Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4814 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been seeing some talk on the internet lately as to what you can get more distance out of a fade or a draw. I don't want the answer that they travel the same when everything is equal. I know that. I spoke to an instructor friend of mine and he thinks depending on the club it makes a difference. If you hit a driver with a positive AoA the fade should go farther and an iron shot a draw will go farther. I think the draw will go farther because you the delofting of the club due to the weight being forward. I think with a driver hit on the upswing it doesn't matter just changing the HSP will help dictate the ball flight.


Posted
Originally Posted by tkahlm

I have been seeing some talk on the internet lately as to what you can get more distance out of a fade or a draw. I don't want the answer that they travel the same when everything is equal. I know that. I spoke to an instructor friend of mine and he thinks depending on the club it makes a difference. If you hit a driver with a positive AoA the fade should go farther and an iron shot a draw will go farther. I think the draw will go farther because you the delofting of the club due to the weight being forward. I think with a driver hit on the upswing it doesn't matter just changing the HSP will help dictate the ball flight.

I can't see how a positive angle of attack with a driver will make a fade go further than a draw with the same positive angle of attack, assuming everything else is equal of course. I also don't believe a draw will go further with an iron. You can fade an iron just as easily as you can draw it and on both swings have a negative angle of attack with the handle forward.

Remember, you're just tilting the spin-axis. Unless the two swings creating the curve are different and thus providing different AOA, spins, etc., then a fade should in theory go the same distance as a draw with any club.

We have to say "when everything is equal" or else you'd be comparing apples to oranges aren't you? You could make an endless amount of arguments if everything isn't equal. It would be like saying a fade will go further with a swing speed of 112 vs a draw at swing speed of 90. Of course it will.


Posted
Originally Posted by tkahlm

I have been seeing some talk on the internet lately as to what you can get more distance out of a fade or a draw. I don't want the answer that they travel the same when everything is equal. I know that. I spoke to an instructor friend of mine and he thinks depending on the club it makes a difference. If you hit a driver with a positive AoA the fade should go farther and an iron shot a draw will go farther. I think the draw will go farther because you the delofting of the club due to the weight being forward. I think with a driver hit on the upswing it doesn't matter just changing the HSP will help dictate the ball flight.

Be careful what you say here.  This bold part implies that if you hit a fade, your weight is back.  That's ridiculous.

And Deron is right, you have to say "when all else is equal" because, otherwise, you have no basis for comparison.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
It depends on a multitude of factors including what exactly you change to tilt the spin axis as well as what your normal impact conditions are.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Its to complex to give a general answer. Technically if you use the same swing, just open or close the clubface for a draw or a fade, a fade should go a bit shorter just because it will travel higher and land softer, but its probably not that much difference. Bubba Watson hits a fade, and Dustin Johnson hits a draw.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Has anyone seen any information, maybe from trackman, that shows one flight typically goes farther than another. And what I meant by a fade going farther with the driver is with a HSP of 0 and a square face having the ball cut compared to hitting a draw with a driver.


Posted
Originally Posted by tkahlm

Has anyone seen any information, maybe from trackman, that shows one flight typically goes farther than another. And what I meant by a fade going farther with the driver is with a HSP of 0 and a square face having the ball cut compared to hitting a draw with a driver.

I don't think you can find data from Trackman to show that one flight goes further than another. Unless of course, one or more of the variables are different. Again, you're just tilting spin-axis, so assuming swing speed, smash factor, spin, etc., are all the same, the ball turning left-to-right isn't going to go further or shorter than a ball turning right-to-left.


Posted
Originally Posted by deronsizemore

I don't think you can find data from Trackman to show that one flight goes further than another. Unless of course, one or more of the variables are different. Again, you're just tilting spin-axis, so assuming swing speed, smash factor, spin, etc., are all the same, the ball turning left-to-right isn't going to go further or shorter than a ball turning right-to-left.

Right, as has been said numerous times on here.  Another way to think of it is to realize that the ball has no idea if it's being hit by a right handed or left handed swing.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Right, as has been said numerous times on here.  Another way to think of it is to realize that the ball has no idea if it's being hit by a right handed or left handed swing.

Exactly. It doesn't make sense to say that one flight goes further than the other. Assuming for a second that a fade goes further (for a right handed player) with an positive angle of attack, then guys like Phil Mickelson would be at a disadvantage hitting a fade since their fade curves to the left and other players curves to the right.


Posted
Originally Posted by saevel25

Its to complex to give a general answer. Technically if you use the same swing, just open or close the clubface for a draw or a fade, a fade should go a bit shorter just because it will travel higher and land softer, but its probably not that much difference. Bubba Watson hits a fade, and Dustin Johnson hits a draw.


this actually makes sense, even in context with what the other posters are trying to say - then it just depends on which side of the optimal loft angle the particular club lives on......

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well its really to complex

For example, i play a 910D2 Driver, i have it set at 8.75 degrees, that gained me some distance because i cut the spin rate on the golf ball.

But from swing to swing, if you look at trackman, your spin rate and launch angles fluctuate greatly, i've had swings that were 3000 rpm, and 5000 rpm. For all the precision the club makers say, and getting fitted, you can only get so close, before its drowned out because of error in the swing.

Its like saying, ok mill this corner to 1/1000th of an inch. you can only draw a line to 1/10th of an inch.

For me, as long as i get a driver were even if i mis hit i am not getting punished to bad, i am fine. I am not looking to squeeze out ever yard i can, cause i know i am going to be hitting drives that fluctuate greatly anyways.

Even with the fade versus draw. If you have an inside out swing path, lets say +3 degrees to the right. difference between a push and a fade could be 2-3 degrees in clubface orientation, i am not sure if that adds much to the loft of the driver anyways. I doubt it would be noticable. So, really your not looking at anything earth shattering.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I keep it simple in my little brain that if I hit a draw, I close my club face thus delofting it making it a lower more penetrating ball flight with more roll out (compared to a fade) and a fade I open the face thus adding loft causing a high flight with less rollout. My view...

- Jered

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by jclark

I keep it simple in my little brain that if I hit a draw, I close my club face thus delofting it making it a lower more penetrating ball flight with more roll out (compared to a fade) and a fade I open the face thus adding loft causing a high flight with less rollout. My view...

Everything you say there seems backwards to me.  To hit a draw you leave the face open, or right of the target.  To hit a fade you close the face left of the target.  Closing the face adds more loft and opening delofts.  My opinion on the OPs question is fades should go farther due to more roll out.  My fades go farther in real life.


Posted
Originally Posted by jclark

I keep it simple in my little brain that if I hit a draw, I close my club face thus delofting it making it a lower more penetrating ball flight with more roll out (compared to a fade) and a fade I open the face thus adding loft causing a high flight with less rollout. My view...

Originally Posted by ossojones

Everything you say there seems backwards to me.  To hit a draw you leave the face open, or right of the target.  To hit a fade you close the face left of the target.  Closing the face adds more loft and opening delofts.  My opinion on the OPs question is fades should go farther due to more roll out.  My fades go farther in real life.

Neither of you are necessarily wrong, just incomplete.  (Except the sentence I bolded for you, that is definitely wrong)  jclark is probably referring to having his clubface closed in relation to his swing path but not his target, and so long both are to the right of the target, then he can hit a push draw.  You don't mention swing path either, but are obviously saying the same thing as him.  Face open to target, path right of face, equals push draw.

Regarding the bold, however, you got that backward.  Just think about the extremes.  If you open the club as far as your hards can turn, the club is pointing at the sky, so now your 11* driver is now a 90* sand wedge (with about 75* of bounce - good luck hitting that one of a tight lie ;)), and closed as far as humanly possible points that face at the ground.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
In my post I was talking about my club face relative to the swing path.

- Jered

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by ossojones

Everything you say there seems backwards to me.  To hit a draw you leave the face open, or right of the target.  To hit a fade you close the face left of the target.  Closing the face adds more loft and opening delofts.  My opinion on the OPs question is fades should go farther due to more roll out.  My fades go farther in real life.

Id agree with no lateral movement a fade should go farther but most players hit a draw with hips that are sliding towards the target. When the hips move towards the target in the swing the hands lead more delofting the club.


Posted
Originally Posted by deronsizemore

I don't think you can find data from Trackman to show that one flight goes further than another. Unless of course, one or more of the variables are different. Again, you're just tilting spin-axis, so assuming swing speed, smash factor, spin, etc., are all the same, the ball turning left-to-right isn't going to go further or shorter than a ball turning right-to-left.

Many teachers do their own research with trackman. I have heard many top instructors talk about starting direction of slicers being 15% to the right of the target and lower, those numbers where found from the use of a trackman. I understand spin axis tilt as well I was trying to find out if anyone has experience on the spin loft being more on a draw or a fade thus lower the smash factor.


Posted
My fade has less smash factor than a draw.

- Jered

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4814 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.