• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
lazyoldme

My grip. Thoughts?

8 posts in this topic

I started playing golf around August or September of 2011. I love golf and have a lot of fun playing and part of the fun was how fast I was improving. I went from shooting 100's to 90's then a few 80's and broke 80 twice (79 and 77 at a relatively easy course) all in a short period of time (less than 2 years). Lately though I've been struggling again and haven't broken 90 in about the last 5 rounds or so (shooting in the 100's twice at a course that is pretty hard: 6,900 yard par 72 with 72.3 rating and 137 slope). I was able to spend a lot of time at the driving range this summer since I am a college student who was only working part time, but since school has started again and I have less time to spend I think my game has started to regress again a little bit. I made a video of myself hitting some golf balls in my shed today and took this screen shot of my grip/address setup as best as it could be.

I was just curious to hear some thoughts on my grip. It looks funky when I actually view it on camera and my arms look very low as well. I am 5'11'' and definitely not skinny; so I know I may not match up well to the "ideal" golfer image of comparison.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Looks like you need to have the grip more into the fingers of both hands, left and right hand look "palmy".

Try and copy these pics, notice in the first pic how the grip is in the fingers and on top of the heel pad of the left hand.

Then the right hand

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Grip is something I need to revisit a few times per season, it's very easy for it to drift back into the palms if I stop paying attention to it. I'm working on getting my gripping process into my pre-shot routine to try to keep it where it needs to be. The pics that @mvmac posted are excellent. Exactly how I grip it. Really get that grip deep into the fingers of your left hand, I like to start by laying it across the crease between the base of my fingers and my palm. Think perpendicular rather than diagonal. Make sure it stays there when you close your hand and apply your thumb and doesn't shift back up into your palm. Then hook your right second and ring fingers around like mvmac's third picture. When you fold your right hand the rest of the way over the top of your left, check to make sure that the left thumb is nestled into the lifeline of your right hand. It will probably feel like your right hand is a little weaker than your left. It's probably going to feel very strange if your used to a palmy grip, like you have no control or power. But you quickly see that you have a much better wrist hinge with this grip which will translate to way more power and control. It's gonna take time to make the change because this grip will likely feel REALLY uncomfortable at first but stick with it, it's going to make a lot of other, seemingly unrelated, aspects of the swinging easier to execute.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

[VIDEO] http://youtu.be/J9kzkcHrOE4 [/VIDEO] The club is your friend..grip it right and you know what it is doing all the time.,like a stalker..;-) Also get a cut off club..by the grip. Practice what you want to do over and over again. Will feel unnatural at first, but after a few months will feel like a old pair of shoes.. Won't happen over night as everyone on internet golf world thinks.. These things take a lot of time no quick fix here..thank me later Cp
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mvmac? Why the long thumb? What is wrong with the short? I guess longs does shorter up the backswing a bit
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The pro I have been working with advocates getting a proper grip on the club as the very first step in the pre-shot routine.  This seems right to me so far.

I agree that the pictures look excellent, and that it will probably feel real strange until you get used to it.  But you WILL get used to it, and it works.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mvmac?

Why the long thumb? What is wrong with the short? I guess longs does shorter up the backswing a bit

Less range of motion with the left wrist hinge when you go short left thumb.  Can't create as much "leverage".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Good stuff..long left thumb also let's u pull back with the middle 2 fingers of the right hand.. As left wrists.. Big lag there. Alla hogan
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No offense, but in my opinion this makes you unprepared to discuss it.
    • Every year, something is changed in a club design.  The real differences are minimal, assuming your current clubs are from within the last 10 or so years (just throwing out a random number).

      However, I just got upgraded to the Ping G driver from the Ping G30, and the big change I noticed is the face of the driver has a bit more friction on the G (at least as I understand it).  What it seems to do is reduce side spin, while retaining normal-ish back spin (I use the low-spin tec version).  When I miss-hit a drive with my old driver vs the newer one, I see noticeably less slice or hook with the newer version.
        When I go through those articles, I mostly read through the reviews of them.  It gives a better idea of what might be better.
    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
    • I'd have thought there would be a sliding scale, akin to a volume discount. Not just $x/18 = per-hole cost. Or if there are obvious points where it's not terrible to get back to the clubhouse, make 3-hole, 7-hole, 11-hole, 15-hole, and 18-hole rates. Then you could even consider the par of the holes. Heck, if the course started par 5, 4, 5 I'd be tempted to just play the first three holes three times.  I'd get more for my money than playing holes 4, 5, and 6 which are pars 3, 4, 3.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries