Jump to content
IGNORED

Why would one want a lower ball flight?


Note: This thread is 3983 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I read threads here and other places around the web that discuss wanting a shaft that produces a lower ball flight and I can't help but wonder why. With a driver or fairway wood, I could see how a lower boring flight would be more desirable. Also, if you're loosing distance due to a higher flight, I could understand that as well. Although, that would most likely be a swing issue though, no? Otherwise, wouldn't you want the highest flight you could get into a green?

I speaking about ideal conditions here, a lower flight is obviously desired when it's windy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well I would think the answer is primarily distance.  I think Hogan mentions how the best players turn a 5-iron into a 4-iron because they get lower trajectory, while bad players turn a 5-iron into a 7-iron.

Obviously higher flight is better for sticking greens but in that case a good player can simply go down to a wedge or any other lower club to get added loft.  However in many cases distance is what is desired so a more penetrating trajectory gives that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you hit it too high, you want a lower ball flight. If you hit it too low, you want a higher ball flight. Coming in high is nice for holding greens, but going too high will hurt your distance. There are people struggling with hitting it too low and people struggling with hitting it too high. Shafts and clubheads are means you can use to manipulate the ball flight.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's a really good question. I've often heard the expression "low, penetrating shot" and wondered (other than the obvious) what that meant.

It seems as though when I hit a 5 iron cleanly - one where I can hardly tell I hit the ball - the flight is always high and the ball seems to continue to climb. I just don't get that feeling or distance from lower trajectory shots. So unless I'm trying to shoot under branches, I don't try to hit low. Keep in mind, I obviously have a great deal to learn about the game.

For me, the hybrid and fairway woods are different. Depending on where the club head makes contact, a clean shot from say my 5 wood off the turf can result in either a higher or lower trajectory, both of which feel good and travel about the same distance. The lower shot rolls more while the higher shot carries more. If there's a difference in distance, it isn't noticeable to me.

As far as the driver, the longest shot I've ever made was of relatively low trajectory but that shot was an anomaly.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Couple reasons why guys hit it too high.  Flipping it resulting in high weak shots or for whatever reason, spinning the ball too much.  Guys that spin the ball too much tend to have higher swing speeds, the initial launch might be ok but the ball keeps ballooning.  I don't think anyone should ever want to hit it low consistently, unless they live in Scotland or something.  Hitting it high, effectively, should be more preferable over hitting it low.

Originally Posted by anthony

With a driver or fairway wood, I could see how a lower boring flight would be more desirable.

Go to the range of a tour event, see how "boring" they hit their woods.  Most people would be surprised how high they hit it.  Easier to get distance through the air than on the ground.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by anthony

I read threads here and other places around the web that discuss wanting a shaft that produces a lower ball flight and I can't help but wonder why. With a driver or fairway wood, I could see how a lower boring flight would be more desirable. Also, if you're loosing distance due to a higher flight, I could understand that as well. Although, that would most likely be a swing issue though, no? Otherwise, wouldn't you want the highest flight you could get into a green?

I speaking about ideal conditions here, a lower flight is obviously desired when it's windy.


the first sentence...."threads here and other places around the web"........a lot of crap is said on the net, yes there is times when a lower ball flight is optimum, but its not the be all and end all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's all about finding optimal. If your ballflight is so high that you're losing distance, you'll want to bring it down a bit.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm a perfect example of a golfer who, at times, prefers a low trajectory shot.

I'm not a heavy hitter. there are many occasions, e.g. second shots on par 5's or long par 4's, when I just want to advance the ball as much as possible on a relatively flat fairway. All that extra roll from a low shot can be quite beneficial, especially if it's rolling towards the green.

Also, wind hasn't been mentioned much (though one person made the Scotland reference). I've seen what wind can do to drives, and blow them off the fairway is most certainly one of the potential consequences. If I'm playing on a blustery day, I definitely tee up a little lower, and hope for the best...

Well, I guess I'm always hoping for the best :).

taylormade.gif Burner Superfast 1.0: 10.5* Driver, 15* 3-wood

adams.gif a5OS Hybrid/Irons Set: 3h-5h, 6-PW

adams.gif "Tom Watson Classic" Wedges: 52*, 56*, 60*
taylormade.gif Est 79 TM-770 Putter, "Fontana" Pattern

 xFIXx

Link to comment
Share on other sites


hitting too high or too low is mostly a technical problem. changing clubs and shafts is finding the wrong fix I beleive. might as well search technical progress.

also many beleive it's really cool to say they hit it so hard they need a lower ball flight

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Seems to me there's less room for error ... a low to medium ball flight would have to be more accurate than a high ball flight.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have a Nickent Evolver driver with a Grafalloy ProLaunch Red shaft that hits it lower and a UST ProforceV2HL shaft for when I want to hit it high and get more carry.  If I'm playing on a windy day or on an dry course where I think that roll is more important than carry the Pro Launch is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


After hitting a lot of thin shots today, I have to re-think my opinion that lower-trajectory iron shots don't have the same distance as my normal higher-trajectory ones. I hit a few that carried over the green when I was at the distance where a well-struck high shot wouldn't have.

