Jump to content
IGNORED

Anchored Putters Rules Change (Effective January 1, 2016)


mvmac
Note: This thread is 2491 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by newtogolf

Based on my limited insight to the rule change, it wasn't the USGA that pushed for the change, it was the R&A;, after Els won The Open.  According to the articles I've read, anchored putting is not as popular outside the US, and after seeing Ernie win their major the R&A; decided that they needed to ban anchoring before it became popular outside the US.  R&A; told the USGA of their intentions and gave them the option of joining in the decision or to have this affect only play outside the US.  USGA felt it would be confusing to have 2 sets of rules and joined with the R&A.;

Where on earth did you get this from?

This discussion has been on the Joint Rules Committee's agenda for some years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by JerseyThursday

So, it took them 35 years to modify their definition of a stroke in regards to anchoring?

Then go on to make it more convoluted (made matters worse) by saying variations like this are somehow okay.

I don't see a problem. The club does not appear to be anchored in either instance.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Originally Posted by JerseyThursday

Not that I don’t mind get pummeled from all sides on the merit of the ruling, but what’s the deal with the Arm Lock putter?

Its hard to tell from the photo but it just looks like a standard belly putter (in the 45 inch range) braced against the forearm (Kuchar style).

Is the grip somehow configured to rest more comfortably against the arm?

Yep.  Little more info here, and if you have any questions I can pass them along to our Callaway guys

http://thesandtrap.com/t/63451/odyssey-reacts-to-proposed-anchor-ban-with-metal-x-arm-lock-putters

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It was initially discussed on Brian Katreks show on XM.  He was the one that mentioned after the Open he had received information from golf insiders that the R&A; was not happy with increased number of golfers using anchored putting and that they were going to consider the rule change in conjunction or independent of the USGA.

Quote:

Speaking in the wake of the South African’s victory at Royal Lytham, R&A; chief executive Peter Dawson suggested the sport’s governing bodies were poised to take definitive action in the interest of resolving the long-running controversy.

Reuters’ Tom Pilcher was on hand to collect the quotage :

“The situation is that the R&A; and the USGA do have this subject firmly back on the radar… I think you’re going to see us saying something about it one way or the other in a few months rather than years.”

Quote:

Jim MacArthur, chairman of the championship committee for the R&A;, said there were 27 long putters and 16 belly putters in the 156-man field at the Open. Dawson said the number of golfers using the long putter has dramatically increased from about 5 percent five years ago, although he did not notice an increase at the recent British Amateur.

"It hasn't yet backed its way all the way down the game, although the statistics would show -- and I've checked this with the manufacturers -- that at the club level or recreational level, they are much more used in the United States than they are anywhere else in the world," Dawson said.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Rulesman View Post
Where on earth did you get this from?

This discussion has been on the Joint Rules Committee's agenda for some years.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

* sigh* And I'm sorry for lumping you into a group with Texian, since I know his posting history and you are nowhere near stooping to his level.  But I'm sure you will simply never see my point of view on this, so you can have the last word on it.

Aaaaah the old *divide and conquer* - not cool [quote name="newtogolf" url="/t/62766/anchored-putters-rules-change-was-decision-coming-soon/360#post_788801"]It was initially discussed on Brian Katreks show on XM.  He was the one that mentioned after the Open he had received information from golf insiders that the R&A; was not happy with increased number of golfers using anchored putting and that they were going to consider the rule change in conjunction or independent of the USGA.[/quote] So those damn euros are getting back at us for defeating them hundreds of years ago by imposing their will on us - now it all makes sense.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think you have read more into the what the journalists have said and selectively quoted that what has actually been going on in the meeting rooms.

I has been simmering for some time but no doubt the Open was an opportunity to trigger someone turning the heat up.

It has been an informal topic among staffers and referees at R&A; events for a couple of seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm not sure which part of my post you feel I've read too much into.  The quotes are selective in that they back up the points I made which is what you requested.  I did qualify the entire post by saying I had limited insight so I have no issue in being corrected if I've misunderstood what I heard and read.

Originally Posted by Rulesman

I think you have read more into the what the journalists have said and selectively quoted that what has actually been going on in the meeting rooms.

I has been simmering for some time but no doubt the Open was an opportunity to trigger someone turning the heat up.

It has been an informal topic among staffers and referees at R&A; events for a couple of seasons.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:


We didn't run out of arguments. We presented arguments that no one could refute other than insightful comments like "I'll know it when I see it,." and "Uh, if you say so. It's about the stroke in my opinion."

