Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Aging Boomer

Long Iron Replacement? Really?

Note: This thread is 2503 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

43 posts / 10514 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Calling hybrids "long iron replacements" is the biggest deliberate lie in retail marketing.

What replaced long irons are middle irons that are at least two clubs stronger in loft than than the middle irons with which I took up golf. In the case of some "game improvement" irons, it's even more than that.

Hybrids have clearly replaced fairway woods. These were the lofts on TaylorMade's original "Pittsburgh Persimmon" fairway woods in 1980.

3-wood: 17°
4-wood: 20°
5-wood: 23°

These were the lofts on the same company's Firesole Rescue utility hybrids a decade or so later.

15, 18, 21, 24­°

If you don't believe me, do some homework on your Google machine. In my case, I just have to look at the old clubs.

Now, what have hybrids really replaced?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

If what's in your bag is from the 80's and your buying something new for the bag then you would probably be correct, a 3 hybrid would replace a old persimmon 3 wood, but if you have clubs from this century than the "long iron replacement" statement is true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true but not really current news, Tom Wishon has written a few ebooks on this very topic if you're interested.

Originally Posted by Aging Boomer

Calling hybrids "long iron replacements" is the biggest deliberate lie in retail marketing.

What replaced long irons are middle irons that are at least two clubs stronger in loft than than the middle irons with which I took up golf. In the case of some "game improvement" irons, it's even more than that.

Hybrids have clearly replaced fairway woods. These were the lofts on TaylorMade's original "Pittsburgh Persimmon" fairway woods in 1980.

3-wood: 17°

4-wood: 20°

5-wood: 23°

These were the lofts on the same company's Firesole Rescue utility hybrids a decade or so later.

15, 18, 21, 24­°

If you don't believe me, do some homework on your Google machine. In my case, I just have to look at the old clubs.

Now, what have hybrids really replaced?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Exactly. Its really not relevant what the lofts are from the 80s and 90s. Its simply a comparative point. If your 4 iron is 24 degrees and you decide you want to replace with a ~24 degrees hybrid, then its accurate. If you have a 4 iron from old, that is 26 degrees, replace it with a 26 degree hybrid. Point would still be the same. The reason people are replacing with hybrids has nothing to do with the loft on the club per say but for a variety of other reasons which might include it could be easier to get the ball in the air for the particular golfer.

I think the more salient point is that there is a reason why more people today cannot hit the 4 and 3 irons and that point is your point. The lofts are lower and low lofted irons are just simply hard to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wishon contends that the average casual golfer cannot hit an iron with less that 24* of loft consistently.  In older sets the 3i was 24*, in todays iron sets the 3i has an average loft of 21* which he contends is a wasted club in a set because casual golfers can't him them consistently.  The trend to create longer irons by strengthening their lofts resulted in the need, development and most importantly the sale of the gap wedge (between PW and SW)  and hybirds to replace the worthless 3 irons in modern sets.

Wishon contends it's basically a scam, the numbers and letters on the clubs are now meaningless and the club manufacturers just lowered the lofts on all respective clubs to create the need for additional clubs in a bag that are not typically included in a set.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If you're going to play clubs with today's "normal" loft I'd highly recommend 3, 4, and maybe even a 5 hybrid for a lot of players. They're just so much easier to hit. Especially out of the rough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys, just visiting from the year 2043. You guys still worrying about fairway woods, I see. My 20 degree sand wedge takes care of that issue. I use it a lot thanks to my 65 inch long driver, can really get it close in there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the advancements in golf clubs over the past 30 years, I would think a modern 3 iron with a loft of 21* is still easier to hit than the 24* 3 iron from back in the day.  Regardless, 90% of the golfers in the world hit the ball too low on the face to get any real benefit from a 3 iron, be it 24 or 21 degrees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Given the advancements in golf clubs over the past 30 years, I would think a modern 3 iron with a loft of 21* is still easier to hit than the 24* 3 iron from back in the day.  Regardless, 90% of the golfers in the world hit the ball too low on the face to get any real benefit from a 3 iron, be it 24 or 21 degrees.

