Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Golfer20

Can Someone Please Define what Shoulder Bend is?

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody, earlier today I was looking back over my old GolfTec lesson videos and I noticed where one of the measurements was shoulder bend.  Now, this was awhile ago and I'm sure I asked what shoulder bend was to my coach but I have since forgot!  I also noticed where shoulder bend could be defined as forward or back so many degrees?  So if anybody knows how to define shoulder bend and what it means to be back or forward it would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Hi everybody, earlier today I was looking back over my old GolfTec lesson videos and I noticed where one of the measurements was shoulder bend.  Now, this was awhile ago and I'm sure I asked what shoulder bend was to my coach but I have since forgot!  I also noticed where shoulder bend could be defined as forward or back so many degrees?  So if anybody knows how to define shoulder bend and what it means to be back or forward it would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

What were your numbers?  Shoulder turn should be in degrees and could be anywhere from 45 to 110.  It defines how much shoulder rotation you have from set up to the top of the backswing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What were your numbers?  Shoulder turn should be in degrees and could be anywhere from 45 to 110.  It defines how much shoulder rotation you have from set up to the top of the backswing.

That would probably be called shoulder turn, though, right? Not "shoulder bend"?

If I had to guess it would be how far your shoulders are from horizontal when viewed down the line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That would probably be called shoulder turn, though, right? Not "shoulder bend"?

If I had to guess it would be how far your shoulders are from horizontal when viewed down the line.


Thanks Eric, that makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did GolfTec a while back. I thought shoulder bend was the angle from horizontal that an imaginary spear would be if it pierced you from back to front at your midpoint between shoulders. Hopefully imaginary. http://www.gflashcards.com/collections/28732-golf-tec-swing-parameters/cards At impact it's down. At finish it's up. I can't vouch for those flash card numbers but I'll bet they're close to current guidelines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I did GolfTec a while back. I thought shoulder bend was the angle from horizontal that an imaginary spear would be if it pierced you from back to front at your midpoint between shoulders. Hopefully imaginary. http://www.gflashcards.com/collections/28732-golf-tec-swing-parameters/cards At impact it's down. At finish it's up. I can't vouch for those flash card numbers but I'll bet they're close to current guidelines.

I just looked at that list of parameters, does golfTEC advocate shoulders open 5* at address or am I misreading it? Is that something they advise for all players or is it specific to your swing/lesson? Curious because I think that would be a disaster with my swing, I suspect pull-fades would be the best I could do and as a former slicer, I know I don't wanna be doing that. Although, I guess that's better than pull-hooks. :-P Never heard of shoulder bend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

GolfTec advocates a range of values, and while I'll trust the guy who posted those, I will say that there was likely a fairly wide tolerance, with the 5 open being the average, and they didn't try to push you to hit the center of the range. They claimed to have measured averages of tour players to get all those. They would give you "green" on a measurement if you were within a tolerance of that. "Yellow" and "red" for being further out of their ranges. I dont recall exactly but you'd likely have been in the green for address, EJ. Their instruction was ok to me, but I lost interest at the time. It was very angles-based, which I thought I enjoyed at the time. That chart was the holy grail- hit those positions and you'd have a good swing. Kinda mechanical. Looking back now, the methodology of 5 simple keys works better for me than hitting exact angles at each of the positions in a swing. I'd rather know key elements to a swing than what angles to position your body. Edit: yes shoulder bend confused me too. Not sure I have it right!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • As a disclaimer I wont bother with techinal terms for this.    Exessive stretching puts the muscle in an elongated or "full rom" state. Basically its as long as the muscle can get without tearing. More rom sounds pretty good eh? What could go wrong? The problem is that when the muscle is stretched to this point it doesnt have the same ability to stretch anymore. So that tightness people are so keen to get rid of is actually the muscles inherent stretch reflex that protects the muscle, tendons and ligaments from tearing. The muscle is designed to stretch first to protect everything else. If you live a sedentery lifestyle and that stretch reflex isnt used it can tighten up too much but even then youre best off doing dynamic stretching because thats how the muscle is supposed to work in the first place. This principle is why it isnt recommended to do static stretching before a workout. So really you shouldnt attempt to increase the static rom as much as the dynamic rom.  
    • It is and it isnt. For the most part Id say it isnt. At the end of the day it really is as simple as calories in and calories out BUT because that piece of cake is not particularly nutritious nor does it take very long to digest you tend to need to eat more cake to say full which tends to promote overeating. You pretty much have to decide to stay hungry for a while to compensate.  
    • When did I ever say I was talking about them using to RUN FASTER. Never. If the ball flies further guess what. The club was moving faster. THEY GOT FASTER. Yes steroids have a multitude of benefits for an athlete but for the sake of this discussion I didint think it was relevant to list every one of them. For sure they benefitted from the faster recovery aswell as the increased performance.   Dont tell me about my logic when its obvious you havent even read what Ive said. To quote myself: "Also keep in mind were not talking about going from Bubba to Arnold here. Theres a healthy middle point for optimal performance. Tour players just do not look like athletes(on average)." "Youre always going to find exceptions" You are uninformed to put it nicely. 450*10 does not happen all the time outside of powerlifting gyms. Especially not for a guy weighing 165. His estimated max is around 600-640 lb. Please dont get started on the way estimations work. The american record is like 700 for the 165. Either way he is very strong both in relative and absolute terms and its a very impressive lift. Ofcourse there comes a point where if he bulks up too much it wont help thats exactly what Ive said. At no point have is said tour players should look like bodybuilders. Infact to quote myself again: "Strength = speed potential. Speed athletes are not inherently going for size its just a byproduct of getting stronger and faster. If it was we would have meat balls like IFBB pros breaking records at everything speed related. The whole bulking up too much is pretty much a myth for natural athletes anyways."
    • Yes Daniel Im is a CP-ish player with kind of an inline downswing, he likes the way "swinging left" with his body feels. He does hit up a little with the driver. CP is not optimal for clubs over a 6 iron....typically. It's just a much easier pattern, easier way to swing and hit all the trajectories, especially with today's equipment. Hogan didn't have the left arm as far out as Mac wants it and Snead hit pull draws. Like I just said CP isn't good for the longer clubs, Mac never played a tournament going CP, he went with CF fades.  It's also a complicated pattern, lots of sequencing and movements have to be in order and most importantly you need a lot of speed to do it functionally. I could make the case Hogan had more CF pieces than CP pieces. Anyway, I agree with what @iacas has been posting. Mac's info isn't the answer to the golf swing, it's an attempt in the right direction but there is better and more functional information out there.
    • Oh, gosh, on the range tonight, I discovered that my address position was too far away from ball, and I had lowered my hands at address. I was setup for failure. Made  a few minor changes, and was hitting fairways high again. Now I can determine whether the shafts fit on some new Tour Edge woods - I fear the regular is too soft. Another winter project - shafts. I want to be done with clubs.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. hockeyref18
      hockeyref18
      (18 years old)
    2. Mike86
      Mike86
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.