Jump to content
IGNORED

Dark Horse golf club Auburn ca.This is one of the hardest tracks Iv'e ever played!


Note: This thread is 1691 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Today was a dousey to much course for me to handle!!. Greens ran at 11.0 I tried to play from the tips with some wind, I was also a little tired and slightly off with my driver. This made it tough I shot 85 in pga tour conditions. Next time I play from the men's tees. Mostly missed fairways and short game. One hole I putted off the green but on a few I had some nice lags. They were so much quicker than what i'm used to and with the wind just made the long par 4's with 240 yard forced carry's kinda intimidating seeing that I carry it 265 with no wind.

 

o.jpg

Edited by Mike Boatright
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I still want to get out and play Dark Horse someday.  I played The Ridge golf course around 5 years ago, which is also near Auburn, I think, and it was one of the toughest courses I've played.  After the round, people mentioned that Dark Horse was the same way.  Forced carries, undulating greens that can be very fast, etc.  I think I four-putted twice that day.  

Other than the difficulty, what did you think of the course?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 1691 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjan21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • To me, the way you post is you want all or nothing. Basically, you want a word that is unrealistic. You can't donate to charity unless you are Mother Teresa because it is demeaning to the people you are donating to if you are not.  Here is the rub. What if RL goes to another country that has better LGBT policy for their manufacturing. What if that causes them to lose a ton of market share because their cloths prices go up. What if that causes them to cut funding to LGBT charities and fire employees who may be LGBT because they can't compete as well. I can easily see a scenario where you are doing more harm than good by going by your unrealistic ideological stance. The world is complex. Sometimes, you have to accept and work with the system you are in and still try your best to achieve a large positive change for good.  I agree. 
    • They may not, really, not practically. And again, @Bonvivant likely has no idea what measures they've taken to effect change in those countries. Ralph Lauren sells clothes in a country that's often incredibly racist. Should they stop selling clothes in the U.S.? It's a bridge WAY too far to try to excuse Justin Thomas or something. WAY too far. Let's go so far as to say Ralph Lauren is a "bad" company (they're clearly not, as their award indicates, but let's pretend). They would have been a "worse" company if they kept Justin Thomas on board and acted as if this wasn't a big deal. Oh for f***'s sake. That's one of the dumbest things I've in this whole thing.
    • Then if they are such big LGBT champions they should take the latter in my eyes. That would be the "right" thing to do, if they were so worried about LGBT rights.   I don't think that any of my posts have tried to defend JT. Quote it if I did. All of my posts have been about RLs hypocrisy.
    • I get what you’re saying. And if I’m RL, I continue to manufacture where cost is lowest to increase my profit margins and I let JT go because it make generate scrutiny from a social base that you support if you don’t. I personally would do nothing different than what they did...it’s business not personal. But I get what @Bonvivant is saying that they do have the choice (control) over where they do their manufacturing...whether it makes good financial sense or not.  So I what think @Bonvivant is pointing to is that if it’s a really big deal to RL, why are they choosing to keep their manufacturing where it is?    But again, I would do exactly what RL did...it’s just business. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Cy McCaffrey
      Cy McCaffrey
      (39 years old)
    2. MPD
      MPD
      (64 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...