• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
nevets88

Rate of Closure and Spin Axis

Recommended Posts

nevets88    805

I recently read the blog post below on rate of closure - @iacas - so a high rate of closure -> slice, low -> hook? For righties.

Also, I assume face/path differential overrides rate of closure by a lot?

http://3jack.blogspot.com/2014/04/rate-of-closure-and-spin-axis.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

jamo    701
I recently read the blog post below on rate of closure - @iacas - so a high rate of closure -> slice, low -> hook? For righties. Also, I assume face/path differential overrides rate of closure by a lot? [URL=http://3jack.blogspot.com/2014/04/rate-of-closure-and-spin-axis.html]http://3jack.blogspot.com/2014/04/rate-of-closure-and-spin-axis.html[/URL]

Would it be that, or high rate of closure -> slice, low rate of closure -> less of a slice? Either way (high or low rate of closure) the club is still rotating in the same direction (counterclockwise), so shouldn't the ball still rotate clockwise in both cases? EDIT: I missed Richie's last paragraph, which is basically saying what I just did. Have you guys or the Trackman guys tested this stuff, or is still more of a hypothesis?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

nevets88    805

Would it be that, or high rate of closure -> slice, low rate of closure -> less of a slice? Either way (high or low rate of closure) the club is still rotating in the same direction (counterclockwise), so shouldn't the ball still rotate clockwise in both cases?

EDIT: I missed Richie's last paragraph, which is basically saying what I just did. Have you guys or the Trackman guys tested this stuff, or is still more of a hypothesis?

Yes, I stand corrected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

iacas    4,164

Thanks for pointing that out. I posted this comment to his blog article:

Agree on the last part. We were mostly pointing out to those who still think "horizontal hinging" produces draws solely because of the face closing during the impact interval had it backwards.

I'd guessed that the number would be very small, and it is: Fredrik gave me the number, but I think it was something like 0.7°, and that's with an incredibly high rate of closure (and possibly with the driver). That is to say that with an incredibly high RoC, the spin axis will be tilted about 0.7° farther to the right (for a righty) than it would with no RoC (which as you hinted at is highly unlikely on a full swing shot).

It's also important to point out how little distance off-center you have to strike a golf ball for actual gear effect to take over. This "RoC Gear Effect" is, again, easily over-ruled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

nevets88    805

Stuff like this makes my face hurt.....

Even though as @iacas points out that gear effect (due to off center hits and many of us are off center, a lot) overrides RoC, it means all those guys saying in theory, closing the face promotes a draw - they're not correct.

More stuff to sing "I'm not listening, I'm not listening" with your hands to ears while some guy who thinks he knows it all, totally unqualified, however well meaning, tries to teach the guy in the stall next to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

iacas    4,164

Even though as @iacas points out that gear effect (due to off center hits and many of us are off center, a lot) overrides RoC, it means all those guys saying in theory, closing the face promotes a draw - they're not correct.

Yes it does. If I have to draw or hook the ball, I'm closing the face a bunch. At setup.

Horizontal hinging works because it gets the face more closed to the path at impact. But it literally says that the action of closing the face during the impact interval is what makes it draw. Turns out that's backwards. That's all.

More stuff to sing "I'm not listening, I'm not listening" with your hands to ears while some guy who thinks he knows it all, totally unqualified, however well meaning, tries to teach the guy in the stall next to you.

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

nevets88    805

Yes it does. If I have to draw or hook the ball, I'm closing the face a bunch. At setup.

Horizontal hinging works because it gets the face more closed to the path at impact. But it literally says that the action of closing the face during the impact interval is what makes it draw. Turns out that's backwards. That's all.

:)

Errr. Have to be more careful with my words. :-) I meant thinking of closing the face crazy faster during that nanosecond of impact.

But closing the face at setup - it gets people to get face closed to path, so even if they're over the top, way over the top, their path still manages to be open to the face. So while they're hitting a draw, albeit really left, they're not truly swinging in to out. They may be thinking - I've got something, but really aren't swing more in to out as the should.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wangus94    0
What on earth are you guys talking about? How does any of this fix my hook?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What on earth are you guys talking about? How does any of this fix my hook?

Its basically how much the club face goes from open pre impact to closed post impact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

nevets88    805
What on earth are you guys talking about? How does any of this fix my hook?

As someone who admittedly probably reads too much and into the details of the swing, probably not much compared to how much a good teacher will help you.

But if your pro is going by the old ball flight laws, a ton.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

mvmac    1,759

Stuff like this makes my face hurt.....

Just keep getting that left shoulder down ;-)

What on earth are you guys talking about? How does any of this fix my hook?

Take home, "closing" the toe more through impact doesn't make the ball draw, if anything it can make the ball fade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wangus94    0
I don't really think too much about stuff like that. My pro told me my hook is because my upper body is too slow compared to my arms. I'm not sure about the path vs face thing. He' keeps telling me to clear everything faster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nevets88    805
So high speed close up video of the face opening up around impact on tv - I wonder how many of these were not shown that were a draw/slice to keep in line with generally accepted principles. This is very conspiracy theory, I know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

iacas    4,164
So high speed close up video of the face opening up around impact on tv - I wonder how many of these were not shown that were a draw/slice to keep in line with generally accepted principles. This is very conspiracy theory, I know.

Huh? Elaborate more. What?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

nevets88    805

Huh? Elaborate more. What?

When they show the face twisting open on replays, it's always when they hit a fade. At least based on my recollection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

mvmac    1,759

When they show the face twisting open on replays, it's always when they hit a fade. At least based on my recollection.

I don't think it's a conspiracy, the "experts" just don't know why there is gear effect. Most golfers think that there is only gear effect on woods and that it's due to the bulge and roll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • ... well, it was clarity for me, anyway.  

      I've been going through a slump recently.  After finally achieving a single digit index, it's been all downhill for the last 3 weeks or so.  Off the tee, I developed a quick hook that I couldn't get rid of.  Everywhere else, I've struggled to strike the ball solidly.  

      On the 5th hole this morning, I was in the rough up the left hand side.  I had 193 yards to the hole and the ball was kind of sunken down a bit, but the back of the ball was exposed.  I took a few practice swings, and then it hit me that I needed to play this like a fairway bunker shot.  I needed to make sure the contact to the back of the ball was clean and that I accelerated through the ball.  I hit a low 4 iron that ran up into the green side trap.  Other than the fact that I pulled it a bit (the rough closed the club face just enough), I played it exactly as I'd wanted to.  

      2 holes later, I had 130 to a flag in the back corner of the green.  This specific green is hard and the ball always releases.  Again, I was in the rough... but this one was sitting cleaner.  I had that same swing thought, playing it like it was a fairway bunker shot, and I hit a great shot with a pitching wedge that landed just shy of the pin and released to about 20 feet.  

      For the rest of the round, that was my thought standing over the ball with an iron.  I've been pretty good out of fairway traps for awhile now.  I don't know why it never clicked with me before today.  I hit crisper irons today than I have for the last month.  I scored like crap (a lot of shots were going further and I was left with tough up & down chances), but... striking the ball felt good again.  

      Chances are that I'll forget this again in the near future, or some other 'masterful' swing thought will take over... but, for now... at least I feel like I'm headed in the right direction.

      CY
    • It may. I'm assuming the driver is the biggest issue right now, and not just by a little. If I have a student who is coming for > 1 lesson, I take a slightly different approach. I'll work more often with an iron swing, because many of the same issues are present across the board. But if they're just coming once? I have to show them that I can help them get better with their biggest weakness. And so sometimes that means "yeah, you probably do that with your irons, but since it's magnified even more with the driver, let's work with that." It's not always a pure "golf" decision. Sometimes it's a business decision. If you've got someone coming for eight lessons, you can work up a longer-term plan, and if the driver still isn't fixed you can address it in a later lesson, and the student is more comfortable with that too. If you have one shot, you've got one chance to leave the student feeling happy at the end of the lesson. Your priorities change a little, as does the student's - he's not looking for a long-term ten-shot improvement, he wants to save two or three shots by not hitting a huge slice 14 times a round. Depending on what you mean by "generally." The driver and iron swings can be fairly different. There's less importance on getting your weight forward when the ball is teed up, you can swing faster, many pros play a different shape with the driver than irons, etc. It's a similar but different swing… depending on how picky you want to be about calling something the same or different.
    • Why?   I'll assume you're familiar with logical fallacies and spare explaining why this isn't a legitimate argument.   I don't remember Jack complaining when he was outdriving most of his fellow competitors in the 60s and 70s.    
    • There's no one commonality here Frankie. If letting your head/neck rotate through more will help your chest/torso rotate through more, go for it.
    • Well, some people equate long game with length alone. Straight is a huge factor as well. Length without the ability to find the darn thing is pretty useless. All other aspects of the their games being equal someone who hits the ball farther will win as they should have a better chance of getting the ball in the hole in the fewest number of strokes. That being said in the real world that would never happen as people's games would almost never be equal in all other areas. And I never said that, too many factors exist. I just never did buy into the "practice your short game 80% of the time" theory for the mere fact that even the best players on the planet only get it up and down at an average of about 60% of the time. I mean the best guy on tour only gets it up and down 67% of the time. So even the best amateur can only hope to achieve 50%. (although there are people on this forum who would make you think they get it up and down 90% of the time ) Basically my belief has always been to be successful you have to have as many looks at birdie as possible, so you have to have as many GIRs as possible which means you have to be in the best position possible to hit greens. Which in turn means hit it as long as you can AND hit it where you can find it. Even the best hybrid player on the planet from 225 yards is not as good as I am with sand wedge from 110. Like Lee Trevino said, "There are two things that won't last long in this world, and that's dogs chasing cars and pros putting for pars." You can only get it up and down so often so there is a direct correlation between GIR and scoring well. if you miss 10 greens on average even the best player is looking at a score of +4. 
       
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bryan Kasper
      Bryan Kasper
      (25 years old)
    2. Greg Pickett Golf
      Greg Pickett Golf
      (62 years old)
    3. hobecorning
      hobecorning
      (75 years old)
    4. Lfm
      Lfm
      (73 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon