IGNORED

# When ball on path, can i choose 'nearest point of relief'?

Note: This thread is 1976 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

## Recommended Posts

I'm having a bit of a problem understanding this. To me, if there is a tree trunk or bush at the so-called NPR 1 cl where you will be dropping no nearer the hole - to me you aren't getting relief there because you can't make a drop or take a stance. So please explain why that would be the nearest point of relief and not on the opposite side of the cart path further from the hole where there is no such interference.

• Replies 60
• Created

#### Popular Posts

It depends on the permanence of the fence.  If they're just little wooden stakes pushed in the ground with string between them, then it's a movable obstruction and you ignore the fence and if your NPR

Those fences are always movable.  Just pull the two or three nearest posts out of the ground and lay them on the path to make sure the rope is out of your way.

In general, you take relief for one rule at a time.  If taking relief from one condition puts you into a position where you are entitled to relief under another rule, you then follow the procedure for

#### Posted Images

(edited)
20 minutes ago, DrvFrShow said:

I'm having a bit of a problem understanding this. To me, if there is a tree trunk or bush at the so-called NPR 1 cl where you will be dropping no nearer the hole - to me you aren't getting relief there because you can't make a drop or take a stance. So please explain why that would be the nearest point of relief and not on the opposite side of the cart path further from the hole where there is no such interference.

## Player Determines Nearest Point of Relief But Physically Unable to Play Intended Stroke

Q.In proceeding under Rule 24-2b(i) or Rule 25-1b(i), the Definition of "Nearest Point of Relief" provides that to determine the nearest point of relief accurately, the player should use the club, address position, direction of play and swing (right or left-handed) that he would have used to make his next stroke had the obstruction or condition not been there. What is the procedure if, having determined the stroke he would have used, he is unable physically to make such a stroke from, what would appear to be, the nearest point of relief because either (a) the direction of play is blocked by a tree, or (b) he is unable to take the backswing for the intended stroke due to a bush?

A.The point identified is the nearest point of relief. The fact that at this point the player cannot make the intended stroke due to something other than the obstruction or condition from which relief is being taken does not alter this result. The player must drop the ball within one club-length of the nearest point of relief, not nearer the hole. Once the ball is in play, the player must then decide what type of stroke he will make. This stroke may be different from the one he would have made from the ball's original position had the obstruction or condition not been there.

Edited by Rulesman
##### Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrvFrShow said:

I'm having a bit of a problem understanding this. To me, if there is a tree trunk or bush at the so-called NPR 1 cl where you will be dropping no nearer the hole - to me you aren't getting relief there because you can't make a drop or take a stance. So please explain why that would be the nearest point of relief and not on the opposite side of the cart path further from the hole where there is no such interference.

Rule 24-2 guarantees that you will no longer have interference from the cart path after taking relief, but does not guarantee that you will have a playable position after you take relief from the cart path.

##### Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrvFrShow said:

I'm having a bit of a problem understanding this. To me, if there is a tree trunk or bush at the so-called NPR 1 cl where you will be dropping no nearer the hole - to me you aren't getting relief there because you can't make a drop or take a stance. So please explain why that would be the nearest point of relief and not on the opposite side of the cart path further from the hole where there is no such interference.

The point is to get relief from the cart path (or whatever), not to have a perfect lie or an unobstructed stance.

##### Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrvFrShow said:

I'm having a bit of a problem understanding this. To me, if there is a tree trunk or bush at the so-called NPR 1 cl where you will be dropping no nearer the hole - to me you aren't getting relief there because you can't make a drop or take a stance. So please explain why that would be the nearest point of relief and not on the opposite side of the cart path further from the hole where there is no such interference.

To sum it up, taking relief from an obstruction or from abnormal ground doesn't hold any assurance of relief from any other condition.  I've played many shots over the years from concrete, asphalt, and gravel cart paths when the only "relief" at the NPR would be virtually unplayable.

##### Share on other sites

Really, the place where people are getting hung up in this question is the word "choose." You're almost never making a choice; you're identifying the one NPR that is objectively correct for that particular situation. It's the one closest point in space that satisfies all of the conditions for relief in the rules and it doesn't care about whether it's a good option for the player.

Of course, once you have the NPR identified, you have a narrow range of choice of where to drop within one or two club-lengths, as prescribed under the particular rule.

##### Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dkolo said:

Of course, once you have the NPR identified, you have a narrow range of choice of where to drop within one or two club-lengths, as prescribed under the particular rule.

I can't find a rule which gives you 2 cl when NPR is involved.

##### Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 1976 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
• ### Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap

• #### Negatives of Offset in Irons?

By Val Raj, in Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting

• 4 replies
• 145 views
• #### Opponent Did Not Know Stroke and Distance Rule 1 2 3

By ChetlovesMer, in Rules of Golf

• 41 replies
• 1,862 views
• #### What I Learned From 9 Holes With a Much Better Player

By darthweasel, in Golf Talk

• 2 replies
• 36 views
• #### Atlas Valley Golf Club 1 2

By dennyjones, in Topics

• 18 replies
• 457 views
• #### Hensby Receives Ten Penalty Strokes

By iacas, in Rules of Golf

• 10 replies
• 231 views

• Want to join this community?

We'd love to have you!

• ## Support TST Affiliates

Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
• ### Posts

• Yup, when i switch from my maltby PTMs which have a lot less offset to the Ping G irons, i have to take extra care to ensure that it is pointing in the right direction --- otherwise it tends to point to the left. I have some markings on my grips which helps ensure the grip/alignment is consistent.
• Golf is just a difficult game because of the required precision needed to hit strait-isn shots when the downswing is a fraction of a second in duration.  Golf rule are made because they are fair and for the most part simple to understand. This means, there are not 100 different situations for one rule. Which is good. None of your examples are anything to complain about regarding the rules. Honestly, you don't encounter those situations that much to say it make golf excessively hard.
• I have encountered much reluctance to play by USGA rules that make the game "too hard". Examples are no automatic two-putts on temporary greens, balls that are lost because they embedded are still lost, bare ground is not GUR, mud is not temporary water, penalty relief area may be on a cart path, no relief from divots, no relief from boundary fence, no line of play relief from immovable obstructions, etc.
• Thanks for sharing, I enjoyed the read. Playing your own game is important.  Many years ago, there was a woman at my home club who would play from the blue tees, hit her drives about 230, and would shoot in the high 70s/low 80s.  It was fun being paired with her because... well, playing with good players is always fun, but I also enjoyed watching men who couldn't handle being outdriven by her try to hit the ball further, mostly unsuccessfully.  I knew I couldn't compete with her for distance (and I don't think I was ever competing against her anyway), but that really helped.  As for the safe shot vs correct shot, I think the driver is the right club a lot more often than many think it is.  Fairways hit are overrated in most golfers' minds and distance from the tee is underrated as a contributor to scoring.
• ### Today's Birthdays

1. afair1
(18 years old)
2. jesikalopez
(26 years old)
3. jpokracki
(60 years old)
4. krupa
(46 years old)
5. ppine
(71 years old)

×
×
• Create New...

## Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...