Jump to content
IGNORED

It's 2012


iacas
Note: This thread is 4282 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

A few little mini-thoughts that aren't big enough on their own to warrant separate posts.

I have a hard time understanding how it's 2012 and:

  • Many (perhaps most) instructors (let alone golfers) believe the ball starts in the direction of the path and ends up where the face is pointing.
  • Poor instructors - in general - still exist so widely, and still get business. If mechanics were like golf instructors, there would be massive industry reform.
  • People still think that you "turn the face down at impact" to hit a draw, or that hinge actions affect the ball because of what they do while the ball is on the face.
  • There are still so many club hos out there. I think that's how you spell hos. :)
  • We still have people who think the ball is "trapped" against the ground, people who still think draws have topspin, and people who still believe that greens must all break "towards" or "away" from something that's 20 miles or 2 miles or 40 yards away from where they're putting.

I think the biggest singular breakthroughs in golf in the past 50 years include:

  • Affordable high-speed cameras.
  • Jorgensen's "Physics of Golf."
  • FlightScope/Trackman and other launch monitors.
  • AimPoint.
  • Many would include TPI/AMM type data in here, but I don't think it quite crosses my threshold.
  • TGM would be included if this span was longer than 50 years, even though most of it is wrong or outdated or lacking, it changed the way a LOT of people thought about things, and has had ripple effects that affect a LOT of golfers and instructors.

This isn't instruction-related, but the best ten U.S. players of all time might not include Phil Mickelson. In no order: Tiger, Jack, Arnie, Ben, Bobby, Billy, Byron, Sam, Walter, Gene, and Tom. That's 11. Phil's probably definitely top 12, but which two of those people could he bump to crack the top 10? When you consider the strength of the fields these days, though, it becomes much easier to bump a few guys down and move Phil inside the top 10.

To the quality of instruction, I will say this: things are heading in the right direction. The Internet has played a moderate role in this. The better golfers are becoming more informed, and when a lesser golfer asks "who should I take lessons from?," the better golfer is more likely than ever to recommend a good instructor rather than a poor one. The poor instructors are slowly (too slowly) getting fewer lessons.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The misunderstanding of the ball flight laws really amazes me. I understand that people might have been taught differently 10, 20, 30 years ago but over the years we gain new information and need to update our models with current information.

People used to think the world was flat. That model worked pretty well - for practical purposes when you navigate around town that model works fine. But when you try to explain things like sun rising/setting it doesn't work too well. The "old" ball flight laws worked in some cases but fell flat in other areas. The "new" laws work much better and apply to all situations. They've been proven using high-speed video, launch monitors, doppler radar. So now we have a much better model. And yet, knowledgeable, well respected people in golf refuse to believe it. It's like showing someone pictures of the earth from outer space and still argue that the world is flat. Simply amazing. Yes, Brandel Chamblee, I am talking about you!

  • Upvote 1

“You don't have the game you played last year or last week. You only have today's game. It may be far from your best, but that's all you've got. Harden your heart and make the best of it.”

~ Walter Hagen

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My instructor told me that whatever direction my club is moving in at impact is the direction my ball is going to start flight. Along with that he said that what ever direction my club face was in at impact is the direction my ball will basically end its flight. Does that seem right? Maybe this question is to obvious to be asked here but im still learning and want to learn right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Originally Posted by chris650

My instructor told me that whatever direction my club is moving in at impact is the direction my ball is going to start flight. Along with that he said that what ever direction my club face was in at impact is the direction my ball will basically end its flight. Does that seem right? Maybe this question is to obvious to be asked here but im still learning and want to learn right.

It's wrong, and I'd find a new instructor, because I think that understanding why the ball flies the way it does is fundamental to golf instruction. http://thesandtrap.com/b/playing_tips/ball_flight_laws.

And I don't want this thread to turn into a Ball Flight Laws discussion ( everyone is tired of those), so let's not let it. It had to make my list, but we don't have to talk about it.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

ed

Originally Posted by iacas

Poor instructors - in general - still exist so widely, and still get business. If mechanics were like golf instructors, there would be massive industry reform.

Sadly, with golf being what it is, poor (i.e. not knowing the correct BFLs etc.) instructors still manage to improve golfers. And more bizarrely, golfers still go back to the same poor instructors every week even when they are not improving! I have targeted many golfers at my local club that have been having lessons for years with the same old pro and steadily gotten worse, and they tell me, "I like Paco, I enjoy my lessons with Pedro, José a great guy!" Unbelievable.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Someone should create a website/mobile app that's the Angie's List of golf instructors. Verified (as much as possible) reviews from actual students of instructors. Perhaps photos and video, along with writeups about the instructor. So as to hold more accountability. You sort of have some semblance of this on YouTube. It's very hard for someone who is just starting out to figure out who is a good instructor. I've encountered more than a few people who take lessons from the top instructors of your state lists who say that a good portion of the instructors on these lists weren't that good.

