• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
MEfree

Launch angle and club head speed

21 posts in this topic

Am I correct assuming that higher club head speed=higher launch angle?

AKA, assuming you hit the same club with the same attack angle, shaft lean, etc. will it start off higher with a higher swing speed?

i.e. When I chip a 9i into my basement golf net, it hits the net low.  When I hit a half shot, it hits the net in the middle and when I hit a full shot it hits towards the top of the net.  Is it safe for me to assume that the difference in club head speed is (at least partially) responsible?

Thanks

(Feel free to move this is it is in the wrong forum)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Am I correct assuming that higher club head speed=higher launch angle?

AKA, assuming you hit the same club with the same attack angle, shaft lean, etc. will it start off higher with a higher swing speed?

i.e. When I chip a 9i into my basement golf net, it hits the net low.  When I hit a half shot, it hits the net in the middle and when I hit a full shot it hits towards the top of the net.  Is it safe for me to assume that the difference in club head speed is (at least partially) responsible?

Thanks

(Feel free to move this is it is in the wrong forum)

No, it depends on many more factors. You might be equating launch speed to maximum height of the shot, which a faster golf swing will average a higher ball flight, but that isn't launch angle. You can have a lower launch angle, and a higher ball flight if your hitting the ball with 4500 rpm.

I am not sure if higher club head speed will add a few degrees to launch. I am going to say its negligible. Your not going to see like 4 degrees of loft change.

Here's the thing as well. If you chip, then you go to a pitch, then to a full swing your going to load the club differently. The shaft will bend more on a faster swing. So, you just can't assume its swing speed, though it does effect how the club impacts the ball. If you have the same dynamic loft at impact, I am going to say your going to see the same launch angle no matter what the swing speed is.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I understand what you are saying about the shaft bending but find it hard to believe that my loft at impact is so much higher on my full swings compared to chips and half shots.  I would be very disappointed if the extra height into the net is due mostly to the club getting ahead of my hands (lack of flat wrist/shaft lean on full shots compared to chips/half shots).

Does anyone else have thoughts on this because I hope Saevel is wrong when he says

Quote:

Originally Posted by saevel25 View Post

If you have the same dynamic loft at impact, I am going to say your going to see the same launch angle no matter what the swing speed is.

Just did some googling and http://golf.about.com/od/golfterms/g/launchangle.htm says

"Many factors affect launch angle, including swing speed , angle of attack (how the clubface approaches the golf ball) and clubface position at impact. The loft of the golf club itself is the single biggest factor, of course. But the same club can produce very different launch angles in the hands of different golfers based on the other factors. A club will produce a higher launch angle with a higher clubhead speed , for instance, so long as other factors are equal."

That makes sense to me...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fairly certain you're flipping. You're not producing identical impact conditions except for differences in club head speed.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The ball should come off the face at the same angle, no matter how hard the swing
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The ball should come off the face at the same angle, no matter how hard the swing

That's not true. Speed will change the launch angle. The ball will deform differently, grooves will come into play more or less, etc.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's not true. Speed will change the launch angle. The ball will deform differently, grooves will come into play more or less, etc.

To a significant extent?

What sort of change in clubhead speed could account for a change in launch angle of, say, 4*?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too many other variables to say. What kind of ball, what is the first clubhead speed, what is the lie, what is the clubhead CG and MOI, groove configuration, temperature, impact location, etc.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm sure those variables need factored in to a theoretical model of launch conditions.

But are you saying that, keeping the other variables constant, you think a change in speed could account for a change in launch angle of as much as 4*?

If so, I can only assume that you're thinking of low speed impacts like pitches and chip shots, where it's feasible for clubhead speed to change by a factor of 2 or even 3. But would like to hear more.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the thing, everything is so intertwined you will never see that condition.

If you keep the same club, and swing easy versus swinging hard. The club shaft will flex differently, and the ball will launch differently. This type of discussion is not applicable to anything that is useful to an actual golf swing. In reality there is to much going on. You can change a few degrees just by a slight flip of the hands, or maybe the hands descend at a slightly slower rate. Its just crazy to think this matters at all.

