Jump to content
IGNORED

Norman says "probably would have" beaten Tiger


mvmac
Note: This thread is 3766 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Norman was a solid player and still is compared to me but Tiger in his prime was just a different level of greatness, I don't think anyone would have kept up with Tiger in his prime. Phil couldn't, Ernie also was always playing second fiddle.  However I think Tom Watson could have handled him better than most.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
I think Greg Norman spent 331 weeks at number one in the world, and Tiger Woods just hit twice that: 662 weeks.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Norman is right he would have beat all of them - on Saturday!

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think the blown opportunities at majors is still haunting the guy to this day and he just says things like this to bolster his ego. Some of the lost tournaments were from heroic shots Mize, Gamez  etc,  but then there was the 96' masters, that is going to go down as one of the biggest folds in tournament golf. And of course the very next year Tiger blazes Augusta national, if they did not make the changes to that course as soon as they did he may have 6 jackets by now particularly adding rough in 99.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Norman would have beaten Tiger........that's a fair statement. Take that statement for what's its means, it refers to Norman the way he played in his career and time, against Tiger the way he has been playing. He makes no reference to when Tiger was dominating. Norman was really long and really straight. Reading into it as comparing himself to Tiger accomplishments is a different statement entirely.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Greg Norman was one of the best drivers of the golf ball.

Just taking a look at at scoring average. Though when Tiger was at his best, his scoring average was 2-3 strokes better than Greg's. Greg had a 10 year stretch were his scoring average was in the realm of a few years Tiger was at. Greg at the end of his career had nearly the same scoring average as Tiger at the beginning '97. I think Greg could beat Tiger on occasion. Even when Tiger was in his prime, I think Greg could take a few tournaments from Tiger.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Greg Norman was one of the best drivers of the golf ball.

Just taking a look at at scoring average. Though when Tiger was at his best, his scoring average was 2-3 strokes better than Greg's. Greg had a 10 year stretch were his scoring average was in the realm of a few years Tiger was at. Greg at the end of his career had nearly the same scoring average as Tiger at the beginning '97. I think Greg could beat Tiger on occasion. Even when Tiger was in his prime, I think Greg could take a few tournaments from Tiger.

Huh?

Norman's best ever scoring average was 1994 at 68.81.  But you have to look at that in the context if the scoring averages of the other players that year.  His biggest margin was in 1995, beating the #2 by .53 strokes.  Tiger had SEVEN years where he bet the #2 by a bigger margin.  In fact in his 10 seasons where he led the scoring average, Tiger had a smaller winning margin only 3 times. Of the other 7 his smallest winning margin was .74.  And he had 4 years where his winning advantage was more than a full stroke.  In the 6 years that Norman led his average winning margin was .29 strokes.  In the 10 years that tiger led the scoring average his average margin was .89.

Or, looking at it another way, Greg's best year was 1986 when he had 3 wins including one major.  Tiger has had NINE years that were better than that.

Could Greg have won an occasional event with Tiger on the field?  Sure.  So what?  Lots of guys have won occasional events with Tiger in the field over the last 19 years.  If THAT is what Greg meant than it is true, but he is an idiot for even saying it, it is so self-obvious.  But we all know that he meant a lot more than that.  And frankly I don't think he would have been better than Phil nor Vijy over most of that period.  Let alone Tiger.  Greg is very very lucky that he was born 20 years before Tiger.  If he had been born in 1975 instead of 1955, IMO he would be lucky to be considered the 3rd best player of his time. And he would have had the same number of weeks at #1 as Phil has had.

  • Upvote 1

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think he probably is, anyway.

Faldo - Ballesteros - Norman

He's lucky Woosie, Lyle, or Langer didn't win more majors. Actually, to be honest, on reflection, I probably rate Langer higher than Norman anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
Norman is being honest, this is what he thinks and probably what it takes to be one of the greats of all time. Probably would have won have won 10 majors if it wasn’t for larry Mizes chip in. If u ask Seve he would say
Link to comment
Share on other sites


There's one thing being confident, then there's another thing saying you can beat the best player in the world without even matching up against him once. Hell, it doesn't matter if it's the worst player, you don't say you can beat someone unless you beat them first, no exceptions. This is just a cause of Norman either being the typical narcissist he is, or wanting the spotlight again. Probably both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How can you claim you would've beat Tiger when he couldn't even beat Faldo, Fuzzy Zoeller, Raymond Floyd, Bob Tway, Larry Mize, Mark Cakcavecchia, Paul Azinger, Corey Pavin......should I keep going?

Norman should keep his mouth shut and check his memory because it's pretty short.

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3766 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I've played Bali Hai, Bear's Best and Painted Desert. I enjoyed Bali Hai the most--course was in great shape, friendly staff and got paired in a great group. Bear's Best greens were very fast, didn't hold the ball well (I normally have enough spin to stop the ball after 1-2 hops).  The sand was different on many holes. Some were even dark sand (recreation of holes from Hawaii). Unfortunately I was single and paired with a local "member" who only played the front 9.  We were stuck behind a slow 4-some who wouldn't let me through even when the local left. Painted Desert was decent, just a bit far from the Strip where we were staying.
    • Wordle 1,035 3/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜ 🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Just lipped out that Eagle putt, easy tab-in Birdie
    • Day 106 - Worked on chipping/pitching. Focus was feeling the club fall to the ground as my body rotated through. 
    • Honestly, unless there's something about that rough there that makes it abnormally penal or a lost ball likely, this might be the play. I don't know how the mystrategy cone works, but per LSW, you don't use every shot for your shot zones. In that scatter plot, you have no balls in the bunker, and 1 in the penalty area. The median outcome seems to be a 50 yard pitch. Even if you aren't great from 50 yards, you're better off there than in a fairway bunker or the penalty area on the right of the fairway. It could also be a strategy you keep in your back pocket if you need to make up ground. Maybe this is a higher average score with driver, but better chance at a birdie. Maybe you are hitting your driver well and feel comfortable with letting one rip.  I get not wanting to wait and not wanting to endanger people on the tee, but in a tournament, I think I value playing for score more than waiting. I don't value that over hurting people, but you can always yell fore 😆 Only thing I would say is I'm not sure whether that cone is the best representation of the strategy (see my comment above about LSW's shot zones). To me, it looks like a 4 iron where you're aiming closer to the bunker might be the play. You have a lot of shots out to the right and only a few to the left. Obviously, I don't know where you are aiming (and this is a limitation of MyStrategy), but it seems like most of your 4 iron shots are right. You have 2 in the bunker but aiming a bit closer to the bunker won't bring more of your shots into the bunker. It does bring a few away from the penalty area on the right.  This could also depend on how severe the penalties are for missing the green. Do you need to be closer to avoid issues around the green?  It's not a bad strategy to hit 6 iron off the tee, be in the fairway, and have 150ish in. I'm probably overthinking this.
    • Day 283: Putted on my mat for a while watching an NLU video. Worked on keeping my head still primarily, and then making sure my bead is okay.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...