Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Slowcelica

Reason for keeping the clubhead inside the hand plane on the downswing

16 posts in this topic

I have a question, I watch Mark Crossfield's YouTube videos from time to time, and I have seen him recommend keeping the club head under the hand plane in the downswing. I know it would be bad to go outside the hand plane because that is an over the top swing, but what does going under the hand plane get you?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I have a question, I watch Mark Crossfield's YouTube videos from time to time, and I have seen him recommend keeping the club head under the hand plane in the downswing. I know it would be bad to go outside the hand plane because that is an over the top swing, but what does going under the hand plane get you?

I'd suggest that going under the plane is bad too, though very few people do it. I prefer a swing that's more ONline than INward or OUTward.

If your clubhead gets too far inside the hands the path will tend to be very far to the right and often AoA becomes shallow and low point control becomes more difficult.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd suggest that going under the plane is bad too, though very few people do it. I prefer a swing that's more ONline than INward or OUTward.

If your clubhead gets too far inside the hands the path will tend to be very far to the right and often AoA becomes shallow and low point control becomes more difficult.

@iacas , in general, the more shallow, the more forward the low point? Or the low point gets more elevated - thin shots?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@iacas, in general, the more shallow, the more forward the low point?

The opposite is true. The more you swing left ("INward" for a righty), the easier it is to move the low point forward. That's part of the reason so many hackers have over-the-top moves. If they didn't, they'd NEVER hit a ball close to solid.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The opposite is true. The more you swing left ("INward" for a righty), the easier it is to move the low point forward. That's part of the reason so many hackers have over-the-top moves. If they didn't, they'd NEVER hit a ball close to solid.

This is interesting and something I suspected was happening with my own swing.  I definitely felt it was easier to move low point forward while swinging left.  This does not really help me though.  When I try to swing more right I struggle with fat shots.

What do I need to do more of to move low point forward while swinging right?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This is interesting and something I suspected was happening with my own swing.  I definitely felt it was easier to move low point forward while swinging left.  This does not really help me though.  When I try to swing more right I struggle with fat shots.

What do I need to do more of to move low point forward while swinging right?

I suspect weight forward is going to be part of the answer?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This is interesting and something I suspected was happening with my own swing.  I definitely felt it was easier to move low point forward while swinging left.  This does not really help me though.  When I try to swing more right I struggle with fat shots.

What do I need to do more of to move low point forward while swinging right?

Keys 2 and 3. And possibly 1. :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Maybe I miss understood what he was saying, or didn't explain it in the correct terms. The guy he was helping with his swing was swinging with the club outside of his hand plane, and I think he was just trying to get him to swing on the same plane as his hands. Here is the link to the vid it's about 13:30 where he starts talking about it. [VIDEO]http://youtu.be/CYwqVJgr8RE?t=13m30s[/VIDEO]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The answer : [VIDEO]http://youtu.be/iuJaSM7Kexw[/VIDEO]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks long but exactly the explanation I was looking for. Basically if you drop the club head inside at impact the torque will help to square the club face. I'm going to give this a shot because I have trouble squaring the club face especially with my driver.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The answer :

Wait...so the models discussed are concerned with forces operating inline with the plane (or handpath), but the reverse roll of the forearms (teeacing it) causes the tumble?  Those forces dont operate inline with the plane.  Or maybe these guys are having a hard time explaining this stuff on a simple level...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer, as I understand it, is that the club head path being above or below (inside or outside) of the hand path, creates a moment arm, that causes the forearms and club to rotate.

When the club head path is below the hand path, the moment arm, causes the club to rotate square (or closed); when the club head path is above the hand path, it causes the club to rotate open.

AFAIK....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I got it...but theres no way the torque to square the face works within the same plane as the hands (the plane that is used in mackenzie's model to measure reactive forces).  "In my opinion"

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the club head path is below the hand path, the moment arm, causes the club to rotate closed; when the club head path is above the hand path, it causes the club to rotate open.

That's pretty much it, except that the body may or may not do those things. There's a torque in each of those directions (I changed your "square" to say "closed" for consistency), yes, but it's small and the actual rotation of your forearms, wrists, etc. often play a much larger role in this.

In layman's terms (kind of):

  • A clubhead under the hands plane tends to be more open and as the forces attempt to shift it towards inline with the hands path/plane, it will try to twist the face in the closed direction.
  • A clubhead above the hands plane tends to be more closed and as the forces attempt to shift it towards inline with the hands path/plane, it will try to twist the face in the open direction.

It's not a big force, though, and I will re-iterate what I think I said above: I prefer a swing that's more ONline than INward or OUTward.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Iacas would you care to share anything on the "loading" of the moment arm? Robert rock for example...butt of the club pointing inside the ball from dtl at A3 (p3 in 5sk?). What has to happen from A3-A5 to get the Ch "online"?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What has to happen from A3-A5 to get the Ch "online"?

Those are primarily positions we use to discuss the downswing. They don't really have any relation to the backswing, and PGA Tour players range from Ray Floyd to Rickie Fowler/Ryan Moore.

Originally Posted by PingG10guy

Iacas would you care to share anything on the "loading" of the moment arm? Robert rock for example...butt of the club pointing inside the ball from dtl at A3 (p3 in 5sk?).

See the above - we don't really care about the backswing unless it's causing problems with the downswing. I will also say that a lot of players go from steep (relatively, bear in mind) to shallow (again, relatively) in transition.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • The course with my absolute favorite greens is Eaton Country Club which, despite the name, is far cheaper golf than most courses. A membership is something around $100 a month with no initiation fee or food requirement if I remember correctly. Play golf once a week and you're paying only $25 a round with cart for 18 holes, which is a far better deal than any other course in the area (the 9 hole course I work at is the cheapest in my city at $25 for 9 holes with cart). The greens at this course stimp between 11 and 12 on a daily basis and are the smoothest that I've ever set foot on. Their maintenance crew is fantastic about fixing every little imperfection in the greens. They go over them with a fine-toothed comb every evening to fix anything on the green.  I know there must be some kind of limit to how much play a green like this could sustain, but the course has looked this way every time I've played it (including weekends, weekdays, and such). It's not an enormously busy golf course though, and I don't think it would work on the courses that regularly see 200 or more golfers. I would be willing to bet good money though that, given equal traffic, good maintenance will definitely produce a much higher quality putting surface. The course I used to work for had two people assigned to fix ball marks on the course once a week, both of which had issues with their backs that made bending over for any extended period of time uncomfortable. The greens at that course clearly showed it, with unfixed or only partially fixed ball marks marring every putting surface. The course I currently work at has a maintenance crew that fixes marks whenever they're out to water as well as marshalls that are assigned a couple of holes to maintain during their shifts and I notice that the greens here have many fewer ball marks across the greens. The maintenance crew is also diligent when it comes to regularly verticutting, needle-tining, etc. all of the greens to ensure that they're in top shape. They water the greens up to four times a day depending on the weather conditions as compared to the old course only watering in the evenings and sometimes mornings to save money. As a result the greens at my current course are much more lush and smooth than those at the course I used to work and play at, and I know the difference is the care and attention to the maintenance of the greens (they have similar player traffic).
    • To clarify, I have a push cart. I don't have an umbrella, yet. That probably would have done loads of good keeping the sun from beating down on me. I've got one picked out, but just haven't pulled the trigger yet.  Shooting an 86 was a "decent" to "good" round for me. I felt like I played well. My ball striking was above average today. I had 7 GIR and 7 nGIR. I had 37 putts today, which was my score killer. Oddly enough, most of my 3 putts were on my GIRs! I say this because in the super heat I would think that ball striking would be the first to go, but it didn't for me. Putting was mainly because I'm still working on breaking old habits I had with my old putter and moving to my new putter. Lines were always spot on but I would go back to "popping" the ball like I did with my old putter and would lose it way past the hole.  Definitely need to pick up that umbrella. I imagine that would help a ton. I'm 28 years old and in pretty darn good health/shape and I would have probably died had I actually carried my bag today... lol. Even my lighter "carry" bag.
    • For irons, last year at a Titleist fitting they said I should get the AP1's with the XP 90 gram shaft with a +1/2.  This year I did another free open fitting and they said they wouldn't need to adjust the shaft but I don't remember what shaft they recommended.  Just got fit for a driver last Thursday but i don't think that helps. Scheduled a fitting for Saturday afternoon but who knows if the clubs will still be available then. 
    • I would say nicer golf courses tend to have better greens because of the money it takes to maintain them.  I would say that greens that can routinely hold up to being cut short probably have a healthier denser grass with stronger root systems that allow it to resist damage from pitch marks. I've played on course in Dayton where a pitch mark will just tear up the green versus another course where it just leaves a slight indentation. 
    • Give that man an icy cold beer, stat! I'm relatively young, and I'd take the cart for the breeze between shots and holes as well as the portable shade. What's the point in suffering unless you are practicing for competition in similar conditions? For anyone, I think the physical metabolic toll of moving all that water through to stay cool would tend to lower scores. But you do get longer drives than typical playing conditions, and you may feel extra limber. Older folks face potential heat stroke risk, because they aren't as efficient with heat regulation as a healthy adult. If you are healthy and that's your only day free to play, why not.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. chriswuk
      chriswuk
      (25 years old)
    2. Gero
      Gero
      (73 years old)
    3. SUPGolfer
      SUPGolfer
      (46 years old)
  • Blog Entries