Jump to content
IGNORED

"Lowest Score Wins" by Barzeski and Wedzik


iacas

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

The reason I ask this, is that I have a hard time believing pros or most any other reasonably accomplished player is going to maintain what putting skills they have if they practice less.

Pros spend much more time on their long game than their putting.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Either. Absent a glaring weakness, work that ratio. Whether you get there by adding time or rearranging the time you have is up to you.

I almost never work on my putting… and it is one of the strengths of my game.

There have been a few really good players that I've played with over the years that I guess I never saw on the practice green.

I'm an inconsistent player with every club, so I need the reps with my putter. I've got to add a lot of range time to my agenda to get it near the 65% mark....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

There have been a few really good players that I've played with over the years that I guess I never saw on the practice green.

Don't get me wrong… when I was a kid (15-18) I'd be at the country club day after day, dawn to dusk. When I couldn't get out on the course (tournament, closed to junior members, etc.) I'd be on the putting green.

The putting stroke is simple. It simply doesn't require a lot of practice once it's decent to good. It also has a fairly low ceiling - you simply can't practice so much you make every 6-foot putt, let alone every 8-footer, 15-footer, or 30-footer.

As you'll read (you picked up a copy of LSW IIRC?), putting doesn't have a lot of "Separation Value®".

I'm an inconsistent player with every club, so I need the reps with my putter. I've got to add a lot of range time to my agenda to get it near the 65% mark....

This thread may interest you: .

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I still have some issue with how the book lays out course management.

Lets say you are 270yds out from the green with water right in front of the green going out to 40yds from the green, so going for it isn't an option.  The green is medium firmness but rolls at a 13ish (so, fast).  The way I play it would be to get to the 100yd marker, or as close to it as possible.  I'd prefer NOT to be in the 50-65yd zone, which the book would say is better.

Let me first say is that I'm not talking about hitting the green (B/c I better hit the green!), I'm talking about getting as close to the pin as possible.  My reasoning is a couple things. I know how to hit a 100yd shot with several clubs with varying spins accurately in both direction and distance vs a 50yd shot which I'd only use one club and don't have many ways of spinning the ball because of how little swing it is from there.  50yds just isn't a comfortable distance for me.  Is this just something I have to get over, because it is easier to hit it closer from 50 than from 100 or are there multiple strategies because of the way the green is laid out?

You also see many pros laying up to further distances than you'd think, but it's because they know that distance better and can control spin.  I've seen pros walk back 50 yds down the fairway to drop their ball after a water hazard because they'd prefer a fuller swing.  Are they crazy too? I wouldn't think so.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

At +2.4 handicap, you may have a game good enough to make those judgments based on more conditions than the ones mentioned in the book. And if you are really comfortable at 100 yards, but haven't worked much on 50 yards and never feel good from that distance, laying up at 100 might be the better option for you in some situations.

The book tries to catch most players in most situations, and for most players, in most situations, getting closer is better. This is supported by data gathered by Erik and Dave, but as with any statistic, there are bound to be outliers.

PGA players can be going back 50 yards for many reasons, but I'd think they usually drop as close as possible. Again, outliers and individual situations doesn't tell much. You can look at the PGA stats and see that the pros hit it closer and hit more GIR the closer they are to the hole.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still have some issue with how the book lays out course management.

Lets say you are 270yds out from the green with water right in front of the green going out to 40yds from the green, so going for it isn't an option.  The green is medium firmness but rolls at a 13ish (so, fast).  The way I play it would be to get to the 100yd marker, or as close to it as possible.  I'd prefer NOT to be in the 50-65yd zone, which the book would say is better.

Let me first say is that I'm not talking about hitting the green (B/c I better hit the green!), I'm talking about getting as close to the pin as possible.  My reasoning is a couple things. I know how to hit a 100yd shot with several clubs with varying spins accurately in both direction and distance vs a 50yd shot which I'd only use one club and don't have many ways of spinning the ball because of how little swing it is from there.  50yds just isn't a comfortable distance for me.  Is this just something I have to get over, because it is easier to hit it closer from 50 than from 100 or are there multiple strategies because of the way the green is laid out?

You also see many pros laying up to further distances than you'd think, but it's because they know that distance better and can control spin.  I've seen pros walk back 50 yds down the fairway to drop their ball after a water hazard because they'd prefer a fuller swing.  Are they crazy too? I wouldn't think so.

For the sake of argument I'm going to accept the fact that you @phillyk are mor e comfortable at 100yds vs. 50yds and if given the option to take an approach from either spot you would choose the 100yds instead and I'm going to accept that it is true, and if you actually took 100 shots from each location on average you would be closer to the hole from 100 yds.

Having said that, it still doesn't justify the comment I have highlighted about your objection/issue with how the book lays out course management.  Specifically because statistical analysis was done with many groups of golfers, and the end result always showed significant data supporting that on average most people including pro golfers are much better at getting close to the pin when closer to the hole, and not at some random yardage perception the golfer has.  If you are going to disagree, I think you need to provide some statistical information to back up your reasoning, rather than just basing your opinion on what it is you like or perfer, and what you have seen a couple of pro golfers do.  Numbers speak louder than words, and your objection/issue is a non starter as it doesn't address nor have any "meat" behind it.

  • Upvote 1

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

For the sake of argument I'm going to accept the fact that you @phillyk are more comfortable at 100yds vs. 50yds and if given the option to take an approach from either spot you would choose the 100yds instead and I'm going to accept that it is true, and if you actually took 100 shots from each location on average you would be closer to the hole from 100 yds.

Having said that, it still doesn't justify the comment I have highlighted about your objection/issue with how the book lays out course management.  Specifically because statistical analysis was done with many groups of golfers, and the end result always showed significant data supporting that on average most people including pro golfers are much better at getting close to the pin when closer to the hole, and not at some random yardage perception the golfer has.  If you are going to disagree, I think you need to provide some statistical information to back up your reasoning, rather than just basing your opinion on what it is you like or perfer, and what you have seen a couple of pro golfers do.  Numbers speak louder than words, and your objection/issue is a non starter as it doesn't address nor have any "meat" behind it.

OK let me edit the green and see if you think the same.  It's still medium firmness and rolls at 13, but the pin is 5ft from the front where the water starts, and the green runs away from you past the pin (no backstop to help slow the ball down).  Would you rather be at that 50-60yd distance unsure you can stop the ball in time before it runs away, or will you move back to a distance where you can take a fuller swing and stop it right away if not come back every time?  And if you want proof of pros being further back than you think after a layup, watch last weeks tournament.

ps. I'm not trying to say I lay up to 100yds vs 50yds every time I play, because I don't at all.  I'm just asking about the situation mentioned above.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

OK let me edit the green and see if you think the same.  It's still medium firmness and rolls at 13, but the pin is 5ft from the front where the water starts, and the green runs away from you past the pin (no backstop to help slow the ball down).  Would you rather be at that 50-60yd distance unsure you can stop the ball in time before it runs away, or will you move back to a distance where you can take a fuller swing and stop it right away if not come back every time?  And if you want proof of pros being further back than you think after a layup, watch last weeks tournament.

Your argument still doesn't hold water when it comes to the bone you are picking with the book though.. The situation you just mentioned happens how often? Green rolling away towards water with pin 5ft from the front? So, you say building a strategy should be based on this exceptional circumstance that happens once every lunar eclipse during the year? I mentioned an important point that you didn't respond to in terms of the statistical analysis done with a large number of subjects who overwhelmingly performed better being closer to the green.. That says a lot doesn't it? have you ever thought that maybe I'd you worked on shots from 20, 30, 40, 50 yards you would be able to hit it closer to the pin on average than 100 yards? In average I think pros are what like 15 - 20 feet from the pin from 100 yards? I'm sure they are much closer than that at 50 or less.. Anyway, I'm not arguing about your experience since that is your own and might be true to you. I am just contending that your objection do any have a leg to stand up on because of the lack of empirical data.

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

OK let me edit the green and see if you think the same.  It's still medium firmness and rolls at 13, but the pin is 5ft from the front where the water starts, and the green runs away from you past the pin (no backstop to help slow the ball down).  Would you rather be at that 50-60yd distance unsure you can stop the ball in time before it runs away, or will you move back to a distance where you can take a fuller swing and stop it right away if not come back every time?  And if you want proof of pros being further back than you think after a layup, watch last weeks tournament.

ps. I'm not trying to say I lay up to 100yds vs 50yds every time I play, because I don't at all.  I'm just asking about the situation mentioned above.

I agree with this.  A 50 yard pitch shot is hard to stop quickly, so when the pin is in the front of the green, there is no chance at all to get it close without doing something super risky.  Best case scenario is that you are landing a pitch a little past the pin and it's running out 10,15,20 or more feet, depending on the speed and slope of the green.  That is the best case.  If you're playing safe/smart, you're staying away from the pin and pitching it 10 feet (or more) past and then its running to 20, 25 or 30 feet past.  The worst case is you flub a pitch and dunk one in the water and you have to still hit the same shot +2.

If you're back farther and taking a full swing, the flub/chunk shot is less likely.  Further, you are taking a club to land 15-20 feet beyond the hole to avoid the water.  But with a wedge, it's not rolling anywhere, and might even back up some.

Sure, @phillyk (nor I) has any empirical data on this particular shot, and I wouldn't even be willing to bet that I'd necessarily average closer to the hole from farther.  But I would be willing to bet that I'd average fewer strokes from farther in this situation because I'm taking less penalties from farther away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just for clarification I was never asking for empirical data on this made up scenario, that happens how often? I was asking for data to support the objection to how the book addresses the issue of laying up to a "comfortable" distance vs trying to get as close as possible. Everyone can come up with their own examples, but surely to object to statistical information a lot more is needed than a made up hypothetical and what a couple of pros did? That's all I was saying.

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Chapter 25: The Longest Yard. You shade greens, too, on your Decision Maps, so you GamePlan based on that. So if you are faced with a situation where you're going to end up worse with a pitch than a longer shot, I think it's pretty clear you go for the longer shot. GamePlanning is about making the best decision out of [i ]your[/i] game.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Lets say you are 270yds out from the green with water right in front of the green going out to 40yds from the green, so going for it isn't an option.  The green is medium firmness but rolls at a 13ish (so, fast). The way I play it would be to get to the 100yd marker, or as close to it as possible.  I'd prefer NOT to be in the 50-65yd zone, which the book would say is better.

Generally speaking, it is better. From 100-125 yards, the median PGA Tour player averaged about 20' from the flag, and… missed the green nearly 25% of the time.

Let me first say is that I'm not talking about hitting the green (B/c I better hit the green!), I'm talking about getting as close to the pin as possible.  My reasoning is a couple things. I know how to hit a 100yd shot with several clubs with varying spins accurately in both direction and distance vs a 50yd shot which I'd only use one club and don't have many ways of spinning the ball because of how little swing it is from there.  50yds just isn't a comfortable distance for me.  Is this just something I have to get over, because it is easier to hit it closer from 50 than from 100 or are there multiple strategies because of the way the green is laid out?

If your Shot Zone from 50 yards is larger than your Shot Zone from 100 yards… then isn't the choice somewhat obvious?

Also, you're talking about a very infrequent, specific situation: super fast green (faster than they play on the PGA Tour week in and out), water, pin incredibly close to the water, green sloping away, etc. In such a case… you may be better off at 90 or 100 yards than at 50. Absolutely.

But… I would be willing to bet that, unless you've got some sort of mental block from 50 or so, you'd be surprised at your average scores and proximity. You probably aren't hitting it inside 20 feet very often from 100 yards, especially KNOWING that you can't come up SHORT at all. You'd probably average 25 feet or so, and you're missing the green 20% of the time or so. From 50 yards, you'll hit more greens and likely still average 25 feet or so. But since you're hitting the green more, it may still be the better choice.

You also see many pros laying up to further distances than you'd think, but it's because they know that distance better and can control spin.  I've seen pros walk back 50 yds down the fairway to drop their ball after a water hazard because they'd prefer a fuller swing.  Are they crazy too? I wouldn't think so.

You'd be surprised… Tour pros are not always the best strategists. NFL head coaches still haven't hired a math geek to stand beside them to tell them when to take time outs, when to go for it on fourth down, etc.

At +2.4 handicap, you may have a game good enough to make those judgments based on more conditions than the ones mentioned in the book. And if you are really comfortable at 100 yards, but haven't worked much on 50 yards and never feel good from that distance, laying up at 100 might be the better option for you in some situations.

Agreed.

The book tries to catch most players in most situations, and for most players, in most situations, getting closer is better. This is supported by data gathered by Erik and Dave, but as with any statistic, there are bound to be outliers.

Yessir.

Having said that, it still doesn't justify the comment I have highlighted about your objection/issue with how the book lays out course management.  Specifically because statistical analysis was done with many groups of golfers, and the end result always showed significant data supporting that on average most people including pro golfers are much better at getting close to the pin when closer to the hole, and not at some random yardage perception the golfer has.  If you are going to disagree, I think you need to provide some statistical information to back up your reasoning, rather than just basing your opinion on what it is you like or perfer, and what you have seen a couple of pro golfers do.  Numbers speak louder than words, and your objection/issue is a non starter as it doesn't address nor have any "meat" behind it.

Maybe @phillyk has a mental issue from 50 yards. Or maybe he just thinks he hits it better from 100 than from 50. Tough to say.

But there are times when laying back (i.e. to get more spin) makes sense.

We can't talk about everything in the book, though. But @phillyk , I think @Abu3baid is correct in pointing out that your bold text was off target. This is a very specific, odd case. 99% of the time, the course management we laid out in the book makes sense.

Chapter 25: The Longest Yard.

You shade greens, too, on your Decision Maps, so you GamePlan based on that.

So if you are faced with a situation where you're going to end up worse with a pitch than a longer shot, I think it's pretty clear you go for the longer shot. GamePlanning is about making the best decision out of your game.

Yeah, you can't just plan on the shot you face, but future shots too. Look at the example we made with the fairway and the tree… you aim halfway into the rough because the tree effectively shades the fairway to the left dark grey because you can't play toward the green from there.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Just got done reading the book. I thought it was excellent. I was a little worried about how much content would be new to me being a member of this site. But there was plenty of new information. Well written. I'm excited to get my game plan put together. I also liked the little blurb on tournament prep as I am planning on joining a men's club and playing in tournaments for the first time this year. There was alot of things that after I read it I thought it was obvious, yet I had not thought of it myself as of yet. Nice job. I am really excited about this golf season and I feel that this book is going to help my scoring alot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I bought 4 copies.  One for each of my typical tourney foursome members.

They just shipped yesterday, so I can't wait to get them.  Based on what I have read on this site, it is going to be a valuable read.

Regards,

Mark

Currently in the bag

Driver: TaylorMade SLDR S 10* --- Fairway: Cobra BioCell 3 and 5 Metal --- Hybrid: Nike VR 3 Hybrid
Irons: Ping i20 (4-5) , S56 (6-PW) --- Wedges: Ping Tour Gorge 52* & 56* SS --- Putter: Nike Method 004 --- Ball: Nike 20 Xi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I bought 4 copies.  One for each of my typical tourney foursome members.

They just shipped yesterday, so I can't wait to get them.  Based on what I have read on this site, it is going to be a valuable read.


Great. BTW, they ship in two envelopes. So if you get a pack of two, the others are coming. Often they arrive the same day, but sometimes they get split up a bit. Both have their own tracking #.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Reading this book finally convinced me to schedule a series of winter lessons to work on my full swing mechanics. In previous years I had dedicated a large percentage of my (admittedly meager) practice time on partial wedge shots and putting but the combination of that book, the data from GameGolf and some radical honesty on my part convinced me of what I should have done years ago. I'm about half-way into rebuilding my full swing with the help of a good instructor and a Flightscope.

I bought a 10 pack of the books and have been handing them out to my golfing buddies. We'll see what sort of effect it has on them this next season.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Reading this book finally convinced me to schedule a series of winter lessons to work on my full swing mechanics. In previous years I had dedicated a large percentage of my (admittedly meager) practice time on partial wedge shots and putting but the combination of that book, the data from GameGolf and some radical honesty on my part convinced me of what I should have done years ago. I'm about half-way into rebuilding my full swing with the help of a good instructor and a Flightscope.

I bought a 10 pack of the books and have been handing them out to my golfing buddies. We'll see what sort of effect it has on them this next season.

That was nice of you, but might not have been the best idea.

j/k :beer:

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Great. BTW, they ship in two envelopes. So if you get a pack of two, the others are coming. Often they arrive the same day, but sometimes they get split up a bit. Both have their own tracking #.

Thank you for the update, sir.  Looks like at least one pack will be here on the 28th.  I've only received one tracking number thus far.

Regards,

Mark

Regards,

Mark

Currently in the bag

Driver: TaylorMade SLDR S 10* --- Fairway: Cobra BioCell 3 and 5 Metal --- Hybrid: Nike VR 3 Hybrid
Irons: Ping i20 (4-5) , S56 (6-PW) --- Wedges: Ping Tour Gorge 52* & 56* SS --- Putter: Nike Method 004 --- Ball: Nike 20 Xi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
    • I get trying to limit relief to the fairway, but how many roots do you typically find in the fairway? Our local rule allows for relief from roots & rocks anywhere on the course (that is in play). My home course has quite a few 100 year old oaks that separate the fairways. Lift and move the ball no closer to the hole. None of us want to damage clubs.
    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
    • I agree with @klineka & @DaveP043 above.  When a new member first joins the club they cold be told that they are not eligible for tournaments until they have an established HCP.  As you said, it only takes a few rounds.  If they do not to post HCP that was their choice and choices have consequences.  If playing in the tournament is important to them then they should step up and establish an HCP.  Maybe they miss the 1st tournament, is that a real big deal?  And if it is a "Big Deal" to them then they had the opportunity to establish the HCP. As for not knowing how to report for HCP I assume your club has a pro and they should be able to assist in getting the scores reported and I suspect out of state courses may also have staff that can assist if asked.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...