Jump to content
IGNORED

To Golfers Who Score in the 70s - What's Your Story?


gr8golf

Recommended Posts

Only just scored in the 70's with a 77 with a 38-39 (On a PAR-72) Had to put my driver away in the back 9 as it just was not consistent enough with a few pushes and pull shots (3w made a huge difference putting in the middle much more often) .. 9 out of 10 chips/lobs were solid  ...only one three-putt ..if it wasn't in the hole it was a tap in

This time for a first I didn't add up my score going into the last few holes I just didn't want to know I wanted the feeling I was just playing an average round and not going for my first ever sub 80 scores in over 184 games carded.

Now I've had much better 9 hole rounds and much better games with the driver ...but would be my best at just keeping the ball in play and confident short game.

 Nothing burns me up in a game to miss easy birdie after birdie from poor short gameplay..  

IMHO Mid to high HC players the 3w isn't used enough in place of the driver I certainly wouldn't have broke 80 if I had to use Driver only on PAR-4-5's

 

Edited by NZ Golfer

Go Foxy Go

Link to comment
Share on other sites


New member, just found this thread. Started hitting balls in1964 at 8 yrs old. By the time I was 16 I was an A player in the Men's game at the course I grew up on . Turned Pro after school and played for a living for 12 years. I my opinion, the ability to play very well inside 100 yards and putting seperate the good players from the others. Length is a contributing factor, but short game is a determining factor. It is all about how fast did you get it in the hole. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The average amateur will putt 40+ times per round. If you want to have a chance at shooting in the 70’s, learn how to putt.

What did I do? Married the right woman that didn’t care if I started this adventure of golf. Had the right people in place to allow me to leave a business for a few hours a day. Joined a Country Club that forced me to practice if  I was to meet golf friends.

Started 2011, broke 80 within a year, and par within the second year.The 60’s would be in the third year. I played almost every day and got lessons when I couldn’t get lower than 8. I still use the same one now when necessary.

Edited by LMoore
Missed a word
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

Got my second 70's score the other day with a 79 (45/34) now with 191 carded rounds ...it seems after getting 83 (around 80 games ago 6yrs+ it's been so hard to beat that score)  with many 83's at best but just as many low 90's ....

then after a 5-month break with zero golf .... I just took a different mindset to really think about my game and not focus on my score so much ...got a net out the back yard work on the swing path contact ...much more chipping practice ..

and it been 40 days where outside a couple of days I haven't held a club ...played doz or so rounds and I go from 15.1 HC to 12.1 .... 77 and 79  >>> brilliant haven't yet scored an 80 or 81

  • Thumbs Up 1

Go Foxy Go

Link to comment
Share on other sites


18 minutes ago, 3jacker said:

Anyone who takes 40+ putts in a round surely must take 60+ or 70+ full shots. 

 

Don't know if I agree with that. If you 2 putt 14 greens and 3 jack 4 greens, but hit all of the greens in regulation, you'll end up with a 76. Certainly, it's unlikely that all of the greens were hit in regulation, but I know for sure I've broken 80 with bad putting days. In fact, depending on one's length, 3 putt pars are possible on par 5's. I've been a victim of those ugly pars many times. It makes the putt count high, but the score can be close to handicap.

More common for a low single is 30-34 putts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 4/9/2019 at 5:55 AM, Old Pro said:

Length is a contributing factor, but short game is a determining factor.

No, putting is the least determining factor, then short game. Ask @iacas 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's always the possibility for anything.

In general, 40+ is an indicator of an average or less golfer and in general, people are far less able to execute a full swing than a putt.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Story?  I'm a fan of the Dark Tower series, also Feist's Magician series (the entire thing), and Julian May's extended Pliocene Exile series.

 

(Frankly, it's not birdies for me, those come one or two maybe a round, but some of the best rounds are just regulation golf - that GIR approach shot is a big deal - I'd rather be 2 putting for par (with chance of birdie) every day rather than scrambling for par - if you can hit that approach shot well, then suddenly being good vs great at putting matters a lot less in just keeping the score from blowing up - which is a good thing, frankly I'm medicore at putting at best).

Edited by rehmwa
  • Like 1

Bill - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
On 4/9/2019 at 12:39 AM, LMoore said:

The average amateur will putt 40+ times per round. If you want to have a chance at shooting in the 70’s, learn how to putt.

I don't believe that first bit is true.  Based on this study, with data collected by TheGrint,


YOU (vs) OTHER GOLFERS How do you compare to other golfers in the US?

even 25 handicappers average less than 39 putts.  For a 25 handicapper to get to the point where he breaks 80 regularly, we're talking about close to 20 strokes of improvement.  The fewest putts a player is likely to average is 30 to 32, so he can gain maybe 7 or 8 per round by putting better.  To get into the 70s with regularity, he has to improve everything he does, with most of his improvement coming before he gets to the green.

  • Like 3
  • Thumbs Up 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

58 minutes ago, LMoore said:

Don't know if I agree with that. If you 2 putt 14 greens and 3 jack 4 greens, but hit all of the greens in regulation, you'll end up with a 76. Certainly, it's unlikely that all of the greens were hit in regulation, but I know for sure I've broken 80 with bad putting days. In fact, depending on one's length, 3 putt pars are possible on par 5's. I've been a victim of those ugly pars many times. It makes the putt count high, but the score can be close to handicap.

More common for a low single is 30-34 putts.

