Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
LuciusWooding

Hitting over the trees

0  

  1. 1. Do you intentionally hit over trees?

    • All the time!
      3
    • Never!
      2
    • Sometimes...
      14

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

24 posts in this topic

I didn't find a thread on this topic, and I was curious just how much some of you guys avoid trees. Lately I've been taking a couple chances doing just what it says in the thread title, and it seems I can take them on a little more than I thought and it can simplify some problematic holes a lot.

What do you guys think? Do you have the height to do it but don't like the risk? Or is it just not an issue on your course?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I'm getting there. My height is increasing and, more importantly, becoming more consistent and with that consistency comes the confidence to take some chances. You need to not only know what kind of height you can get but also where your apex is with the given club. It's something that I can see using more often when the risk-reward ratio is right but I'm not quite there yet.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Trees are my friend. :-D

They make me concentrate. I hit it over them, under them, through them and around them. I even deer hunt out of them.

Seriously, part of the fun of golf to me is hitting shots that other people won't, or can't, hit. I didn't bring much natural talent to the game but I could hit high draws and high fades as well as opening up mid lofted clubs like 7 irons and hitting huge flop shots over tall trees from pretty far distances.

Hell I had to do something to hold my own because I certainly wasn't very good at the traditional parts of the game.

My old playing partner used to always joke that he was going to plant trees in the middle of every fairway so I would hit better shots. Nowadays I play more boring golf than I did back then but the fun of the gamble hasn't completely gone away.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't drive over a tree! But I've lobbed over them to get on greens rather than chip through them!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how to answer the poll so I didn't.

I do when it's appropriate to do so and when the reward is worth whatever the associated risk is.  Just like deciding whether to play over a water hazard and if so, how much to cut off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't find a thread on this topic, and I was curious just how much some of you guys avoid trees. Lately I've been taking a couple chances doing just what it says in the thread title, and it seems I can take them on a little more than I thought and it can simplify some problematic holes a lot.

What do you guys think? Do you have the height to do it but don't like the risk? Or is it just not an issue on your course?

It depends on the shot. I do go under trees than over most of the time, but I can go over trees if I want. Its a non-issue for me, no problem getting the ball in the air.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Depends on the area and terrain I play on. When I lived in Washington state the area I was in had some of the tallest fricking pine trees I've ever seen in my life. It was like trying to hit over a skyscraper. I learned quickly to hit the low burning runner to the green when I got into the woods there. Back in the Northeast where most our trees are more "normal sized" it's a matter of risk/reward. It's a good idea to practice the shot on the range from time to time.

To get a wedge up really high very quickly and carry a significant distance you really need some club head speed. I like to play the ball slightly more forward and envision myself swinging a Driver, loose and free wheeling.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

golf courses that do not have trees the sport would be boring :bugout: I hate trees because I am constantly battling them, fairway what's a fairway when you have trees. I have to laugh sometimes I could have one small over hanging limb with leaves on it and  80% of the time I will hit the damn thing. :censored:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not in a place with my game whereiam confident enough to go over...... My ball finds the trees enough when I am trying to dodge them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Depends on the situation.  Trying to hit over trees is a high-risk shot and I tend to prefer to hit a low, stinger that goes under them, as I feel its an easier shot to pull off consistently.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a trade-off... Depends on the distance TO the tree, height of the tree, how far past the tree my landing spot is(green, layup, etc...) risk/reward factor, etc.... And that's for drives, cutting corners or getting out of trouble. No real issues getting up in the air- depending on the lie. A tight hardpan lie, the high pop might not be the best call- a bit tricky to get the ball cleanly under the ball. On a "normal" lie, no worries about getting it up and over with any club.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too found the poll tough to answer. I would prefer a clear shot to the green vs having a tree in the way so I'd try to avoid it. When confronted with it, a lot of factors would have to be considered to determine whether to fly it, go under or punch out. But I hit the ball relatively high so may be able to take on a tree more readily than others.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would add that when I decide to fly a tree and it's going to be close, my swing thought is "hit down on the ball".
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am confident enough to fly over trees, but usually it's a 60 or SW to get on a green, and not an iron to go over a dog leg
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't find a thread on this topic, and I was curious just how much some of you guys avoid trees. Lately I've been taking a couple chances doing just what it says in the thread title, and it seems I can take them on a little more than I thought and it can simplify some problematic holes a lot.

What do you guys think? Do you have the height to do it but don't like the risk? Or is it just not an issue on your course?


Ironically I hit these better, knowing I must have loft means I stay in the shot better and remain focussed on the strike. I'm one of those guys who scrambles well and messes up when I have a straightforward shot in.  Bet there's a few people on here who relate to that !!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't play many courses with trees tall enough to matter. There isn't one tree in play at my home course, the few that I see aren't even on course property. Most modern courses in CO are faux links. I do play a few older park style course and it's really all about whether or not you are so far in you have to punch out. But I do hit over trees here and there. A few weeks ago I was far enough back I hit a 7w over some fairly tall trees after missing a fairway.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's situational. I hit over trees when I can or have to, but if the risk is too high, the reward too low, or the probability of success too low, I don't attempt it. If you can do it, it becomes another tool to use. When I'm standing in front of a tree that I'm confident I'll hit over, I don't even see it as an obstacle.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I answered sometimes.  If I know I can clear the tree with the height of my shot, I will.  I have hit quite a few shots over trees successfully.  I have used as low as a 6 iron from the rough.  I assume you are not talking about tee shots.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I agree there may be repercussions from using force to restrain a criminal but I believe as long as the force was used to only restrain the individual and no additional bodily harm was done the courts would be lenient in their ruling and most likely no charges would result in most jurisdictions.   The alternative is the courts send a message to all victims of crimes that they are helpless and must solely depend on the police to capture criminals even when they are face to face with them.    
    • https://www.gamegolf.com/player/bweiss711/round/1137850 A couple of firsts in this round.  It was my first round using the GG tags, and it was also my first round ever under 100.  If you want to see what 18 holes looks like when you have no clue where the ball is going off the tee and have no short game at all to speak of.... check out this round!
    • I think the point is, if the victim of a non-violent theft decides to use violence against the thief well after the crime was committed, he opens himself up to all kinds of trouble. Obviously it's different if someone gets jumped or car-jacked and the criminal is the first one to threaten or use violence. I'm not sure how pepper spray is classified in terms of being a weapon or not but I imagine using it could legally be considered assault in a situation like this.  
    • Well, I did it!  Been taking hacks at golf courses for 20 years, started actually practicing 7 weeks ago, and I finally mother-effing broke 100 yesterday.  Shot 96 at a course I had only played one time before about 8 years ago. This was easily the most consistent I've ever hit the ball into the greens (8 GIRs) and my driving was as good as it has been all season.  The biggest thing with the driver was deciding to stop trying to be perfect on the tee.  Meaning, I wasn't concerning myself with how I thought I should be ideally hitting the club, instead, I just hit it the way I naturally hit it right now, played the "power fade" aimed out over the left side of the fairway, and mostly kept it in play.  I was still inconsistent off the tee with a few pop ups and pulled shots, but for the most part, I stayed out of trouble. The even better news is that I shot 96 and my short game was terrible. I had a couple duffs in sand traps and from the rough around the greens.  Plus, of my 8 GIRs, I 3-putted 5 of them and it wasn't always the lag putt that was the problem.  I missed a few 3 footers that you just can't miss.  So, I've still got plenty of strokes to remove from my score once I actually start to work on shots around the green.  To this point, all of my practice has focused full swings with the irons and driver.  So, needless to say, I'm really excited about this.  I think i'm just going to play the rest of the season with the same practice focus.  Might be time to start a "member swing" thread for my driver.  And in the off-season, the focus will shift to the short game. Unfortunately, it might be a few weeks before I'm able to get out for 18 again, but I can't wait to get out there and try to do this again.
    • The incident in the OP doesn't sway my opinion on gun control one way or the other. Isolated incident in which some angry, old white dude should lose his right to carry indefinitely, but nothing that makes me believe that every gun carrier needs to be affected or restricted due to this incident. The John Wayne comments from some of y'all however, do make me think that gun laws need to be seriously revisited. The fact that some of you...ahem...more extreme individuals are actually permitted to carry is frightening indeed. And before there is an uproar, let me be clear that I have no issue with most of you who carry as your comments seemed to be well balanced and rational. Some others...not so much. It's seems pretty obvious to me that your right to bear arms should be dependant upon on your ability to not lose your shit when you're pissed off.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. kennysunstonelinks
      kennysunstonelinks
      (54 years old)
    2. lastings
      lastings
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries