Jump to content
IGNORED

Xhot or Xhot Pro


Note: This thread is 3843 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I was at the Tulsa Golf Galaxy yesterday thinking about getting some new irons to replace my Ping G15's. I hit Xhot Pro, speedblades , rocketblades, Mizuno EZ's, and one other that doesn't come to mind right now. The two Taylormade types were fine. I absolutely hated the Mizuno EZ's. The Xhot Pro's were sweet! My first shot was a little squibbler, but after that the 6 iron was getting out there to 170+. My current Pings are in the 160 range for a 6 iron. I was unable to complete the fitting as I had to leave, but it wondered why I wasn't given a regular Xhot to hit? What is the difference in the Xhot and Xhot Pro lines? Joe
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I believe the XHot is more of a regular "game improvement" club, while the XHot Pro is more of a "players game improvement" club.  Smaller head, shallower cavity, probably less offset.  (i.e. harder to hit consistently but more workable)  I didn't study the specs, I'm sure you can do that on their web site for the details.  My guess is they didn't show you the XHot because they didn't have any in stock, but that's only a guess.  Maybe something you said to them got them focused more on players clubs?  Most retailers aren't going to show you stuff you don't seem interested in unless there's a real commission spiff involved.

For what it's worth, I really like the looks of the XHot clubs, though being currently a Titleist/Ping fanboy I haven't looked real hard at the specs.  I'm not a fan of the current trend that seems to demand that each new product line release be "out longest ever!"  But even Titleist is playing now so I'll just sit over here and grumble.

Driver: Titleist 913 D2 10.5*, Aldila RIP Phenom 50

Fairway 1: Titleist 913F, 17*, Titleist Bassara W55

Fairway 2: Titleist 913F, 21*, Titleist Bassara W55

Irons: Titleist AP1 714 5-PW, Aerotech Steelfiber i95

Wedges: SCOR 4161 48/52/56/60, Genius 9

Grips: GolfPride New Decade Red Mid-size on all of the above.

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Super Stroke Slim 3.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I believe the XHot is more of a regular "game improvement" club, while the XHot Pro is more of a "players game improvement" club.  Smaller head, shallower cavity, probably less offset.  (i.e. harder to hit consistently but more workable)  I didn't study the specs, I'm sure you can do that on their web site for the details.  My guess is they didn't show you the XHot because they didn't have any in stock, but that's only a guess.  Maybe something you said to them got them focused more on players clubs?  Most retailers aren't going to show you stuff you don't seem interested in unless there's a real commission spiff involved.

For what it's worth, I really like the looks of the XHot clubs, though being currently a Titleist/Ping fanboy I haven't looked real hard at the specs.  I'm not a fan of the current trend that seems to demand that each new product line release be "out longest ever!"  But even Titleist is playing now so I'll just sit over here and grumble.

I'm like you, I am not so much interested in having the "longest ever" type clubs. I used to play a pretty long game in my younger days, but these days 250 is about my longest drive and, pushing 60, I find that I am more into staying in the short grass than trying to get longer. Hence, I'm looking for more game improvement type clubs now.

I will be back in the Dallas area next week. I'll probably hit the PGA Superstore and Golfsmith soon after arriving.

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3843 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Hit my tee shot just into the penalty area and barely found it. Swung hard just in case I hit it. It was slightly downhill with a heavy tailwind. I don't actually hit my 9i 170 yards.
    • Right. The difference between being 120 out and 70 out for me (this is the important part) is negligible and not worth putting other risks into play off the tee.   Ok the argument against driver is that my shot cone is comically large. It puts every possible outcome into play. You can't see the green from the tee so there's a good chance I'd have to wait for it to clear which would slow down play. That's the third tee right in the middle of the firing range there. I really don't want to wait just to hit a terrible shot and I especially don't want to injure somebody. Yea I have no problem playing out of the rough short of the bunker if I'm just going to lay up short of the bunker, but I absolutely need to avoid flaring it right into the penalty area if I'm going to be laying up in the first place. As a general strategy I understand where you're coming from. But since we're specifically talking about me (this is a shot I'm going to have to hit on Saturday), I think the cost is fairly marginal. I hit the ball 8' closer on average from 50-100 than I do from 100-150 from the fairway and rough and the green success % difference is 4%. Bunker might as well be a penalty drop. Based on the data,  Here's my SG:A data compared to a 10: I honestly don't know how to use SG for decision making. That's why I was mostly looking at proximity to hole and green success rate for comparison. I mostly use SG as a way to track my progress. All good. Like I said, I appreciate the discussion. It makes me think. If I didn't want to see alternative/opposing viewpoints to my own I just wouldn't post anything. You should post it! In your own swing thread, of course. It's been a fun exercise.
    • Played my first 2024 round at Pierce Lake. Boomed my first drive down #10 fairway, then slowly slipped into mediocrity. 83 (69.6/131). The high point was going 2 of 4 on sand saves. My sand game is pretty marginal but today I must have discovered the secret for a couple hours.
    • day 34. Technique practice. Became too quick and outcome oriented. need to slow down and work on technique again. 
    • Day 534, April 18, 2024 Practice before lessons today. Priority piece. No sim this time. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...