Once again, if your talking about how high the ball goes, a slower ball speed will produce a lower overall ball flight. Not necessarily launch angle.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree - particularly with the point that shot height is going to be seen to rise with clubhead speed, and it's not necessarily anything to to with launch angle. I also agree that harder swings are liable to change factors that directly impact the delivered loft.

But there's still the question of whether clubhead speed itself can change the launch angle to a significant degree . I'm inclined to think not, which makes it much easier to agree with you on the other points being much more important.

There's a reasonably interesting discussion about this point here - http://www.brianmanzella.com/golfing-discussions/15009-new-launch-direction-dictated-chart-trackman-conference.html - which suggests that change in clubhead speed is NOT a signficant factor in launch angle, at least on full swings.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But there's still the question of whether clubhead speed itself can change the launch angle to a significant degree. I'm inclined to think not, which makes it much easier to agree with you on the other points being much more important.

First you'd have to define "significant."

There's a reasonably interesting discussion about this point here - http://www.brianmanzella.com/golfing-discussions/15009-new-launch-direction-dictated-chart-trackman-conference.html - which suggests that change in clubhead speed is NOT a signficant factor in launch angle, at least on full swings.

That thread is about horizontal launch direction, not launch angle, and it shows the change as about 15% (and even 5% or so just between two irons that are about, what, 1.5" different length?).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's not true. Speed will change the launch angle. The ball will deform differently, grooves will come into play more or less, etc.

Originally Posted by iacas

Fairly certain you're flipping. You're not producing identical impact conditions except for differences in club head speed.

If speed will change the launch angle, why are you "fairly certain" I am flipping?

-most amateurs flip

-you saw some of my evolvr video from last year

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First you'd have to define "significant."

I'd be happy to take significant to mean the 4* I asked about earlier. But if you have data illustrating a change of more, or less, I'd be equally happy for you to define it however you like. But a sensible measure of significance, for me, would be the difference in loft between 2 adjacent clubs.

That thread is about horizontal launch direction, not launch angle, and it shows the change as about 15% (and even 5% or so just between two irons that are about, what, 1.5" different length?).

Is the physics governing horizontal launch direction different from what governs launch angle?

As regards that chart, I took the difference to be more a function of the difference in loft than the difference in length. Do you have a different hypothesis?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If speed will change the launch angle, why are you "fairly certain" I am flipping?

-most amateurs flip

-you saw some of my evolvr video from last year

A combination of all of those (except I don't recall your swing, but I can see your handicap), plus the fact that you're trying to compare chipping to your full swing. There will be several different things.

Your observation was enough to tell me that you were doing something different, too. If you could noticeably see the difference in height, it was due to things other than clubhead speed.

I'd be happy to take significant to mean the 4* I asked about earlier. But if you have data illustrating a change of more, or less, I'd be equally happy for you to define it however you like. But a sensible measure of significance, for me, would be the difference in loft between 2 adjacent clubs.

You can't really measure it without an Iron Byron or something capable of generating very precise impacts at very precise speeds and keeping everything else constant. This question is a lot closer to a "theoretical" one than a practical one.

Is the physics governing horizontal launch direction different from what governs launch angle?

Yes. One of the primary reasons? Grooves (and their "corners") are oriented to have an effect vertically, not horizontally.

As regards that chart, I took the difference to be more a function of the difference in loft than the difference in length. Do you have a different hypothesis?

Length affects clubhead speed. If you had to narrow it down to one thing, it would be how much the ball deforms. The more a ball deforms, the more it will want to "get away" from the clubface (i.e. more perpendicular). The slower the clubhead speed the more the ball can truly be "carried" a little by the path. I'm simplifying too because the ball will "roll up" the face a little on a higher lofted club more so than a lower lofted one, and many other things. And obviously there's a limit to this effect because a putter is 90%+ face angle.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't understand how speed can change the effective loft of a club. My hands at impact, forward press, flipping, opening/closing club face change the clubs loft. Swing speed does not. Am I wrong for thinking this??
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So if speed doesn't effect loft, then it doesn't effect launch angle either. So my conclusion would be the club is being manipulated to cause different launch angles on different speeds.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't understand how speed can change the effective loft of a club. My hands at impact, forward press, flipping, opening/closing club face change the clubs loft. Swing speed does not. Am I wrong for thinking this??

The assumption would be that as you vary the force of your shot, your alignments at impact will change. In crude terms, the harder you swing the more you flip.

Yes. One of the primary reasons? Grooves (and their "corners") are oriented to have an effect vertically, not horizontally.

The frictional effect of the grooves would be to "carry" the ball a bit more in the direction of the vertical component of the clubhead path, but the frictional effect would not be so strong with regards to the horizontal direction?

Length affects clubhead speed. If you had to narrow it down to one thing, it would be how much the ball deforms. The more a ball deforms, the more it will want to "get away" from the clubface (i.e. more perpendicular). The slower the clubhead speed the more the ball can truly be "carried" a little by the path. I'm simplifying too because the ball will "roll up" the face a little on a higher lofted club more so than a lower lofted one, and many other things. And obviously there's a limit to this effect because a putter is 90%+ face angle.

Sounds fine in theory. But longer clubs are also less lofted - which in turn will compress the ball more too, even holding clubhead speed constant, no? Which would trend in the same direction but for a different reason.

I'm still not sure though whether these effects are "significant" - or if in the real world the effects are so minor as to be negligible.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    •   On one hand, you say you have trouble with lag putts, then you say you're not a poor putter.  And someone has told you that you're decelerating.  My suggestion, a FEELING of acceleration might help you get more putts to the hole, especially the long ones.
    • I first met with and talked about golf with Dean Snell when he was the main man at TaylorMade's moderately lavish TP Red/Black launch event the weekend before the 2006 Masters at Reynolds Plantation (coverage here, here, here, here, and elsewhere on the The Sand Trap .com). Dean had been snagged by TaylorMade after helping Titleist introduce the Pro V1/V1x to the golf world. A little while ago, we solicited questions from you, the members and readers of The Sand Trap .com, and what follows are Dean's responses to the first chunk of those questions. You'll notice that we jump right in to the Q&A. If you'd like to read more about Dean Snell, you can do so here. If you'd like to check out Snell's golf balls, they're right here. And of course, everything else is available at http://snellgolf.com/. One last note: Dean broke up a few of the questions so that he could more clearly answer pieces of them the way he wanted. Aside from editing for spelling/grammar, we've left these changes as is. Now, right into the Q&A… Technology Questions 1) How big of a difference is there between premium golf balls? DEAN: The biggest difference today between premium tour balls is the short game spin and control. Typically, when spin is controlled with mid and short irons, you can prevent the ballooning and problems in the wind… and when you get closer to the green, the thinner urethane covers allow for more short game spin and control. 2) Reducing SKUs seems wise but what percentage of golfers do you think you cover with only two models? Bridgestone has four B330 models but you have just one urethane ball. DEAN: I think two to three models is sufficient for entire market. The tour level players can really tell the difference in performance from one ball to another. some like more, some less spin… some firmer, some softer feel… so maybe two balls at tour level. As for the general public, I think if they choose to play a low compression, low spin ball, then the difference is so small that adding more for them is not worth it… also, when some companies talk about swing speed, I do not think this is worth having 3 SKU to fool consumers into thinking they need this in their game. 3) Bridgestone (and I think Callaway) has come out with tour caliber balls for players who swing under 105mph. Is it possible to design a tour caliber ball for a specific segment of swing speed or is this just mostly a marketing thing? DEAN: The whole swing speed story to me is one of the most over-rated stories in golf. Companies force or teach golfers to play low compression balls so their low swing speed can compress the ball. The problem with this is that low compression balls have the lowest spin in all shots, so they are pushing players to play a ball with no performance at all… and when you need that spin around the green, it's not there… 4) Since the four piece urerthane seems so hot in the ball industry right now, is there any chance that Snell will come out with a four-piece ball? DEAN: Stay tuned… I am working on several types of protos to address performance. I think when there is a performance target, then we adjust to the layers and materials to meet that target… so layers to help in meeting these targets… let it develop… ha ha… 5) How much diminishing returns are there on the number of layers? DEAN: Every time you add a layer, you add cost and some level of new performance. When I did penta (5 layers) it was to address concerns with the tour players on certain shots that they were seeing. So I always recommend that players do 100 yard and in testing, and see what they like in the ball… choose the ball from the short game testing, as this is where they are different. 