Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
nevets88

2015 U.S. Open at Chambers Bay Discussion Thread

Note: This thread is 1471 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

2,111 posts / 83491 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

An article with some interesting and insightful stats about the greens at Chambers Bay:  http://www.golfdigest.com/blogs/the-loop/2015/06/one-more-thing-about-the-green.html

I read that yesterday too, and have been trying to figure out if you can really conclude anything from it.  I feel like I read somewhere on TST, and perhaps even several pages back in this thread, a stat saying that GIR average for the field was higher here than most US Opens.  The fact that the course had wider fairways and bigger greens also comes to mind.

Am I remembering that correctly?  And if so, couldn't that, PLUS the fact that the greens had a lot of contours, have as much of an effect, if not more, on each of those stats than the bumpiness of those greens?

If greens are bigger, more are hit, and consequently, the proximity to the hole increases, so it stands to reason that the putting numbers predicated on GIR would also be higher.

The last two stats, however, were not based off of GIR, so he might have something there.  Still, you can't definitively say its more or less to do with the condition of the greens or more or less to do with the size and contours either.  For example, did he 3-putt because he missed a 4 footer, or did he 3-putt because he left his first putt 13 feet short?

I feel like the only real telling stats on the green conditions might simply me to compare make percentages of all short length putts versus other US Opens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac62 View Post

An article with some interesting and insightful stats about the greens at Chambers Bay

Quote:
First, let’s look at the granddaddy of putting statistics, putts per green in regulation . Generally, when tour players hit a green in regulation they take less than two putts most of the time.

Move over granddaddy, Strokes Gained Putting has taken over as the best putting stat :)

Quote:
That’s the third highest that number has been in history. Only Oakmont in 2007 (1.933)

Can someone say, putting massacre at Oakmont 2016 ;)

Quote:
But at Chambers Bay a player three-putted a relatively absurd 8.58 percent of the time. The average for U.S. Opens from 1997-2014 was 4.84. The only year that comes close to Chambers Bay’s number is Oakmont in 2007 at 7.22.

So they basically are saying that Oakmont had a historically high 3-Putt % in 2007 and I didn't hear anyone complaining about those greens.

Umm, maybe they have something else in common. Both courses have very large, fast, undulating greens.

Was their some poor greens, yea. I might be able to say that it was more due to the fact the greens were very undulating than how bumpy they were. If the common link between the two highest 3-putt % ratings in US Open is they both have large, fast, undulating  greens.

I could say that 1.36% of the 3-Putting was due to the bumpy greens. Not really that bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Charlie Rose: Jaime Diaz and John Feinstein on the US Open. I watched because I'm suffering from post USO withdrawal, but wow, I really didn't enjoy it very much as I felt they really didn't say anything I didn't already know. And Feinstein with the short game is the most important aspect of the game. Rose needs to find fresh faces to interview.

http://www.hulu.com/watch/809649

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I read that yesterday too, and have been trying to figure out if you can really conclude anything from it.  I feel like I read somewhere on TST, and perhaps even several pages back in this thread, a stat saying that GIR average for the field was higher here than most US Opens.  The fact that the course had wider fairways and bigger greens also comes to mind.

Am I remembering that correctly?  And if so, couldn't that, PLUS the fact that the greens had a lot of contours, have as much of an effect, if not more, on each of those stats than the bumpiness of those greens?

If greens are bigger, more are hit, and consequently, the proximity to the hole increases, so it stands to reason that the putting numbers predicated on GIR would also be higher.

The last two stats, however, were not based off of GIR, so he might have something there.  Still, you can't definitively say its more or less to do with the condition of the greens or more or less to do with the size and contours either.  For example, did he 3-putt because he missed a 4 footer, or did he 3-putt because he left his first putt 13 feet short?

I feel like the only real telling stats on the green conditions might simply me to compare make percentages of all short length putts versus other US Opens.

Yeah, I think the contours overall resulted in a longer average first putt distance. The countour plus the bumpiness probably put a premium on lag putting touch to avoid 3-putts. Spieth may have gained on DJ there, while DJ was gaining on Jordan with long game, but the green contours probably forced him to hit more long putts than he's used to in competition. The longer initial putt distance and lower make percentage was probably an intentional part of the the USGA 'test' to see who could roll with the conditions affecting their expectations of making a score. That said I think Mickelson had a point about differing speeds between greens being a little too much of an adjustment.

