and I prefer them when I know it will be bright the entire round. The style is a bit larger and that is why I prefer them for very bright days.

This is why I use polarized lenses now. They don't change in your car and I had an issue with the lenses changing partially due to my hat. I now wear polarized blue grey lenses. I think the amber lenses would be more ideal for golf, but can't justify a $350 pair of glasses just for golf. I also got the new hi def lenses, which make a huge difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 year later...

Hi,

Great questions and I will do my best to answer them. My name is Rob and I am a certified optician and specialize in prescription sports glasses. I work for SportRx so I like to think I am an expert!

Usually, we do not recommend polarized lenses for golf. They tend to interfere with depth perception and also, if you think about it, there’s not a whole lot of reflective glare on the course. What polarized lenses do is cut the sun’s glare off of flat shinny objects, like chrome, the road, water, and snow. So outside of water traps, there is not much actual reflective glare on the golf course. We tend not to recommend it on golf lenses to avoid depth perception issues.

We actually make a gold specific transitions lens called the Over It. It is an amber-to-brown, self-adjusting lens that specifically increases contrast while giving good protection in any light condition. For golf, it is awesome! Amber, brown, and rose lenses are best for golf as they really heighten contrast so that you can read the green more accurately, as well as track the ball in the air and in & out of shadows. We can also recommend a golf-specific frame with more coverage and less distractions!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm using Rudy Project Argon with Golf Photochromatic Lens , it come with a optical adapter for prescription.

I have to agreed with Rob that polarize lens are not good for reading the green especaillythe grain .

What I Play:
913D3 9.5°Diamana Kai'li 70 Stiff  "C3" | 910F 15°, Diamana Kai'li 80 Stiff "D2" | 910H 19°,  Diamana Kai'li for Titleist 85 Hybrid Stiff | Titleist 714 AP2 4 to P Aerotech Steelfiber i110 S | SM4 Vokey 50.12, 54.14 & SM5 60.11K| 34" Edel Umpqua + 40g Counter Weight
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3681 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Hit my tee shot just into the penalty area and barely found it. Swung hard just in case I hit it. It was slightly downhill with a heavy tailwind. I don't actually hit my 9i 170 yards.
    • Right. The difference between being 120 out and 70 out for me (this is the important part) is negligible and not worth putting other risks into play off the tee.   Ok the argument against driver is that my shot cone is comically large. It puts every possible outcome into play. You can't see the green from the tee so there's a good chance I'd have to wait for it to clear which would slow down play. That's the third tee right in the middle of the firing range there. I really don't want to wait just to hit a terrible shot and I especially don't want to injure somebody. Yea I have no problem playing out of the rough short of the bunker if I'm just going to lay up short of the bunker, but I absolutely need to avoid flaring it right into the penalty area if I'm going to be laying up in the first place. As a general strategy I understand where you're coming from. But since we're specifically talking about me (this is a shot I'm going to have to hit on Saturday), I think the cost is fairly marginal. I hit the ball 8' closer on average from 50-100 than I do from 100-150 from the fairway and rough and the green success % difference is 4%. Bunker might as well be a penalty drop. Based on the data,  Here's my SG:A data compared to a 10: I honestly don't know how to use SG for decision making. That's why I was mostly looking at proximity to hole and green success rate for comparison. I mostly use SG as a way to track my progress. All good. Like I said, I appreciate the discussion. It makes me think. If I didn't want to see alternative/opposing viewpoints to my own I just wouldn't post anything. You should post it! In your own swing thread, of course. It's been a fun exercise.
    • Played my first 2024 round at Pierce Lake. Boomed my first drive down #10 fairway, then slowly slipped into mediocrity. 83 (69.6/131). The high point was going 2 of 4 on sand saves. My sand game is pretty marginal but today I must have discovered the secret for a couple hours.
    • day 34. Technique practice. Became too quick and outcome oriented. need to slow down and work on technique again. 
    • Day 534, April 18, 2024 Practice before lessons today. Priority piece. No sim this time. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...