6) From your perspective, will you follow the market trend and produce a soft golf ball? DEAN: The GET SUM is very low compression, very soft feeling golf ball. The issue in tour balls going too soft is you lose the feel of hitting good solid shots… players think soft means more spin at that level, so we have to balance this in design. 7) And would you describe why the market is "Hot with Soft or Softer" golf balls? DEAN: The soft golf ball market has taken off due to the lower spinning balls means players can be longer in distance. Today, softer balls means lower spinning, whereas in the past tour balls were higher spinning if softer… 8) Given what we now know about the relative importance of the full swing (driving, approach shots) and the short game and putting, does the old concept of fitting yourself for a golf ball by starting at the green and working backward still apply? DEAN: Absolutely… you should really spend a lot of time from 100 yards and in when testing different golf balls. This is where they are different, and where you would be able to see performance differences. If you test here and cannot tell, then buy the cheapest one. 9) Or should more importance be given to how the ball performs off the driver and irons, which are now understood to be the true scoring clubs? DEAN: No chance. Fitting a ball with a driver is a big mistake… you hit one drive, but you have to finish the hole, and play most of your golf around the greens, so choose a ball around the green, not off the tee. They will all go about the same difference off the tee today. 10) Is electronic technology embedded within the golf ball ever going to happen? For instance are we likely to see trackers or sensors anytime soon? I have tested this concept several years ago. Problem is that it is illegal to the rules of golf. The USGA will not allow, as you would have an advantage over someone else who did not have it. The other problem is that it was super expensive — over $4 per ball to have technology put into the ball — so it added $48 per doz, plus you had to buy the controller to find it… it does not really speed up play unless everyone on the course has it… which will be tough to implement. We look forward to bringing you the additional parts of this Q&A in the coming weeks. Thank you to Dean Snell for taking the time to answer these and the other questions still pending. Again, if you're looking to pay less AND get the best ball on the market today, https://snellgolf.com/.
    • I'm all for ready golf, but I think it's rude for everyone to hole out before you've made it to the green. That's just me though. 
    • Exactly. Unfortunately, we had a ringside seat to just such a thing yesterday.  The group ahead of us had finally made it to the green on 3.  One was in a green side bunker, while the others were on the green itself.  I asked my buddy, blade or chunk, as we watched from 60 yards out.  He said he'd leave it in the bunker.  I won.  Hard blade 30 yards over the green.  The remainder of the group WAITED while he raked the bunker and then walked completely across the green and proceeded to chip all the way back, almost dumping it in the same bunker again.  Again, Larry, Moe, and Curly wait for Bunker Boy to meander back and play his shot before playing theirs.  After all, he was away...   3 more swings and he was finally in the hole.  Total elapsed time that group took from when they reached the green, nearly 15 minutes!   We caught them on the next tee box in time to watch two of them knock it into the junk short of the fairway.  When it became obvious that they had no intention of acknowledging us, we politely asked if we could play through while they searched for their balls, and thankfully they agreed.   3 hours later, as we were teeing off on 18, we saw them driving up to the tee box on 12.  Not good golfers, true, but more than anything, they simply didn't move with any sense of purpose, or efficiency.  If we'd have had to play behind them much longer, I would have cut my own throat with my wedge!  
    • I love watching those shows on the golf channel.  Especially Michael Breed.   But, ultimately, it's not really personalized instruction, so you don't really get too much instruction from it.   Maybe a swing thought idea here and there, and some short game drills to work on.  As a matter of fact, I think a long while ago, I learned how to hit out of the sand from the golf channel.  That is still, to this day, the one skill I gain strokes on all of my friends at.   (unfortunately, I imagine bunker shots are like a SV (-8), given that I have like 1 per round.  tops.) But, it's still quite enjoyable nonetheless.   It's always fun to listen to people talk about the golf swing.  If your'e in to that kinda thing.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Isaac03
      Isaac03
      (33 years old)
    2. phillyk
      phillyk
      (27 years old)
    3. PhishAreFriends
      PhishAreFriends
      (27 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon