Jump to content
IGNORED

Long drive?


Note: This thread is 2738 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Watching the long drive competition on the golf channel and just a little confused. I always thought the conventional wisdom was that you needed to learn to draw the ball for distance but the guys I'm seeing tonight all seemed to be taking the ball left to right...is this the power fade and, if so, does a person (like myself) whose natural misses tend to be slices better off trying to learn a more controlled fade vs. draw with a driver.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Part of it is that they're hitting up 5-6*, basically with neutral alignments at set-up, hitting up means you're swinging left.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/44307/hitting-up-or-down-with-the-driver-in-an-inline-pattern

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Part of it is that they're hitting up 5-6*, basically with neutral alignments at set-up, hitting up means you're swinging left.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/44307/hitting-up-or-down-with-the-driver-in-an-inline-pattern

Or 8 or 9° actually…

And a lot of players will play draws too. It's kind of irrelevant at that level - any curvature is actually a slightly glancing blow, so they're trying to play relatively little curve.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Or 8 or 9° actually… And a lot of players will play draws too. It's kind of irrelevant at that level - any curvature is actually a slightly glancing blow, so they're trying to play relatively little curve.

Yeah, their target is the width of a football field so a two way miss is not really a problem and accuracy definitely takes a back seat to distance so I'd imagine they would mostly just be trying to nut one as straight as they can. All else being equal, curvature reduces distance because 350 straight yards is longer than 350 drawing or fading yards when measured in a straight line.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So I watched the Long Drive Competition last night on Golf Channel in between the World Series and these guys are crushing it 400+ yards.  I went to the website of the drivers a lot of them use called "Krank Golf Clubs".  If you can hit it that freaking far with one of these drivers why are they essentially unheard of in the golfing world...are they junk, illegal, or what??  I see that they're expensive as heck but I've never heard a word about these had I not watched the show last night.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hotrod - the drivers they use in the long drive competition do not meet the USGA criteria for what is conforming ( the drivers are a few inches longer than what's allowed by the USGA ). That being said, those guys can crank them either way...
Link to post
Share on other sites

So I watched the Long Drive Competition last night on Golf Channel in between the World Series and these guys are crushing it 400+ yards.  I went to the website of the drivers a lot of them use called "Krank Golf Clubs".  If you can hit it that freaking far with one of these drivers why are they essentially unheard of in the golfing world...are they junk, illegal, or what??  I see that they're expensive as heck but I've never heard a word about these had I not watched the show last night.

Actually the clubheads are conforming for REMAX. So the Krank clubs are on the USGA conforming list. The one thing that isn't conforming is the shaft length.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Saw the LD early this morning.

Krank was represented by the winner and others, but Callaway showed up and earned a second, and had others using the XHOT.

At that level, it's a matter of hitting 3 long drives straight.

427 to win is looooooooooooooooooooooooong.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Saw the LD early this morning.

Krank was represented by the winner and others, but Callaway showed up and earned a second, and had others using the XHOT.

At that level, it's a matter of hitting 3 long drives straight.

427 to win is looooooooooooooooooooooooong.

Seriously they are hitting it down a 60 yard wide fairway, I would love that ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Actually the clubheads are conforming for REMAX. So the Krank clubs are on the USGA conforming list. The one thing that isn't conforming is the shaft length.

Pretty sure that's conforming too. The clubs are supposed to have to conform to the Rules of Golf. That means, IIRC, a 48" shaft.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Pretty sure that's conforming too. The clubs are supposed to have to conform to the Rules of Golf. That means, IIRC, a 48" shaft.


My kid's regular coach (a well respected club-fitter) stated exactly the same thing. He was helping some long drivers with fitting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So I watched the Long Drive Competition last night on Golf Channel in between the World Series and these guys are crushing it 400+ yards.  I went to the website of the drivers a lot of them use called "Krank Golf Clubs".  If you can hit it that freaking far with one of these drivers why are they essentially unheard of in the golfing world...are they junk, illegal, or what??  I see that they're expensive as heck but I've never heard a word about these had I not watched the show last night.