Perhaps instruction is in the state that it is in because a majority of people don't really expect much out of it when they should.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why are you surprised by the amount of club hos? With all the marketing out there it's not a surprise that so many fall for it, especially when in general a lot of golfers kind of dumb and will believe anything (like the OBFLs or that something breaks towards something miles away). Plus, playing around with the latest and greatest can be fun!

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
PXG 0211 Driver (Diamana S+ 60; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrids (MMT 80; 22°, 25°, and 28°) · PXG 0311P Gen 2 Irons (SteelFiber i95; 7-PW) · Edel Wedges (KBS Hi-Rev; 50°, 55°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Vice Pro or Maxfli Tour · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · Star Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Sun Mountain C130S Bag

On my MacBook Pro:
Analyzr Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Shouldn't "ho" have a "w" in front?  No, that would be Whos and sounds like a Dr Seuss book.  We should ask Velvet Jones.

I think in any industry you will always have people instructing others who have a little knowledge and are dangerous.  I have met many "engineers" who I think should have their degree taken away and don't understand the basics.  Yet they are still employed.

We must keep our chins up and press on!  The truth will win out!

Many thanks for your help including Mike, James and Dave .

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I had to add one to my first post:

People still think that you "turn the face down at impact" to hit a draw, or that hinge actions affect the ball because of what they do while the ball is on the face.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

[LIST] [*] There are still so many club hos out there. I think that's how you spell hos. :) [/LIST]

Because technology has limited benefit (no club fixes fundamental swing problems), or because clubs perform similarly (everyone replicates and copies successful designs), or something else?

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Originally Posted by B-Con

Because technology has limited benefit (no club fixes fundamental swing problems), or because clubs perform similarly (everyone replicates and copies successful designs), or something else?

Both, to be honest. I don't think drivers have really done much to advance (well, the hosels have, but you could always just get a club that's fit for you as I think the hosels are a fitting tool) in the past five or six years. Yet a club ho will buy six drivers a YEAR, or spend $500 on a shaft and go shoot 80.

That's more the kind I meant.

But what do I know. My irons look like this:

http://thesandtrap.com/gallery/album/view/id/56038/user_id/1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • We still have people who think the ball is "trapped" against the ground, people who still think draws have topspin, and people who still believe that greens must all break "towards" or "away" from something that's 20 miles or 2 miles or 40 yards away from where they're putting."

---------

yeah but.  I normally play in SC Charleston area.  The break to the ocean (from 4 miles away is bogus).

BUT, recently played in the Appalachian foothills and was told time and again by the members that "these greens break away from the mountain".

--nonsense I said, the greens break how they read just like any other green.  I learned my lesson.  Finally.

--on more than one 6-12 foot putt where it was obvious to my eye that the ball would break down the slope away from the bunker,,it infact did not.  On one ocassion it was completely straight when I read a 4-5 ball break.  Just sayin'

Regarding trapping the ball, ball flight rules, hinge action, blah blah blah.  It is waaaaay too much for me to think about.  When I do get a lesson I ask the instructor to give me drills to work on and context as to why I'm working on them.  If he/she started to go into hinge action relative to ball flight blah blah balh- I would begin looking for another instructor.

In the bag:
Cleveland Launcher 9.5º Driver
Cleveland 4W 17º
Mizuno MX Hybrid 20ºMizuno MX-200's 4 - GCleveland G10 56º SWOddysey 2ball with line Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
Originally Posted by lonewolf

Regarding trapping the ball, ball flight rules, hinge action, blah blah blah.  It is waaaaay too much for me to think about.  When I do get a lesson I ask the instructor to give me drills to work on and context as to why I'm working on them.  If he/she started to go into hinge action relative to ball flight blah blah balh- I would begin looking for another instructor.

Yes, you should because the instructor is incorrect, not because it's too complicated Like Erik said, hinge action doesn't effect curve.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by lonewolf

BUT, recently played in the Appalachian foothills and was told time and again by the members that "these greens break away from the mountain".

--nonsense I said, the greens break how they read just like any other green.  I learned my lesson.  Finally.

--on more than one 6-12 foot putt where it was obvious to my eye that the ball would break down the slope away from the bunker,,it infact did not.  On one ocassion it was completely straight when I read a 4-5 ball break.  Just sayin'

That kind of misses the point I was making, which I realize, was subtle.

Most greens built on the side of a mountain might very well break away from the peak of the mountain because it's cheapest to just go with the overall grade of the land, but in no way is it some sort of over-riding principle that governs all putts everywhere, especially when you're not literally ON the mountain like the courses that host the Bob Hope, Augusta National (and Rae's Creek), etc.

Putts break towards downhill. That's all there is to it. :-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

Yes, you should because the instructor is incorrect, not because it's too complicated   Like Erik said, hinge action doesn't effect curve.

I think you are missing my point.

the whole conversation is too complicated to me.  Too much other stuff in my mind right now (work, family, etc.)  If I start to hear about hinge-action; spin rate; blah blah blah it's over for me.

Again, I want some drill and some context as to WHY I'm doing those drills - in laymen's terms.

In the bag:
Cleveland Launcher 9.5º Driver
Cleveland 4W 17º
Mizuno MX Hybrid 20ºMizuno MX-200's 4 - GCleveland G10 56º SWOddysey 2ball with line Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by iacas

A few little mini-thoughts that aren't big enough on their own to warrant separate posts.

I have a hard time understanding how it's 2012 and:

Many (perhaps most) instructors (let alone golfers) believe the ball starts in the direction of the path and ends up where the face is pointing.

Poor instructors - in general - still exist so widely, and still get business. If mechanics were like golf instructors, there would be massive industry reform.

People still think that you "turn the face down at impact" to hit a draw, or that hinge actions affect the ball because of what they do while the ball is on the face.

There are still so many club hos out there. I think that's how you spell hos. :)

We still have people who think the ball is "trapped" against the ground, people who still think draws have topspin, and people who still believe that greens must all break "towards" or "away" from something that's 20 miles or 2 miles or 40 yards away from where they're putting.

I think the biggest singular breakthroughs in golf in the past 50 years include:

Affordable high-speed cameras.

Jorgensen's "Physics of Golf."

FlightScope/Trackman and other launch monitors.

AimPoint.

Many would include TPI/AMM type data in here, but I don't think it quite crosses my threshold.

TGM would be included if this span was longer than 50 years, even though most of it is wrong or outdated or lacking, it changed the way a LOT of people thought about things, and has had ripple effects that affect a LOT of golfers and instructors.

This isn't instruction-related, but the best ten U.S. players of all time might not include Phil Mickelson. In no order: Tiger, Jack, Arnie, Ben, Bobby, Billy, Byron, Sam, Walter, Gene, and Tom. That's 11. Phil's probably definitely top 12, but which two of those people could he bump to crack the top 10? When you consider the strength of the fields these days, though, it becomes much easier to bump a few guys down and move Phil inside the top 10.

To the quality of instruction, I will say this: things are heading in the right direction. The Internet has played a moderate role in this. The better golfers are becoming more informed, and when a lesser golfer asks "who should I take lessons from?," the better golfer is more likely than ever to recommend a good instructor rather than a poor one. The poor instructors are slowly (too slowly) getting fewer lessons.

I'm not surprised at all that people still believe these things and that golf instruction is terrible.  Why would people believe anything different when they here these things everytime they turn on the TV and watch the golf channel or a golf tournament.  Fix the commentary on golf tournaments and get better instructors on the golf channel - things would change very quickly!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by iacas

That kind of misses the point I was making, which I realize, was subtle.

Most greens built on the side of a mountain might very well break away from the peak of the mountain because it's cheapest to just go with the overall grade of the land, but in no way is it some sort of over-riding principle that governs all putts everywhere, especially when you're not literally ON the mountain like the courses that host the Bob Hope, Augusta National (and Rae's Creek), etc.

Putts break towards downhill. That's all there is to it. :-)

Fair enough.

But when playing in terrain one is not accustomed to "downhill" is not as easily defined.

Go play a southern coastal bermuda green course (Kiawah) one day and then a mountainous Bent grass greens course the next day.  Downhill isn't as easy as one thinks.  Local knowledge DOES come into account.

In the bag:
Cleveland Launcher 9.5º Driver
Cleveland 4W 17º
Mizuno MX Hybrid 20ºMizuno MX-200's 4 - GCleveland G10 56º SWOddysey 2ball with line Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4282 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
    • I get trying to limit relief to the fairway, but how many roots do you typically find in the fairway? Our local rule allows for relief from roots & rocks anywhere on the course (that is in play). My home course has quite a few 100 year old oaks that separate the fairways. Lift and move the ball no closer to the hole. None of us want to damage clubs.
    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...