Jump to content
IGNORED

F1 (Formula 1) Racing Topic


Recommended Posts

I am really enjoying that this season there is some legitimate competition to Mercedes. It's clear that both Verstappen is incredibly talented and the Red Bull is incredibly difficult to drive well, but at least this year there is somebody besides Hamilton/Bottas who is legitimately competing for wins each week and the overall title.

I'll readily admit I'm not much of a Lewis Hamilton fan simply because it gets boring watching the same guy win for so long, but I'm really enjoying seeing him get the chance to properly display his talent again in a way that hasn't really happened since 2018. Wire-to-wire victories are impressive, of course, but admittedly not much fun to watch especially when nobody else even has a chance. Seeing him race on more equal footing is fantastic because it gives better perspective on just how good he really is as a driver.

That said, I'm still strongly anticipating next season's regulation changes. I was so disappointed when they were postponed another year, but now that more teams have long-term certainty (McLaren, Aston Martin, Red Bull/Alpha Tauri, Williams, basically everybody other than Haas is in their best financial position ever compared to the last 3-5 years) it will be even better since hopefully we aren't at risk of seeing teams bail entirely if they don't have a good design philosophy from the get-go. If the increased ground effect helps cars follow and race one another, as predicted by simulations, it will be fantastic even if the pecking order largely remains the same (unlikely).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I didn’t think I am. George went from zero points in his entire career to really having should have won the one race he did in a Merc. With only a few days to get used to it, the wrong sized cabin, a

I am really enjoying that this season there is some legitimate competition to Mercedes. It's clear that both Verstappen is incredibly talented and the Red Bull is incredibly difficult to drive well, b

I'd also wager that an F1 car would quite thoroughly thrash a NASCAR Cup car on any track in the world. Without restrictor plates the NASCAR Cup cars are limited to 670 horsepower. F1 cars peak o

Posted Images

  • Administrator

It's kinda crazy, but at the same point… you can kind of approximate this with some of the more advanced simulators.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to F1 (Formula 1) Racing Topic
19 minutes ago, iacas said:

It's kinda crazy, but at the same point… you can kind of approximate this with some of the more advanced simulators.

I don’t know a whole lot about F1... all I know is the cars turn better and handle better and are faster than NASCAR cup series cars (that’s debatable though, because I think if you have the air intake the same at all tracks including Talladega and Daytona)  I think on ‘Dega where you can carry more speed the F1 car would still win but it would be close. 
 

I do know that F1 cars turn both ways equally well, and NASCAR Cup cars tend to struggle a little more with the right hand turns (usually bus stops in NASCAR), where in F1 the seems to only have to brake going into to the first part of the chicane and have more acceleration coming out of the chicane.

I think Cup Cars rely more on the setup, and F1 is more driver... but you can have a great car in the Cup series and still DNF.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I don't think that F1 is more about the driver at all. That's one of the biggest things I dislike about F1 - how much the car matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

38 minutes ago, iacas said:

I don't think that F1 is more about the driver at all. That's one of the biggest things I dislike about F1 - how much the car matters.

Why’s that? Is it because the cars are built like a jet on wheels? Do you think it take’s less skill to drive a F1 car than a NASCAR Cup series car?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 minutes ago, onthehunt526 said:

Why’s that? Is it because the cars are built like a jet on wheels? Do you think it take’s less skill to drive a F1 car than a NASCAR Cup series car?

I'm not sure how you got that from what I said.

A guy who had never won a point in two years in a Williams car should have won the first (and only) race he did in the Mercedes were it not for not only one but two massive issues (the wrong tires were put on his car, requiring another immediate pit stop, and he got a puncture then).

Maybe 90% of F1 is the car. Only 10% is the driver.

But, also, I think it takes more skill to drive an F1 car than a NASCAR car.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, onthehunt526 said:

Is it because the cars are built like a jet on wheels?

F1 cars aren’t jets on wheels. Quite the opposite, actually. Lots of downforce.

Jets have wheels, btw 😜

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd also wager that an F1 car would quite thoroughly thrash a NASCAR Cup car on any track in the world.

Without restrictor plates the NASCAR Cup cars are limited to 670 horsepower. F1 cars peak out at over 1,000 horsepower. The minimum weight for a NASCAR Cup car is 3,400 pounds, while F1 cars weigh only 1,631 pounds. That's nearly twice the power in half the weight, not even counting the grippier tires, additional downforce, and stronger brakes.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, Pretzel said:

I'd also wager that an F1 car would quite thoroughly thrash a NASCAR Cup car on any track in the world.

Without restrictor plates the NASCAR Cup cars are limited to 670 horsepower. F1 cars peak out at over 1,000 horsepower. The minimum weight for a NASCAR Cup car is 3,400 pounds, while F1 cars weigh only 1,631 pounds. That's nearly twice the power in half the weight, not even counting the grippier tires, additional downforce, and stronger brakes.

