• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
seanfitzg

Chipping. Mickelson/Utley versus Leadbetter/Pelz

9 posts in this topic

First time post, from a long time lurker.  I think this is an ongoing debate on this forum.

I believe I have a fairly solid golf swing as I've been playing for a long time (see here ), but right now I have an absolutely terrible short game, especially around the greens.

2 years ago I bought Stan Utley's book's short game book to try and improve my sort game, especially my chipping.  I've also watched Mickelson's short game DVD.  Both of these guys promote the hinge & hold method (see also here ).  But I think my short game has become substantially worse by using this technique.  I'm thinning chips, duffing chips, and I no longer have any confidence in making solid ball contact.

After much frustration I decided to watch the chipping section on David Leadbetter's old short game DVD yesterday. I think it's excellent: much simpler, more like putting (with the putting grip) and less margin for error.  In fact, Leadbetter's method was how I used to play a chip, the same thing I learned years ago when I read Dave Pelz's book .  In fact I had much more success back then, so that now I think I have to return to that method.

It made me think - perhaps Leadbetter's/Pelz's chip-putt method is a far easier technique when, like me, you don't have the time to put the hours in around the practice greens.   Mickelson/Utley's method is more for the low handicapper that has the time to get it right, and the confidence to make good contact.

What do you think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I think the methods are really for different situations.  Chipping with a a putting method works well for just off the green from the fairway or very light rough. @mvmac posting a video of this technique below.

But there are situations where I will use an Utley style chip too.  These are usually much longer chips where I need to either get some height or a long roll out.  For any situation where I need height, I will use a pitch.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I like Dave Stockton's advice about keeping it simple and just try for a low shot or high shot I don't like to get to much into mechanics and go knee height and below for "chipping" and chest height and above for "lobbing ". It I try to hit something in between I almost always mess up my shot
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Additionally, this video and thread have done well to help a lot of people learn to pitch:

I would tend to agree that "hinge and hold" is of limited use. Phil doesn't "hinge and hold" on too many shots, if you watch him. It may be his feel for a lot of shots, but feel and reality are often two very different things.

Good luck!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 years ago I bought Stan Utley's book's short game book to try and improve my sort game, especially my chipping.  I've also watched Mickelson's short game DVD.  Both of these guys promote the hinge & hold method (see also here).  But I think my short game has become substantially worse by using this technique.  I'm thinning chips, duffing chips, and I no longer have any confidence in making solid ball contact.

What do you think?

Sounds like you are coming in too steep and/or you are too armsy.

Pitching -- think wide coming down (club comes down before club comes forward - more of U contact at the bottom instead of a V contact) so you can use the bounce. Stay connected with the body for good rhythm.


And simply, Chipping should be wrist hinge, not wrist cock. Pitching will have hinge and wrist cock.


Relax.

(I use styles that are a bit of Utley, Phil, and what I've found on TST, depending on what I'm trying to do)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's nothing wrong with anyone's teaching of the short game. The problem lies with the the golfer being able to utilize those different teachings.

I liked Pelz's stuff for a while, and then I tried Utley's stuff. They both worked well for me, but I wanted a little more from my chipping game. I found some info from an older golfer (Paul Runyon) which gave me a better understanding of what I was trying to accomplish. I never looked back after reading/practicing his information. Here's a link to one of his videos.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks guys,

So if you are using the Utly method, does the Chip-Putt ever come into play?  The reason I ask is because Leadbetter appears to suggest that this is the best chipping method (with a putting grip), whereas Utly never mentions it at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

So if you are using the Utly method, does the Chip-Putt ever come into play?  The reason I ask is because Leadbetter appears to suggest that this is the best chipping method (with a putting grip), whereas Utly never mentions it at all.

I think you've got to find your personal comfort zone.

On a chip not too far off the green, I use a traditional grip, move closer to the ball, set the wedge more up on its toe, weight on front foot, hands even or slightly ahead of ball, and use a wrist hinge with some relaxed rhythm in the swing. It's not a big swing and it may resemble more of a putting motion, if I ever videoed it. lol.

But that's me. You need to find your own zone of consistency.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks guys,

So if you are using the Utly method, does the Chip-Putt ever come into play?  The reason I ask is because Leadbetter appears to suggest that this is the best chipping method (with a putting grip), whereas Utly never mentions it at all.

I use both.  The chip-putt is used when I am just off the green and need a little carry to get over the fringe.  For longer bump and run type chips, I will use the Utley method.  One thing about the Utley method is I will get the ball to check up because it adds a lot of spin with good contact.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No offense, but in my opinion this makes you unprepared to discuss it.
    • Every year, something is changed in a club design.  The real differences are minimal, assuming your current clubs are from within the last 10 or so years (just throwing out a random number).

      However, I just got upgraded to the Ping G driver from the Ping G30, and the big change I noticed is the face of the driver has a bit more friction on the G (at least as I understand it).  What it seems to do is reduce side spin, while retaining normal-ish back spin (I use the low-spin tec version).  When I miss-hit a drive with my old driver vs the newer one, I see noticeably less slice or hook with the newer version.
        When I go through those articles, I mostly read through the reviews of them.  It gives a better idea of what might be better.
    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
    • I'd have thought there would be a sliding scale, akin to a volume discount. Not just $x/18 = per-hole cost. Or if there are obvious points where it's not terrible to get back to the clubhouse, make 3-hole, 7-hole, 11-hole, 15-hole, and 18-hole rates. Then you could even consider the par of the holes. Heck, if the course started par 5, 4, 5 I'd be tempted to just play the first three holes three times.  I'd get more for my money than playing holes 4, 5, and 6 which are pars 3, 4, 3.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries