Jump to content
IGNORED

What kind of car do you drive?


Note: This thread is 1995 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

Sorry, the Camaro is pretty cool car but the Challenger is way classier. Camaro is sexy but trampy if you know what I mean.

IMO challengers look silly, they have a tricked-out crown vic offset stance and the rear end is disgusting.  plus performance for $ is ridiculous as the SRT8 can barely beat the SS which costs about $10k less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 944
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Yea mine came with them from the dealer. I think it is a part of the rallye edition. I also got power sunroof, touch screen radio, heated leather seats, etc etc. Heres an actual picture of mine

Okay. My Dad bought this car in 1974 for $375. He drove it as his daily driver for years and I grew up riding around in this. He spent ten years restoring it himself but then never really drove it

pic ?

Originally Posted by tuffluck

IMO challengers look silly, they have a tricked-out crown vic offset stance and the rear end is disgusting.  plus performance for $ is ridiculous as the SRT8 can barely beat the SS which costs about $10k less.


I don't mind the Challenger's looks, in fact I also like it more than the Camaro.  The real problem with the Challenger is that it's so large, I call my buddy's a 2 Door RV.  With the size comes weight, which is why it barely outperforms the Camaro.

I liked the Camaro until I had to drive one.  High door panels and dash, combined with a low roof line and huge A and B pillars make it a PITA to see out of compared to the others in it's class.

If you're looking at value for performance, neither car is a great value.  The Mustang runs the same 1/4 mile times as the Camaro for 2013 and costs $4000 less.  Most tests attribute the better slalom and braking times of the Camaro to being fit with better tires from the factory, and for $4k, I can get a few sets of badass tires or upgrade the shocks/struts/springs and tires and blow it out of the water.

Or just buy a Boss 302..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I don't mind the Challenger's looks, in fact I also like it more than the Camaro.  The real problem with the Challenger is that it's so large, I call my buddy's a 2 Door RV.  With the size comes weight, which is why it barely outperforms the Camaro.

I liked the Camaro until I had to drive one.  High door panels and dash, combined with a low roof line and huge A and B pillars make it a PITA to see out of compared to the others in it's class.

If you're looking at value for performance, neither car is a great value.  The Mustang runs the same 1/4 mile times as the Camaro for 2013 and costs $4000 less.


visibility is pretty easy to get used to, though at first it is a little off putting.

actually the mustang should be a little faster.  mustang was a no sell for my 6'6" frame--they have no telescopic steering column.  i literally can't fit in a car that won't let you adjust the steering wheel about a foot away from the dash.  big shortcoming by ford IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tuffluck

visibility is pretty easy to get used to, though at first it is a little off putting.

actually the mustang should be a little faster.  mustang was a no sell for my 6'6" frame--they have no telescopic steering column.  i literally can't fit in a car that won't let you adjust the steering wheel about a foot away from the dash.  big shortcoming by ford IMO.


My best friend is 6'10" and drives a Mustang............

He loves the car, but doesn't really look comfortable in it.  But then again, he doesn't look comfortable in any car.  Me, being 5'5", find the Camaro's lack of visibility horrible, but the Mustang perfect.  For someone my height, the Camaro interior is like being in a cave.

The difference in straight line performance between the two is so close, that it would come down to the driver instead of the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, those two are practically identical cars.  Neither is "classier" or "trampier" than the other.  (They're both pretty bad-ass though)  My first car was a Camaro, as a matter of fact.  Nother super fancy at all ... a 1979 RS Berlinetta (in 1991) ... but nevertheless it was a Camaro.  My mom owned a '67 RS new that she sold around the time I was born to get a "family" car.  :cry: That's right ... when I ask her why she didn't keep it so I could have it when I was old enough, she blamed it on me. :mad: I currently drive either a Nissan Altima or a Chevy Traverse ... and occasionally on the weekends we break out the Mini. :)

Don't get me wrong, the Camaro is plenty badass, I'm just sayin' if I had my druthers...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

My best friend is 6'10" and drives a Mustang............

He loves the car, but doesn't really look comfortable in it.  But then again, he doesn't look comfortable in any car.  Me, being 5'5", find the Camaro's lack of visibility horrible, but the Mustang perfect.  For someone my height, the Camaro interior is like being in a cave.

The difference in straight line performance between the two is so close, that it would come down to the driver instead of the car.

if he has a long torso it isn't a big issue, but if he has long legs like i do, every time i scoot in close enough for my arms to reach the steering wheel, my knees are hitting the dash.  so if i have a telescoping steering column, i can pull it closer to me rather than me closer to the dash.  maybe he just hasn't realized that's a problem, heh,

i would think shorter would be better on visibility since the car is short.  my head nearly hits the top and i do have to bend at the neck a bit to see traffic lights when i'm stopped at one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tuffluck

i would think shorter would be better on visibility since the car is short.  my head nearly hits the top and i do have to bend at the neck a bit to see traffic lights when i'm stopped at one.