The people (USGA and R&A;) imposing this change don’t seem to understand what it takes to propel a golf ball a short distance, as on a green.

You don’t have to “swing” at it. A “tap,” a “jab,” or a tiny movement that is no more than a “pivot” can move it the necessary distance on most putts.

You have to “swing” clubs other than the putter. If you tried a “pivot” movement with your driver, unless you have wrists like King Kong, the ball wouldn’t go 30 yards.

It makes you wonder if those USGA and R&A; people even play the game, or just spend their time sitting around making up arcane rules to make it more complicated.

Why can't you make a putt with a real putter?

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

Yep.  Little more info here, and if you have any questions I can pass them along to our Callaway guys

http://thesandtrap.com/t/63451/odyssey-reacts-to-proposed-anchor-ban-with-metal-x-arm-lock-putters

Thanks.
I can see that the hosel is unique and as rulesman said it has more loft than a traditional putter.
My one question: is the grip different in that the flat side is facing to the left to lay flat against the wrist? Is that even allowed?

Driver: Ping K15 10°, Mitsubishi Diamana Blueboard 63g Stiff
Fairway 4-wood: TaylorMade RocketBallz Tour TP 17.5°, Matrix Ozik TP7HD S shaft

Hybrids: Callaway Diablo Edge 3H-4H, Aldila DVS Stiff
Irons: MIURA PP-9003, Dynamic Gold Superlite S300, Sand Wedge: Scratch 8620 56°
Putter: Nike Method Concept Belly 44"
Ball: Bridgestone Tour B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Originally Posted by notsohard

seems like a lawsuit may be coming......

Not a winnable one IMO. Not even one a reasonable judge shouldn't throw out of court.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by notsohard

seems like a lawsuit may be coming......


Idle threats...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Idle threats...

Somebody will sue - but it will be a waste of their time. Any chance of this being changed would have to come from someone coming up with an argument that the USGA hadnt thought of yet - also highly unlikely, but more likely that someone winning a lawsuit.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by notsohard

seems like a lawsuit may be coming......

Has anybody been quoted to that effect since word of the decision came out?

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Not a winnable one IMO. Not even one a reasonable judge shouldn't throw out of court.

True. But since when has that stopped anyone from trying in our overly litigious environment, We REALLY need a "loser pays" system in this country...

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was at my club today and 5 of us anchored putter users were on the putting green consoling each other and fiddling around with alternative methods that were going to be legal. The pro saw us and walked out to us saying: “I can guess what you guys are discussing.” He went on to tell us, that in his opinion, the easiest transition for anchored belly putters would be going to the Kuchar grip and the rule for that is the grip can press up against your left forearm but can't extend above your elbow.
We all had typical belly putters so it didn’t work perfectly (the loft hadn’t been added to accommodate for the forward tilt and the flat side of the grip was facing forward), but I really like the way it felt. I played 9 holes and again it felt really good.
Point being, I can see why Odyssey is developing the “arm-lock” putter and I can see a lot of  people switching to this method when the time comes.

Driver: Ping K15 10°, Mitsubishi Diamana Blueboard 63g Stiff
Fairway 4-wood: TaylorMade RocketBallz Tour TP 17.5°, Matrix Ozik TP7HD S shaft

Hybrids: Callaway Diablo Edge 3H-4H, Aldila DVS Stiff
Irons: MIURA PP-9003, Dynamic Gold Superlite S300, Sand Wedge: Scratch 8620 56°
Putter: Nike Method Concept Belly 44"
Ball: Bridgestone Tour B330-S

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by JerseyThursday

I like how you edited out my key point: the governing boards are doing away with it without one shred of numerical statistics that proved it gave an advantage to user.

They were trying to solve a problem that never was a problem.

Maybe because the basis of the rule was NOT that anchored putting provides an advantage.  If someone could demonstrate that pool cue putting dies not provide an advantage would that be an argument for allowing it?

And, as an aside, if it doesn't provide YOU with an advantage why do you use it?

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2491 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
    • I get trying to limit relief to the fairway, but how many roots do you typically find in the fairway? Our local rule allows for relief from roots & rocks anywhere on the course (that is in play). My home course has quite a few 100 year old oaks that separate the fairways. Lift and move the ball no closer to the hole. None of us want to damage clubs.
    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...