Cool, apparently I'm a 10%er...I have no problem hitting my 3 iron, a tiny MB blade and it feels wonderful!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by dak4n6

Cool, apparently I'm a 10%er...I have no problem hitting my 3 iron, a tiny MB blade and it feels wonderful!

Must be.  I mean you're hitting blades and all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just gotta put the time in. Most of my range time is spent on mid - long irons. Usually it seems I'm the only one not endlessly hitting drivers and wedges...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by dak4n6

Just gotta put the time in. Most of my range time is spent on mid - long irons. Usually it seems I'm the only one not endlessly hitting drivers and wedges...

I used to be that guy. Since I replaced my 2-iron with a hybrid I spend most of my golf related time playing or getting my daughter started. I decided that no, I don't gotta put in the time. I only have so much and other things matter more than occasional oohs or aahs a veteran player would give me after striping a 2-iron. Younger players couldn't care less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by dak4n6

Just gotta put the time in. Most of my range time is spent on mid - long irons. Usually it seems I'm the only one not endlessly hitting drivers and wedges...

Well, driver and wedge are the two clubs which affect your score the most (outside of putting and chipping).  How many times are you hitting a 3 or 4-iron during a round?  Twice?  Maybe 3 times?  How many times are you hitting driver?  10-12 times on average I'd guess (unless you have no confidence with it).  Likewise, how many shots between 40-120 yards do you have during a round?  Probably at least once every three holes, so that's six times per round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by k-troop

Well, driver and wedge are the two clubs which affect your score the most (outside of putting and chipping).  How many times are you hitting a 3 or 4-iron during a round?  Twice?  Maybe 3 times?  How many times are you hitting driver?  10-12 times on average I'd guess (unless you have no confidence with it).  Likewise, how many shots between 40-120 yards do you have during a round?  Probably at least once every three holes, so that's six times per round.

Completely agree with you.  I hit the 3H/4H/5iron clubs combined <5 times a round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the question "do hybrids replace long irons or fairway woods?" depends on both the club and your bag setup.

Hybrids hit the mainstream in the early 2000s; I think Appleby was the first guy I remember seeing hit a hybrid on tour.  I very vividly remember thinking "what the heck was that", after watching him hit a ball about 240 from light rough very high, very straight, and the ball stopped very quickly.

The decade prior to that was when I was playing high school and college golf.  Back then, about 90% of the guys I competed against had more or less the same club setup:  driver, fairway wood, 2-9 iron, and 3 wedges.  That was the bag setup I had as well.  I had no problems hitting a 2-iron--the typical well-struck shot from the fairway carried about 215-220, very low, and would roll out 20-50 feet depending on conditions.  Forget about hitting it from even very light rough.  My 3-wood (a 15* Callaway Big Bertha at the time) flew about 230-240, so I had a sizeable distance gap.

Around 2005 I replaced the 2-iron with a 17* hybrid (one degree stronger loft than my 2-iron).  I could hit that thing sky high, about 225-230, and it stopped on a dime.  It's a transformative club.  For me, it was a long-iron replacement, because it replaced my 2-iron.

I now carry a 3-iron, which still flies relatively low when hit from a tight fairway lie, about 215-yards.  I have an 18* 2-hybrid which I can hit anywhere from 220-240 from a fairway lie (neutral wind conditions), depending on the shot shape I choose.  My 3-wood flies about 240-260, depending on how much I go after it.  The hybrid is an excellent gap filler, distance wise.

But it's more than that.  In windy conditions, I now have more options.  My 3-iron is a low-ball club, in that the tendency is to hit a low traj.  I have to force it to get up in the air with some variation on my stock swing.  The hybrid defaults to a higher ball flight, and the 3-wood back to a lower ball flight.  So, if I have a 225 yard shot, I have lots of options depending on the wind.  If It's dead into the wind, I might hit a 3-iron, which I can control very well into the wind, and play for a spot 50-60 feet short of the flag.  If I have a cross or neutral wind, I can hit a high cut with the hybrid and know that I'll be able to stop the ball quickly.  If the green is open in front, I can hit a sawed off 3-wood and run the ball into the hole (into the wind), or a 3i or hard 4i (downwind) and fly it in, knowing that the ball will probably roll out 20-40 feet.