But the dash and door panels are up high as well.  There's not a lot of window height at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tuffluck

my head nearly hits the top and i do have to bend at the neck a bit to see traffic lights when i'm stopped at one.

I have a long torso too and, therefore, this same problem in just about any car.  When I drive my wife's Mini and the top is down, I actually find it easier to look OVER the top of the windshield to see the lights change. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I don't mind the Challenger's looks, in fact I also like it more than the Camaro.  The real problem with the Challenger is that it's so large, I call my buddy's a 2 Door RV.  With the size comes weight, which is why it barely outperforms the Camaro.

I liked the Camaro until I had to drive one.  High door panels and dash, combined with a low roof line and huge A and B pillars make it a PITA to see out of compared to the others in it's class.

If you're looking at value for performance, neither car is a great value.  The Mustang runs the same 1/4 mile times as the Camaro for 2013 and costs $4000 less.  Most tests attribute the better slalom and braking times of the Camaro to being fit with better tires from the factory, and for $4k, I can get a few sets of badass tires or upgrade the shocks/struts/springs and tires and blow it out of the water.

Or just buy a Boss 302..........


I'll provide a little levity here as a challenger owner.   The stock RT and SS are pretty even in the quarter mile. Both can run the 1/4 in the 13's stock..... The best driver who knows how to launch on street tires will win.....If 1/4 mile time is all that is important, the new 5.0 mustang is faster.   It's smaller and lighter....the new GT is crazy fast for the $$$.

IMO...the typical Challenger RT owner is a different person.  It's a bigger car, the ride is softer and more comfortable, it costs more than the Mustang,  the interior is more spacious, and it has a bigger trunk..............a 375hp HEMI doesn't hurt, but people don't buy this car to have the fastest 1/4 mile pony car on the block..   The challenger is more true to what old MOPAR muscle was.......mid-size cars and big motors!! I don't race mine....it's just a baddazzz daily driver that has a comfy ride and a lot of storage........and I can haul AZZZ if I want to!!!  I considered the others, but for my purposes, the Challenger was the best option as a cool pony and daily driver.

I never considered the mustang for me because it's too small and the ride is too stiff for a daily driver.  That stiff ride is great for racing, but not for me to drive everyday!!!  I did consider the SS.....what swayed me is more passenger and trunk space in the Dodge...plus...MOPAR is waaay cooler looking..IMO......the challenger is baddazzz.  MOPAR rules..LOL

On the other hand, the 392HEMI is an entirely different beast..........it's not for me, but it's pretty DAMN badazzz with 500HP...a stiffer suspension, and all that I don't want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll provide a little levity here as a challenger owner.   The stock RT and SS are pretty even in the quarter mile. Both can run the 1/4 in the 13's stock..... The best driver who knows how to launch on street tires will win.....If 1/4 mile time is all that is important, the new 5.0 mustang is faster.   It's smaller and lighter....the new GT is crazy fast for the $$$.   IMO...the typical Challenger RT owner is a different person.  It's a bigger car, the ride is softer and more comfortable, it costs more than the Mustang,  the interior is more spacious, and it has a bigger trunk..............a 375hp HEMI doesn't hurt, but people don't buy this car to have the fastest 1/4 mile pony car on the block..   The challenger is more true to what old MOPAR muscle was.......mid-size cars and big motors!! I don't race mine....it's just a baddazzz daily driver that has a comfy ride and a lot of storage........and I can haul AZZZ if I want to!!!  I considered the others, but for my purposes, the Challenger was the best option as a cool pony and daily driver.  I never considered the mustang for me because it's too small and the ride is too stiff for a daily driver.  That stiff ride is great for racing, but not for me to drive everyday!!!  I did consider the SS.....what swayed me is more passenger and trunk space in the Dodge...plus...MOPAR is waaay cooler looking..IMO......the challenger is baddazzz.  MOPAR rules..LOL On the other hand, the 392HEMI is an entirely different beast..........it's not for me, but it's pretty DAMN badazzz with 500HP...a stiffer suspension, and all that I don't want.

RT is 4,000lbs and 375hp vs 3,900lbs and 425hp is the Camaro, so I don't think they should be that close. Specs are usually crap, there are plenty of manual SSs stock that have clocked 12s on the Camaro forums. I think the lowest is 12.6. Though the auto SS has less power, but I personally don't drive those! Anyway... I do agree the new Mustangs are supposed to be quicker despite the lack of a telescopic wheel! Haha.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, having driven all 3 extensively, but not owning any of them, The username is because I own Mustang Bullitt #5339, which wouldn't hold a candle to any of them bone stock, but after a few small upgrades, runs 12.25@110mph with no supercharger or nitrous.

