Jump to content
IGNORED

2016 Ryder Cup Discussion Thread


dunfy3
Note: This thread is 2752 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

On 5/31/2016 at 2:55 PM, Chilli Dipper said:

One thing I know I'm not going to like about this Ryder Cup is the re-routing of holes. I had started to get excited about the 16th hole (a par-4 that juts into the lake) being set up as a drivable hole at a crucial time in the round...but then I read that it's not going to be the 16th hole at the Ryder Cup, but the 7th, because the PGA of America could fit more grandstands on the opposite side of the course. So much for drama.

Ha, I just read this and came in here to post about it.  http://www.golfdigest.com/story/why-the-hazeltine-you-recall-from-pgas-and-us-opens-got-re-routed?mbid=social_facebook

For a match play event, I don't really see the necessity to put corporate tents along the final few holes, because there are plenty of matches that don't even make it that far.  If I was a bigwig and wanted a perch that I could hang out in the whole time, I'd probably want it to be on 15, maybe 16, but not beyond that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Strokes gained perspective of potential captain's picks.

 

  • Upvote 1

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I personally don't like there being more than 2 captains picks.   They were a way to bring someone in who might help the team gel, even if other people were in better form ; or they were people who were peaking 1 - 2 months prior to the event and were not in the top ten.

IIRC the US side wanted more captains' picks to avoid people who had a lot of points but were in not so great form around the event.   Usually they got a lot of their points in the prior year.   That's a good and sound strategy.  However since points are awarded for the large part of two years you have to make do with what you get.   Having 1/3 of the team be selections is kind of crummy if you ask me.

Kuchar and Holmes seem pretty solid to me.   Fowler doesn't have a great match play record but he's enthusiastic.  

—Adam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, Broke100Once said:

Rich Beem should be a captain's pick, he's an experienced winner at Hazeltine.

The Ryder Cup is VERY different. I don't see him with that RC fire. 

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm fine with the Fowler pick (see Broadie's strokes gained table above). Kuchar is fine. I'm not sure I would pick him if I had a say, but he's also hard not pick because he's a solid golfer and apparently a good glue guy.

I do not like the Holmes pick. Yeah, he can drive the ball a mile, but Bubba can too, and he is a much better iron and short game player. Holmes is basically a poor-man's Bubba. I really hope he doesn't play alternate shot at all, because I would hate to be his partner and have to clean up his putting or short game. If he goes out there in singles and fourball only, then fine. He does have a pretty good birdie or better percentage (7th on tour this year), so he can be asset if used correctly. Hopefully that will actually happen.

It also annoys me that we're taking a bunch of veterans who have failed in this event over and over. One rookie on the team so far. What exactly is the point of the task force if we're going to take the same players over and over? Bleh.

I'm hoping that the final pick will be Gary Woodland. He got the semis (if I remember correctly) of the match play 2 years ago, and he's super intimidating on the course. He's built like a linebacker and his demeanor on the golf course is intimidating. Might be a good fight for match play.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

I'm fine with the Fowler pick (see Broadie's strokes gained table above). Kuchar is fine. I'm not sure I would pick him if I had a say, but he's also hard not pick because he's a solid golfer and apparently a good glue guy.

I do not like the Holmes pick. Yeah, he can drive the ball a mile, but Bubba can too, and he is a much better iron and short game player. Holmes is basically a poor-man's Bubba. I really hope he doesn't play alternate shot at all, because I would hate to be his partner and have to clean up his putting or short game. If he goes out there in singles and fourball only, then fine. He does have a pretty good birdie or better percentage (7th on tour this year), so he can be asset if used correctly. Hopefully that will actually happen.

It also annoys me that we're taking a bunch of veterans who have failed in this event over and over. One rookie on the team so far. What exactly is the point of the task force if we're going to take the same players over and over? Bleh.

I'm hoping that the final pick will be Gary Woodland. He got the semis (if I remember correctly) of the match play 2 years ago, and he's super intimidating on the course. He's built like a linebacker and his demeanor on the golf course is intimidating. Might be a good fight for match play.

I could be wrong but I believe Kuchar was picked for his performance in the Olympics.  I am not a Holmes fan, I don't see him as a good team player and I agree he's a bad partner for alternate shot unless you want to cover up for someone that lacks distance but has a great short game.  I'd have preferred Bubba but it seems Bubba is not very popular with the guys already on the team, so maybe he needs to work on that.  

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

I could be wrong but I believe Kuchar was picked for his performance in the Olympics.  I am not a Holmes fan, I don't see him as a good team player and I agree he's a bad partner for alternate shot unless you want to cover up for someone that lacks distance but has a great short game.  I'd have preferred Bubba but it seems Bubba is not very popular with the guys already on the team, so maybe he needs to work on that.  

A guy I used to work with grew up down south and played junior golf with Bubba. Basically said he is a jerk and most other golfers don't like him. You don't need a poison pill on the team.

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DeadMan said:

I do not like the Holmes pick. Yeah, he can drive the ball a mile, but Bubba can too, and he is a much better iron and short game player. Holmes is basically a poor-man's Bubba. I really hope he doesn't play alternate shot at all, because I would hate to be his partner and have to clean up his putting or short game. If he goes out there in singles and fourball only, then fine. He does have a pretty good birdie or better percentage (7th on tour this year), so he can be asset if used correctly. Hopefully that will actually happen.

I'm guessing that's exactly what will happen. Holmes will play fourball on both days (probably paired with a steadier player like Kuchar or Zach), and will sit out foursomes. That's how he scratched out a 2-0-1 record in 2008 and Love will be smart enough not to mess with that formula. 

My guess is that it was an either/or proposition for JB and Bubba. You can't have 2 captains picks who are a liability in the same format, so JB's inclusion means that Bubba will be sitting this year out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, newtogolf said:

it seems Bubba is not very popular with the guys already on the team, so maybe he needs to work on that.  

Some things are probably a lost cause.

In all seriousness though, this is a competition which allows the occasional (how to put this diplomatically?) "difficult personality" to thrive - think of Monty and Poulter. I could easily imagine Bubba, on his game, getting under a Euro player's skin. I'd have taken Bubba instead of Holmes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, newtogolf said:

I'd have preferred Bubba but it seems Bubba is not very popular with the guys already on the team, so maybe he needs to work on that.  

Holmes is one of the slowest players on tour. I wonder how that plays into his relationship with other PGA Tour players. Fowler and DJ play pretty fast, so I'm sure they don't enjoy getting paired up with Holmes.

And, I mean, if you really want to avoid being a dysfunctional team, you're fighting a losing battle with DJ and Walker already on the team...

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, ScouseJohnny said:

Some things are probably a lost cause.

In all seriousness though, this is a competition which allows the occasional (how to put this diplomatically?) "difficult personality" to thrive - think of Monty and Poulter. I could easily imagine Bubba, on his game, getting under a Euro player's skin. I'd have taken Bubba instead of Holmes.

I know Americans don't like Poulter but I didn't know other Euro players didn't like him.  

7 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

Holmes is one of the slowest players on tour. I wonder how that plays into his relationship with other PGA Tour players. Fowler and DJ play pretty fast, so I'm sure they don't enjoy getting paired up with Holmes.

And, I mean, if you really want to avoid being a dysfunctional team, you're fighting a losing battle with DJ and Walker already on the team...

Yeah, Walker and DJ could be a bit awkward, guess they'll be no "How's the wife" questions.  

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2752 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 12: Same as last couple days, but focus was on recentering aspect of flow. When I recenter earlier I make decent contact most swings but if I recenter late or not at all it’s a roll of the dice. 
    • A couple of things.  Some of the clubs in your bag should be dropped immediately.  A 2-iron for example with what obviously seems to be a lower swing speed or possibly not great swing yet is a definite no-no.  To be hitting that 120-140 yards, which I assume includes run, is a sign that you are not getting the ball airborne at the correct angle to maximise distance.  The reason your 3 and 5 hybrid are going the same distance is that your launch angle is better with the 5.  Loft is your friend. Ideally I would suggest going to a golf or sporting store where you can hit golf balls on a simulator without being disturbed to understand your club carry distances and hopefully swing speed.  With that information we can definitely guide you better.
    • Let us be clear, unless you have proof of cheating, you just sound like a case of sour grapes.  In our club we have a guy who won club titles for many years.  Yes, he was a low single digit handicapper, but there have been quite a few others who played at his level.  Yet his mental strength and experience helped him win in many years when he shouldn't have.  Did he sandbag.  DEFINITELY NOT.  Did he just minimize his mistakes and pull out shots as and when needed.  Definitely.
    • Day 111 - Worked on my grip and higher hands in the backswing. Full swings with the PRGR. 
    • First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...