Jump to content
IGNORED

Anchored Putters Rules Change (Effective January 1, 2016)


mvmac
Note: This thread is 2491 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Seems to me the putter sales tell the whole story, just as someone else suggested.  Any math nerds want to guess how many years of doubling it takes before it would become the majority putter choice?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/sports/golf/belly-putter-could-lift-golf-equipment-sales.html?_r=0

To match the growing demand, the leading shaftmaker True Temper has increased its production of belly and long putter shafts to 120,000 last year from 60,000 in 2010. The company says it expects to produce more than 500,000 shafts this year.

Chris Koske, the global director of Odyssey Golf, said the company sold 8,000 belly putters in 2010 and more than 34,000 units last year. He has high hopes for this season.

“I’d like to get to 100,000,” he said. “I think it is completely doable.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by dave67az

Seems to me the putter sales tell the whole story, just as someone else suggested.  Any math nerds want to guess how many years of doubling it takes before it would become the majority putter choice?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/sports/golf/belly-putter-could-lift-golf-equipment-sales.html?_r=0

To match the growing demand, the leading shaftmaker True Temper has increased its production of belly and long putter shafts to 120,000 last year from 60,000 in 2010. The company says it expects to produce more than 500,000 shafts this year.

Chris Koske, the global director of Odyssey Golf, said the company sold 8,000 belly putters in 2010 and more than 34,000 units last year. He has high hopes for this season.

“I’d like to get to 100,000,” he said. “I think it is completely doable.”

I do not see it becoming the putting choice of the majority - but those are some big numbers for a *small niche*

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by meenman

I do not see it becoming the putting choice of the majority - but those are some big numbers for a *small niche*

Another article (I can't find it again right now, but it was from late last month) had a quote from a Taylormade rep who said that 15% of their 2012 sales were from belly/long putters.  If they saw the same increase that Odyssey did (more than tripling from 2011-2012), and if they were projecting the same as Odyssey for the future (barring any USGA action), then they should expect anywhere from 45-50% or more in 2013.  Sorry, but this isn't difficult math.

And people are still asking why the USGA acted now??  Seriously?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by dave67az

Another article (I can't find it again right now, but it was from late last month) had a quote from a Taylormade rep who said that 15% of their 2012 sales were from belly/long putters.  If they saw the same increase that Odyssey did (more than tripling from 2011-2012), and if they were projecting the same as Odyssey for the future (barring any USGA action), then they should expect anywhere from 45-50% or more in 2013.  Sorry, but this isn't difficult math.

And people are still asking why the USGA acted now??  Seriously?

It does make sense that 15% of their putter sales would be long and belly putters. Most guys do not buy putters like they do drivers. The only ones that would buy putters are those changing their putting method.

Once the USGA backs down - anchored putting sales will be through the roof. Those that are holding off for fear of the (proposed) ban will buy one once it is safe.

The whole USGA plan will backfire on them - they just gave a ton of free publicity to what they are trying to stop. Some of these guys that will buy anchored putters probably never knew anything about them before (as we can tell from all of those on here that say they have never seen someone anchor.)

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by meenman

Once the USGA backs down - anchored putting sales will be through the roof. Those that are holding off for fear of the (proposed) ban will buy one once it is safe.

The whole USGA plan will backfire on them - they just gave a ton of free publicity to what they are trying to stop. Some of these guys that will buy anchored putters probably never knew anything about them before (as we can tell from all of those on here that say they have never seen someone anchor.)

We'll see. Making some bold predictions. The PGA Tour is not the entire world. I haven't heard anything in opposition from any of the other major tours, PGAs, etc.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Dave67, thanks for the data - interesting. meenman: I'd be surprised if many active golfers are only now learning about long putters/anchoring, as a result of the present controversy. You'd have to be living in a hut in back of the tenth green or something.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


All this discussion is fascinating! As a person who anchors the putter and is against the ban, I kinda wish some people weren't on my side as their ridiculous arguments do not help the cause. Ban or not, golf will go on. A miniscule few might give up the game and nobody, and I mean NOBODY is going to not pick up the game because of the ban. Golf is bigger than this ban. I sure as hell am not giving up the game I love.

That being said the more I think about it, this ban just sucks. The ban has been put in place and is being supported by a bunch of people that solely "believe" that anchoring the putter is bad for the game. They "believe" that its not a real stroke. Even the USGA admits there is no proof at all the stroke creates any sort of an unfair advantage. So its being banned simply on "belief"?

This is very similiar to the fight faced by the LGBT community as they try to gain the right to marry. Banning something based completely on aesthetics and not evidence just seems antiquated and wrong to me.

  • Upvote 1

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by dave67az

Seems to me the putter sales tell the whole story, just as someone else suggested.  Any math nerds want to guess how many years of doubling it takes before it would become the majority putter choice?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/sports/golf/belly-putter-could-lift-golf-equipment-sales.html?_r=0

To match the growing demand, the leading shaftmaker True Temper has increased its production of belly and long putter shafts to 120,000 last year from 60,000 in 2010. The company says it expects to produce more than 500,000 shafts this year.

Chris Koske, the global director of Odyssey Golf, said the company sold 8,000 belly putters in 2010 and more than 34,000 units last year. He has high hopes for this season.

“I’d like to get to 100,000,” he said. “I think it is completely doable.”

But wouldn't you then make the assumption that sales of regular putters would have declined by nearly the same amount?  Since supposedly golf is declining, I don't see how you could have one without the other.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Fourputt

But wouldn't you then make the assumption that sales of regular putters would have declined by nearly the same amount?  Since supposedly golf is declining, I don't see how you could have one without the other.

Seriously?  You're that bad at math?

So you don't see how the numbers of belly putters can increase while the numbers of regular putters stay the same.

I'm sorry, when exactly did the government place a limit on the total number of putters allowed for sale each year?

Oh...finally found that other story with the Taylormade numbers and some more Odyssey numbers, too.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/28/sports/golf/proposed-golf-rule-changes-pushes-long-putters-out-of-style.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by NM Golf

This is very similiar to the fight faced by the LGBT community as they try to gain the right to marry. Banning something based completely on aesthetics and not evidence just seems antiquated and wrong to me.

Wow there have been some questionable arguments in this thread that but that one takes the cake.

You're serious trying to equate a fight for the free choice to marry whoever someone pleases with decision over where the line lays in an arbitrary set of rules governing a made up game? Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I believe he's saying that the arguments and attitude of those opposed to both practices are rather similar. And I agree with him.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't understand this fight at all. the timing of seems silly to me... from what i have read the most crucial facts are below.

- according to the stats the USGA says there is no advantage to the anchored putter - this is either correct or part of an elaborate lie to write a rule change they think will stand up in court.

- the game is hurting for new growth numbers - why limit a stroke now that som many have spend time grooming.

- the rule is simply the intent to define a stroke - this IMO doesn't pass the smell test.

- long putters have been used in one fashion or another for close to 100 years.

just as an FYI - my putter is 28" so i don't have a horse in the race.

as a business person, parent and active memeber of several charitable organizations i have learned you need to pick your battles, there seems to me no logical reason to have this fight. the USGA and the Royal whatever need to just quietly push this under the rug and it will be forgotten about or at least pushed way back into the history books shortly.

Driver- Callaway Razor somthing or other
3W- Taylor Made R11S
3H Rocketballz
4I-PW- MP-59
Gap- Vokey 54

Lob- Cleveland 60

Putter- Rife

Skycaddie SG5  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Originally Posted by NM Golf

That being said the more I think about it, this ban just sucks. The ban has been put in place and is being supported by a bunch of people that solely "believe" that anchoring the putter is bad for the game. They "believe" that its not a real stroke. Even the USGA admits there is no proof at all the stroke creates any sort of an unfair advantage. So its being banned simply on "belief"?

a) The USGA ( and R&A; - why do people keep acting as if this is just the USGA?) has said that they're not banning it because it provides an advantage. It clearly does (provide a mechanical advantage), but that's not the reason they're banning it .

b) They DO get to decide such things. They DO get to decide that distance measuring devices are only allowed by condition of competition, they do get to decide that wedge grooves have gotten too severe, they do get to decide that the stymie is not allowed and your opponent can require you to mark your ball, etc.

Originally Posted by Stretch

I believe he's saying that the arguments and attitude of those opposed to both practices are rather similar. And I agree with him.

They're not the same. Give me a break. The Rules of Golf are arbitrary rules for a game we invented. They have absolutely nothing to do with basic human rights or civil liberties or actual LAW. And I couldn't care less if two people want to marry each other, regardless of either of their genders.

Originally Posted by Lefty-Golfer

as a business person, parent and active memeber of several charitable organizations i have learned you need to pick your battles, there seems to me no logical reason to have this fight.

Here's the deal: they don't feel it's a stroke, and they feel the game of golf will be better off if the practice is prohibited. They're doing it because they think it's the right thing to do.

They've been very clear about that. There was a time when we'd admire a group that stood up for what they thought was right. Now I guess we just say "there seems to me no logical reason to have this fight." They're doing what they think is best for the integrity of the game. Both the USGA and the R&A.;

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A big question I'm asking is what is the reaction in the rest of the world.  Americans sometimes act that they are the only ones who count for anything, yet from what I've read the European PGA hasn't voiced any objection (I read somewhere that they do not oppose the ban), and I've heard nothing at all from Asia or anyplace else.  Anyone else heard or have any information on that?  The US doesn't rule the world, not even the golf world.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A big question I'm asking is what is the reaction in the rest of the world.  Americans sometimes act that they are the only ones who count for anything, yet from what I've read the European PGA hasn't voiced any objection (I read somewhere that they do not oppose the ban), and I've heard nothing at all from Asia or anyplace else.  Anyone else heard or have any information on that?  The US doesn't rule the world, not even the golf world.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the US may rule this time. While the r+a covers a bigger geographical area, the usga actually covers a higher percentage of golfers.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by meenman

Correct me if I am wrong, but the US may rule this time.

While the r+a covers a bigger geographical area, the usga actually covers a higher percentage of golfers.

Old numbers (five or six years ago) put it at about 50/50.

So among that 50/50, you have an incredibly small minority who opposes the ban, the perhaps equally small minority (or maybe smaller, who knows?) who support the ban, and the 90%+ of golfers who have no clue about the ban and never will.

And "favor" outside of the U.S. goes the way of supporting the ban.

You can do the math. The very fact that this is a tempest in a teapot is a big thing in favor of the USGA/R&A.; At the end of the day, the PGA Tour will abide by the Rules of Golf, and are not interested in becoming a rules-making body. Finchem said that. They may not like the rule, but in the end, I think they'll go along with it.

We'll see... In the "spring" apparently.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Mike Walker, senior editor, Golf Magazine: The anchored putter debate has turned into a power struggle over who controls the game. The USGA and R&A; should call the PGA Tour's bluff: some players might complain, but the Tour will abide by the ban. Tim Finchem will never allow a situation where his players could be called cheats. Incidentally, this whole situation is not helping golf dispel its image as a game for doddering twits.

Alan Shipnuck, senior writer, Sports Illustrated: It's a sad day. The blue coats have made mistakes but their motivation has always been to protect the game. All Finchem cares about is protecting the Porsche money of a couple dozen yippy journeymen. This is a troubling precedent and, much like the Citizens United court decision, its ugly impact will only become more obvious over time.

Eamon Lynch, managing editor, Golf.com There's nothing surprising in the Tour's stance. Finchem is employed by the players to represent their interests, and as Gary Van Sickle pointed out earlier this week, many Tour players don't like blue-blazered amateurs deciding on the tools of their livelihood. Expecting any other reaction from the Tour is akin to expecting the Teamsters to rise up against overtime. That said, the USGA and R&A; seem to be in this one for the long war. Trial lawyers are the only happy constituency. If only the various bodies in this spat were as eager to deal with slow play, which has much more of a detrimental impact on the game for most of us.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2491 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...