• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Davie81

Coach change

9 posts in this topic

I've hit a recent slump and I've been having lessons from the same coach for around a year.  No matter how many lessons I've had some parts of the game haven't improved at all. I'll have one or two good rounds but it always goes back a step.

Is it worthwhile biting the bullet and changing coach to hopefully fix my major flaws and risk changing what is good about my game? Starting to feel like I'm paying money to not see a huge improvement.

Any advice is appreciated.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

You seem to be implying that the coach is to blame because you are not improving.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all. Not trying to blame anyone. It's probably me but I'm wondering if a different set of eyes and point of view might help in any way.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've hit a recent slump and I've been having lessons from the same coach for around a year.  No matter how many lessons I've had some parts of the game haven't improved at all. I'll have one or two good rounds but it always goes back a step. Is it worthwhile biting the bullet and changing coach to hopefully fix my major flaws and risk changing what is good about my game? Starting to feel like I'm paying money to not see a huge improvement. Any advice is appreciated.

It is possible that the coach is not compatible with your needs, and you are the customer. You should have a talk with your current coach to discuss the progress you have made and the amount you think you should have made. There are things that you did learn and things that are still lacking, so if you break down the things that are lacking you can discuss them with the coach and see if it is possible to fix them. Have a look at the 5SK as well, the keys might help give you some hints as to what you need to fix.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for the advice there. I've already had lessons on just the areas which I'm struggling with but still no improvement.  What is 5sk?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all. Not trying to blame anyone. It's probably me but I'm wondering if a different set of eyes and point of view might help in any way.

it may be worth trying but only if you are sure that you are doing everything the existing coach wants you to do.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely doing everything I'm told etc but it just won't work and get my to where I want to be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely doing everything I'm told etc but it just won't work and get my to where I want to be.

There's nothing wrong with finding another instructor, especially when there is no progress being made. I did and within 5 months am playing at a much higher level than I had hoped with my last one. Sometimes there could be a miscommunication. For instance, your current coach could be telling you to do something and you interpret it differently than he meant. Assumptions made by both parties could lead to problems with learning. You are not in school where you need to conform to the rules of the teacher strictly. You're trying to learn a sport that has enough things making it difficult as it is. Adding another level of potential confusion will just make it that much harder. If in fact there could be any communication issue, I would try to find another instructor for a second opinion. It really doesn't matter if you aren't learning well enough or if he's just a bad instructor, the fact is you are not communicating your needs and he's not able to help you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have had two different instructors and am about to go see a third. The first instructor tried to convince me I needed fitted clubs on my third lessons (shooting 120, mind you. Fitted clubs were not what i needed, and i knew it). The second one watched me hit 5 or 7 balls, adjusted my grip, and then watched me hit balls the remaining 30 minuts without much comment. In my case, less than stellar instructors. Yours is probably a grade above mine, not trying to blame the pro. But you`re spending your free time and disposable income on a voluntary activity, so you should feel free to try another pro. You can always go back to your regular pro. I have had plenty of professors in college. All were very smart. A few had a gift of also being great teachers. But I had to work very hard in many courses because the professor was not communicating with me in a way that I found the easiest to follow. In college, you suck it up and hit the books. With your free time and disposable income, you should feel empowered to seek the maximum return for your investment.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No offense, but in my opinion this makes you unprepared to discuss it.
    • Every year, something is changed in a club design.  The real differences are minimal, assuming your current clubs are from within the last 10 or so years (just throwing out a random number).

      However, I just got upgraded to the Ping G driver from the Ping G30, and the big change I noticed is the face of the driver has a bit more friction on the G (at least as I understand it).  What it seems to do is reduce side spin, while retaining normal-ish back spin (I use the low-spin tec version).  When I miss-hit a drive with my old driver vs the newer one, I see noticeably less slice or hook with the newer version.
        When I go through those articles, I mostly read through the reviews of them.  It gives a better idea of what might be better.
    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
    • I'd have thought there would be a sliding scale, akin to a volume discount. Not just $x/18 = per-hole cost. Or if there are obvious points where it's not terrible to get back to the clubhouse, make 3-hole, 7-hole, 11-hole, 15-hole, and 18-hole rates. Then you could even consider the par of the holes. Heck, if the course started par 5, 4, 5 I'd be tempted to just play the first three holes three times.  I'd get more for my money than playing holes 4, 5, and 6 which are pars 3, 4, 3.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries