Jump to content
IGNORED

British Open vs. The Open Championship?


Foursum Golf
Note: This thread is 3160 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

2 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you call it?

    • The British Open
      21
    • The Open Championship
      20
    • Either/I Don't Care
      17


Recommended Posts

This discussion occurs every year it seems.  I guess the R&A; has a right to call it whatever they want. As long as they don't complain about our "World Series" I won't complain about their "The Open".

Of course you have framed the issue completely backwards. NO ONE is complaining about the brits calling it "The Open"  The R&A; can call it whatever they want and major league baseball can call the WS anything they like.  And I do not give a dipsy doodle if some foreign announcer refers to the US-PGA, the US Masters, or the US Open.  Or the US World Series, for than matter.

But while the R&A; has the right to call it anything they like, so do I.  It is those who insist on "correcting" those of us who choose to call it the British Open who create the issue, not folks clamoring for the R&A; to change what they call it.  You'll not find any messages saying "XXX called it the Open championship - doesn't he know it is the British Open?"

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by turtleback

Quote:

Originally Posted by pitchandputter

P.S. On my visit to the Golf Museum I was lucky enough to see the "original" claret jug and it was interesting to note the trophy contains the words "champion Golfer of the World" -a fitting epitath I think to Allan Roberston and all those who have followed him over the past 145 years.

Maybe Robertson, but for a lot of the history of the event it would be an absurdity to consider the winner the champion golfer of the world.  This is the kind of pretentiousness which may have been justified at the outset when there was one tournament, but no longer makes a lick of sense and clearly was ridiculous for many decades.  Keep the titles, by all means, but let's not make believe they mean the same thing now they did in 1860.

There is no more reason that the British Open winner is the Champion of the World than there is reason to consider the winner of any other event the Champion Golfer of the World.  And this really, is the root of the problem.  Circumstances changed but there are some on the far side of the pond who cling to the days when being at the top of the British Empire in almost anything was to be top of the world.  That isn't the case any more, socially, politically, culturally, or golf-wise.  So now they are reduced to worrying about what we call things.  Thankfully, most brits have a little more common sense.

Wouldn't it have been the World Champion  when it was only played there and nowhere else and was the only Open tournament?

And that is why I put "for a lot of its history".    All that ended at least by the time Jones and Hagen spent a decade or so dominating it, (7 wins in the 10 years between 1922 and 1931) demonstrating that the best players were not British, making the world championship notion a little silly.

Circumstances changed, and something that might have made sense in 1900 makes no sense today.  When there is one tournament in the whole world it makes sense to call the winner the world champion.

But when there are dozen of top-flight tournaments around the world, the very idea of determining the world champion by the result of a single event, and one in which the best players in the world long eschewed, is just pretentious.  Especially when for a pretty good stretch, (1934 to 1960) it seemed like every time a top American went over, they won.  But because of the cost and distance, playing the in the British Open, for all but the brits, became a novelty entry.  Even as late as the 60s and 70s a top flight player like Billy Casper, arguably the best player for a 2 or 3 year stretch in the mid 60's. Mr. Nicklaus notwithstanding, played the British Open 3 times in a whole career than included 50 PGA wins and several majors.

Now circumstances have changed and it has become a "must play" for top players.  But that doesn't make it any more of a world championship than the US Open or the Masters, or the guy who wins the Dubai cup, or the guy who wins the Fed-Ex cup, or the guy who wins the club championship at Ilseworth.

And with all that said, I have no objection to them calling the event and the winner whatever they want.  My only objection is the pedantic twittery exhibited by those compelled to "correct" us.  And those who try to argue that what they are called is what they really are,  The only thing the "Champion Golfer of the Year" is champion of is the British Open.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Of course you have framed the issue completely backwards.  NO ONE is complaining about the brits calling it "The Open"  The R&A; can call it whatever they want and major league baseball can call the WS anything they like.  And I do not give a dipsy doodle if some foreign announcer refers to the US-PGA, the US Masters, or the US Open.  Or the US World Series, for than matter.

But while the R&A; has the right to call it anything they like, so do I.  It is those who insist on "correcting" those of us who choose to call it the British Open who create the issue, not folks clamoring for the R&A; to change what they call it.  You'll not find any messages saying "XXX called it the Open championship - doesn't he know it is the British Open?"

I don't recall saying you don't have a "right" to call the tournament whatever you want.   I really don't have an axe to grind on whatever you call it.  But when you call something by other than its correct name I can't be held responsible for someone else correcting you.  But I didn't, correct you that is.

Butch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi Guys.

Please accept my apologies, didn't intend to come across snobbish or elitist with my posts on The Open Championship, stand by what I said in my earlier post that anyone is free to call the tournament by what they know best.

Don't worry there are no plans to invade the US anytime soon, the liberty bell is safe! :surrender:

Joking apart I was just trying point out the little known title on the Claret Jug and that the competition is a fitting legacy for the father of professional golf -and I include all the rest of the majors in that legacy. Hope this makes sense. In the same way that there would be no Masters without the late great Bobby Jones. Hope you get what I'm trying to say.

Think we've maybe been caught up in pedantics and we've maybe been taking things literally. Without sounding disrespectful I didn't mean the Open Champion is the champion of the world in the same way that the US Master winner isn't neccesarily "the Master" of the golfing world. I think all the majors are special in their own way and its a great compliment that so many people are willing to travel thousands of miles from home to compete in them.

I hope that maybe puts the debate to rest, although I do suspect merely to due to globalised marketing and media, the tournament might be increasingly known as "The Open" elsewhere, however that doesn't stop people calling it the "British". We'll know what you mean. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Hi Guys.

Please accept my apologies, didn't intend to come across snobbish or elitist with my posts on The Open Championship, stand by what I said in my earlier post that anyone is free to call the tournament by what they know best.

Don't worry there are no plans to invade the US anytime soon, the liberty bell is safe!

Joking apart I was just trying point out the little known title on the Claret Jug and that the competition is a fitting legacy for the father of professional golf -and I include all the rest of the majors in that legacy. Hope this makes sense. In the same way that there would be no Masters without the late great Bobby Jones. Hope you get what I'm trying to say.

Think we've maybe been caught up in pedantics and we've maybe been taking things literally. Without sounding disrespectful I didn't mean the Open Champion is the champion of the world in the same way that the US Master winner isn't neccesarily "the Master" of the golfing world. I think all the majors are special in their own way and its a great compliment that so many people are willing to travel thousands of miles from home to compete in them.

I hope that maybe puts the debate to rest, although I do suspect merely to due to globalised marketing and media, the tournament might be increasingly known as "The Open" elsewhere, however that doesn't stop people calling it the "British". We'll know what you mean.

No worries. It is already cracked! :-)

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3160 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I've played Bali Hai, Bear's Best and Painted Desert. I enjoyed Bali Hai the most--course was in great shape, friendly staff and got paired in a great group. Bear's Best greens were very fast, didn't hold the ball well (I normally have enough spin to stop the ball after 1-2 hops).  The sand was different on many holes. Some were even dark sand (recreation of holes from Hawaii). Unfortunately I was single and paired with a local "member" who only played the front 9.  We were stuck behind a slow 4-some who wouldn't let me through even when the local left. Painted Desert was decent, just a bit far from the Strip where we were staying.
    • Wordle 1,035 3/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜ 🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Just lipped out that Eagle putt, easy tab-in Birdie
    • Day 106 - Worked on chipping/pitching. Focus was feeling the club fall to the ground as my body rotated through. 
    • Honestly, unless there's something about that rough there that makes it abnormally penal or a lost ball likely, this might be the play. I don't know how the mystrategy cone works, but per LSW, you don't use every shot for your shot zones. In that scatter plot, you have no balls in the bunker, and 1 in the penalty area. The median outcome seems to be a 50 yard pitch. Even if you aren't great from 50 yards, you're better off there than in a fairway bunker or the penalty area on the right of the fairway. It could also be a strategy you keep in your back pocket if you need to make up ground. Maybe this is a higher average score with driver, but better chance at a birdie. Maybe you are hitting your driver well and feel comfortable with letting one rip.  I get not wanting to wait and not wanting to endanger people on the tee, but in a tournament, I think I value playing for score more than waiting. I don't value that over hurting people, but you can always yell fore 😆 Only thing I would say is I'm not sure whether that cone is the best representation of the strategy (see my comment above about LSW's shot zones). To me, it looks like a 4 iron where you're aiming closer to the bunker might be the play. You have a lot of shots out to the right and only a few to the left. Obviously, I don't know where you are aiming (and this is a limitation of MyStrategy), but it seems like most of your 4 iron shots are right. You have 2 in the bunker but aiming a bit closer to the bunker won't bring more of your shots into the bunker. It does bring a few away from the penalty area on the right.  This could also depend on how severe the penalties are for missing the green. Do you need to be closer to avoid issues around the green?  It's not a bad strategy to hit 6 iron off the tee, be in the fairway, and have 150ish in. I'm probably overthinking this.
    • Day 283: Putted on my mat for a while watching an NLU video. Worked on keeping my head still primarily, and then making sure my bead is okay.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...