For many of the reasons listed in the above posts, I still prefer the predicability of my normal high shot even if it isn't the maximum distance that I'm capable of hitting.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If your hitting a low shot and the ball is not staying on the green due to lack of backspin, then you probably need a higher ball flight. If you hit a more boring, low trajectory and the ball holds the green with spin, than no need to change. Depends on the low shot for me. I've had a towering high 7 iron land soft and not back up, and have a low boring 7 iron back up 5-10 feet on the green. The spin difference was absurd. This is because i flip at the ball and when i don't and actually swing good, the ball comes off much lower, and with a lot more spin.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Originally Posted by JonMA1

After hitting a lot of thin shots today, I have to re-think my opinion that lower-trajectory iron shots don't have the same distance as my normal higher-trajectory ones. I hit a few that carried over the green when I was at the distance where a well-struck high shot wouldn't have.

Not sure if you're joking, but the lower trajectory shots this thread is talking about are more of the solid strike, lower ball flight shots.  A thinned shot is a miss hit.  At least that's what I've been assuming lol

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

Not sure if you're joking, but the lower trajectory shots this thread is talking about are more of the solid strike, lower ball flight shots.  A thinned shot is a miss hit.  At least that's what I've been assuming lol

Thin- ier. POW.

TMAG should come out with a modified tour striker that only hits worm burners for the extra-ier yardage!

  • Upvote 1

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

Not sure if you're joking, but the lower trajectory shots this thread is talking about are more of the solid strike, lower ball flight shots.  A thinned shot is a miss hit.  At least that's what I've been assuming lol

Sorry about my mis-use of terminology. I meant when I don't hit what I consider my normal high-flight shot. Whether it's thin, or I haven't hit it at the correct angle of attack, or it's too far back in my stance, whatever is the cause or term. The low shots I hit today had plenty of power, they just resulted in a longer, less predictable distance.

As far as putting backspin on the ball, that's a bit advanced for me at this stage of my game (but it's cool to watch the good players do that). I'm just happy to have my iron shots land softly on the green without rolling through and at a distance that is predictable. That's why I prefer the high shots. I guess that was my point. The only time I try to purposely hit a low shot is to keep it under branches.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

mini has (had?  it's been a while) a wicked flip and wants a lower ball flight.  Less spin would be nice, too.  Or maybe the same spin with the lower ball flight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


As others have said, optimizing distance is key and this is the only time you would really have a legitimate cause for concern in ball flight.

I prefer my high, soft-landing shots. I  generate a lot of backspin and 90% of the greens that I hit are a result of my ball coming to rest with the ball coming to rest several inches to two feet behind the ball mark (backspin). The other 10% would be in the event I catch it a little thin or a pitch or punch is required where my ball will still land softly and roll out only several inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3983 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 3/6* 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟩⬜🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • On my car I got the extended power train warranty. I do read the fine print most of the time. Though at now 37, my eyes aren’t what they were 10 years ago.    The problem with most of these extended warranties on electronics and appliances is you don’t register the warranty with the place you buy the warranty from, which I’ve always found strange. Unless it’s GameStop then you know Alina drops her Switch in the next two years and the screen cracks they’ll replace it. No questions asked.    You buy a slow cooker at Walmart for $50 and the extended warranty is say $6, you have to go through a third party to register your product for the warranty, and it’s pretty damn annoying. Target is the same way. Anything you buy the extended protection on you have to go through a third party.    Why do retailers go through a “broker” for warranties? Because they don’t wanna deal with it? They make me talk to someone from another country, that I can barely understand, when I need my warranty fulfilled.   Sorry for the rant.
    • You may be able to find a regular flex Blueboard on the second hand market. I’m little more than half your age so I swing a shaft that launches pretty low so I don’t have a lot of experience with Regular flex (other than when I try to hit it I miss way to the left).    There are other shafts, such as the newer Ping Alta that I’ve heard good things about. And one that no one talks about. The Jupiter shaft. You can get this shaft for a $100 with a grip and your Ping adapter installed. I was talking to the golf manager at Dick’s Sporting Goods here and he has one in his driver and has nothing but good things to say about it. I thought about getting one for my Paradym Triple Diamond to play it a little shorter, but haven’t pulled the trigger yet.
    • Wordle 1,013 3/6* ⬛🟨⬛🟨🟨 🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Meanwhile, another old Tour Edge guy switches to Callaway for this season. I have a different problem, course dependent set-ups. What I’m wondering is if @dragonsmhas the 8 iron set 5-PW, AW, GW or just 5-PW, GW. Because the PW is 42°, AW 47°, and GW 52°. Because that could potentially be a gap there. The 5-iron to 6-iron length jump is 5/8” instead of 1/2” so you should be careful of that.    @WUTiger the problem most people have with 3-woods is they don’t play them far enough back into their stance. And they usually don’t have enough loft and the shaft is too long. So 3HL, 4 or 5-wood is probably better for most golfers. I do the “Frankenwood” approach. I have both the 3+ and 5 woods. I typically will either add two degrees to the 3+ on 6600 yards or longer courses, or take a degree off the 5-wood on shorter courses than 6300 or so, and use the 5-wood shaft for both. I don’t usually find a situation where I need both the 3 and 5 wood on a course. I don’t play from 7000 yards it’s no fun. Edit: I mostly agree with @WUTiger on the gapping, although a lot of the newer even fixed hosel fairway woods are made better than what we had when we were playing the old Exotics XRails.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...