Jump to content
IGNORED

Should Divots Be Considered Ground Under Repair?


Foursum Golf

Should divot holes be considered GUR under the Rules of Golf?  

129 members have voted

  1. 1. Should divot holes be considered GUR under the Rules of Golf?



Recommended Posts

I don't prefer playing out of a divot; but it rarely happens and is, I'd say, a skill one needs to have.  It doesn't take much effort to repair them either...sand or a few scrapes with your foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

While i think we can all agree that walking up to your ball and finding it in a divot can be very annoying its just part and parcel of the game. Sometimes lady luck is against you and sometimes she isn't.

I have had the odd time, playing in the English weather, where i have landed in a fresh divot and had a better lie than i would have had landing on the very soggy turf. Other times it's royally screwed me, but as they say "thems the breaks".

Making divots GUR would, in my opinion, be too difficult to enforce effectively.

People just need to repair/replace their divots more often. I they did that then this topic probably wouldnt have existed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

You know it occurs to me that how you feel about this topic could be one of those tests that speak to your personality and the way you view rules and logic and structure and luck and stuff.

I've watched a few episodes of the TV show Bull and he's a trial scientist, so he's always asking questions like "if a neighbor's dog poops in your yard and the neighbor sees it but doesn't have a baggie on it, and says he'll get it in a few hours, how do you feel about that?" as a way of sussing out how the juror is likely to be persuaded re: big pharma or something…

I think that those who see this issue differently would likely fit into two different camps re: some other issues, maybe even politics, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, iacas said:

You know it occurs to me that how you feel about this topic could be one of those tests that speak to your personality and the way you view rules and logic and structure and luck and stuff.

I've watched a few episodes of the TV show Bull and he's a trial scientist, so he's always asking questions like "if a neighbor's dog poops in your yard and the neighbor sees it but doesn't have a baggie on it, and says he'll get it in a few hours, how do you feel about that?" as a way of sussing out how the juror is likely to be persuaded re: big pharma or something…

I think that those who see this issue differently would likely fit into two different camps re: some other issues, maybe even politics, etc.

This makes a lot of sense to me.  Its kind of like "THEY should make this right" as opposed to "I need to find a way to get through this".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well these are the words I have heard many times in the way of an explanation. I respectfully disagree. These are just symanticsbut the USGA and R&A have the final word

The point I was trying to make when I first posted the question about divots was if divots aren’t ground under repair why do we repair them? I don’t mean replacing the sod in the divot. I’m talking about maintenance crews filling them with sand & seed or players that have sand & seed on their carts filling the divot. Either it’s GUR or it isn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


59 minutes ago, JLC4GLF said:

The point I was trying to make when I first posted the question about divots was if divots aren’t ground under repair why do we repair them?  

The same reason you (hopefully) repair your ball marks on the green even though ball marks aren't ground under repair.

It's about respecting the course and trying to leave it in an equal or better place than you found it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
25 minutes ago, klineka said:

The same reason you (hopefully) repair your ball marks on the green even though ball marks aren't ground under repair.

Ditto bunkers. Teeing grounds. And everything else on a course that gets maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

This makes a lot of sense to me.  Its kind of like "THEY should make this right" as opposed to "I need to find a way to get through this".  

Well - if we're going to pull this into a character caricature direction...... I'll put out a data point.  I'm very Libertarian.  For divots:

1 - If I'm all alone or casually with someone, I'll play however damn well I feel.  Somedays I'll hit from it (serious days), others I won't sporadically (practice days).  My reasons are my own.

2 - If I'm competing or betting or recording a handicap (all of which I avoid like the plague), I'll follow the rules explicitly.

I think it matches, personal freedom where it doesn't hurt or would impact another.  Diligence in following a contract when relating to others.

 

Can I assume the liberals will want to force others to follow the arbitrary rules at all times, unless they can force someone else to take their penalties?

And the conservative will follow the rules when someone is watching and thinks watches and matching shoes to belts is a good idea?

Greenies simply think anyone that takes a divot is Satan....Grass clumps are people too.

😛

Edited by rehmwa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
10 minutes ago, rehmwa said:

1 - If I'm all alone or casually with someone, I'll play however damn well I feel.  Somedays I'll hit from it (serious days), others I won't sporadically (practice days).  My reasons are my own.

2 - If I'm competing or betting or recording a handicap (all of which I avoid like the plague), I'll follow the rules explicitly.

That's not the point I was making at all. I was saying that how you feel about whether divot holes should be GUR is what provides insight, not whether you follow the rules in a competition.

But that's not the topic here, so, it was just an aside. Not a shift to the topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, CaseyD said:

Dude I thought we were just discussing divot holes. Now you guys got me questioning my political views and self worth and shit 😟

My digression, I cheerfully withdraw the mock stereotypes.  (Practice days - I'll hit from divots sometimes.  Simply because I can learn from it.)

Edited by rehmwa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, klineka said:

The same reason you (hopefully) repair your ball marks on the green even though ball marks aren't ground under repair.

It's about respecting the course and trying to leave it in an equal or better place than you found it.

This.  Fixing divots, pitch marks, etc is like regular car maintenance.  Necessary, ordinary, and an expected part of the game if you give a damn.  So if you have to play out of one, that's life.

Divots in the fairway are expected.  A half bulldozed patch the size of a small yard is not.  Grounds under repair is like insurance: covers the unexpected.

Edited by Foot Wedge
Forgot a sentence
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The problem is that people think of the "fairway" as if it's some mystical land where you're guaranteed a good lie.

Fairways are just an area of shorter grass, kept that way so that hitting straight tee shots presents an advantage (and, for other strategic reasons).  Having your ball roll into a divot hole in the fairway is no different than having it roll up against a tree root in the rough.

"Play it as it lies, except in the fairway, where you're guaranteed a good lie" just doesn't have the same ring to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/8/2013 at 1:23 PM, Foursum Golf said:

I have heard people say that sand-filled divots should be considered ground under repair. Thoughts?

Yes.

I wish that they'd addressed this in the new rule changes for 2019.

I always thought you should get relief from fairway divots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
7 hours ago, BallMarker said:

I wish that they'd addressed this in the new rule changes for 2019. I always thought you should get relief from fairway divots.

Did you read any of the rest of the topic?

Because you must not have. You didn't even bother to attempt to make a case for your feelings.

DIvot holes on a golf course are not an "abnormal ground condition."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think this is called, or used to be called, the "rub of the green". Things don't always turn out perfectly, even when you hit it where you want to. 

I kind of fall into rehmwa's camp. In a casual round I may move the ball, usually to the grass behind the divot like you would do on a practice tee. In a serious or sanctioned round, play it as it lies. I played in a local tourney this past August when an approach shot wound up in a hole! It was not a divot nor a sprinkler. It didn't appear to be a drain or made by a burrowing animal. I hacked it out of there and moved the ball maybe 2 feet! Just my lousy luck, and it definitely cost me a stroke. 

It also just occurred to me that if divots were GUR who would take the spray paint and make all the lines around every single divot in the fairway!😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to Should Divots Be Considered Ground Under Repair?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct links for Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package. Save 10% on Mevo with coupon code "IACAS" as well.
  • Posts

    • Day 164 (22 May 22) - worked on getting weight on lead foot - used the reverse stork drill and 3w.  Key was to stay as balanced as possible, did okay.  Followed with some lefty swings with the Dunlop lefty 7i, focused on the pressure of my weight on my lead “right” foot.  Then turned it back around and completed the drill session with full swings with my SLDR 7i and the hard foam balls. 
    • Correct. The R10 is much closer to the Mevo, not the Mevo+. Yeah. 😄
    • At $300 and requiring only 3’ for a radar unit, I don’t think it’s going to be very accurate. So no, it’s not going be dominating the Mevo market anytime soon. There are those of us who didn’t get the Garmin R10 at a fraction of the price of a Mevo+ (and Pro package) because of questionable accuracy. Hell, the gifs on their site show people “playing” the simulator without even hitting a ball. It’s basically a video game at that point.
    • Yet another question about the technology for filming a swing. I read Erik's updated "Filming your Swing" blog post as part of researching my next phone purchase. My current phone, which is on its last legs, was able to record video up to 1080p at up to 120 fps (Pixel 3XL).  However, that camera isn't great at the moment (various reasons unrelated to its specifications) and I'm going to get a new device soon, too.  Its likely successor for me is only able to do 30fps at 1080p, so that won't work for filming a golf swing.  It can do 720p @ 480 fps though (device I'm likely to get is a Galaxy A42).  Will that work for this?  I realize the post says "at least 720p video," but I don't know if I should shoot for better than that (such as if it is expected to be outdated soon).  It also seems odd to me that a camera could do only 30fps at 1080p but 480 fps at 720p, but I know almost nothing about these things. I am also debating getting a separate camera for golf swings if this won't work;  my prior separate-camera is a Canon PowerShot ELPH 110.  I believe it tops out at 720p / 30 fps;  if there's a reasonably priced camera that works for my golf swing filming, I'd be happy to get that and not sweat the camera on the phone. Other than filming my golf swing, my phone is pretty much a communication device and podcast player, so I'm not going higher end except if doing so is the most effective way to get a good camera for my golf swing. (Apologies if this should have been a separate thread, but I figured it was on-topic here and I didn't think there was another forum than Member Swings where this would be an appropriate top-level post)
    • Day 127: Played 18 this morning. Tried to simplify the mechanics of my priority piece (which is two things) into a feel but didn’t work great, so just settled on on of them after a few holes. Played okay except for a dumb triple bogey on #12.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DocP
      DocP
      (61 years old)
    2. Isaac03
      Isaac03
      (38 years old)
    3. phillyk
      phillyk
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...