Jump to content
IGNORED

SEC investigating Phil Mickelson for insider trading


MS256
Note: This thread is 3599 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

It's

He's always been a good guy, so I'd hold off on any judgements. We'll just have to wait and see what happens.

I don't know Phil personally but he comes off as a good guy on television.  That said, until all the facts come out, he's innocent until proven guilty (except by those who don't like him).

It's very possible Walters gave him Phil the tip and Phil acted on it without any knowledge that Walters had received insider information from Icahn.  If the investigation concludes that Walters acted on insider information but Phil didn't know, then Phil probably testifies in court against Walters and at worst pays a fine.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's very possible Walters gave him Phil the tip and Phil acted on it without any knowledge that Walters had received insider information from Icahn.  If the investigation concludes that Walters acted on insider information but Phil didn't know, then Phil probably testifies in court against Walters and at worst pays a fine

Phil has balls.  He put a couple hundred grand into options that were set to be worthless in a matter of days.  Instead they multiply in value.  He plays with money like his shot selection on par 5's!

More seriously, without emails or testimony from someone, there will be no way to prove Phil broke any laws.  Good timing isn't illegal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


All this, and this goes for the other post re: Phil, is all Speculation at this time, and nothing more. Wait until the legal system has run it's course, then comment...sheesh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's I don't know Phil personally but he comes off as a good guy on television.  That said, until all the facts come out, he's innocent until proven guilty (except by those who don't like him). It's very possible Walters gave him Phil the tip and Phil acted on it without any knowledge that Walters had received insider information from Icahn.  If the investigation concludes that Walters acted on insider information but Phil didn't know, then Phil probably testifies in court against Walters and at worst pays a fine.

That's true, it's possible even likely Phil didn't even know it was insider information. He could have just been trusting his "financial advisor".

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

What's the saying, never let the facts get in the way of a good story?

http://espn.go.com/golf/story/_/id/11071283/phil-mickelson-cleared-part-insider-trading-investigation-according-report

Quote:

One investigation down, one to go for Phil Mickelson .

No evidence was found that Mickelson was involved in questionable stock trading in shares of Clorox, multiple sources told the New York Times.

The Wall Street Journal previously had reported that Mickelson was being investigated by FBI and SEC agents in an insider-trading case allegedly involving investor Carl Icahn and Las Vegas gambler Billy Walters. Officials reportedly analyzed trades Mickelson and Walters made involving Clorox in 2011, at the same time Icahn was attempting to take over the company. When Icahn's intent became public, the stock price jumped. Mickelson remains under investigation over well-timed trades involving Dean Foods stock that netted him nearly $1 million, according to New York Times sources.

As far as Dean Foods, the New York Times reported that authorities are pursuing a theory that a source tipped Walters off about the company's plan to offer its WhiteWave Foods subsidiary in an initial public offering in 2012. It is unclear what prompted Walters and Mickelson to trade; however, shares of Dean Foods went up 41 percent the day after the company officially announced the news. Icahn is not connected to the Dean Foods trading.

Mickelson has denied any wrongdoing in either instance. No charges have been filed.

New York Times (Grudgingly) Admits They Misfired On Phil Mickelson's Part In Insider Trading Story

The Matthew Goldstein and Ben Protess story which , while still suggesting Phil Mickelson may have issues related to his Dean Foods trades that netted him $1 million (to Billy Walters' $15 million), includes this:

“The new details, provided in the interviews with the people briefed on the matter, indicate that Mr. Mickelson’s ties to the investigation are weaker than previously reported.”

My analysis at GolfDigest.com's The Loop .

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

What's the saying, never let the facts get in the way of a good story?

http://espn.go.com/golf/story/_/id/11071283/phil-mickelson-cleared-part-insider-trading-investigation-according-report

New York Times (Grudgingly) Admits They Misfired On Phil Mickelson's Part In Insider Trading Story

The Matthew Goldstein and Ben Protess story which, while still suggesting Phil Mickelson may have issues related to his Dean Foods trades that netted him $1 million (to Billy Walters' $15 million), includes this:

“The new details, provided in the interviews with the people briefed on the matter, indicate that Mr. Mickelson’s ties to the investigation are weaker than previously reported.”

My analysis at GolfDigest.com's The Loop.

That's funny, usually retractions are on page 57 in small print next to the donut shop ads.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What's the saying, never let the facts get in the way of a good story?

http://espn.go.com/golf/story/_/id/11071283/phil-mickelson-cleared-part-insider-trading-investigation-according-report

New York Times (Grudgingly) Admits They Misfired On Phil Mickelson's Part In Insider Trading Story

The Matthew Goldstein and Ben Protess story which, while still suggesting Phil Mickelson may have issues related to his Dean Foods trades that netted him $1 million (to Billy Walters' $15 million), includes this:

“The new details, provided in the interviews with the people briefed on the matter, indicate that Mr. Mickelson’s ties to the investigation are weaker than previously reported.”

My analysis at GolfDigest.com's The Loop.


Surely the New York Times wouldn't jump the gun on a story. ;-)

(Sarcasm).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Surely the New York Times wouldn't jump the gun on a story.

(Sarcasm).

LOL, no they never would, nor would the Daily News, Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS or FOX.  Seems who's first to report something is more important than reporting the facts so overall the news industry in this country is worthless.

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3599 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I've played Bali Hai, Bear's Best and Painted Desert. I enjoyed Bali Hai the most--course was in great shape, friendly staff and got paired in a great group. Bear's Best greens were very fast, didn't hold the ball well (I normally have enough spin to stop the ball after 1-2 hops).  The sand was different on many holes. Some were even dark sand (recreation of holes from Hawaii). Unfortunately I was single and paired with a local "member" who only played the front 9.  We were stuck behind a slow 4-some who wouldn't let me through even when the local left. Painted Desert was decent, just a bit far from the Strip where we were staying.
    • Wordle 1,035 3/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜ 🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Just lipped out that Eagle putt, easy tab-in Birdie
    • Day 106 - Worked on chipping/pitching. Focus was feeling the club fall to the ground as my body rotated through. 
    • Honestly, unless there's something about that rough there that makes it abnormally penal or a lost ball likely, this might be the play. I don't know how the mystrategy cone works, but per LSW, you don't use every shot for your shot zones. In that scatter plot, you have no balls in the bunker, and 1 in the penalty area. The median outcome seems to be a 50 yard pitch. Even if you aren't great from 50 yards, you're better off there than in a fairway bunker or the penalty area on the right of the fairway. It could also be a strategy you keep in your back pocket if you need to make up ground. Maybe this is a higher average score with driver, but better chance at a birdie. Maybe you are hitting your driver well and feel comfortable with letting one rip.  I get not wanting to wait and not wanting to endanger people on the tee, but in a tournament, I think I value playing for score more than waiting. I don't value that over hurting people, but you can always yell fore 😆 Only thing I would say is I'm not sure whether that cone is the best representation of the strategy (see my comment above about LSW's shot zones). To me, it looks like a 4 iron where you're aiming closer to the bunker might be the play. You have a lot of shots out to the right and only a few to the left. Obviously, I don't know where you are aiming (and this is a limitation of MyStrategy), but it seems like most of your 4 iron shots are right. You have 2 in the bunker but aiming a bit closer to the bunker won't bring more of your shots into the bunker. It does bring a few away from the penalty area on the right.  This could also depend on how severe the penalties are for missing the green. Do you need to be closer to avoid issues around the green?  It's not a bad strategy to hit 6 iron off the tee, be in the fairway, and have 150ish in. I'm probably overthinking this.
    • Day 283: Putted on my mat for a while watching an NLU video. Worked on keeping my head still primarily, and then making sure my bead is okay.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...