Jump to content
IGNORED

Should Divots Be Considered Ground Under Repair?


Should divot holes be considered GUR under the Rules of Golf?  

123 members have voted

  1. 1. Should divot holes be considered GUR under the Rules of Golf?



Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Shorty said:

MY experience is that I could probably count the number of times I've been severely disadvantaged by being in a divot on one hand in decades of golf.

 

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Particularly given how infrequently this occurs.

 

17 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

The odds of ending up in a divot is very low.

Same here.  Decades of mediocre golf and I think I've made more eagles in my career than I've been screwed over by landing in a divot hole.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just an FYI, mate.... I have been around this forum for quite a few years and have been involved in my fair share of debates. I have (or had) the habit of looking for controversial subjects to po

See below for an excerpt from a joint USGA and R&A report on topics not addressed in the 2019 modernization of the Rules. Apparently, the discussion on divot holes was very short, about the length

I would highly recommend purchasing and reading this booklet. It's super cheap (shipping will cost more than the booklet), and sheds light on why certain rules/penalties exist. Pr

Posted Images

  • Administrator
3 hours ago, GolfLug said:

Off topic but honest question - why are there so many deep unfilled divots left behind?

Is it an agronomy thing? logistics of not having enough volunteers? Not all divots come out clean enough for caddies to hunt them down and replace them? Or is it just that some of the player/caddies don't bother with the etiquette? I mean, they would be run up the flag pole if they left a sand trap unraked after a shot.

Mowers just throw 'em around, too. So even if you replace your divot in the divot hole, the next day when they mow it might just be chucked aside by the mower.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 hours ago, Shorty said:

Please explain why it would be better if changed. 

No, I am done in this particular thread, it feels like about 10 to 1 against me, and some of the language I haven't been real fond of so I'm not going to partake in this particular topic anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
5 hours ago, Billy Z said:

No, I am done in this particular thread, it feels like about 10 to 1 against me, and some of the language I haven't been real fond of so I'm not going to partake in this particular threat anymore.

And there’s where you do what I had warned against. Sorry to see that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
12 hours ago, iacas said:

Mowers just throw 'em around, too. So even if you replace your divot in the divot hole, the next day when they mow it might just be chucked aside by the mower.

I would assume the mower would clear out the sand/seed mix too, correct?

5 hours ago, Billy Z said:

No, I am done in this particular thread, it feels like about 10 to 1 against me, and some of the language I haven't been real fond of so I'm not going to partake in this particular threat anymore.

You’ve stated your position clearly and others have countered clearly. I think it has been a good discussion. The hardest part appears to be defining GUR as it would apply to divots made by strokes. I feel this would be very difficult to draw the line so to speak. Fresh divots are fairly obvious, but as the grass grows back, it gets more difficult to differentiate. Even replaced or filled divots may be gone the next day.

The governing bodies have then drawn the line that divots or depressions that may have been divots are not GUR because it is the only clear point in the continuum between fairway and new to regrowing divot. 

It’s a tough break at times, but even normal fairway in munis can be tough.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, Billy Z said:

No, I am done in this particular thread, it feels like about 10 to 1 against me, and some of the language I haven't been real fond of so I'm not going to partake in this particular threat anymore.

Geez man....I’ve taken much more of a beating than this...it’s all good, and it’s just golf. Relax. Look...even if you disagree consider the big picture; does this rule really affect your game to a degree that you want it changed? If you hit a tree and your ball ricochets onto the green do you go back and place it in the trees? You got a good break. You take it. You get a bad one, you take it. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 3/10/2021 at 2:26 PM, Golfingdad said:

 

 

Same here.  Decades of mediocre golf and I think I've made more eagles in my career than I've been screwed over by landing in a divot hole.

Perhaps it's because I am playing on sub-standard courses when it comes to maintenance, i.e. munis, but in the decade or so that I recall (i.e. when I got more serious about golf than just knocking the ball around), I have been impacted negatively, to varying degrees, by playing from a divot hole in the fairway more than a handful (or maybe even two?) every year. I am not complaining about the rule, but I am saying that it's not really a one-off thing... at least for everyone. :beer:

Of course that situation arises even much more when taking unfilled holes in the rough and around the greens into account [which I know is :offtopic:]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

Challenge question:

Explain to me why an embedded ball gets relief and not a fairway divot???

  • Rule 16.3 allows relief for a ball embedded anywhere in the “general area” (that is, the area previously known as “through the green”), except when embedded in sand.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, Billy Z said:

Challenge question:

Explain to me why an embedded ball gets relief and not a fairway divot???

  • Rule 16.3 allows relief for a ball embedded anywhere in the “general area” (that is, the area previously known as “through the green”), except when embedded in sand.

Two reasons.

  1. An embedded ball is in the same rule (16 IIRC) as “abnormal course conditions.” An embedded ball is not a “normal” course condition - it’s conditions that are softer than normal, so accommodations have to be made to play from those conditions. Divot holes are not abnormal, in fact, they’re quite normal to be expected on a golf course.
  2. “Embedded” has a pretty clear definition that can be applied pretty uniformly. “Divot holes” do not.

Challenge won.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Informative 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, iacas said:

Two reasons.

  1. An embedded ball is in the same rule (16 IIRC) as “abnormal course conditions.” An embedded ball is not a “normal” course condition - it’s conditions that are softer than normal, so accommodations have to be made to play from those conditions. Divot holes are not abnormal, in fact, they’re quite normal to be expected on a golf course.
  2. “Embedded” has a pretty clear definition that can be applied pretty uniformly. “Divot holes” do not.

Challenge won.

That depends who you ask. To prevent getting an embedded ball is actually a skillset, keeping the ball flight lower and a slight draw helps prevent it. So slicers would be penalized, as they should, because slicing is a lack of skill set. Slicing elevates the ball and usually parachutes somewhat to the ground, and plugs!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
6 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

That depends who you ask. To prevent getting an embedded ball is actually a skillset, keeping the ball flight lower and a slight draw helps prevent it. So slicers would be penalized, as they should, because slicing is a lack of skill set. Slicing elevates the ball and usually parachutes somewhat to the ground, and plugs!

Are you suggesting that a ball might plug in conditions that are "normal", due to a specific ball flight?  And if it does, the player should have to play it as it lies?  I'm not sure how your comments are germane to the question you initially asked:

2 hours ago, Billy Z said:

Explain to me why an embedded ball gets relief and not a fairway divot???

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
10 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

That depends who you ask. 

I can be pretty damn sure no-one would be asking you, given your cyclical logic where you disregard cogent answers and revert to your original flawed position.

Do you think that if a tee shot on the 17th at TPC Sawgrass hits the flag and goes in the water it should be replayed?

Do you think a ball hit in the middle of the fairway that lands behind a tree in the fairway is unlucky? Or a ball in the bunker on the middle of the  green is bad luck?

Apart from the fact that you aren't guaranteed a good lie on the fairway, no-one can define a divot that would suit everyone, so how about we just leave the rule as it is? 

As for the term "skill set", It's bad enough but worse when you really mean "skill". 

And.....I'm pretty sure I've seen lots of drawn or hooked balls plugged in mud.

Don't be petty just for the sake of it - as I did three lines up.

Edited by Shorty
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

To prevent getting an embedded ball is actually a skillset, keeping the ball flight lower and a slight draw helps prevent it.

I'm not sure I'm following this argument. Maybe certain ball flights are less likely to embed, but I have hit thin draws into an upslope that ended up almost entirely plugged. I think ground conditions are better predictor of a ball embedding than ball flight.

Using skill, players could also avoid divot holes by hitting to parts of the course that no one usually plays from. Instead of driver off the tee, hit a short iron to a part of the fairway that doesn't get much play, and then approach the green with a 3W or something.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, Darkfrog said:

 

Using skill, players could also avoid divot holes by hitting to parts of the course that no one usually plays from. Instead of driver off the tee, hit a short iron to a part of the fairway that doesn't get much play, and then approach the green with a 3W or something.

Exactly. 👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
21 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

That depends who you ask. To prevent getting an embedded ball is actually a skillset, keeping the ball flight lower and a slight draw helps prevent it.

I’m going to assume that you’re just being hyperbolic in an attempt to be funny at this point, or something. 🙂 Because, no, that’s not a skill set. It’s a course condition issue.

You asked a question, I answered it.

It’s about this time that you should, if you’re being serious, basically concede that you’ve changed your mind as you now understand why the rules are as they are, and why relief is not granted when your ball finds its way into a divot hole.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

No, I don't think I have changed my mind, I would like to see a rules changed. In a forum, you have a unique selection of golfers, not necessarily a good sample of all who play the game. In a forum you have folks who change their putter on a weekly basis as opposed to golfers who use one putter for many years. In other words, people in here get very picky about varying aspects and rules of the game. I wouldn't be surprised if a poll were taken that would reflect 'all golfers' opinions, that showed more of an interest to change the rule then not. The reference to embedded was just a bit of tongue-in-cheek, but seriously, I will go out on a limb and say the majority of golfers think the rule should be changed. Just for further conversation, I do think some flight paths are more conducive to plugging.

Edited by Billy Z
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • The only times I really get ticked about hitting a third shot is if I'm still closer to the tee box than I am the green.
    • Day 80 (6/24/21) -   Chipping and Putting Practice - spent about 20 minutes on the practice green with my 58* wedge spot chipping to a target (my folded golf towel) 2,3 and 4 paces from the edge of the green, then hit 3 chips each to various holes trying to get the ball to within 4 feet of the hole (which I did about half the time). Then practiced lag putting, 3 balls each to different holes trying to get within 4 feet of the hole, which I did around 2/3s of the time.  Range practice - 9-3 swings using my 7 and 8 iron and a noodle station; small bucket. Focused on keeping the club face facing the ground on the downswing and making good contact.
    • Best part about this pit stop is that they did more than the pit stops in the videos above. Not only did they change the tires, they also adjusted the front wing at the same time on both sides. All in under 2 seconds still.
    • If it was about skill, and if the green reading books made bad putters better than they otherwise would perform, we'd see the worst putters on tour being closer to the best putters because there is less of a skill gap between the two. Instead we see that the gap between the best and the worst at putting has only grown larger since the widespread introduction of green reading books. This means they have not had any measurable impact on a player's ability to putt well, because it isn't allowing the worst putters on tour to keep up with the best like you would see if some part of the game took less skill suddenly. I ignored the skill issue because claiming it's a matter of skill is patently ridiculous, and provably false. They can say whatever they like, doesn't mean a word of it is true.
    • I have been thinking of this for a bit now and it happened to me yesterday, where I hit only 2 of 4 par-5s in regulation.   I am not sure what a realistic expectation for me should be.  I feel I should be able to make routine pars on these, or at least routine GIRs.  I try (I am not always successful, but I generally try) to not go for a pin from outside of 80 yards, focusing instead on getting on the green.  But even with that, maybe I should think more about what a realistic expectation for me on a par-5 is. I am always happy with a GIR.  Yesterday I hit 6 GIR, I don't think I was inside 25 feet on any of them, and I played those six holes in a total of +1.  I think that's a pretty good outcome for 6 GIRs, especially since I didn't make any of the birdie putts (which, again, were all low probability anyway).  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. benharris
      benharris
      (29 years old)
    2. Erik Tedfelt
      Erik Tedfelt
      (26 years old)
    3. ForcedCarry21
      ForcedCarry21
      (30 years old)
    4. hlan
      hlan
      (36 years old)
    5. Hookman
      Hookman
      (29 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...