Jump to content
mvmac

How to "Flight" Your Wedges and Short Irons

252 posts / 66723 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

I still don't get that kind of backspin, even when I feel the club strike "ball first." But feel isn't real so maybe I'm hitting ground first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still don't get that kind of backspin, even when I feel the club strike "ball first." But feel isn't real so maybe I'm hitting ground first.


Depends on a lot of things, too:

  • clubhead speed
  • solidness of strike
  • groove cleanliness/sharpness
  • ball cover type
  • temperature
  • conditions of greens
  • etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Depends on a lot of things, too: [LIST] [*] clubhead speed [*] solidness of strike [*] groove cleanliness/sharpness [*] ball cover type [*] temperature [*] conditions of greens [*] etc. [/LIST]

Conditions of greens actually might have a lot to do with it now that I think about it. Whenever I have noticed some back spin it has been on certain types of greens (usually the bigger name courses).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still don't get that kind of backspin, even when I feel the club strike "ball first." But feel isn't real so maybe I'm hitting ground first.

It's pretty clear to me from the action of that ball that there is a "backstop" there. It's not excessive spin, just a sloped green.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hit two greens from afar yesterday with this shot; in both cases, I was about 75 yards from the pin. I hit a flighted gap wedge to pin high. Both pins were to the side of the green, and I was at an odd angle, so they weren't in tight, but both were putts with a chance to make and a tap-in afterward. No complaints. I think this was my first time hitting a green with a flighted shot, although not my first attempt. Good day overall. Thanks again for the help Mike.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, Crazycanuck44 said:

Well with 21/2 months to go are there any indoor drills I can do for this?

Heck yeah. You can work on "positioning" in a mirror, making 1/2 speed swings inside and even work up to full speed swings (video) if you have the carpet or a matt for it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

mvmac

What do you mean "flight" your wedges? When I hight my sand wedge or pitching wedge, I get a lot of height.  The sw probably flies up about 150 feet up while traveling about 70-75 yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Howling Coyote said:

mvmac

What do you mean "flight" your wedges? When I hight my sand wedge or pitching wedge, I get a lot of height.  The sw probably flies up about 150 feet up while traveling about 70-75 yards.

 

 

Check out the first post. 150 feet is way too high even for a wedge. You want more near 90-100 feet high. Flighting just means a lower more boring trajectory. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

27 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

 

 

Check out the first post. 150 feet is way too high even for a wedge. You want more near 90-100 feet high. Flighting just means a lower more boring trajectory. 

Saeve125

Without height, won't the ball skip off the green?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Howling Coyote said:

Saeve125

Without height, won't the ball skip off the green?

PGA Tour players average 30 yards in peak height (90 feet). They have no issue stopping the ball on the greens. Also partial wedge shots and pitch shots can stop as well. So I see no reason why flighting a wedge would not stop. I think you are overestimating the importance of height or how high you need to hit the ball. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, Howling Coyote said:

Without height, won't the ball skip off the green?

It will still have some height, just not as much as a regular full swing wedge.  This means that you'll have more control in the wind and more control over the amount of spin.  Both of those lead to better control of overall distance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, Howling Coyote said:

mvmac

What do you mean "flight" your wedges? When I hight my sand wedge or pitching wedge, I get a lot of height.  The sw probably flies up about 150 feet up while traveling about 70-75 yards.

Like @saevel25 and @Golfingdad said, it's a technique for lowering the ball flight of wedges/short irons for better distance (possibly better contact) and spin control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am playing golf again after laying off several years after an accident.  I can still strike the ball fine, but touch within 30 yards is the toughest part of my game. After reading Dave Pelz I am working on getting calibrated with different wedges. The 9:30 swing with "dead hands" is by far the hardest to execute. Any pointers for the touchy, reproducible swing with a wedge on short shots?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Fair enough. I wouldn't have the slightest guess on average trips per licensed driver, but I would think that using driver instead of car would be more accurate.
    • Lol. Well if you don’t want to reach your potential then you’re exactly right. So If by realistic you mean what you’re willing to work on, then yes. And I’m not knocking that at all. I personally have never taken up a sport with the goal to be as mediocre as possible but I’ve known those who are happy to just play regardless of how they do. 
    • Greetings, I thought I'd circle back on this topic and let everyone know that I've decided to stick with my current coach.  My current coach has really taken me a long way. Not only that, but I think it's "easier" (is that the right word) to stick with one voice. I hit the ball brilliantly on the range the last couple weeks before getting injured, but it didn't translate to the course (actually quite the opposite). I think some of that was due to me being kind of stuck between the two worlds. While injured I've been diving into my video and my swing was never better that it was while under his instruction. So, back to it.  Since I've been injured I haven't had a chance to work on much of anything new. However, he and I are putting together my plan for the next 6 months. We will use all my data including Arccos, as well as launch data from Trackman. Going to analyze weaknesses, firm up strengths and get to the plan. It should be a fun off season.  Thanks to all who responded to this thread.  One more thing: Really looking forward to getting back to the SuperSpeed training. 
    • Give it another 3-5 years and I might feel the same. Some tech within that umbrella is ready to go out and be a commercial success, but I've done enough work with some of the latest and greatest for machine learning algorithms to know I don't want it touching anything critical safety related just yet. Computer vision is something that many people have a pretty good handle on and there's fresh data coming in often enough that 1-3 missed detections aren't going to cause any noticeable affects. Machine learning is quite a bit more difficult and most practical applications using it are currently "stuck" in that 80-90% of the way there phase that's good enough to show real promise but not good enough to release to the public. Funny enough it's a lot easier to teach an AI to play a video game than it is to teach them to do something like control a temperature. It wasn't all that far off it turns out, the real number was 0.00029 compared to my estimate of 0.00039. The reason I said 3 trips per registered car on average is because while there are a lot of cars that sit (multiple cars for one driver, or the driver isn't using it that day) there are also plenty of cars that are moving all day possibly with multiple different drivers. Figured it probably averaged out somewhere in that 3-4 trips per car range and it looks like that's correct (since 4 trips per car would give a probability of 0.00028. 4 trips per car per day would've been the best guess it seems.
    • I will accept "easier" for many but for me both more realistic & easier!  + Why make things more difficult than they need be? 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Edsland
      Edsland
      (65 years old)
    2. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (37 years old)
    3. snowbeast
      snowbeast
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...