Most of the driver heads are designed for high durability, since these guys are hitting rock-hard balls with incredible swing speeds. Even so, they occasionally crack a face. I picked up a SMT 455 Deep Bore head at a garage sale the other week, and it looks and feels rock solid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

Saw the LD early this morning.

Krank was represented by the winner and others, but Callaway showed up and earned a second, and had others using the XHOT.

At that level, it's a matter of hitting 3 long drives straight.

427 to win is looooooooooooooooooooooooong.

Seriously they are hitting it down a 60 yard wide fairway, I would love that ;)


Pffft...I still hit it OB

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One of the main reasons you don't see the big brand names in long drive is the loft options...Callaway went low in lofts this year and Adams has in years pasts.

Such a small world. Only so many golfers need a 5 degree or lower loft! Or a XXX Flex....

Wish they put more in the grid...Tough to get excited when you see someone hit 6 out of bounds...or "off the grid." Congrats to Tim Burke. That was an outrageous drive.

Always fun to swing hard..but you still gotta be in the fairway.

I went to a few long drive events and hit a couple 360 yards....Did me no good. One of the golfers in the top 8. Aaron Mansfield was there and hit one 417 yards.

made my 360 seem like 220..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

One of the main reasons you don't see the big brand names in long drive is the loft options...Callaway went low in lofts this year and Adams has in years pasts.

Such a small world. Only so many golfers need a 5 degree or lower loft! Or a XXX Flex....

Wish they put more in the grid...Tough to get excited when you see someone hit 6 out of bounds...or "off the grid." Congrats to Tim Burke. That was an outrageous drive.

Always fun to swing hard..but you still gotta be in the fairway.

I went to a few long drive events and hit a couple 360 yards....Did me no good. One of the golfers in the top 8. Aaron Mansfield was there and hit one 417 yards.

made my 360 seem like 220..

What loft and length do you use for long drive competitions?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was using a 4.5 and 6 degree at full 48 inch legal max...As you may have seen from the long drive on the golf channel last night, you can be long with those but not accurate!!  Would never dream of using something like that for real golf.  The dispersion factor on something that low in loft is so high and you are swinging out of your shoes every time.  I contemplated coming out with low loft versions of the Grenade but thought it would be better if it was under a different company name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 2738 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasfeb21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Day 75.  More wall drill, plus I set up to a ball with my 6-iron (on a mat, but I didn't downswing and hit the ball at any point).  I set up, took the backswing, incorporating what I was getting out of the wall drill.  The thing I really noticed when I got to the top is that my club isn't as far over-extended (seriously, some of those face-on videos looked like I was trying to be John Daly). 
    • Hard to think of a more perfect iron shot from the rough. I guess you could ask to hole out but that seems a little greedy. Brave to even try the shot then it sounds like. Glad you were rewarded!
    • Some of DiMarco's missed putts were pretty timid efforts so that is why I described it as giving them away. He can say he misread them and that is true for some but others really were just poorly struck. It is not to say DiMarco handed the green jacket to Tiger on a silver platter but Tiger was very fortunate that DiMarco did not really capitalize on the chances he was giving himself. That said I agree it does not really take away from the case for Tiger's greatness. The post iacas linked to came off rather biased in tone so I more pointed this out to acknowledge that every Tiger victory was not a controlled cruise either. I think it just goes to show that winning a major is extremely difficult and even the greatest need some bounces to go their way sometimes. It is like that with many sports when played at such an elite level.
    • I played Richter Park a few weeks ago for the first time. It was nice, though not something I desire to drive two hours for. Playing Links at Union Vale again in a few weeks; that is a course that I don't mind the drive for. We could look at other central CT courses. Wintonbury Hills is really nice. I'm playing Gillette Ridge tomorrow, which is supposed to be similar. 
    • Jack's courses always seem to be like you have to always be calculating and many risk/reward decisions. It's harder to relax on his courses, imo.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. ChappyEight
      ChappyEight
      (40 years old)
    2. marcadelic
      marcadelic
      (29 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...