Jump to content
IGNORED

Tiger Woods Accused of Cheating With Amanda Dufner


mvmac
 Share

Note: This thread is 2534 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Sounds like he finally got his glutes to activate, anyway. :-D

[ETA:] As to the original story, I'm somewhere between belief and doubting it.  Belief because it fits his character and past history; disbelief because a) it wouldn't be the smartest thing in the word for him to do, and b) The National Enquirer is about the least reliable source one could possibly come up with.  Their next big story could have him and Amanda hanging out with Elvis Presley and Bigfoot at Area 51.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I can't tell if it's hard hitting expose reporting on an important topic or utter bunk. Probably gonna go with utter bunk.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. "Reported."-I also like how you use "fact" just to get it in the sentence. Here is another version of using the word "fact" in a story: the National Enquirer which as a fact often publishes completely made up bullcrap on alien babies and other tripe, is saying something about Tiger Woods now. You hate Tiger and will believe anything about him even if it is published in the worst lamest most "make up whatever the heck we want" crap tabloid rag we have in the U.S.

Wasn't NE the first rag to publish the Rachel Urchitel story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wasn't NE the first rag to publish the Rachel Urchitel story?

99.9% of NE stories are either total fabrications or utter exaggerations. They've been right before, but a broken clock is right twice a day, I think is the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I can't see this as true. Tiger and Duf were seen laughing with each other last year at the PGA. You just don't do that to your friends. I just have a hard time believing Tiger would stoop that low.

When your history shows that you have been cheating on your wife and the mother of your two children, with a dozen more or less seedy ladies, I am afraid that you more or less is doomed for gossip. I really think Tiger learned from the past and that he would not shit on his own green, so to speak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That Woods is one without a moral compass he proved before. But would he really be this stupid? I can't imagine it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why are you guys all picking on Tiger for This. if this is true amanda should be the one to blame.

She than is the bitch ****ing your husbands friend. She is the one that was married.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Personally I can't imagine he would. For one thing she's not blond and another; what sort of a shoulder turn is that!!!!

Tiger would never sleep with someone who could beat him at golf :whistle:

Why are you guys all picking on Tiger for This. if this is true amanda should be the one to blame.

She than is the bitch ****ing your husbands friend. She is the one that was married.

It takes two to tango. If Tiger did sleep with Amanda then they are both equally to blame. A single person should respect the marriage of another person enough not to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Personally I can't imagine he would. For one thing she's not blond and another; what sort of a shoulder turn is that!!!!

What shoulder turn? Oh, I see. What do you expect? She has a Corona as her swing oil instructor...


And look at that butt sticking out .... yes, let's look at it....

:-$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2534 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct links for Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package. Save 10% on Mevo with coupon code "IACAS" as well.
  • Posts

    • C’mon man! You were the President of the Taylor Gooch fan club! You got that tatoo!😜 Agree, 54 hole snooze fest.
    • True, but even when they decide to focus on a shot, it can still take 20-30 seconds for the player to execute. The broadcast likes to include the player picking a club and setting up. If they take too long, sometimes they cut away, sometimes they don’t. I’m not saying I prefer it.  Personally, I would love to see more shots, less putting. 
    • Apart from what  OP has just repeated, the clue is in the term temporary water,  the revised name for what used to be called casual water.   As it is  a temporary condition, you could not designate an area as temporary water all the time. And to push that thought further, if it were water all the time it wouldn't be temporary but by definition a penalty area. It wouldn't be surprising if on occasion parts of this mushy area do meet the criteria to be temporary water (I get the notion that you get occasional showers in Seattle) but it could be very difficult to know or have virtual certainty that a lost ball was in such a patch. 
    • Your only hope is to react quickly enough and  stop your downswing or deliberately miss the ball.
    • Interesting. Out of curiosity, I googled the past 20 winner of the PGA's Match Play tournament. My assumption was that most of the winners were mid-range to lower level guys. But it appears that most of the winners were "top 10" types. Perhaps match play does favor higher level players.  With that said, the assertion that match player is easier as a blanket statement is pretty absurd on it's face. In any 128 player field, the odds of a given player winning are 1 - X. X being the likelihood that any of the other 127 players will win. The fact that match-play is easier for certain types of golfer makes it mathematically necessary that it is harder for other types of golfers.    
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. chaserp75
      chaserp75
      (31 years old)
    2. Don2
      Don2
      (71 years old)
    3. dougferrell
      dougferrell
      (59 years old)
    4. Gaetano Fasano
      Gaetano Fasano
      (48 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...