They don’t use restrictor plates in NASCAR any more the intake is just smaller at ‘Dega and Daytona... and it’s 750 horsepower without restrictions... Though you can probably get closer to 800 or so if you took the skirting off and made the bodies more in line with the way that they were pre-1988, in the current generation of car. In response to the Bobby Allison crash at Talladega in the spring of 1987, they added the skirting, restrictor plates and reduced airflow to slow the cars down at Super-speedway races. 

 

Lewis Hamilton went around Daytona in a test in 40.320 seconds. Which by my math is ~231 mph. (45.000 is 200 mph at Daytona) Bill Elliott went around Talladega in 1987 (this was before the engines were 750 hp) in 44.988. 212+ mph. You put his qualifying sort of set up in the Car of Tomorrow... you’re talking the F1 car would probably still win, a 3 lap race around one of the big Tri-Ovals... but it would be closer than one may realize. Open up the NASCAR a little bit and you’d be surprised how fast they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I think you're drastically under-estimating F1 cars.

And the truth is that you're having to say "open up a bit…" and they're still not to an F1 car, so…?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, iacas said:

I think you're drastically under-estimating F1 cars.

And the truth is that you're having to say "open up a bit…" and they're still not to an F1 car, so…?

They aren’t an F1 car, no. But I think you’re underestimating NASCAR Cup Cars... if you took NASCAR’s regulations off of a car... 900 HP wouldn’t be out of the question... neither would 250 MPH....

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
1 hour ago, onthehunt526 said:

They aren’t an F1 car, no. But I think you’re underestimating NASCAR Cup Cars... if you took NASCAR’s regulations off of a car... 900 HP wouldn’t be out of the question... neither would 250 MPH....

900 horsepower and 3,400 pounds still pales in comparison to 1,000+ horsepower and 1,600 pounds. Power to weight ratio is still more than 2x in the favor of the Formula 1 car, with an F1 car having much more flexible aero packages for reduced drag (on ovals) or increased downforce (on road courses). Even swiss-cheesing the NASCAR chassis to save 1,000 pounds doesn't put it in the same class as an F1 car, but that's perfectly okay. They're different cars for different purposes.

Edited by Pretzel
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

900 horsepower and 3,400 pounds still pales in comparison to 1,000+ horsepower and 1,600 pounds. Power to weight ratio is still more than 2x in the favor of the Formula 1 car, with an F1 car having much more flexible aero packages for reduced drag (on ovals) or increased downforce (on road courses).

I agree... the F1 car definitely would have a higher ceiling than a NASCAR. Hell a Lambo is faster than a stock car.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 weeks later...
On 6/18/2021 at 9:48 PM, iacas said:

Red Bull commonly has sub-2.0-second pit stops in F1.

Red Bull must give them wings.

https://youtu.be/U1MnVvVRkSk

Best part about this pit stop is that they did more than the pit stops in the videos above.

Not only did they change the tires, they also adjusted the front wing at the same time on both sides. All in under 2 seconds still.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Speaking of fast pit stops…

racefansdotnet-21-06-24-16-33-13-1-e1624

The FIA is to introduce new rules forcing F1 teams to slow down their rapid, two-second tyre changes during races.

 

"Mercedes complained about Red Bull pit stops. The current internet theory is that Red Bull personnel are anticipating wheels being fully sealed on cars rather than reacting to the sensor saying the wheel is on the car, hence why they are so fast. So the person in charge of signaling to the lollypop person is reacting before the sensor is actually “on”. I guess they’ve analyzed the reaction times by pit personnel and compared it to scientific studies on human reaction time. Explains why Red Bull is so fast, they don’t react to sensors they anticipate them. From a safety perspective makes sense why that’s a no-no."

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Here's several technical directives in a row aimed directly at Red Bull, and yet curiously the incredibly flexible Mercedes front wings that have been protested since race 1 remain ignored by the FIA...

I'm honestly pretty sick and tired of the FIA at this point, because it's become increasingly clear that they heavily favor Mercedes. The entire transition to turbo-hybrid V6 engines was primarily at the behest of Mercedes, who had already been developing similar systems and had an experience advantage. Despite introducing incredibly complex new engines, the FIA also made sure to add a token system that limited development and fixes for these complex systems to help ensure the team with the most experience (Mercedes) kept a large advantage. Mercedes was given secret tire tests using current-year chassis in an era where test time is severely limited or banned entirely. In 2017 Ferrari started to burn oil in the same way Mercedes had since the start of the turbo-hybrids, and the limit was reduced for every team besides Mercedes (0.9l/100km for other teams, 1.2l/100km for Mercedes) because Mercedes fitted their last engines early, ran a lap to make the engines "officially used", and then continued using their old engines again until it was time to switch for real. In 2018 the FIA made last-minute tire changes that were requested by Mercedes for multiple races, because the team had difficulty with the standard spec of tire. In 2020 they were allowed to continue to use DAS for the remainder of the season, despite banning it for future seasons and making it impossible for other teams to implement based on both cost caps and chassis homologation regulations.

Now these sudden changes once Mercedes finally has a legitimate competitor. It's such a departure from the past where the FIA worked to keep the teams more evenly matched with regulations that targeted top teams rather than their competition. No kind of targeted regulation is fair to any of the competitors in the sport, but at least when they were aimed at the dominant team it meant that snooze-fests with one team winning everything for nearly a decade never happened. Now the FIA is hell-bent on keeping Mercedes as the only team capable of winning a WDC/WCC for the foreseeable future.

 

  • Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Good for you, what course are you qualifying at?  Good luck.
    • Considering how many people he comes into contact with and how often he is flying, it is unfortunate but not a total surprise. You can catch Covid-19 again even with being vaccinated and previously infected. It just means that your infection is mild.
    • Or, he understands how it transfers, and he was only around his wife for two months. He didn't need to get tested… because in getting tested, maybe he would have gone out more than he did in isolating at home, perhaps? You are making a LOT of assumptions, as you often do, @Shorty. Cool it.
    • The Club at Lac La Belle - 6.5 I wasn't a big fan of this course. It was beautiful and well-maintained, but I found parts of it to be a little contrived. It's definitely a target golf course and for someone like me who is wild off the tee, it took all the fun of strategizing out of it because the risks were just too high. I did like that there was variety in the course layout with a good mix of short/long, right/left, uphill/downhill holes. I'm not sure I'd make a trip out to this one again if I'm ever back in the area for golf, but it's less than 10 minutes away from a delicious French bakery with the best croissants I have ever had, so that bumps up the score a little  I'd go back just for the croissants. The Sandbox - 7.0 This little 17 hole par 3 course was just fun. It gave you different looks and a variety of options for play. I really liked it and tried a bunch of different things I normally wouldn't have on a regular course. A 7.0 is probably the most I'd give to a par 3 course, though. Lawsonia Links - 7.5 I really enjoyed this course. Overall I found the layout to be good. There were plenty of places to miss, but you still needed to hit good golf shots to play well. I liked the way the mounds and bunkers were designed to play with the shape of the holes visually. There were really only a couple of holes I didn't like - 13 in particular, even though I made par both times using completely different strategies. It's just bordering on too many blind shots for me, though. I'd definitely play this course again if I have the chance. Mammoth Dunes - 8.5 This course was spectacular to look at - absolutely visually stunning. The pictures don't do it justice because they fail to capture the scale of everything. The place is massive. I'll echo what the others have wrote above: it's a journey. You feel like you're not going out to play a round of golf, but rather that you're going on an adventure while hitting a golf ball on the way. I understand now how some other reviews I've read or seen describe a feeling of getting lost, or losing your bearings for a bit. I wasn't thinking about routing. I had no idea where the clubhouse was. I didn't really care about any of it because I was out in this beautiful landscape. The golf itself for me was just there. I would be perfectly happy spending an afternoon just walking the course without playing it. And that's a bit of a detriment, because at the end of the day, it is a golf course. As a golf course, I found it didn't really matter much how you played it as long as you hit decent shots. There was certainly an ideal way to play the course well, and I hit some awful shots and paid the price for them, but plenty of just okay shots I got away with because of the layout. In the end that's fine. I don't need every course I play to be a grueling test of my skills.  I'd make a return trip and play this course again. Sand Valley - 9.0 This one is a golf course first and a spectacular view second. Where Mammoth Dunes focuses on the adventure, Sand Valley focuses on the golf. It's still visually stunning, but just not quite on the grand scale that Mammoth Dunes is. And Sand Valley does not let you forget for even one second that you're out there to do one thing: to play golf. I don't remember having a single shot out there that didn't require my undivided attention. The course absolutely punished you for missing your spots. But the flip side of that coin is that it was extremely rewarding to hit good shots there. An example is #8 mentioned above - I don't think I have ever felt so pleased to hit a GW to 35' before in my life, and I might never again. The course is a challenge in the best way. It makes you want to rise up to face it. I want to go back and battle it again. I shot my best score of the week with an 87 at Lawsonia, but it's the 94 the second time playing Sand Valley that I'm most proud of. Like Mammoth Dunes above, I'd make a return trip specifically to play this course again. Bonus Stuff The facilities at Sand Valley Golf Resort were top notch. The prices at the pro shop were fair. The food and drinks were also reasonably priced and delicious. The food truck at The Sandbox had the best food in the whole complex, IMO. Lac La Belle I felt was fancy but overpriced. I bought a polo at the pro shop at Sand Valley, but a similar shirt at Lac La Belle was like 50% more expensive. The golf carts had beautiful leather seats, but I absolutely hate geo-mapping on the GPS systems. I don't know how many times it slowed me down to tell me not to drive in the fescue even though I was driving parallel to it 20 yards away. Lawsonia had an older clubhouse and it certainly had a quaint feeling to it. That's not a bad thing. I did not look to see the prices they were charging for their merchandise.
    • Every YouTube video should start with a 10- to 45-minute diagnosis to make sure the video you're about to watch applies to you. There are a LOT of reasons why someone hits a slice. YouTube videos do not start with a 45-minute "disclaimer" because nobody would get through it. They just want to stop slicing, but if the video shows a fix for something that the student doesn't do, the video is less than worthless — it may actually cause more damage. Don't watch YouTube videos unless they're just working on some fundamental things, or you're very confident that what they're going to show you actually applies to you.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...