Move over granddaddy, Strokes Gained Putting has taken over as the best putting stat :)

Can someone say, putting massacre at Oakmont 2016 ;)

So they basically are saying that Oakmont had a historically high 3-Putt % in 2007 and I didn't hear anyone complaining about those greens.

Umm, maybe they have something else in common. Both courses have very large, fast, undulating greens.

Was their some poor greens, yea. I might be able to say that it was more due to the fact the greens were very undulating than how bumpy they were. If the common link between the two highest 3-putt % ratings in US Open is they both have large, fast, undulating  greens.

I could say that 1.36% of the 3-Putting was due to the bumpy greens. Not really that bad.

I would agree that the larger factor was the longer initial putt distance from approaches caroming a bit due to the undulations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign where DJ hit 5I on 18th. Wonder if there's one for Spieth's 3W. I guess people remember the what if rather than the win more?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1471 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • I tend to like it. In most cases, companies changed simply to match what was already happening.  People would, and always have, taken “sick” time for your aforementioned fun things, and still come to work while sick. Trying to verify and manage sick time, especially the one or two days when someone is (or claims to be) sick enough to want to stay home, but not so sick as to warrant the visit to a Dr, is a nightmare.   Now the employee can use their PTO however they want, and the company benefits from an easier to manage system.   Just for fun....the day most often called out for being “sick” is the Monday following the Super Bowl.  Imagine that.      Yup
    • I disagree, and both companies I have been at so far have had the 1 large PTO bucket, and I can't say I've really ever seen someone in the office who was so visibly sick that they shouldn't have been there.  Plus, for people who rarely get sick, the separate sick and vacation buckets would just mean they would either end up accumulating weeks upon months of sick time, or lie about being sick so they could actually use those days, especially if their employer has a "use it or lose it" policy where you can't roll unused days over to the following year. You just said you hated that policy of 1 PTO bucket, but then you said given the choice between those two policies you would choose the 1 PTO bucket. That doesn't make sense. Clearly the 1 PTO bucket must not be that bad of an idea if you would choose it over having separate vacation/sick buckets, right? I have the 1 PTO bucket and I think it is perfectly fine. When I plan out my vacations and other PTO days throughout the year, I make sure I leave a couple days unused in case I get sick, and then if December comes and I haven't used those days yet, I take random Fridays or Mondays off in December since we can't roll any unused days over.
    • so did I - was the classic gym rat with the weights before taking up golf.  Lots of power not too much precision in the beginning.   Over time I've changed workout routines to still get in strength work with weights  but I've incorporated  lots of body weight work, cardio, and flexibility work.   As a result (and I'm sure golf equipment advances help)  I'm tons more accurate.  had my best drive over the weekend that measured 320 in the heat and firm conditions.   I usually carry about 280.   In all I've been working out since I was 26, I'm 56 now. So I think weights should be a part of an overall fitness plan
    • I work for the government, and our sick leave policies are more liberal than most, I would imagine. We can use sick leave for any doctor/dentist appointment. We can also use it for any illness or anything like that. This includes a kid's appointment or illness. We don't have a bright line policy on medical documentation for using sick leave, except for extended leave for childbirth or something similar. I think it's in our supervisor's discretion to request some sort of documentation, but I've never personally had that happen. I can't imagine that happening for taking sick leave of less than 3 days, though. I hate this policy. I think it's shortsighted from management. People don't want to use their days off for being sick; they want to use it for fun things. I think it leads to sick people working more often, getting other people sick, and thus making the office less productive. If the choice is between 3 weeks vacation + 1 week sick time, or just 4 weeks PTO, I would obviously take the 4 weeks. But I would also be coming into work sick more often.
    • Here’s hoping that this ends his caddying career as well.  I’d hope that no Tour pro will want to be associated with that kind of asshole in any way, shape, or form...
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. ghphjuriya
      ghphjuriya
      (27 years old)
    2. GolfGuy1980
      GolfGuy1980
      (39 years old)
    3. RyckyRych
      RyckyRych
      (50 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...