• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Monte the Bear

Who Played the majors the best in 2012?

41 posts in this topic

Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics. Well, I love 'em.

From all of the players that tee'd it up at Augusta thru to Kiawah, only 12 players made the cut in all events. In order

Adam Scott - -6 for all 16 rounds

Graham McDowell - -4

Ian Poulter - -1

Paddy Harrington - +3

Tiger Woods - +5

Jason Dufner & Jim Furyk - +8

Steve Stricker - +12

Freddie Jacobsen +16

Keegan Bradley & Frank Molinari - +20

Zach Johnson - +26

If only Adam Scott had a better caddie.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I would throw Ernie Els into that discussion, but unfortunately the guys at Augusta didn`t think he was good enough to play.

He captured a title and beat Adam Scott in 2 of the 3 majors they both played.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed that it was Ernie; he should have been in the Masters.  Your list doesn't include a winner; I don't think you can say someone "played the majors the best" without winning one.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well, as I said, it's all about the stats of those who played all of them - there was a reason Els never made Augusta and generally that's because you didn't win or were not in the top 50. Only three of these players shot 3 of the 4 Majors under par - Scott, Poulter and Mc Dowell, so as far as consistency goes, I'd say they played better over the 4 tournaments.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call me crazy but making cuts in all 4 majors is not better than contending (being in the discussion on the final day) in a couple and winning one.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would throw Ernie Els into that discussion, but unfortunately the guys at Augusta didn`t think he was good enough to play. He captured a title and beat Adam Scott in 2 of the 3 majors they both played.

I agree. Ernie. I'll add though that "good enough to play" isn't one of the selection criteria by which Masters invitations are extended..... Ernie didnt meet the criteria and the tournament committee didn't make an exception for him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Monte the Bear

Well, as I said, it's all about the stats of those who played all of them - there was a reason Els never made Augusta and generally that's because you didn't win or were not in the top 50. Only three of these players shot 3 of the 4 Majors under par - Scott, Poulter and Mc Dowell, so as far as consistency goes, I'd say they played better over the 4 tournaments.

I'd say that Poulter, McDowell, and Scott were definitely the best . . . of the guys who didn't win any, because winning one is better than contending in 4.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But I didn't say contending. I said playing. I mean, all best to Bubba Watson and all that, but there's a man who has gone off the boil since winning.

BTW here's how they stack up over the 4 majors

Scott A - Masters -4 US Open +6 British -6 PGA -2

McDowell G -2, +2, -2, -2

Poulter I -5. +11. -3, -4

Harrington P -4, +7, -3. -2

Woods T +5, +7 -3, -2

Dufner J +1, +3, +3, +1

Furyk J -3, +3, +4, +4

Stricker S +7, +6, +2 -3

Jacobsen F Par, +6, +7, +3

Bradley K, +2, +18, +4, -4

Molinari F Par, +9, +5, +6

Johnson Z +3, +11, Par, +12

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Monte the Bear

But I didn't say contending. I said playing. I mean, all best to Bubba Watson and all that, but there's a man who has gone off the boil since winning.

BTW here's how they stack up over the 4 majors

Scott A - Masters -4 US Open +6 British -6 PGA -2

McDowell G -2, +2, -2, -2

Poulter I -5. +11. -3, -4

Harrington P -4, +7, -3. -2

Woods T +5, +7 -3, -2

Dufner J +1, +3, +3, +1

Furyk J -3, +3, +4, +4

Stricker S +7, +6, +2 -3

Jacobsen F Par, +6, +7, +3

Bradley K, +2, +18, +4, -4

Molinari F Par, +9, +5, +6

Johnson Z +3, +11, Par, +12

I suppose statistically (points system?) you have a point, but I wonder if Scott would trade his 2012 major season with Watson or Simpson?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Monte the Bear

I'm sure he would. But that's not the point of the thread.

If the point of the thread is that Scott had the lowest total score for 16 rounds, then the rest of us shouldn`t have bothered posting.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by k-troop

Agreed that it was Ernie; he should have been in the Masters.  Your list doesn't include a winner; I don't think you can say someone "played the majors the best" without winning one.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Call me crazy but making cuts in all 4 majors is not better than contending (being in the discussion on the final day) in a couple and winning one.

Originally Posted by Monte the Bear

I'm sure he would. But that's not the point of the thread.

I have to agree with ktroop (also mefree up there) and Sean.  You can add up the scores all day long for everybody who did not win one and compare them to each other, but the extra weight for a win is too much to ignore.  Heck, even if Adam Scott came in second in all four and lost them all in a playoff, I'd have a hard time saying he played the best in the majors over whichever of the 4 winners played the best in the others.

Bubba did nothing after the Masters, and Webb and Rory didn't do a whole lot outside of their wins, so I would agree that Ernie Els (started last day of US Open in 4th, and finished somewhere in the top 10) played the majors the best overall this year.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm sure he would. But that's not the point of the thread.

What is the point of the thread? I thought it was, who played the best overall in the majors....? Now the question is, what defines best? Can you be best without a win? Maybe with 4 2d's.....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No, as I stated at the start of the thread, I was not being subjective, I did not proffer an opinion, only the facts of the stats of who played the best golf over the 4 majors. The only stat that looks a bit skewed is Bradley's +18 at the US Open, whch may indicate he tanked his last round (he shot 77 to finish 3rd from last).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by colin007

What would be the average finish for these guys?

Good question, here's the answer

Poulter I 69.50

Scott A 71.00

Harrington P 71.25

Stricker S 71.50

McDowell G & Bradley K 71.75

Furyk J 72.00

Dufner J 72.50

Woods T & Molinari F 73.00

Jacobsen F 73.25

Johnson Z 74.25

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Monte the Bear

Good question, here's the answer

no, i meant position of finish, like 3rd place, tenth, etc...

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Monte the Bear

No, as I stated at the start of the thread, I was not being subjective, I did not proffer an opinion, only the facts of the stats of who played the best golf over the 4 majors. The only stat that looks a bit skewed is Bradley's +18 at the US Open, whch may indicate he tanked his last round (he shot 77 to finish 3rd from last).


Then why did you add a question mark?  "Who played the best in the majors?"

Your title should be changed to:  "If the majors were combined into a single 16-round tournament, here is how the top-10 would have looked."  That would have received 1 response, maybe.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Why not just send it back and get your refund?..Spending $200 on a "starter driver" seems expensive, from my perspective.... That all said, I'm very happy with my GX-7. I've got 10 rounds in with it so far and it isn't leaving my bag. They tell you right up front that it isn't going to win in a head to head distance competition with your driver. The point is that you'll hit it an acceptable distance (think 2 wood), but will be in play a lot more than with your driver. That's why they tell you to do the "averages test". Play a full round with your driver and measure EVERY driver shot (even the ones you dribble off the tee or slice into the nearby pond). Then play the same course with the GX-7 and measure your distances. That's what they mean when they say you'll be "consistently longer" with the GX-7.  If you're like me, your distances with the GX-7 will be averaged as longer than the driver.  If you can keep your driver in play on most every hole, then the GX-7 really isn't for you anyway. You aren't the target audience.    
    • I use it as a streatching/warm-up/exercise device.  I think it works well for that.  Maybe it helps my tempo also.
    • I bought a 100 pack of 48mm plastic castle tees on eBay for less than $4-shipped. They're the PERFECT height for the GX-7 and should last me forever. 
    • When using a cart don't wait for your fellow player sharing your cart to finish their shot and get back in the cart if it is quicker to drop him off and drive to your ball while he is getting ready to hit.  You have to use your judgement on when this will quicken your pace of play, it often will. There are really dozens of things you can do to help with pace of play. Little things, like where you park your bag around the green when walking, bringing your head cover to the tee box so you can put it back on as you walk back to your bag, mark your scorecard at the next tee while your playing partner is teeing off, etc. etc.  They all add up.  If you stay focused and aware of pace of play you'll learn them and/or figure them out.
    • I'll be in class with you then, Bill. Will be totally new to me, but let me know if there's any pre-knowledge you think might be helpful for me to brush up on first. I played a round last week, but I'm not sure what the heck happened to me (other than just age). I got fatigued at the turn, and started to feel a twinge in my neck- but played through it. Past couple days have been nursing the neck with Advil and massages, but now it is isolated to just some pain in my right shoulder blade when I lift my head up and turn it to the left. Other head movements feel just fine, but I'm not pushing it with a swing or anything yet. So I'm recovering well, but I'm just more concerned that this is a sign I'm starting to fall apart! It felt like a pretty standard walking round, which I'm usually able to do without any fatigue/aches/pains. I tell my wife, see! I just gotta play more for my own health! That logic seems to be working for now Good luck with your recovery, Matt.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. chewyshaun
      chewyshaun
      (38 years old)
    2. JetFan1983
      JetFan1983
      (34 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon