Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Club Rat

Ball moved accidentally when player is getting stung by bee?

Note: This thread is 1528 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

41 posts / 2543 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

During our annual Member/Member last weekend, my friend was about to putt.

He get's stung by one of those pesty sweat bees and accidentally bumps the ball with his putter.

How should he proceed and are there any rules which covers these mishaps?

I wasn't sure and could not think of any rule which covers a situation like which happened.

I advised him to mark the original spot, continue play as the ball lies and then play a second ball from the original spot.

Then inquire with the Pro before turning in the score card.

Club Rat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

Since there is no consideration in the rules for such an incident, it is treated like any other case where the player causes the ball at rest to move.  One stroke penalty and the ball must be replaced.  If the ball is not replaced, then two strokes and the score stands.  It doesn't sound as if the ball moved far enough to call it a serious breach.

In your case, the score with the second ball would be the one that counts, adding a penalty stroke.  When the player is the cause of the ball moving, it must always be replaced - the act of the bee is irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

hmmm.... just throwing this out there... could the bee be considered an "outside agency" that technically was the cause of the ball moving? e.g. the bee caused the ball to move by the act of stinging the player?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since he bumped the ball with his putter, why would that not be one stroke and play the next stroke from where it lies? As if he had putted it ... even though it may not had gone any distance at all. I don't understand the "why" behind the penalty when you hit(bump) with a club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

hmmm.... just throwing this out there... could the bee be considered an "outside agency" that technically was the cause of the ball moving? e.g. the bee caused the ball to move by the act of stinging the player?

Nope. While the bee is an outside agency, it did not, itself, move the ball. It's an argument I'd expect one of my buddies to try to make though..... ;-) [quote name="isukgolf" url="/t/83788/ball-moved-accidentally-when-player-is-getting-stung-by-bee#post_1182888"]Since he bumped the ball with his putter, why would that not be one stroke and play the next stroke from where it lies? As if he had putted it ... even though it may not had gone any distance at all. I don't understand the "why" behind the penalty when you hit(bump) with a club.[/quote] Because in order for it to count as a stroke, you must intend to strike the ball. One of only a handful of places in the Rules where intent matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

" When the player is the cause of the ball moving, it must always be replaced"

.....except:  " If the ball is moved , it must be replaced, unless the movement of the ball occurs after the player has begun the stroke or the backward movement of the club for the stroke and the stroke is made"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since there is no consideration in the rules for such an incident, it is treated like any other case where the player causes the ball at rest to move.  One stroke penalty and the ball must be replaced.  If the ball is not replaced, then two strokes and the score stands.  It doesn't sound as if the ball moved far enough to call it a serious breach.

In your case, the score with the second ball would be the one that counts, adding a penalty stroke.  When the player is the cause of the ball moving, it must always be replaced - the act of the bee is irrelevant.

Stroke

A " stroke " is the forward movement of the club made with the intention of striking at and moving the ball, but if a player checks his downswing voluntarily before the clubhead reaches the ball he has not made a stroke .

However 18-2

b . Ball Moving After Address

If a player's ball in play moves after he has addressed it (other than as a result of a stroke ), the player is deemed to have moved the ball and incurs a penalty of one stroke .

The ball must be replaced, unless the movement of the ball occurs after the player has begun the stroke or the backward movement of the club for the stroke and the stroke is made.

Exception: If it is known or virtually certain that the player did not cause his ball to move , Rule 18-2b does not apply.

At first I thought it would be considered a stroke since he hit the ball with his putter. However it seems that there was not intent to hit the ball as defined above.

Therefore if there was no intent to move the ball the golfer must replace the ball and take a stroke.

hmmm.... just throwing this out there...

could the bee be considered an "outside agency" that technically was the cause of the ball moving? e.g. the bee caused the ball to move by the act of stinging the player?

The "outside agency" did not cause the ball to move. The golfer did.

I think using your logic you would say that when a rain drop hits the golfer on the back of the neck causing the golfer to flinch and move the ball, it is an "outside agency".

it is the golfer who moves the ball not his/her surroundings!

but that is just my opinion!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by ccotenj

hmmm.... just throwing this out there...

could the bee be considered an "outside agency" that technically was the cause of the ball moving? e.g. the bee caused the ball to move by the act of stinging the player?

The "outside agency" did not cause the ball to move. The golfer did.

I think using your logic you would say that when a rain drop hits the golfer on the back of the neck causing the golfer to flinch and move the ball, it is an "outside agency".

it is the golfer who moves the ball not his/her surroundings!

but that is just my opinion!

nah, i'd consider "rain" to be the same as "wind" (not an outside agency)...  a golfer can reasonably expect wind/rain to impact his person, whereas the bee sting isn't something in his "expectation"...

like i said, just throwing it out there...   but there is a definite link of causality between the bee sting and the ball moving...  which is why "outside agency" popped into mind...

let's make it an alligator running out of a pond at a player, player runs, accidentally moves ball...  ruling?  a penalty for avoiding mauling/death seems rather extreme...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

let's make it an alligator running out of a pond at a player, player runs, accidentally moves ball...  ruling?  a penalty for avoiding mauling/death seems rather extreme...

Yep, penalty. Not for "avoiding mauling/death", but for causing his ball to move. Had the alligator moved the ball in chasing the golfer, the ball would have actually been moved by the outside agency , and there would be no penalty. It's worth remembering, that the Rules aren't necessarily "fair", but they must be "equitable", that is, they treat all like situations the same. The like situation in these cases is that the golfer caused his ball to move, for whatever reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played a shot recently back up a slope and just as I was about to make contact with the ball it moved down the slope a fraction towards on the oncoming club head I take it that should be a 1 stroke penalty?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played a shot recently back up a slope and just as I was about to make contact with the ball it moved down the slope a fraction towards on the oncoming club head I take it that should be a 1 stroke penalty?

Not necessarily, unless you caused the ball to move or had addressed it. As in putting on a slope, in a situation like that you're better off not to address the ball.... Addressing the Ball A player has "addressed the ball" when he has grounded his club immediately in front of or immediately behind the ball, whether or not he has taken his stance. Decision 14-5/1 pertains. 14-5/1 Ball Moving During Backswing Struck While Still Moving Q.A player's ball starts moving during his backswing and he strikes the ball while it is still moving. What is the ruling? A.There is no penalty under Rule 14-5 because the ball began to move after the player had begun his backswing. However, if the player had caused the ball to move or addressed it, he incurred a penalty stroke - Rule 18-2a or b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played a shot recently back up a slope and just as I was about to make contact with the ball it moved down the slope a fraction towards on the oncoming club head

I take it that should be a 1 stroke penalty?

No penalty UNLESS you either caused the ball to move or had addressed it

14-5/1

Ball Moving During Backswing Struck While Still Moving

Q. A player's ball starts moving during his backswing and he strikes the ball while it is still moving. What is the ruling?

A. There is no penalty under Rule 14-5 because the ball began to move after the player had begun his backswing. However, if the player had caused the ball to move or addressed it, he incurred a penalty stroke - Rule 18-2a or b.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All I can say is that you have to be pretty damned observant to notice something in that 1/4 second. If you entered your score already it's too late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

nah, i'd consider "rain" to be the same as "wind" (not an outside agency)...  a golfer can reasonably expect wind/rain to impact his person, whereas the bee sting isn't something in his "expectation"...

like i said, just throwing it out there...   but there is a definite link of causality between the bee sting and the ball moving...  which is why "outside agency" popped into mind...

let's make it an alligator running out of a pond at a player, player runs, accidentally moves ball...  ruling?  a penalty for avoiding mauling/death seems rather extreme...


I dont think it matters if it is a bee that hits you or a drop of rain or a leaf. The golfer caused the ball to move.
Would you say there is no penalty if someone blew a horn or yelled and it caused you to jump and make contact with the ball? These are things that are not in "expectation"


it is still the golfer who moves the ball and this is what the rules address.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played a shot recently back up a slope and just as I was about to make contact with the ball it moved down the slope a fraction towards on the oncoming club head

I take it that should be a 1 stroke penalty?


Hitting the moving ball does not incur a penalty. The stroke counts.

Then you need to consider whether you had addressed the ball or not (i.e. grounded your putter behind or in front of the ball)?

1.  If you had addressed the ball, you need to ask:

Did anything else definitely cause my ball to move such as a sudden gust of wind (the slope doesn't count)?

If yes, something else could be identified as the cause of the movement, there is no penalty.

If no, nothing else could be identified that moved the ball,  you are deemed to have caused it move and incur a one stroke penalty.  You do not replace the ball.

2.  If you had not addressed the ball, you need to ask:

Did I cause the ball to move?

If yes,  you incur a one stroke penalty but do not replace the ball.

If no, there is no penalty and you do not replace the ball.

Rules 14-5, 18-2a and 18-2b apply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice is don't overthink the problem. You'll drive yourself nuts. You probably broke at least 4 laws just driving to the golf course. You're worried about whether you caused the ball to move a fraction of an inch during your downswing? Honestly I can't tell if I caused my ball to move a fraction of an inch during my downswing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1528 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Interesting turns to this conversation.  I've read and reread the OP's post and it seems that he is asking a couple of things, for example in the original question, i.e. does shortening a 5i to 7i length have major changes on the club such as lie angle, swing weight, etc.  It begs to ask, do the manufacturers "build" clubs to have the same swing "feel", so that your swing feels the same whether its a 5i - 7i - 4h - PW, where the only real adjustment is knowing that the swing plane shifts slightly based on the varying club lengths which is what the latter part of the OP's post seemed to ask.  For me, I know that I am, based on the static fitment charts such as Ping's, that I need clubs that are 1/2" shorter w/standard lie.  In the same respect if I do take and put tape 1" down on the hand from the butt end and use that as my gauge for gripping the club, I swing straighter with more carry.  The clubs make better contact all around.   One thing I have wondered - does taking a 7i that is 36* loft and shortening the shaft by 1" which would make it in effect a 36* deg loft 9i?  (referencing Tommy Armour 845s Silver Scots here)  I know its still technically a 7i w/a shorter shaft.  To be honest I work off the loft of the irons (which is why I love the TA 845s as the lofts are stamped in the club face) rather than the number stamped in the bottom.   FYI - I have already been using drivers that have shafts shortened from 45.5 to 44.5 and can tell you I have a better sense of feel and control.   wt   
    • I agree.  I am using an Alta CB 55 (SR) and get excellent loft.  The. soft regular may be too flexible for you; go back to your fitter and tell them they got it wrong.  It does happen  
    • I started out with a bag of hand me downs, mostly MacGregor. I played them for almost 6 years, only changed my putter.   In 1975, I finally got my first set of new clubs.  I settled on on set from Wilson. I am very glad I got "basic" golf down before I bought them.  Not a lot of options from most brands. Blades only, steel shafts and not much on the basic market of items such as the 30 options I choose from for new grips.  Price was average for the time ($275.00). If I were new to golf today, I would go try out some clubs.  Then, I would do my best to find a most similar set on many of the sites that deal in used cubs. A phone class my even get you some good advice.
    • Never had a problem in ANY of my dealings with them  
    • I started with a set of Spalding clubs, full set from K-Mart for a few hundred dollars years and years ago, (couldn't afford anything else with family and a low salary at the time). I look at them now and wonder how I ever hit them but they got me hooked on the game. As my salary increased I was able to save up and buy better clubs. Now a days there are tons of 2nd hand clubs available, just look on Ebay. There probably were 2nd hand clubs available when I started but who knew. I agree with most above that you don't need the expensive clubs to start, hell you may not need them going forward either.  Talk to your local Pro Shop, they probably have a set for you or can get you hooked up with someone who does. I for example have probably three sets of clubs in my garage, (not including the Spaldings), that I would gladly part with just to clean my garage out. Just wish I knew someone who could put them to good use. I have 11 putters for example, who needs 11 putters!!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Aldo Aitken
      Aldo Aitken
      (29 years old)
    2. Also Aitken
      Also Aitken
      (29 years old)
    3. CJK
      CJK
      (61 years old)
    4. Coffin-dodger
      Coffin-dodger
      (69 years old)
    5. Greg55
      Greg55
      (64 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...