A lot more can go wrong to compound your score or give you more opportunities to score before you get to the green.  Go read "Lowest Score Wins" and look at strokes gained data.  I'll take a premium ballstriker with suboptimal putting over a premium putter with suboptimal ballstriking any day of the week.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I don't believe that first bit is true.  Based on this study, with data collected by TheGrint,


YOU (vs) OTHER GOLFERS How do you compare to other golfers in the US?

even 25 handicappers average less than 39 putts.  For a 25 handicapper to get to the point where he breaks 80 regularly, we're talking about close to 20 strokes of improvement.  The fewest putts a player is likely to average is 30 to 32, so he can gain maybe 7 or 8 per round by putting better.  To get into the 70s with regularity, he has to improve everything he does, with most of his improvement coming before he gets to the green.

Dave, no question, every aspect of one's game is needed to score consistently in the 70's. In general, most 20-25 handi-cappers are not great putters. I know there are exceptions. But if they have consistently been that number, the quickest way to lower a score is to putt better. A 7 or 8 stoke improvement is pretty significant. And putting well seems the quicker route to do so, especially given that so many folks can't practice full shots for a large portion of the year due to geography. They can putt in a garage or basement.

I realize I'm making a large assumption that they can get off the tee, strike a decent 2nd shot, and be somewhere near the green.

But I acknowledge your point to an overall need of ability. I'm not looking for affirmation in any way by saying I improved quickly when I took the game up in mid 2011. While I quickly moved from not being able to break 100 to an 8 handicap in less than a year[lot's of practice, lots of rounds], to get lower, as low as a +1, I had to put a lot of time into putting. I'm still not a great putter, just better than average. To get lower, I'll have to putt better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
1 hour ago, 3jacker said:

Anyone who takes 40+ putts in a round surely must take 60+ or 70+ full shots. 

No.

My daughter had a bad round putting the other day. 40 putts. Broke 90.

Just now, LMoore said:

Dave, no question, every aspect of one's game is needed to score consistently in the 70's. In general, most 20-25 handi-cappers are not great putters. I know there are exceptions. But if they have consistently been that number, the quickest way to lower a score is to putt better.

Larry, you should buy and read Lowest Score Wins, if you haven't already (you don't have any achievements, so I don't know…).

Yes, the quickest way to lower your score by a few shots is to learn to chip and putt better, but that's also low-hanging fruit, and it's also not very big.

A guy shooting 95 that wants to shoot 75 is losing about 15 of those shots to the full swing, and only five shots from putting and short game.

Just now, LMoore said:

A 7 or 8 stoke improvement is pretty significant.

It's also highly unlikely that a guy shooting 95 has eight shots to lose just from his putting. He'd be a statistical outlier, big time.

Just now, LMoore said:

I realize I'm making a large assumption that they can get off the tee, strike a decent 2nd shot, and be somewhere near the green.

Your assumption is faulty. If they can do those things and they're losing 8 shots a round to putting, they're a statistical oddity. An outlier. Putting is a clear "glaring weakness."

Just now, LMoore said:

But I acknowledge your point to an overall need of ability. I'm not looking for affirmation in any way by saying I improved quickly when I took the game up in mid 2011. While I quickly moved from not being able to break 100 to an 8 handicap in less than a year[lot's of practice, lots of rounds], to get lower, as low as a +1, I had to put a lot of time into putting. I'm still not a great putter, just better than average. To get lower, I'll have to putt better.

Unless you're also a statistical outlier, you're probably wrong about that.

You're probably a much better putter than you realize.

I virtually never practice my putting. Ballstriking (off the tee, approach shots) account for the vast majority of the "Separation Value®" to be had in golf.

On 4/9/2019 at 12:39 AM, LMoore said:

The average amateur will putt 40+ times per round. If you want to have a chance at shooting in the 70’s, learn how to putt.

That's not accurate at all.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, LMoore said:

quickest way

Yes, but it's not the most impactful nor does it provide the longevity and "travel-ability" of ballstriking.  If you go around always relying on putting and short game because you can't hit a green, you'll eventually get bit and it will cost you--often dearly.  Inversely, you can play pretty good golf hitting the ball longer and hitting greens but not putting that well.  

If you can't putt, you won't score as well as you'd like.  If you can't hit the ball, you can't play golf.

15 minutes ago, LMoore said:

to get lower, as low as a +1, I had to put a lot of time into putting.

That's because at your level, you're closer to the peak.  You already do so much well by way of striking to even get to that point.  Makes sense.  Handicap golfers don't have the same problems you do, or else they'd be at +1 who can hit the ball too.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

Yes, but it's not the most impactful nor does it provide the longevity and "travel-ability" of ballstriking.  If you go around always relying on putting and short game because you can't hit a green, you'll eventually get bit and it will cost you--often dearly.  Inversely, you can play pretty good golf hitting the ball longer and hitting greens but not putting that well.  

If you can't putt, you won't score as well as you'd like.  If you can't hit the ball, you can't play golf.

Again, my assumption is "some" ability to move the ball toward the green.

I'm losing this battle. So I digress. Maybe I need to play with some higher handi-caps to gain perspective.

tired donald duck GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, LMoore said:

Again, my assumption is "some" ability to move the ball toward the green.

I'm losing this battle. So I digress. Maybe I need to play with some higher handi-caps to gain perspectivetired donald duck GIF

haha yeah, your better player problems are different.  But you know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
13 minutes ago, LMoore said:

Again, my assumption is "some" ability to move the ball toward the green.

I'm losing this battle. So I digress. Maybe I need to play with some higher handi-caps to gain perspective.

Read LSW. Read ESC.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
    • I get trying to limit relief to the fairway, but how many roots do you typically find in the fairway? Our local rule allows for relief from roots & rocks anywhere on the course (that is in play). My home course has quite a few 100 year old oaks that separate the fairways. Lift and move the ball no closer to the hole. None of us want to damage clubs.
    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...