In Comfort:

Challenger SRT8

Mustang GT

Camaro SS

In Handling:

Camaro SS

Mustang GT

Challenger SRT8

Straight Line:

Mustang GT

Challenger SRT8

Camaro SS

The other issue is the few "special edition" models that are actually closer in price to the SRT8.  The RT isn't in the same performance league as the SS or GT, so you have to go up $10k to get it competitive.

But if you add in the Camaro ZL1 vs The GT500, the SRT8 is way outgunned.  The ZL1 has an edge over the GT500 on road courses, but the GT500 will destory the ZL1 straight line.  Camaro has decided they can't ever get a leg up on the Ford in the power levels anymore, so they're working on some great suspension packages, since everytime they've tried, the Shelby comes out and if that's not enough for you, you can have a GT500 Super Snake with 920hp, fully street legal if you have to be the baddest dude on the block.

The sleeper is the Boss 302.  Use the Red Off-Road Key, and it outperforms the standard GT by quite a bit.  The suspension in the Boss 302 is as good or better than the ZL1, tons better than the standard GT,  but costs a lot less and has less horsepower.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, having driven all 3 extensively, but not owning any of them, The username is because I own Mustang Bullitt #5339, which wouldn't hold a candle to any of them bone stock, but after a few small upgrades, runs 12.25@110mph with no supercharger or nitrous. In Comfort: Challenger SRT8 Mustang GT Camaro SS In Handling: Camaro SS Mustang GT Challenger SRT8 Straight Line: Mustang GT Challenger SRT8 Camaro SS The other issue is the few "special edition" models that are actually closer in price to the SRT8.  The RT isn't in the same performance league as the SS or GT, so you have to go up $10k to get it competitive. But if you add in the Camaro ZL1 vs The GT500, the SRT8 is way outgunned.  The ZL1 has an edge over the GT500 on road courses, but the GT500 will destory the ZL1 straight line.  Camaro has decided they can't ever get a leg up on the Ford in the power levels anymore, so they're working on some great suspension packages, since everytime they've tried, the Shelby comes out and if that's not enough for you, you can have a GT500 Super Snake with 920hp, fully street legal if you have to be the baddest dude on the block. The sleeper is the Boss 302.  Use the Red Off-Road Key, and it outperforms the standard GT by quite a bit.  The suspension in the Boss 302 is as good or better than the ZL1, tons better than the standard GT,  but costs a lot less and has less horsepower.

The Boss is awesome, though the color schemes are ridiculous and for that not sure I could ever own one. I can't wait for the Z28. It should be a good competitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by tuffluck

RT is 4,000lbs and 375hp vs 3,900lbs and 425hp is the Camaro, so I don't think they should be that close. Specs are usually crap, there are plenty of manual SSs stock that have clocked 12s on the Camaro forums. I think the lowest is 12.6. Though the auto SS has less power, but I personally don't drive those! Anyway... I do agree the new Mustangs are supposed to be quicker despite the lack of a telescopic wheel! Haha.

the camaro loses a lot of HP from the flywheel to the tires.......................the 425 rating is generous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Nice ride!  Would be fund to have here in Socal.

My other ride - only thing they have in common is that the Germans like their gas caps on the passenger side.

I'm a "semi-retired" carpenter and if you can believe it, this is my work vehicle which occasionally carries my chop saw and trim compressor.

The VW is a hoot - 6 speed paddle shift, accelerating can pin you to the seat.

Fun car - can't wait to top down it and have the bag in the back seat this spring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 1995 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • We ought to know, by now, that pandemics are pretty low on god's priority list.  
    • Day 75 (6/18/21) - Played 9 tonight with my 9-hole league and had my best 9 of the year, shooting a 41 (7 over the par 34). I had 3 pars and a birdie and if I hadn't had a triple on 16 due to an unplayable, could have broken 40. 
    • George Wright is just about my favorite course anywhere. @boogielicious, @billchao, and I played Keney Park last summer.  I've also played Torrey South, Wintonbury Hills, Montauk Downs, and Triggs Memorial. The latter two could use the TLC that Keney Park got. 
    • Indeed. I stand corrected. Thanks. I knew about this 4 strokes maximum in the pre-2019 rules, but with this ruling of two strokes per hole for 5 holes for using the wrong ball, I would imagine (and apparently, I did imagine) that the same would apply to too many clubs. I see that's not the case, and now I am even more confused. Why or why not? What's the difference? In both cases, improper equipment is being used (and most likely not consciously in both cases): why penalize one case with 2 strokes per hole until corrected, but only for a maximum of 2 two holes in the case of too many clubs?  SMH...
    • I don't know. I thought he was saying that VH had a wardrobe malfunction with his pants 😁.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bs1865
      bs1865
      (46 years old)
    2. DrMJG
      DrMJG
      (69 years old)
    3. Mikejanish
      Mikejanish
      (28 years old)
    4. Stu
      Stu
      (48 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...