That's really the biggest advantage to the hybrid, IMO:  more trajectory options in the 215-250 yard range.  Throw in that you can hit those same shots out of light rough, and the club itself is a no-brainer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by k-troop

Well, driver and wedge are the two clubs which affect your score the most (outside of putting and chipping).  How many times are you hitting a 3 or 4-iron during a round?  Twice?  Maybe 3 times?  How many times are you hitting driver?  10-12 times on average I'd guess (unless you have no confidence with it).  Likewise, how many shots between 40-120 yards do you have during a round?  Probably at least once every three holes, so that's six times per round.

Totally agree. But my driver and wedges work fine. No complaints there. Except for an occasional fatted pitch, my most inconsistent clubs are my mid - long irons. Since I have been working on them, I have been hitting them really well, but I know that can go away very quickly, so I keep up the emphasis on them. Plus, when I'm hitting them well, the confidence leaks into the other areas of my game since they are the most difficult part of the game to master. Lastly, my home courses have the following par 3's (from the whites): 179, 225, 195, 110, 174, 159, 140, 189, and 210. All but 2 of these require a mid - long iron.

I know I'm going against conventional wisdom by putting emphasis on mid - long irons, but I'm not trying to sell you, I'm just saying that's what I do. My iron game is the part that shows how I'm swinging most glaringly, and I have noticed that when the iron game is on, everything else falls in place, that's all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 2503 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Speaking of 4:30 POP, if someone plays in five hours, that is fast, and if someone plays in three hours, that is slow. When you have had to deal with 6 hour rounds, 4:30 seems like a reasonable compromise. When I'm marshaling, it is not "recommended", it is the maximum allowed (in my  mind). 😁 In our case, there is some rhyme and reason to 4:30, but you'll have to follow me . . . .  Each of our first four sets of four holes has a par 3, a Par 5, and two Par 4s.  Bobby Clampett consulted on the course design, and the Par 3 are paced at 12 minutes, the Par 4s at 15 minutes, and the Par 5s at 18 minutes.  Figure that out and you will see the each set of four holes in 1 hour.  17 & 18 are Par 4s, so that's another 1/2 hour, and, Wallah!, 4:30. (PS:  I'm then only one left of the early employees who knows that.) It's really easy to marshal when you get that four-holes-an-hour ingrained in your brain, but it's amazing how many brains are not ingrainable. BTW, unless I'm really have a good round, if I'm stuck in a 4:30 round, I normally go in.  One day this year on the tenth tee I looked at the other guys and said, "Looks like rain.  Bye."  I'm sure it rained somewhere that day.
    • If you have administrator access, you can see the entire history, but the rest of the world can't.  I have access as my club's handicap committee chair, and the pro shop does as well, but that's all as far as I know.  Rank and file golfers can't go any further back than the 12 month history available in the phone app.  Apparently I can look up the complete history for anyone, as long as I know their name.  
    • Last week had two birdies.  Not sure which was the better shot, but here goes. 1) PW from about 110 or so and put it pin high within about 3 to 4 feet and make the putt. 2) nGIR, probably around 5-10 yards from the green.  Chip in for birdie
    • Wow!  Thanks! I've been on Internet forum for 20 years, and I can count on one hand how many times I've seen someone actually compliment someone for their comments. So, kudos to you. 😁
    • Hmm, I could of swore several years back I was in the Golf shop and our pro pulled my history. Maybe the MAGA Assoc. is different? I can check the next time at the club. I could be mistaken, wouldn't be the first time... 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. internal911price
      internal911price
      (37 years old)
    2. kamaaina1
      kamaaina1
      (58 years old)
    3. kenrooker
      kenrooker
      (76 years old)
    4. MSchad
      MSchad
      (57 years old)
    5. pchaney301
      pchaney301
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...